Advertise Contact About This Web Site Donate To oreilly-sucks.com
As you already know by now that Oreilly sucks and is the biggest loser. Oreilly facts apart, many people spend their time on computers playing online poker real money games as a hobby including slots



If you are looking to buy prescription medications from Canada, then buy from a licensed Canadian pharmacy.



Some of the most comprehensive mobile bingo reviews can be found here. Definitely no spin just honest reliable site reviews.



The number one place for mobile slots is this site, they offer lots of info and exclusive free spins.





O'Reilly Sucks
Blog Archives

January - 2016
February - 2016
March - 2016
April - 2016
May - 2016
June - 2016
July - 2016

January - 2015
February - 2015
March - 2015
April - 2015
May - 2015
June - 2015
July - 2015
August - 2015
September - 2015
October - 2015
November - 2015
December - 2015

January - 2014
February - 2014
March - 2014
April - 2014
May - 2014
June - 2014
July - 2014
August - 2014
September - 2014
October - 2014
November - 2014
December - 2014

Website Links

O'Reilly Info

The O'Reilly Iraq Apology Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Spins

Cable News Ratings

Read The Letter O'Reilly Had His Attorney Send me

O'Reilly Wins 2004 Misinformer of The Year Award

O'Reilly Death Penalty Lies

O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 49 Times Since 2001

O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks

Mail-to-Bill

Hate-Mail

O'Reilly #5 On Top 25 Right-Wing Journalist List

O'Reilly Factor Year In Review 2009

Factor Pollster Caught Writing GOP Policy Memo

What a Fair & Balanced O'Reilly Factor Would Look Like

Transcript: Bill O'Reilly v Jeremy Glick

Peabody Award Facts

Bill Clinton Enron News

Buzzflash Names O'Reilly Media Putz of The Week

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly & The Republican Party Are Both Corrupt

The Right-Wing Liberal Killer Story O'Reilly Ignored

The Facts About O'Reilly And GE Doing Business With Iran

How to Deal With an O'Reilly Factor Ambush Interview

Why FOX News Loves Juan Williams: The Strings And The Puppet

Blogroll

ultimatetop10s.com/
AmericaBlog
Progressive Eruptions
Rude Pundit
Moveon.org
Prison Planet
Apocalypse Cafe
Fox News Boycott
Inebriated Discourse
Hannity Sucks
NewsCorpse.com
Glenn Beck Is An Idiot
Ranker.com
GlennBeckReport.com
lauraingrahamsucks.com

The Factor Guest List Count

July 2016 (18 Shows) Republicans - 125 | Democrats - 18

The Factor Guest List Count Archives

Ratings: The O'Reilly Factor - Total Viewers

Monday - 7-25-16 -- O'Reilly - 4.226 - Day 1 Of DNC Convention
Tuesday - 7-26-16 -- O'Reilly - 3.275 - Day 2 Of DNC Convention
Wednesday - 7-27-16 -- O'Reilly - 3.260 - Day 3 Of DNC Convention
Thursday - 7-28-16 -- O'Reilly - 3.459 - Day 4 Of DNC Convention
Friday - 7-29-16 -- O'Reilly -

Weekly Factor Average -

The Cable News Ratings Archives

Oreilly is a polarizing figure and so is online gaming, especially at Begado Casino. There are advocates in Congress proposing a federal law, but Republican detractors. This, according to a supporter of Steve and Oreilly-sucks.com, who runs a Begado Fan Blog. The conservative approach is to stick to legitimate gaming certifications and says Zachary Gleason.


The O'Reilly Sucks Blog

Republicans Fall Apart and Blame The Media For Higher Ratings At The DNC
By: Steve - July 29, 2016 - 11:30am

Earth to Donald Trump, this is real simple, the reason the networks gave a little more time to the DNC than the RNC is because they had actual stars who spoke, in the political world and the acting world. Like Bill Clinton and the current President Barack Obama, not to mention the current Vice President. And they did it because they are getting higher ratings, you would think a so-called tv expert would know that.

Trump had a bunch of unknowns and losers speak at the RNC convention, and he wonders why the DNC got more time, give me a break. If the situation was reversed the networks would be doing the opposite. It's about ratings and who your speakers were.

The party with the reality TV show star running for president, who in 2015 got 327 minutes of coverage compared to 141 minutes for Clinton And Sanders, complained today about what they feel is uneven coverage between the conventions.

Republicans whined about liberal media bias after their reality TV show star turned out a network dud of a convention:

"Traditionally, TV networks ABC, NBC and CBS have worked to ensure fairness giving each party the primetime hour of 10:00PM to 11:00PM on Monday through Thursday of their respective parties conventions. While speeches can go over allotted time, they strive for parity," the GOP press release began.

They went on, "Well that changed this year. As the Democrats final night gets underway, we can see quite clearly that each network have given anywhere from 15 to 30 minutes extra per night of primetime coverage to the DNC. And this isn't just due to long speeches alone. All three networks cut away before 11PM on Monday night of the RNC's convention when Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA), a rising star in our party, had yet to speak."

Trump got millions and millions of dollars in free publicity, and now he is crying about a few minutes difference in network tv time for the conventions, when his conventions sucked, it's ridiculous.

They say based on their analysis, things were unfair, but Republicans should have understood the problem when they had to use Joni Ernst as their rising star and biggest get of the convention other than Ted Cruz and Donald Trump. She was a rising star that isn't a star, nobody knows who she is, except a few far-right Republicans. I write a political blog every day, and I did not really know who she is, I have barely heard of her.

A star would be Oh, say a former President, like President Bill Clinton. Or a real star like Elizabeth Banks or America Ferrera. Lena Dunham. Meryl Streep for God's sake. Those are stars.

So it makes sense that Democrats got more coverage. The Democrats had a sitting President, a former President, numerous actual stars (not reality TV show wannabes), and numerous party leaders who are political leaders.

But Republicans should not be too upset; the less people who saw the RNC, the better for the Republican Party. And they've gotten tons of free press due to Donald Trump's showmanship.

This isn't a case of liberal media bias, if in fact their calculations are accurate. It's a matter of networks wanting to make money and producers making choices about what will bring in the money and what won't.

Tweny-eight more minutes of death, doom and America sucks versus 28 more minutes of Sarah Silverman and Barack Obama. The choice was made for the networks.

Donald Trump brags that he knows the television business, but if he really understood television, he would know that the first of TV is to always entertain. Trump's convention was not entertaining. It was a dark and gloomy convention that was more public access television than star studded entertainment spectacular that Trump promised.

The stars are shining brightly in Philly, while Trump's dud came, went, and was quickly forgotten. Republicans want to blame the media, but the problem isn't the networks. The problem is Donald Trump. Hell, 30% of the Republican party do not even like him, which is another reasons his ratings were so low. But of course he never mentioned that.

O'Reilly Has No Problem With Foreign Governments Hacking Presidential Candidates
By: Steve - July 29, 2016 - 11:00am

As long as they are a Democrat, I guarantee you he would have a big problem with it if Hillary Clinton asked Russia to hack into the Trump e-mails. In O'Reillyworld he supports foreign governments trying to influence a presidential election in America. As long as it will hurt the Democrat and the person running against his friend Donald Trump.

Bill O'Reilly: "If Trump Wants To Ask Putin To Hand Over Hillary's Emails, Fine"

O'Reilly: "I'll Take Them From Putin, Hand Over The Emails"

Here is a partial transcript:

BILL O'REILLY (HOST): I'll tell you, I I thought the story was just ridiculous. I didn't cover it. If Trump wants to ask Putin to hand over Hillary's emails, fine. I don't care. I'd like to see what the emails are. I don't care whether they come from Putin. I don't care if they come from Michael Jordan. I don't care who they come from. Kobe Bryant can give them to me any time he wants. All right? Oh, Trump is telling the Russians to do espionage. It's like a cartoon. Anyway.

BERNARD GOLDBERG: I got to be honest with you, you know I'm not a -- Donald is is one thing personally, but as a candidate, I'm not a big fan. But when I heard him say that I said, that's not a bad idea.

O'REILLY: Yeah, that's not bad. I'll take them from Putin, hand over the emails.

---------------------------

O'Reilly ignored one important thing, there is a big difference if Michael Jordan or Kobe Bryant hack an e-mail, they are Americans, Putin is a russian and the head of a foreign government. So the comparison is ridiculous. And I would bet every dime I have that if Hillary was asking Putin to hack Trump, O'Reilly would lose his mind and call for her to be put on trial for treason.

Fox News Ignored Mothers Of The Movement During DNC
By: Steve - July 29, 2016 - 10:00am

As CNN and MSNBC aired the emotional Democratic National Convention tribute by mothers who lost children to gun violence or police shootings in its entirety, Fox News completely ignored the appearance of "Mothers of the Movement."

The mothers seek to rebuild police-community relationships and strive to end gun violence.

On July 26, the nine women who comprise the Mothers of the Movement gathered on stage at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia to endorse Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

The women said that Clinton was a leader "who will say our children's names" and one who "isn't afraid to say that black lives matter" while stressing the need for criminal justice reform and "common sense gun legislation" to stem the tide of violence in their communities.

Both CNN and MSNBC aired the full, heartrending remarks before concluding with a brief analysis.

On Fox News, an outlet that has worked to demonize Black Lives Matter -- labeling it as "a hate group" "a terrorist group" and "a murder movement," and equating it with the Ku Klux Klan -- and diminished its calls for necessary criminal justice reforms, the appearance went unmentioned.

Rather than hearing the stories of the grieving mothers, Fox host Bill O'Reilly continued his show uninterrupted, interviewing guests on general election polling and border security.

O'Reilly has even called them terrorists who hate America and promote cops being killed, which is all lies. They are simply a group of citizens, even some whites, who protest cops killing unarmed black men.

Erik Wemple Hammered Bill O'Reilly For Defending His Slave Comments
By: Steve - July 29, 2016 - 9:00am

Washington Post journalist Erik Wemple hammered Fox News Bill O'Reilly for defending his comments that slaves who built the White House were "well-fed and had decent lodgings," lambasting both his offensive remarks and the gap between historical fact and O'Reilly's assertions.

On July 26, O'Reilly responded to Michelle Obama's Democratic National Convention Speech, where the first lady paid homage to the slaves who helped build the White House, by inexplicably adding that they were "well-fed and had decent lodgings by the government."

The media widely criticized O'Reilly's "morally bankrupt" comments.

O'Reilly, who has a long and sordid history of racist attacks, responded to the media criticism by doubling down, saying on July 27 that his "commentary" was "100 percent accurate and fact."

Wemple excoriated O'Reilly, noting that his remarks fit right in line with the "offensive style of broadcasting" that thrived under recently ousted former Fox President, Roger Ailes. Wemple noted that historians roundly criticized O'Reilly's false claims, explaining that the real conditions of slaves were unknown because "slaves were not given a choice on what they ate or where they lived."

Wemple added that O'Reilly reached new extremes by lashing out at the far left and calling for his entire network "to band together to call out the people who are actively trying to destroy this network" because "they want me dead."

From the July 28 Washington Post article:

Well, it's been a week since Ailes left, and his offensive style of broadcasting lives on. On Wednesday night, host Bill O'Reilly took to the network's airwaves to attempt a defense of his comments of last night regarding first lady Michelle Obama's Monday night speech here at the Democratic National Convention.

She said, in part, "I wake up every morning in a house that was built by slaves, and I watch my daughters -- two beautiful, intelligent, black young women -- playing with their dogs on the White House lawn."

As the Erik Wemple Blog pointed out this morning, Jesse J. Holland, who wrote the book on slaves and the White House, noted that the slaves were housed in a barn and were provided with food.

Yet there's a gap between that historical fact and what O'Reilly alleged, which, again, is that they were well fed and resided in decent lodgings.

Information scarcity notwithstanding, O'Reilly stands by his conclusions about well-fed-decent-lodgings. At this point, it’s incumbent on him to substantiate these judgments or concede that he's making them without supporting documentation -- a common malaise on certain Fox News programs.

A smaller point pertains to O'Reilly's sudden and complete faith in the ability of government to provide sustenance and accommodations for its people. Why does this guy, a small government proponent, all of a sudden think that the public sector can perform such programs with such efficiency?

Further evidence that O’Reilly has reached new extremes emerged in this comment: "I think the time has come now where this whole network is going to have to band together -- all of us -- and we are going to have to call out the people who are actively trying to destroy this network by using lies and deception and propaganda.

We're going to have to start to call them out by name because that's how bad it's become."

What O'Reilly failed to mention is that the sexual harassment scandal of his former boss -- Ailes -- is doing far more to destroy Fox News than could any outside critic.

Kareem Educates Megyn Kelly On Why Black Lives Matter Exists
By: Steve - July 29, 2016 - 8:00am

Kareem should also explain this to Bill O'Reilly, but of course he never will because O'Reilly is too much of a biased right-wing hack to have Kareem on his show.

Note to Bill O'Reilly, look at the answer Kareem gives to why race relations are worse now than they were 7 or 8 years ago, and it's not because of Obama, it's because whites are worried about being the minority in the future.

Here is a partial transcript:

MEGYN KELLY (HOST): So let's just talk about the mother of Michael Brown, and then we'll get to what actually happened here on the stage, because she's been the most controversial choice, and she's the reason some of the Republicans are objecting, because her son was killed, but was killed after aggressing toward the police officer. Your thoughts.

KAREEM ABDUL-JABBAR: I think that that is really nitpicking. All of those women had really a tremendous amount of grief and tragedy in their lives, losing their children for no good reason. Even Michael Brown was unarmed. So, to say that he might have been aggressive, it might be true. I wasn't there.

But I think the real issue is, why are police officers oftentimes so aggressive with black people, people that they don't know or don't understand, and they make conclusions and decide that these people are dangerous and they kill them with no justification?

KELLY: Let me just clarify the matter of Michael Brown, because there's a lot of confusion about this. He was -- his case helped lead to the birth of Black Lives Matter and the "hands up, don't shoot" mantra, which turned out to be a lie, according to the DOJ. And this is from the DOJ's report. They said, "Officer Wilson and other witnesses stated that Michael Brown reached into the SUV through the open driver's window" -- this is the cop car, "and that he punched and grabbed the police officer.

So, that case is very dicey. It doesn't speak to all the Black Lives Matters incidents. It's just the most controversial and it's the one that the police officers have said, "it's an insult to us to have the mother of an aggressor toward a cop included in this group of mothers who are the mothers of fallen men whose cases are much more clear."

ABDUL-JABBAR: I don't understand what you're asking me to explain.

KELLY: Whether she should have been included.

ABDUL-JABBAR: That wasn't up to me. I understand what you're talking about. My grandfather and father both were police officers. I understand that we have to conduct ourselves in a way so that all our police officers come home at night.

They are the glue that holds our society together. But exactly why they included Michael Brown's mother, I couldn't give you the reasons for that. But I know that there are far too many examples, over a hundred -- in 2015, over a hundred black Americans were killed by police officers. And these were unarmed black Americans.

KELLY: Do you think that white society, generally, has no real understanding of what it is like to be a black man in today's America?

ABDUL-JABBAR: I think that white society devalues and dismisses the value of black lives. That's what the Black Lives Matter is all about. They seem to think that blacks are prone to violence and wish to harm them, and as soon as anything gets contentious between them and a black person, they pull out their gun and kill that black person, and that eliminates any problem that they might have.

KELLY: You're talking about white law enforcement.

ABDUL-JABBAR: I'm talking about white law enforcement. I'm talking about wannabe law enforcement, people like George Zimmerman who killed Trayvon Martin for no good reason. Trayvon Martin was just going from the convenience store to where his father was. Hadn't committed any crimes or done anything. Why is he dead?

KELLY: Why do you think that is, Kareem? Why are race relations so bad right now in the country versus, eight, 12, 16 years ago?

ABDUL-JABBAR: I think race relations are bad right now because things are changing. People of color are becoming more of a majority in our country. It used to be that the majority of people in this country were white Europeans. That's starting to change now, and I think that white people are starting to feel that maybe their sense of power and privilege is being challenged.

KELLY: Some. I assume you don't mean to paint everybody with that brush?

ABDUL-JABBAR: No. No. Some white people might feel that, and they might feel threatened by the fact that --

KELLY: What do you think is the way out of this? I realize this is more than a 30 second answer, but how do we start to get past it?

ABDUL-JABBAR: I think we start to get past it by communicating with each other, by having police officers and police agencies make a sincere effort to communicate with the people that they are supposed to protect and serve.

And I think that the people in these communities that are having problems with the people that are policing them, they need to realize that if they show some respect and some restraint, police officers can meet them halfway, and we can go about the business of uniting our country and having a nation where all lives are respected and appreciated, and no one has to feel that they're being persecuted.

Black Americans really feel that they're targets, and after all this insane, cowardly murders of police officers, I can see where they would feel assaulted and violated, and we have to get past that.

Allen Clifton Slams O'Reilly For Unhinged Rant Over Slavery Comments
By: Steve - July 28, 2016 - 11:40am

This was great, Clifton really nailed O'Reilly. But of course O'Reilly is too much of a coward to have a guy like this on his show to discuss it, he only has fake Democrats on who are almost scared to confront him with the truth.

Bill O'Reilly Goes on Unhinged Rant After Criticism Over His Outrageous Slavery Comments

July 28, 2016 By Allen Clifton

Leave it to Bill O'Reilly to keep lowering the bar of journalistic integrity.

On Tuesday, because he just can't help himself, the Fox News host responded to Michelle Obama's comments she made during her wonderful speech at the DNC where she factually pointed out that the place in which she currently lives (the White House) was built by slaves.

O'Reilly admitted that her comments were accurate, but he went on to point out that the slaves who did help build the White House were "well-fed and had decent lodgings." Because that makes slavery better, apparently.

"Slaves that worked there were well fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802," O'Reilly said. "However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well."

Yes, that's actually the most watched and popular person on Fox News saying that the practice of owning other humans like pieces of construction and farming equipment wasn't all bad because, well, some were "well-fed and had decent lodgings."

That's like saying Auschwitz wasn't completely terrible because at least most of the Jews imprisoned there were given a place to sleep and a roof over their head.

I don't give a damn if the slaves who helped build the White House were provided with soft beds, prime rib every night for dinner and their clothes were made from the finest silk - they were still slaves!

Naturally, O'Reilly's comments didn't sit well with a lot of people. Within hours this story was nearly everywhere, with most condemning the mind-boggling idiocy of anyone who'd remotely try to put a positive spin on slavery.

Well, on Wednesday, O'Reilly responded to the backlash by claiming that those who are upset by his idiotic comments are just far-left radicals who literally want to see him dead.

"This is a designed attack, came out of Media Matters, spread to Mother Jones and the other smear publications, and then into the Daily News and USA Today, designed to diminish me and to harm the Fox News channel," O'Reilly told fellow Fox News host Eric Bolling. "That's what it is designed to do."

Yeah, because it was the "liberal media" who forced him to say comments where he actually tried to put a positive spin on slavery.

After some more back and forth where O'Reilly, Bolling and Geraldo Rivera continued to try to claim that the outrage over his slavery comments was nothing more than liberals being out to get him, that's when O'Reilly snapped.

"This is provocation. These people are doing this. They want me dead, Bolling, literally dead," O'Reilly said.

A somewhat stunned Bolling tried to downplay O'Reilly's comments, only for the Factor host to double-down on his insistence that liberals literally want him dead.

Talk about trying to play the victim.

Nobody took his comments out of context. The so-called "liberal media" didn't "twist his words." All anyone did with this story was quote him verbatim from a segment where, while he didn't say slavery was a good thing, he did try to find a bright side to the indisputable reality that slaves were used to help build the White House.

However, instead of simply admitting that his comments were rather ignorant, he not only defended his ignorance - he then accused those calling him out of "being out to get him."

I wish I could say I was shocked by O'Reilly's reaction to valid criticism, but I'm not, because this is exactly who he's proven himself to be time and time again.

Billionaire Questions Donald Trump's Sanity
By: Steve - July 28, 2016 - 11:30am

Americans should vote for Hillary Clinton because, unlike Republican nominee Donald Trump, she is a "sane, competent person," Michael Bloomberg, the former New York mayor and founder of the Bloomberg financial news and information empire, said at the Democratic National Convention Wednesday.

Bloomberg argued that Trump was a "dangerous demagogue" and a bad businessman who would be a disastrous president. "I'm a New Yorker," he said, "and New Yorkers know a con when we see one."

The billionaire has endorsed Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, made the case that Trump's career is characterized by a litany of collapses and missteps, and that the Republican presidential nominee's boasts don't match reality. Americans who want a great businessperson in the White House should look for someone who isn't Trump, Bloomberg said.

"Throughout his career, Trump has left behind a well-documented record of bankruptcies, thousands of lawsuits, angry stockholders and contractors who feel cheated and disillusioned customers who feel ripped off," Bloomberg said.

Bloomberg's scathing speech seemed designed to chafe Trump's rawest nerves, mocking Trump's business prowess, his inheritance from his late father, his ego and his intellect.

"Truth be told, the richest thing about Donald Trump is his hypocrisy," Bloomberg said. Trump claims great wealth, but won't disclose his real net worth and refuses to release his tax returns. The real-estate developer also reacts defensively when his success is questioned.

Trump says he wants to run the nation like he's run his business. God help us.

Michael Bloomberg

Bloomberg - who rivals Trump in unwavering self-assurance - favorably compared his own achievements in business and politics with Trump's.

"We've heard a lot of talk in this campaign about needing a leader who understands business. I couldn't agree more. I've built a business - and I didn't start it with a million-dollar check from my father," Bloomberg said. "Because of my success in the private sector, I had the chance to run America's largest city for 12 years."

Bloomberg weighed an independent bid for president this year because he objected to both Trump and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Clinton's primary challenger. Bloomberg was a vocal critic of the Republican candidate - his former friend - long before backing Clinton's White House run.

The financial industry tycoon ridiculed Trump's statements on immigration, national security, foreign trade, and his use of overseas labor. And Bloomberg made dire predictions about the damage a Trump presidency would wreak on virtually every aspect of American life.

"I understand the appeal of a businessman president," Bloomberg said. "But Trump's business plan is a disaster in the making. He would make it harder for small businesses to compete, do great damage to our economy, threaten the retirement savings of millions of Americans, lead to greater debt and more unemployment, erode our influence around the world and make our communities less safe."

NY Daily News Said Treasonous Donald Trump Should Be Locked Up
By: Steve - July 28, 2016 - 11:00am

The New York Daily News came out swinging this week after Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump issued a plea for Russia to hack Hillary Clinton. The tabloid described "Comrade Trump's" call for foreign intelligence to attack his rival as "treasonous." Then, the paper took the cry used against Clinton at the Republican National Convention and turned it on the reality TV star:

Tomorrow's front page:

LOCK HIM UP: Comrade Trump's treasonous call for Russia to hack Hillary

- New York Daily News (@NYDailyNews) July 28, 2016

The newspaper has been feuding with Trump for months, depicting him as a clown, blasting him as a racist, calling him stupid and mocking the fact that black voters have abandoned his campaign.

More On O'Reilly Attacking Media Matters
By: Steve - July 28, 2016 - 10:00am

Bill O'Reilly defended his remarks about the treatment of the slaves who helped build the White House on Wednesday, saying his statement about them being "well-fed" with "decent lodgings" was grounded in fact and held no justification for slavery.

The Fox News host came under fire earlier this week after he commented on Michelle Obama's powerful Democratic National Convention speech in which she addressed waking up "every morning in a house that was built by slaves." On Tuesday, O'Reilly, a self-proclaimed historian, provided context for the remarks.

"Slaves did participate in the construction of the White House," he said. "Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802."

He was soundly slammed by critics he labeled "far-left loons" and "smear merchants" before taking to his show to reiterate the point that "any honest historian" knows slaves were kept "strong."

"In order to keep slaves and free laborers strong, the Washington administration provided meat, bread and other staples, also decent lodging on the grounds of the new presidential building," he said. "That is a fact. Not a justification, not a defense of slavery. Anyone who implies otherwise is beneath contempt. Reporting the story behind Mrs. Obama's very valid points does not diminish the horror of enslavement as these dishonest critics allege."

The White House Historical Association has said slaves did in fact help build the White House. But The New York Times notes "there's no historical evidence either way on the question of how well fed the slaves were."

Social media once again erupted, claiming O'Reilly's comment's detracted from the horrors of slavery.

O'Reilly Attacks Media Matters For Simply Reporting What He Said
By: Steve - July 28, 2016 - 9:00am

And btw, half the country is slamming O'Reilly for his slaves were well fed comments, so it is not just media matters. But he only went after media matters, because he does not like the fact that they call him out on his nonsense, racism, and biased comments.

Bill O'Reilly: Media Matters Wants "Me Dead, Bolling, Literally Dead"

Earth to O'Reilly, they do not want you dead, nobody does, they just want you to stop lying and stop being a right-wing racist who is biased for the Republicans and Trump. You are a journalist, so they just want you to follow the rules of journalism, which you never do.

And btw, most of the books O'Reilly writes are written by someone else and full of errors. I guess Bolling does not realize that.

Here is a partial transcript of O'Reilly crying that the media attacked him, when all they did was report the truth and quote him.

ERIC BOLLING: These left wing zealots don't realize you write books about history. And I think you did, you cited history.

BILL O'REILLY (HOST): No, they realize it, They realize it.

BOLLING: OK, but here is the --

O'REILLY: This is designed though -- this is designed, Geraldo, and you know this better than anybody, this is a designed attack, came out of Media Matters, spread to Mother Jones and the other smear publications, and then into the Daily News and USA Today, designed to diminish me and to harm the Fox News channel. That's what it is designed to do.

BILL O'REILLY: I think the time has come now, where this whole network is going to have to band together, all of us, and we are going to have to call out the people who are actively trying to destroy this network, by using lies and deception and propaganda. We're going to have to start to call them out by name, because that's how bad it's become.

O'REILLY: You saw -- you saw the provocations, and that's what I reported on, the racial provocations. And then we see black men killing cops. Now, cause and effect? You can't do it 100 percent, but certainly you can discuss cause and effect. I'm afraid it's going to happen with Fox News. Geraldo gets water dumped on him, what if somebody hit him in the head with a club?

Our reporters can't go out on the floor? Jesse Watters goes on the floor of the Democratic Convention, and some photographer comes up and starts swearing at him and cursing at him right in his face? This is provocation. These people are doing this. They want me dead, Bolling, literally dead.

O'Reilly Defends Comments That Slaves Building White House Were Well-Fed And Had Decent Lodgings
By: Steve - July 28, 2016 - 8:00am

O'Reilly: It Is "100 Percent Right" That "In Order To Keep Slaves And Free Laborers Strong, The Washington Administration Provided Meat, Bread, And Other Staples, Also Decent Lodging"

BILL O'REILLY (HOST): As any honest historian knows, in order to keep slaves and free laborers strong, the Washington administration provided meat, bread and other staples, also decent lodging on the grounds of the new presidential building. That is a fact.

Real Fact: O'Reilly was not there so he does not know for sure if the slaves that built the White House were well fed or not. He is going by historical records, and they could have been lying. Not to mention Mrs. Adams wrote that slaves who were building the White House were half fed and barely clothed, so it is in dispute, O'Reilly acts as if it is a fact, when it is not.

O'Reilly is a joke, he is trying to justify using slaves to build the White House by saying they were well fed, and had good housing. Even if it was true it still does not justify using slaves to build the White House. O'Reilly should just let it go and stop digging the hole deeper, he is just making it worse.

Abigail Adams Debunks O'Reilly's Claims Slaves Who Built The White House Were Well Fed
By: Steve - July 28, 2016 - 8:00am

It turns out O'Reilly is not much of a history expert, as he claims to be, or he just ignored the truth to make a point, then again maybe both. You would think a history expert would know about this letter from Mrs. Adams, then again, he probably did and just lied about it.

Abigail Adams has the distinction of being the first First Lady to reside in the White House. Construction was ongoing when the Adams family moved in. This is an excerpt from a letter Mrs. Adams wrote to Cotton Tufts upon taking up residence in the newly opened White House.

"The effects of Slavery are visible every where; and I have amused myself from day to day in looking at the labour of 12 negroes from my window, who are employd with four small Horse Carts to remove some dirt in front of the house.

the four carts are all loaded at the same time, and whilst four carry this rubish about half a mile, the remaining eight rest upon their Shovels, Two of our hardy N England men would do as much work in a day as the whole 12, but it is true Republicanism that drive the Slaves half fed, and destitute of cloathing, or fit for labour, whilst the owner waches about Idle, tho his one Slave is all the property he can boast, Such is the case of many of the inhabitants of this place."

Sellers Slams Bill O'Reilly's Lack Of Dignity And Decency In Slavery Comments
By: Steve - July 27, 2016 - 11:50am

Sellers: "He Was Speaking In A Way That Was Disrespectful To The Legacy Of Many People Who Came To This Country In Shackles"

Partial transcript:

BAKARI SELLERS: It's easy to just label this as being ignorant. It's easy to label this as being below what most journalists hold to be the bar. But I think it's deeper than that. I think it's the fact that many times African Americans in this country don't get their life valued. There is a question about human decency. There is a question about human dignity.

And in that clip, Bill O'Reilly didn't display any of that. I think any -- it's not an appearance to defend slavery. What he did was say that slaves were well-fed which is beyond the pale. And it's not as if he gave the appearance of anything. He was speaking in a way that was disrespectful to the legacy of many people who came to this country in shackles and actually were tormented, were died, were beaten.

And if they had any other choice, no, Mr. O'Reilly, they wouldn't be there building the White House. They would be living free. And I think that the fact that he can't understand that, that he can't wrap his head around those words of dignity and decency, I really have no use for him at all.

Note: On the Wednesday Factor O'Reilly is going to slam the media for simply reporting his ridiculous comments about the slaves being well fed and had decent lodgings. Which is what he always does when he is caught saying something biased, racist, or stupid, attack the real journalists who simply report what he said. I will report what he says about it later tonight, or tomorrow.

Crazy Trump Says He Hopes Russia Hacked Clintons E-Mails
By: Steve - July 27, 2016 - 11:40am

Now this is nuts, Trump is now saying he hopes Russia hacked into Clintons e-mails, so he can use them against her. That would be a foreign government getting involved in a presidential election, and it is unheard of, except for Trump.

Wednesday Donald Trump said he hopes Hillary Clinton's deleted emails have fallen into the hands of Russian hackers.

"If they hacked, they probably have her 33,000 emails. I hope they do," Trump said at a press conference at his resort in Doral, Florida.

The Republican presidential nominee was referring to the widely held suspicion that Russia is responsible for hacking the Democratic National Committee's servers, resulting in the leak of tens of thousands of emails just days before the party's nominating convention in Philadelphia.

Trump said that he hoped the hackers had also accessed Clinton's private email servers. "They probably have her 33,000 emails that she lost and deleted."

Trump then addressed the rogue nation directly, saying "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing."

By actively hoping that American servers were hacked by another nation, Trump broke an unwritten rule of American public office: You don't root against the United States, even when your political opponent is in power.

Basically, Trump wants Russia to help him win an American election for the President of The United States, which is sedition at best and treason in my book.

Regardless of party or platform, American public officials are expected to champion U.S. interests and defend U.S. national security. Trump did the opposite Wednesday.

For the record, it is illegal for a foreign government to hack into American servers, and also a violation of agreements we have with them. But Trump does not care, as long as it will help him win.

Within moments of Trump's press conference, his running mate, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence (R), released a statement distancing himself from the nominee's words. "If it is Russia and they are interfering in our elections, I can assure you both parties and the United States government will ensure there are serious consequences," Pence said.

Trump even doubled down on his demand for Clinton's emails in a tweet shortly after the press conference.

"If Russia or any other country or person has Hillary Clinton's 33,000 illegally deleted emails, perhaps they should share them with the FBI!"

-- Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 27, 2016

The 33,000 number refers to emails that Clinton said she and her staff deleted from her servers because they contained "personal and private" information, including correspondence about her daughter Chelsea Clinton's wedding.

Earlier this year, FBI Director James Comey said an exhaustive investigation into Clinton's use of a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state revealed that she and her staff were careless in their handling of documents. But he recommend to the Department of Justice that no charges were appropriate.

House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) also pushed back against Trump's hope that Russia successfully got into U.S. servers. "Russia is a global menace led by a devious thug. Putin should stay out of this election," Brendan Buck, Ryan's spokesman said.

Trump declined to say whether or not Putin should stay out of U.S. elections, telling the assembled press Wednesday, "I'm not going to tell Putin what to do. Why should I tell Putin what to do?"

David Gregory said he was shocked at what Trump said:

DAVID GREGORY: I've run out of words to express my shock and how completely beyond the pale that Donald Trump is as a potential leader of the free world, the commander in chief of our country. This was truly beyond the pale. I mean, he is encouraging Russia, which by all accounts was behind the leak of one of our major political parties, to do more, to go beyond, to try to hack into Hillary Clinton's server to find missing emails to kind of get in the middle of the scandal.

It's as if this is a child playing with matches who doesn't understand how badly he and the country can get burned. It's a very serious thing. And I think that the one thing about Trump is that he is very clear for all to see. He is making very clear what he thinks, how he comes by information, and I think, frankly, the lack of seriousness and the intemperance with which he speaks about important national security matters should certainly give people pause.

And I don't think there's anybody who would think that was anything but a fair reading of what we've seen here. Vladimir Putin is dangerous. He's been dangerous to a Democratic president, to a Republican president, President George W. Bush who thought he had a better relationship with him. And now this nominee of the Republican Party wants a closer relationship with Vladimir Putin which is what he said. And he thinks that he has the ability to have a better relationship. There's no evidence to believe that's the case.

NBC's Mark Murray On Trump Encouraging Russia To Hack Clinton's Server: "Stunning" And "Jaw-Dropping"

MARK MURRAY: There's no doubt that the opposition to Donald Trump is going to be one of the forces that motivates a lot of Hillary Clinton's voters in November. But I just -- let's just talk about the press conference itself. Just jaw-dropping, stunning press conference that he made.

The biggest headline was that Russia, if you're listening, I hope you've hacked into Hillary Clinton's missing emails, and there will be a reward for you. And just to think that there's a presidential nominee who is asking a foreign power to search another candidate is -- I've never seen it in my lifetime. And just stunning.

Clinton's campaign was also quick to respond to Trump's press conference.

"This is the first time that a major presidential candidate has actively encouraged a foreign power to conduct espionage against his political opponent," Clinton adviser Jake Sullivan said Wednesday. "This has gone from being a matter of curiosity, and a matter of politics, to being a national security issue."

Goolsbee Schools Hannity On What Obama Has Done As President
By: Steve - July 27, 2016 - 11:30am

In the world of Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly, President Obama has been a disaster. Even though he has done a good job and everyone knows it, the Republicans even know it, they just will not admit it. So they lie about him to try and hurt him politically, and they are also trying to use it to hurt Hillary Clinton and the Democratic party.

And Goolsbee (who is an economist) never even mentioned the stock market is over 18,000, it was down to 7,000 under Bush, $2.00 a gallon gas, the housing market improvement, the low unemployment rate, the fact that about half the debt was added by Bush, they claim Obama did it which ignores the truth that Bush had half that debt, or the record for consecutive monthly job growth.

Hannity will just never give Obama credit for anything, as he lies about what Obama has done. But if all this had happened under a Republican President Hannity would praise him as a God and say he was the best President we ever had, proving what a lying hack he is, just like O'Reilly.

Here is a partial transcript:

AUSTAN GOOLSBEE: Look, we can go through the Obama record if you like. You have been confused for a long time, and I can un-confuse you. But it would take time.

HANNITY: Alright, I feel like I've been a little bit unfair to you in this segment. Go ahead, I'll give you a chance to say "In the eighth year of Obama," and the economy sucks, tell us why you think it's great.

GOOLSBEE: No -- look. The last six years, things have gotten substantially better, and the question for us today is if you're looking at the next eight years, or the next four years, if you so dislike deficits, why are you supporting a guy who has got a $12 trillion tax cut? The biggest tax cut of all time?

HANNITY: Reagan doubled revenues by giving us --

GOOLSBEE: This tax cut --

HANNITY: Wait a minute, by dropping the top marginal rates from 70 to 28 percent during his presidency.

GOOLSBEE: In the last six years -- the first two years of the Obama administration, we come in losing 800,000 jobs a month, in the worst recession of our lifetimes. When that recession ends, which he did not cause, we spend six years improving. Poverty among African-Americans has fallen for the last five years. The poverty rate rose more under Ronald Reagan than it has under Barack Obama. You never want to say that.

HANNITY: He is the first president --

GOOLSBEE: You never want to admit that.

Donald Trump Is Basically The Leader Of A Hate Group
By: Steve - July 27, 2016 - 11:00am

Bill O'Reilly will not admit it, because he is a Republican and Trump is his friend, but Donald Trump is nothing more than the leader of a racist hate group. He is a hero to a group of far-right racists who hate everyone that is not white, and they want America to get rid of all the non-whites because minorities are having more kids than they are and soon the whites will be the minorities.

This is a fact, but O'Reilly will not discuss it. Because he is a friend of Trump and he is helping him to cover it up. Bill O'Reilly knows exactly what Trump is doing, but he ignores it all because he does not want Hillary Clinton to be the next President. So I have some news for O'Reilly, Trump is never going to win, and Hillary will be the next President.

Most Americans will never vote for Trump, when they go to actually vote they will think very hard about it and vote for Hillary over Trump, because they know deep down that Trump is a clown show who is simply using his run for President to get more famous and make more money. And I predict that after Trump loses, he will say he did not care, because he just did it for the fame and money anyway.

Here are some facts about Trump, and what he is doing.

It's been over a year since Donald Trump announced he was running for president. What began as a joke to most people has erupted into the most ridiculous and racist presidential campaign we have ever seen.

The possibility of Trump being our next president is not just something I oppose because he's a Republican. Donald Trump being our next president is something I oppose because he's a pathological lying racist who's based most of his campaign on outright lies and would embarrass this country to such an extent the damage he would cause might never be undone.

Just imagine if he actually won (which will never happen) and he ordered people to be tortured, as he said he would, Americans all over the world would be in fear in any foreign country, fear of getting tortured, especially Americans in the military. Terrorists would most likely start grabbing Americans and torturing them for revenge. And that is just one bad thing that would most likely happen, I could think of 20 more.

I do not even see Trump as a presidential candidate as much as I see him as the head of his own hate group. I've never seen a group of people so crazy and so mad, they are angry and flat-out hateful. Even though things are going pretty good, gas prices are at $2.00 a gallon, the economy is doing good, unemployment is low, the stock market is over 18,000, and the housing market is doing well. They are simply mad because a black man is in the White House and they are slowly becoming the minority.

These far-right white people hate everyone from: Anyone who criticizes Trump. Muslims. African-Americans. Immigrants. Mexicans. Other Republicans. Liberals. Women (at least Trump does). Refugees. Pretty much anyone who isn't a Trump supporter, and anyone who is not white.

Donald Trump has based his entire campaign on fear and lies to stoke the flames of hatred that exist among those who support him. These are people supporting a candidate who is quite literally saying that America is a loser that's no longer great.

That's exactly what the white nationalistic hate groups say and use to rile people up into thinking that the United States is failing them because we've embraced equality and diversity. These people are in a world of their own, a world of only white Republicans who think everything is going to hell because a black Democrat is the President, they are out of touch with reality.

And there is absolutely no reasoning with them, either. It doesn't matter what evidence you show them proving that almost everything Trump has told them is a lie, because it simply does not matter. Unless it comes from his mouth, to them, it's all just part of an big conspiracy against Trump by the media and the establishment, whatever that is.

The bottom line is this, most of Trump's supporters are not supporting him because they care about this great country. They support him because he's preyed on their fear, their anger and their hatred toward basically anyone who is not a white, straight Christian conservative.

These are people who support a candidate who has belittled a war veteran, mocked a man with disabilities and referred to women going to the bathroom as disgusting. These are not proud patriots, as they claim, they are vengeful, hateful, clueless, brainwashed, misinformed bigots. And they got that way partly because of Bill O'Reilly and Fox News, who constantly feed them propaganda and lies that make them hate non-whites and gays even more than they already do.

O'Reilly and the GOP love to point out how race relations in America has got worse since Obama was elected the President. But they never mention the real reason why, they say it's because Obama is divisive, but that is a lie and they know it. Race relations have got worse, not because of Obama, because of racists like O'Reilly and his friends at Fox News and the GOP.

O'Reilly, Fox News, and the GOP are constantly telling lies about Obama and minoriries, so the people on the right hate them even more, even though it is almost all nothing but propaganda that is meant to divide the country. Then they complain about race relations getting worse, when they are a big part of why they got worse, and of course they will never admit it, even though they know it's true.

These are people who are terrified that their country is being taken over by people who are not white, and not pro-life gay hating Republicans. These are not people looking for someone to lead this nation for all Americans. These are racist gay hating people who have simply rushed to embrace the most well-known racist, bigot and pusher of intolerance we have in this country, someone who's been propped up by the conservative media for years.

And his name is Donald Trump. He will never be the President. Because while there are some people (all white) who believe in the lying Trump, there are not enough of them to put him in the White House, unless they cheat and rig the elections, and even if they cheated it will still not be enough.

Insane Tucker Carlson Says Gender Neutral Bathrooms At The DNC Is Disgusting
By: Steve - July 27, 2016 - 10:00am

This far-right moron is an idiot. With everything going on in America and the world, Tucker Carlson talks about gender neutral bathrooms, as if anyone cares, they don't.

He says it is disgusting, when the only thing disgusting is him. He even said it was bizarre, and an alternate reality. When he is the lunatic talking about bathrooms at a political convention.

Here is a clue buddy, talk about the issues, the economy, jobs, health care, etc. you freaking jerk.

Fox's Tucker Carlson: Having Gender Neutral Bathrooms At The Democratic National Convention Is "Disgusting"

Partial transcript:

TUCKER CARLSON (CO-HOST): I thought it was the most disorganized event I have ever covered in 25 years. It was the most badly organized, bizarre event.

Well just the whole thing was bizarre, starting from the like gender neutral bathrooms, which are disgusting. I mean I guess we're liberated by this? Everyone should come visit one and see the reality of it. It's unbelievable.

To the totally screwed up security situation outside. To a line of speakers urging Americans to break the law. To no American flags. I mean the whole thing was like an alternate reality.

O'Reilly Cherry Picked Michelle Obama Speech To Defend Slavery
By: Steve - July 27, 2016 - 9:00am

Bill O'Reilly sparked a firestorm on Tuesday when he pointed out that, while Michelle Obama was "essentially correct" about the White House being built by slaves, those slaves "were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government."

Michelle Obama gave a great 15 minute speech at the DNC convention, and O'Reilly cherry picked one line of it about slavery, what a jerk. He never did that with the Trump speech, or Trump's wife, he only did it to Michelle Obama, proving once again what a biased right-wing hack he is.

It was an awesome speech that talked about everything, all the issues, and O'Reilly only discussed her line about slaves building the White House. Now if someone in journalism did that to Trump or his wife, O'Reilly would lose his mind and call them every name in the book, then he does it to Michelle.

Bill O'Reilly's Reaction To Michelle Obama's Convention Speech: "Michelle Obama Is Essentially Correct In Citing Slaves As Builders Of The White House, But There Were Others Working As Well"

O'Reilly: Slaves Who Built White House Were "Well-Fed And Had Decent Lodgings Provided By The Government"

Here is a partial transcript, O'Reilly never really slammed her, the bad part is that he only talked about one line in a 15 minute speech, and it had to be about slavery. And he used the lame Tip of The Day to do it, which was not a tip, and not even close.

BILL O'REILLY (HOST): Finally tonight, Factor Tip of The Day. As we mentioned, Talking Points Memo, Michelle Obama referenced slaves building the White House in referring to the evolution of America in a positive way. It was a positive comment. The history behind her remark is fascinating. George Washington selected the site in 1791, and as president laid the cornerstone in 1792. Washington was then running the country out of Philadelphia.

Slaves did participate in the construction of the White House. Records show about 400 payments made to slave masters between 1795 and 1801. In addition, free blacks, whites, and immigrants also worked on the massive building. There were no illegal immigrants at that time. If you could make it here, you could stay here.

In 1800, President John Adams took up residence in what was then called the Executive Mansion. It was only later on they named it the White House. But Adams was in there with Abigail, and they were still hammering nails, the construction was still going on.

Slaves that worked there were well-fed and had decent lodgings provided by the government, which stopped hiring slave labor in 1802. However, the feds did not forbid subcontractors from using slave labor. So, Michelle Obama is essentially correct in citing slaves as builders of the White House, but there were others working as well. Got it all? There will be a quiz.

I just can't get rid of that history teacher thing. You know what I'm talking about?

------------------------------

Here are some facebook comments about the stupid statement O'Reilly made, and they are not good for O'Reilly, as expected, but of course he will just ignore them and claim he said nothing wrong.

-- So let me buy u then, Bill. You will be required to lick ass from sun up to sun down. Not just my ass either. I may loan u out to my friends and family to lick their ass as well. But don't worry. You will be well fed and have decent lodging. Meaning my left over and a cot in my basement. Sound good? Alrighty then.

-- I want to know, was he there, did he witness the slaves being well fed and having decent lodgings? A report can say anything that they want it to say, that doesn't mean it was actually what happened. I'm sure the slave owners on the plantation also logged in their books that their slaves were well fed and had decent lodgings too.

I would bet that if the slaves were able to leave a written log of what really happened and how they were treated, the facts would be very different. "Until the story of the hunt is told by the lion, the tale of the hunt will always glorigfy the hunter."

-- There were slaves that also stayed in the homes of their slave owners. Some were close to their owners and their families. They ate well. The thing is their dignity was stolen because they were not free. They didn't have a choice.

They couldn't own land and have equal opportunity. Women often were raped by their owners and their family members. They may have had it nicer then other slaves if this is the case but slavery is still slavery. It still ribs a person of dignity and creates horrible psychological damage among other things.

I wonder what would have happened to one if the slaves if they chose to walk off the job. They would have been killed. It doesn't matter if they had it better then other slaves, it still was slavery.

-- And here folks is why many of us look at this dude and folks who think like him at his network and other places as mercilessly partison and bigoted. In his zeal to fact check a brilliant speech by a classy first lady he actually said "slaves" were well fed and had decent lodgings. Sadly, he probably doesn't even realize how offensive that statement is.

-- O'Reilly fancies himself a historian and truth teller. What I don't understand is what difference does it make if the slaves were well fed and housed? The treatment of slaves ran an entire spectrum from brutal treatment that we would not tolerate of animals today to humane and comfortable in some circumstances.

But it doesn't change the fundamental fact that the truths held self evident by Thomas Jefferson in the opening words of the Declaration of Independence were denied to all of them, well fed notwithstanding.

This country has struggled now for 150 years to deal with its history, and much of the domestic trouble we are experiencing today is a terrible consequence of our failure to address our history and fix it. Bill O'Reilly's revisionist view does nothing to advance the solution to this vexing problem.

And there are many more just like that, in fact, I did not see one comment in support of what O'Reilly said, they are all negative.

Will Says Trump Hiding Tax Returns Because Of Russian Connections
By: Steve - July 26, 2016 - 11:30am

Conservative George Will believes Donald Trump won't release his tax returns because they may show how deeply he's involved with Russian oligarchs.

The Fox News contributor and conservative columnist, who left the Republican Party last month because he couldn't support Trump, said Monday night that he believes the GOP's nominee may have improper relationships with foreign investors, reported The Hill.

Russian agents are accused of hacking into the Democratic National Committee's email servers and sharing private data, possibly to help Trump win the November election, which has underscored concerns about his campaign's ties to the former Soviet Union.

Fox News anchor Bret Baier asked Will about those concerns.

"Well, it's the sort of thing we might learn if we saw the candidates tax returns," Will said. "Perhaps one more reason why we're not seeing his tax returns, because he is deeply involved in dealing with Russia oligarchs and others. Whether that's good, bad or indifferent, it's probably the reasonable surmise."

As Predicted O'Reilly Ignored Police Shooting Unarmed Black Therapist
By: Steve - July 26, 2016 - 11:00am

Three days ago a Miami police officer shot a black unarmed therapist in the leg for no reason while he was laying on the ground on his back telling the police he was unarmed, a therapist, and with his hands in the air. He was no threat to the police, and the autistic patient sitting on the street next to him was playing with a white toy truck.

He did everything the police told him to do and as he was calmly telling them they were unarmed and while he was laying on his back with his hands high in the air, a cop shot him for no reason. And now he has a lawyer who will sue the city so the taxpayers will end up paying him a big settlement, maybe even in the millions.

This is an outrage and every person who pays taxes should be mad as hell. But O'Reilly says nothing, not a thing, while saying the Black Lives Matter group has no reason to protest the police, he even called them a terrorist hate group.

This is real police abuse, and O'Reilly is silent. And it is more proof O'Reilly is a biased hack, by ignoring the problem and then the denial they do anything wrong, O'Reilly is covering for the police and making the problem worse, just as he covers for Trump by ignoring all the negative news about him, he does the very same thing with police abuse stories.

O'Reilly ignores all the police abuse stories, then slams the Black Lives Matter group saying they are wrong to protest because there is nothing to protest. On plant O'Reilly, no police ever do anything wrong, and as long as he ignores it then he can say it never happened. And his stooge viewers buy it, hook, line, and sinker.

O'Reilly Admits The Republican Party Is All White
By: Steve - July 26, 2016 - 10:00am

In the process of admitting the Republican party is nothing but white people, O'Reilly denied that there were any problems at the RNC convention.

You had the delegate revolt, the Melania Trump speech scandal, the Ted Cruz speech where he refused to endorse Trump, his wife even had to be escorted out by security, the Republican Governor of Ohio John Kasich also would not endorse Trump and even refused to speak, he also said Trump will not win Ohio.

O'Reilly also somehow forgot to mention this:

A new RABA Research poll finds that 37% of Americans considered the Republican National Convention a disaster, while just 24% called it a success.

Women voters called the convention a disaster instead of a success by a 3 to 1 margin.

Among young voters, 55% called the convention a disaster, as opposed to just 13% calling it a success.

They even had trouble finding people to speak at the convention, but in the world of Bill O'Reilly there were no problems, just a bunch of white people having a good time. Yes he actually said that, so not only did he admit he is a biased hack who can not report the truth, he admitted the Republican party is nothing but whites.

Here is a partial transcript from his show Monday night.

BILL O'REILLY (HOST): When you say the Republican convention got off to a bad start --

MARY ANNE MARSH: It did.

O'REILLY: Was that because of the Melania Trump speech? Is that what you are referring to?

MARSH: No. There was that, but there was discord on the floor.

O'REILLY: I was there, I didn't see any discord. I just saw a bunch of white people having a good time, that's all I saw.

KATIE PAVLICH: There was a minor floor fight.

MARSH: Trying to stop Donald Trump from becoming the nominee.

Trump Hit With 300K In Attorney Fees After Stiffing Small Business Owner
By: Steve - July 26, 2016 - 9:00am

This is the real Donald Trump folks, a scamming rat who screws people who own a small business that did work for him. He refuses to pay them until they sue him, then he not only has to pay the money, he has to pay their 300K in legal fees too.

That is what wealthy jerks like Trump do, they try to screw the little guy they claim to want to help, then if the little guy stands up to him he gets his money and Trump ends up paying 10 times more than it would have cost him if he had just paid the guy.

The Miami Herald reported Friday that Circuit Court Judge Jorge Cueto, presiding over a lawsuit related to unpaid bills brought by a local paint store against the Trump National Doral Miami golf resort, ordered the billionaire politician's company to pay the Doral-based mom-and-pop shop nearly $300,000 in attorney's fees.

Which is just another example of Donald Trump stiffing those who work for him. Not paying his debts. You know, managing money - the thing of which he says he is the master.

The Paint Spot did a job for Trump and Trump failed to make a final payment of $34,863 on a $200,000 bill for paint used at the resort. The guy who thinks he is immune to all laws - and the United States Constitution - figured The Paint Spot had been paid enough regardless of the contract his company had signed.

Try that one next time you run up some bills at a business. See how it works for you. As Judge Cueto showed, it doesn't.

The Herald reports that this led "The Paint Spot to slap a lien on the property and Cueto to order the foreclosure sale of the resort."

Trump avoided disaster by placing the $34K in escrow but that only avoided the auctioning off of the property; it did not remove the lien, and so Judge Cueto ruled that Trump had to pay for 500 hours of legal work plus a 75 percent risk fee for the paint company's lawyers, who had taken the case despite risking not being paid at all.

Of course, this is Trump we are talking about. The Herald reports that Juan Carlos Enriquez, owner of The Paint Spot said, "I'm happy I have a judgment. But he (Trump) hasn't paid yet."

Trump says he has the best people working for him. Apparently, they're good at screwing everyone else out of money while protecting Trump's own dwindling resources.

As Josh Marshall reported today, Trump's "debt load has grown dramatically over the last year, from $350 million to $630 million. This is in just one year while his liquid assets have also decreased. Trump has even been blackballed by all major US banks."

Trump's entire campaign is built on the idea that he alone can create all the jobs already created by President Obama and save an economy already saved by Obama, when he can't even save his own.

And the GOP claims to be the champions of small businesses. Apparently, this is only if they don't stand between the 1 percent and money.

Trump is a deadbeat racist clown, plain and simple. If he is planning to do to the US what he has done to his own businesses, we all need to get out and vote against Trump on Election Day, because all the things Republicans lied about Obama are actually true of Donald Trump. And that's a mistake we cannot afford to make.

This is serious business, this is not a reality show, it's the most important job in the world, being the President of The United States of America. And Donald Trump would be a disaster as the President, he would only help the wealthy and the corporations and most likely start World War III, if not order a country to be nuked, which would be the worst thing that could ever happen.

Note To Trump Supporters: He Is Lying To You All
By: Steve - July 26, 2016 - 8:00am

To begin with, Donald Trump is never going to build a wall between the U.S. and Mexico.

While this has been, by far, his biggest campaign promise, it is never going to happen. Not only is the idea very expensive (and, no, Mexico is not going to pay for it, either), simply building it is almost impossible.

If you don't believe me, just ask Republicans Jeb Bush and Rick Perry who have both recently said that the wall will never be built.

His so-called plan to defeat ISIS is basically just the very same plan President Obama is already doing.

Trump said he would "declare war on ISIS" (which is actually something Congress would have to do), he also said he wouldn't use many U.S. ground forces. Instead, he would rely on countries in the region to do most of the work.

He has also declared he's going to "bomb the hell out of them." Of course, ISIS hides out in ares that are heavily populated with civilians so you can't just "bomb the hell" out of them. If you did, those are called war crimes.

What President Obama is doing right now is ordering thousands of airstrikes, using very minimal ground troops to aid foreign forces fighting on the ground and working with allies in the region to halt the spread of ISIS, which is exactly what Trump is saying he's going to do.

The only difference is that Trump said he is willing to violate international treaties, while committing various war crimes, including torture. Which even the CIA has admitted doesn't work.

He has no idea how he would actually do anything he's promising he'll do if elected.

Ask a Trump supporter to provide details as to how Trump plans to do all of the things he says he's going to do, so guess what, they have no idea, and neither does he.

He's not going to build the wall. Even if he tried, he certainly has no way to make Mexico pay for it.

What's he going to do about the trade deals, start a trade war? You want to see our economy tank worse than it did in 2008, let him start a trade war with countries like China and Mexico. The price of most of our goods would skyrocket, consumer spending would plummet and millions of jobs would be lost.

How is he going to deport the 12 million illegal immigrants? You know how many hundreds of billions of dollars worth of resources that would take to accomplish? And what do you do with the children of illegal immigrants who are American citizens and legally here, but their parents aren't?

Do you put the child in an orphanage? Are you going to rip apart families? Then what do you do about the millions of back-breaking jobs illegal immigrants do in this country that American citizens won't do? If you get rid of all those laborers it would devastate our economy.

Trump has also declared he will get rid of all inner city gangs. Because, you know, that's possible, Not!

Then there's his ban on Muslims that has no actual way of ever working and even most of the members of his own party agree is illegal and unconstitutional. Is he going to call for every single citizen coming into the United States to be interrogated for their religious ties prior to entering the country? Then what does he do if they simply lie?

It's all pretty much impossible and just stupid. He only said it to make him popular with the far-right in America. None of it is going to happen, the President can not just do whatever he wants, there are laws, the constitution, and Congress. Only Congress can declare war, and half of what Trump says he will do is illegal and unconstitutional, so it will never happen.

During the GOP primary, more Republicans voted against Trump than for him, and a big part of his own party is embarrassed he is the candidate.

While Trump likes to brag about setting a new record for most votes cast for a Republican candidate in our nation's history, he always leaves out the other record he set for having the most votes cast against him.

Not only that, but when you listen to how a lot of members of the party talk about him, most really never talk positively about him, they basically just try to pivot toward attacks on Hillary Clinton. While most won't outright attack him, they certainly aren't rushing to heap praise on him.

Almost nothing he says is true. Trump and his supporters can spin it however they like, but he is, by far, the most dishonest presidential candidate we have ever seen in the history of the country.

And it's not just that he lies, it's that he simply makes things up. His go-to source is "what I'm hearing," or his own brain, though he never provides anyone with any credible source to back up all of this idiocy that he claims to hear. But because he's telling people what they want to hear, they never question him.

It's why he's the first one to accuse others of being liars. He figures if he's out there calling everyone else the liar, playing himself up as the victim of people who are out to get him, it makes his supporters actually believe that there's this big anti-Trump conspiracy.

Even though the truth is just that he lies so much; the only option most people have is to constantly call him out for his endless stream of lies and BS.



Hot Links

O'Reilly Loses Custody Of His Kids After Choking Wife

Conclusive Proof Bill O'Reilly Is Biased In Favor Of Republicans

O'Reilly Dishonest About Publishers Weekly Not Reviewing Killing Reagan

Bill O'Reilly Proves He Is A Lying Right-Wing Idiot Once Again

O'Reilly Wrong About The Constitution & Obama's Power

4 Fox Hosts Slam O'Reilly Over His Ebola Reporting

Historians & The Patton Family Rip O'Reilly's New Patton Book

Jon Stewart Slams Fox For Criticizing President While At War

Facts On The Economy Bill O'Reily Is Totally Ignoring

Under Bush O'Reilly & Fox News Did Not Blame Him For Beheadings

Study Finds Fox News Only Tells the Truth 18% of the Time

More Republican Corruption O'Reilly Has Ignored

Jon Stewart Destroys O'Reilly & Fox For Ferguson Shooting Bias

O'Reilly Caught Lying About ISIS Threat & Juan Williams

NY Times Charles Blow Says Bill O'Reilly Is The Race Hustler

Homeland Security Shows Gutfeld & Baker Are Liars

More Republican Corruption O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Cost Of Obamacare

Bill O'Reilly Is Lying To You About Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Electic Car Company Success

The Most Annoying Celebs Who Should Go Away

Bias Alert: O'Reilly Spins Presidential Election Media Study

O'Reilly & Fox Still Ignoring GOP Voter Registration Fraud Story

Biased O'Reilly Tells Romney To Call Obama A Socialist

O'Reilly Slams Obama With Dishonest Tip Of The Day

O'Reilly & Brit Hume Spin And Lie For Mitt Romney

Fox Promotes Ridiculous Study Of Doctors & Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media & Obama

Low Gas Prices Shut O'Reilly & The Repiblicans Up Fast

I Am Waiting For The O'Reilly Health Care Bill Apology

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About The Media

O'Reilly Ignores MRC Calling For Sharpton Firing

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Wrong On The Deficit

O'Reilly & Fox Lie That Obama To Blame For High Gas Prices

Scientist Group Slams Celebs Like Snooki & O'Reilly

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About America

O'Reilly & Ingraham Lied About Planned Parenthood (Again)

Fox Unemployment Chart Shows Their Right-Wing Bias

U.S. Troops Burn A Box Of O'Reilly's Books

Kelly & O'Reilly Make Up Another Green Energy Scandal

O'Reilly Ignoring All The Stock Market Increases

O'Reilly Flat Out LIED About The Debt Obama Added

O'Reilly Caught Doctoring Florida Mans E-Mail

O'Reilly Ignored Michele Bachmann Church Scandal

O'Reilly & Morris Lied About The Debt Polls

O'Reilly Hypocrisy On The West/Schultz Story

The Truth About Those Bush Tax Cuts

Number Of Tea Party Events Down 50 Percent

NWLC Says O'Reilly Statement Made Up & Offensive

Video Proof O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Hack

O'Reilly Gets It Totally Wrong On Norway Terrorist

Norway Terrorist Info O'Reilly Ignored

O'Reilly Ignoring Ensign/Coburn Hush Money Scandal

O'Reilly Calls Obama Health Care Waivers A Scam

O'Reilly Complains About Losing In His Own Poll

O'Reilly Ignores Republican Hypocrisy On Judicial Filibusters

O'Reilly Ignoring Republican Unpopularity

O'Reilly Tells GOP How To Beat Obama With Scare Tactics

O'Reilly & Fox Are Lying To You About The Debt

O'Reilly Spins The 2008 Presidential Media Study

Important Tax Information Bill O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Ignored McCain Op-Ed On Bin Laden

O'Reilly Scrubs Website & Podcast Of False Obama Claims

O'Reilly Ignored DOJ Black Panther Report

O'Reilly Still Ignoring Wisconsin Judge's Order Story

O'Reilly Ignored Jobs & Unemployment Report

Fox News Town Hall Protester Hypocrisy & Double Standards

O'Reilly & Varney Speculate About Oil Prices

O'Reilly Spins The Quinnipiac Temperature Poll

O'Reilly Proves How Stupid He Is Again

How O'Reilly Puts Out Right-Wing Propaganda

Fox News Insider Admits They Make Things Up

Luntz Admits Fox Has Anti-Obama Focus Groups

Reagan SG Says Health Care Bill Constitutional

O'Reilly Ignores Gore Answer To His Question

O'Reilly Wonders How The Moon Got There

More Republican Hate & Racism O'Reilly Has Ignored

Another Poll O'Reilly Has Totally Ignored

O'Reilly Thinks We Are Still In A Recession

O'Reilly's Nazi Comment Defense Was Laughable

Fox News The Least Trusted Cable News Network

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media (Again)

O'Reilly Claims Estate Tax A Seizure Of Property

O'Reilly Called Bernie Sanders A Loon

Bloomberg Tax Cut Poll Proves O'Reilly Was Lying

O'Reilly Ignored Positive DADT Study & Story

O'Reilly & Fox Ignore Judge Being A 9-11 Truther

More Real News O'Reilly Has Ignored

More Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Ratings

O'Reilly Got The Ireland Economic Crisis Wrong

O'Reilly Ignored The Tom Delay Conviction Story

Women Of America: You Need To Read This

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly Is Dishonest & Crazy

O'Reilly Nazi Comparison Hypocrisy

O'Reilly Ignores New Poll While Promoting Paladino

Andrew Sullivan Called O'Reilly A Dishonest Propagandist

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Nevada RCP Senate Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Right-Wing Abortion Bomber Terrorism Story

Fox & O'Reilly Ignored Friday Pro-Mosque NY Rally

O'Reilly Busted For Health Insurance Premium Lies

Most Factor Gear Made in Vietnam And China

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

O'Reilly Busted For 1st Time Retraction Lie

The Bill O'Reilly Non-Apology Shirley Sherrod Apology

O'Reilly & The Right Are Racist Idiots

O'Reilly Ignored Tea Party Express Racism Story

O'Reilly Compares Gay People To Al-Qaeda

Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Rating Polls

O'Reilly Ignored Mark Kirk Military Award Lie Story

Where Are The Sedition Charges Now O'Reilly

O'Reilly Caught In A Massive Lie About Jail Time

O'Reilly Running Ads For Emergency Food Supply

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Tea Party Militia Links

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Gallup Tea Party Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Harris Poll Showing Republicans Are Stupid

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Health Reform Bill Tax

O'Reilly Caught Lying About NEJM Health Care Survey

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

The Truth About Ratings For News Shows

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Spin Doctor

O'Reilly Spinning Fox News Most Trusted Poll

Fox News Did Not Air Hope For Haiti Telethon

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Obama Terrorism Polls

O'Reilly Caught Lying About House Ethics Committee

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Increase

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Limbaugh Racism

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Religious Festival

O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Lying About CNN

O'Reilly Caught Violating Journalistic Standards Again

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The ACLU & Racial Profiling

More Proof O'Reilly & FOX News Do Not Tell The Truth

O'Reilly Called Bruce Springsteen Un-American & Un-Patriotic

The Bill O'Reilly Senate Torture Report Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Obama Approval Numbers

FOX News Caught Lying About Obama Budget

O'Reilly Busted For Helping GOP Smear Pelosi

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Obama Earmark Promise

Military.com Report Proves O'Reilly Wrong About Homeless Vets

O'Reilly Places 7th in 2008 Wingnut of The Year Award

O'Reilly Denys Reality About Abstinence Only Programs




Proof The O'Reilly Factor is Biased Against Barack Obama
O'Reilly said he is a non-partisan Independent, who is fair to both sides, and that he has been fair to Barack Obama. To check that claim I did a 3 month study of the Factor, it started on August 1st, 2008, and ran until October 31st, 2008. I watched the Factor every night and counted the negative and positive comments for Obama and McCain.

Visit the web page I set up, and you will see the stunning bias from O'Reilly and his mostly Republican guests against Barack Obama. Then you will see there is no doubt Bill O'Reilly is a dishonest and biased Conservative. This study is conclusive proof that O'Reilly is in the tank for John McCain.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The 3 Month Factor Bias Study:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/3mbiasnumbers.htm

Proof O'Reilly Lied About The Balance on His Show
O'Reilly claims the factor is balanced, and that he personally makes sure every week he has an equal number of Republican and Democrat guests. This is a bold faced lie, and I can prove it. I put together a web page that shows the guest list from the factor for the last 2 weeks. Read it and you will see with your own eyes that Bill O'Reilly is lying when he says the factor is balanced.

And remember that we are 3 weeks before a major Presidential election, or the Republican bias numbers would be worse than it is normally. O'Reilly is actually having more Democrats on than he usually does, and the balance is still not even close. If we were not so close to an election it would be a lot worse.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The Lies About The Factor Balance:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillybalanced.htm

O'Reilly Sucks Investigation: Dishonesty, Deception, And Bias By Bill O'Reilly
O'Reilly claims there are no Republicans or Conservative groups that rival George Soros. O'Reilly said the top three conservative tax-exempt foundations are totally dwarfed by Soros and the radical Ford Foundation. And that they have 15 times more the assets. George Soros net worth is $8.5 billion, the Ford Foundation has a net worth of $13 billion. But the seven billionaires who donate to Newt Gingrich and other right-wing causes have a combined net worth of $34.8 billion dollars.

Somehow O'Reilly claims that Soros and the Ford Foundation have 15 times more the assets than anyone on the right. When the seven billionaires alone who give money to Newt, have roughly $14 billion more than Soros and the Ford Foundation combined.

Visit the web page below to see the massive money O'Reilly has ignored from the right:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreilly-investigation.htm

(( Right-Wing Hate Speech Ignored by Bill O'Reilly ))
O'Reilly claims there is no hate on the right, that it's all on the left. But the way he defines hate is ridiculous, if a liberal blog or website writes an article that criticizes George W. Bush (or any Republican) O'Reilly calls it hate. When it's not hate, it's reporting the facts, there is no hate. A great example is when websites like oreilly-sucks.com, mediamatters.org, etc. criticize O'Reilly he calls it hate, and says they are hate groups who lie about him.

That is a lie, it is not hate, and they are not hate websites. There is real hate on the internet, but O'Reilly does not report it, because most of it is from the right. I have documented this hate in my blog and on a web page, all of it was ignored by Bill O'Reilly, and it was never reported on the Factor.

Visit the web page below to see the massive right-wing hate O'Reilly has ignored:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/right-wing-hate.htm


www.oreilly-sucks.com Privacy Policy

Copyright 2001 - 2014


eXTReMe Tracker