Advertise Contact About This Web Site Webmaster Information
Website Info






Play at online gambling
sites with popular games
like blackjack online







echtgeldroulette.com is a new German site about roulette that also covers blackjack for real money







Liberty Slots Casino



Players interested in online poker real money games can play at poker sites like Bwin or Ladbrokes.



Players who wish to play poker online must check out the poker sites with best bonus offers. The best poker sites offer excellent sign up bonuses and freerolls.



O'Reilly Sucks
Blog Archives

January - 2012
February - 2012
March - 2012
April - 2012

Website Links

O'Reilly Info

O'Reilly Spins

Cable News Ratings

Read The Letter O'Reilly Had His Attorney Send me

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The NY Times JFK Terror Plot

O'Reilly's Party Enrollment Form Showing Him a Registered Republican

O'Reilly Wins 2004 Misinformer of The Year Award

O'Reilly Death Penalty Lies

O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 49 Times Since 2001

O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks

Mail-to-Bill

Hate-Mail

FOX News Bias

Transcripts

O'Reilly #5 On Top 25 Right-Wing Journalist List

O'Reilly Factor Year In Review 2009

Factor Pollster Caught Writing GOP Policy Memo

What a Fair & Balanced O'Reilly Factor Would Look Like

Buzzflash Names O'Reilly Media Putz of The Week

The 10 Page Hand Written Lucifer Letter I Got in 2003

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly & The Republican Party Are Both Corrupt

The Right-Wing Liberal Killer Story O'Reilly Ignored

The Facts About O'Reilly And GE Doing Business With Iran

How to Deal With an O'Reilly Factor Ambush Interview

Why FOX News Loves Juan Williams: The Strings And The Puppet

Assorted Links

Blogroll

glenn-beck-sucks.com
AmericaBlog
Crooks & Liars
Progressive Eruptions
Rude Pundit
Moveon.org
Truthout.com
Daily Beacon
Mike Hersh
Prison Planet
Moose & Squirrel
Politics & Society
Apocalypse Cafe
Fox News Boycott
I Hate Hannity
Inebriated Discourse
Hannity Sucks
LT Saloon
NewsCorpse.com
Glenn Beck Is An Idiot
Ranker.com
GlennBeckReport.com
dilhole.net
lauraingrahamsucks.com

O'Reilly Sucks Polls

Torture Poll
Do You Support Torture if The President Orders it?



Current Results

Apology Poll
Should O'Reilly Apologize to Helen Thomas and Courtney Martin


Bias Poll
Do You Think Bill O'Reilly is a Biased Right-Wing Liar


Cable News Poll
Which Cable News Network Has The Most Bias

FOX
MSNBC
CNN

Anchor Poll
Which Cable News Anchor is hurting America The Most

Bill O'Reilly
Sean Hannity
Wolf Blitzer
Lou Dobbs
Keith Olbermann
The Factor Guest List Count

May 2012 (11 Shows) Republicans - 80 | Democrats - 18

The Factor Guest List Count Archives

Ratings: The O'Reilly Factor - Total Viewers

Monday - 5-14-12 -- O'Reilly - 2.724
Tuesday - 5-15-12 -- O'Reilly - 0.000
Wednesday - 5-16-12 -- O'Reilly - 0.000
Thursday - 5-17-12 -- O'Reilly - 0.000
Friday - 5-18-12 -- O'Reilly - 0.000

Weekly Factor Average - 0.000

The Cable News Ratings Archives

The O'Reilly Sucks Blog

The Tuesday 5-15-12 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - May 16, 2012 - 11:00am

The TPM was called: The politics of gay marriage and President Barack Obama. Crazy O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: In 2008 then-Senator Obama ran on a platform of uniting the country and transforming politics into a positive for the folks. That was what 'hope and change' was all about. According to a new poll, the President has failed to do that. When asked why President Obama publicly supported same-sex marriage, 67% of the country said it was for political reasons.

That poll is devastating because it says most Americans now think President Obama is just another politician who will change positions if he thinks it will personally benefit him. As Talking Points said last week, the gay marriage deal will be a negative for the President in November, he can say goodbye to North Carolina and has also lost some support in Virginia, Ohio and Florida.

So the political calculation, if that's what it really was, has actually hurt him and maybe even damaged his image among his most loyal constituents, African Americans. On black radio stations across the country there is outrage over the President's support of gay marriage.

President Obama has a 50-50 chance of being reelected and many things can happen between now and November. But right now the President is slipping everywhere!
And that is some big time right-wing spin, because another poll says 6 in 10 do not care if Obama supports gay marriage and will still vote for him. And Obama is not slipping everywhere, that is just ridiculous.

Then O'Reilly had two black ministers on to weigh in on the same-sex marriage debate. Rev. Emmet Burns said this: "I will support the President, but I can be true to my theological understanding of the Bible and not support same sex marriage. We are going down a slippery slope here, somebody will want to marry his sister."

Rev. Delman Coates equated the controversy over same-sex marriage with the civil rights movement of the 1960's, saying this: "There is no group that has a monopoly on civil rights. As a Christian evangelical pastor and as an American, I support equal treatment under the law for all citizens, even those who are gays and lesbians."

In his commencement address at Barnard College, President Obama slammed the media's "steady stream of sensationalism and scandal." So O'Reilly had Monica Crowley and Alan Colmes on to evaluate the President's message.

Crowley said this: "I agree with him, but he is just stating the obvious. This has been true since Gutenberg's printing press, sex, violence and sensationalism sell. President Obama is not getting the kind of coverage he was getting back in 2008 and now he's whining."

Colmes disagreed with the claim that the media is a single monolithic entity, saying this: "The media is more than just the cable news channels, there's digital media, there are the networks. The younger generation is on line, that's where people get their information."

O'Reilly put his spin on President Obama's anti-media message with this: "The President is saying the media is demoralizing the nation, and he's saying that because he's in big trouble. He's now going to tell his constituents that it's not that bad, the media is telling you it's bad, but it's not that bad."

Then Dave Parker was on to talk about the Police in Norfolk who have arrested three more black teens for taking part in the mob assault of two white reporters.

Parker reported that the case is finally moving ahead, saying this: "According to the reporters who were attacked, on that night about thirty people surrounded their vehicle and a small contingent of five people broke off and attacked them viciously. Now four of those guys have been arrested, and I have every indication that this case will be prosecuted to its fullest."

Then the far-right loon John Stossel was on to talk about one town in New Jersey that is cracking down on pedestrians who are texting while crossing the street.

Stossel said this: "The authorities are doing this for their own good. They mean well, but they get more power if they have more rules. Everyone wants more power, more attention, more importance, but we have enough rules! The number of deaths has been dropping steadily since cell phones were introduced, so why do we need these laws? Let's ban radios and GPS systems in cars, they're distracting!"

O'Reilly argued that some rules are absolutely necessary for the public good, saying this: "I feel very strongly that you shouldn't be allowed to talk on a handheld cell phone and drive at the same time. People have a hard enough time driving with two hands on the wheel! We have to have protection against loons."

Then Lis Wiehl and Kimberly Guilfoyle, who assessed two high-profile cases were on, beginning with John Edwards trial in North Carolina. Wiehl said this: "The defense wants Edwards daughter to take the stand, to humanize him and get some sympathy. But if I were a juror I'd be mad that a father is putting his daughter on the stand after she had to go through everything else."

Guilfoyle turned to the case against former baseball star Roger Clemens, accused of lying to Congress about his steroid use. Guilfoyle said this: "Do I believe his is probably guilty, based on the evidence and the testimony? Yes. But do I think he is going to be convicted? No. That's based on the lack of credibility of the witnesses."

After reports that the Justice Department might charge George Zimmerman with a 'hate crime' in the slaying of Trayvon Martin, Fox News Charles Krauthamer was on to give his opinion of Attorney General Eric Holder. And of course the far-right Krauthammer slammed him, with of course no guest to defend Holder, or provide any balance.

Krauthammer said this: "He's a political hack. The reason that is so grating is that you can be a political hack somewhere else, but the Justice Department is a really important job. You are the top law enforcement official in the country, entrusted with upholding the rule of law and the Constitution. And the amount of stuff he has done shows this to be a guy who will be at the beck and call of his political masters. He has brought cases to gin up issues and agitate the base, and if you're Attorney General, you shouldn't be acting in that way. You should be acting for the nation."

Then the highly edited Factor mail, and the lame as ever pinheads and patriots garbage.

And on a side note, O'Reilly named Former press secretary Robert Gibbs, CNN correspondent Lizzy O'Leary, and MSNBC host Chris Matthews pinheads, for simply going on Jeopardy. O'Reilly said this: "Matthews, who has repeatedly implied that Sarah Palin would be terrible at the game, came in dead last."

But what he failed to mention is that it's the 3rd time Matthews was on Jeopardy, the first time he won the show, and the 2nd time he came in 2nd and almost won. But O'Reilly ignored that to make it look like Matthews is a dummy who came in last. Not to mention, Gibbs and O'Leary are smart and well educated people, so it is not that bad to come in last behind them.

O'Reilly Caught In Cover Up For Frank VanderSloot
By: Steve - May 16, 2012 - 10:00am

Here is more proof that Bill O'Reilly is a dishonest and biased right-wing hack of a pretend journalist.

Tuesday night O'Reilly interviewed Romney campaign national finance committee co-chair Frank VanderSloot yesterday and whitewashed VanderSloot's record on LGBT issues. Discussing criticism of VanderSloot's record that appeared on KeepingGOPHonest.com, O'Reilly suggested the Obama campaign engaged in "political terrorism" and "slimed" VanderSloot. But O'Reilly failed to press or even mention the substance of VanderSloot's record on LGBT issues.

VanderSloot told O'Reilly had VanderSloot on his show, he said that KeepingGOPHonest.com had "said that VanderSloot hated gay people and that he was anti-gay."

O'Reilly then said this: "You're anti-gay. So anybody who was buying your product who was gay said I'm not going to buy my products from this guy."

VanderSloot then said this: "We have a lot of people we work with, who we deal with in the business world that are gay."

So O'Reilly said this: "So they basically slimed you. They smeared you."

And that is as close as O'Reilly got to confronting VanderSloot with the actual substance of VanderSloot's anti-LGBT statements.

And now the facts, the facts you never heard from O'Reilly. VanderSloot and his company, Melaleuca Inc., launched a billboard campaign in Idaho that attacked Idaho Public Television for airing a documentary called "It's Elementary: Talking About Gay Issues In Schools." Idaho Public Television said the documentary "chronicled how some public and private schools in several states are dealing with gay issues in the classroom, specifically name-calling and harassment."

But VanderSloot's billboards attacked the documentary, asking "Should public television promote the homosexual lifestyle to your children?"

VanderSloot also attacked a reporter who had written that the Mormon Church and Idaho Boy Scout officials were sheltering a known pedophile. VanderSloot printed a full-page newspaper ad that called the reporter a "homosexual."

The ad said this:
Much has been said on a local radio station and throughout the community, speculating that the Boy Scout's position of not letting gay men be Scout Leaders, and the LDS Church's position that marriage should be between a man and a woman may have caused Zuckerman to attack the scouts and the LDS Church through his journalism.

We think it would be very unfair for anyone to conclude that is what is behind Zuckerman's motives. It would be wrong to do.

The only known facts are, that for whatever reason, Zuckerman chose to weave a story that unfairly, and without merit, paints Scout leaders and church leaders to appear unscrupulous, and blame them for the molestation of little children.

That too, is wrong and the editors of the Post Register should not have allowed it.
Zuckerman said that as a result of the ad, his boyfriend lost his job, and Zuckerman himself started getting violent threats:
There was a tremendous impact on me both personally and professionally. Personally, it was really hard when my boyfriend, at the time, came home and said, "I don't have my job anymore. They know I'm gay. They know about my relationship with you. They don't want me there anymore."

And it was really hard for him. He actually got sick soon afterwards and was in bed for a month. I didn't know how we were going to pay the bills. It was really hard when people started leaving notes on my doorstep, when somebody kept calling in the middle of the night threatening to rape me with his handgun.

That was -- I mean, that was really terrible. And then professionally, it became much harder to do my job because, yes, Idaho Falls was buzzing about my sexual orientation.

And, you know, when I tried to talk to people, they would say things like, "Oh, I can't talk to you. You're a homosexual . We don't associate with that."
Zuckerman also said that before the ad was published: "I hadn't told anybody on my beat that I'm gay and for good reason, because I was worried they wouldn't talk to me."

And you never heard a word about any of that from O'Reilly, because he was too busy spinning the story to cover for VanderSloot.

Now get this, in August of 1999 VanderSloot even discussed the Idaho Public Television documentary that he was attacking on billboards on the O'Reilly Factor show.

During the segment VanderSloot asserted that the documentary was using taxpayer money to bring "the homosexual lifestyle into the classroom and introduce it to our children as being normal, right, acceptable, and good an appropriate."

VanderSloot also went on to say the film was "certainly not a documentary. It's propaganda"

VanderSloot also said this: "We can teach our children -- and adults, too, for that matter -- to be tolerant of people and to love all people and not to judge them, but we don't have to, in the process, teach them that all behavior is acceptable, especially when it's contrary to the moral standards of our community and nation."

He added that "tax dollars should not be used to bring this standard of morality to our children."

And btw folks, the website KeepingGOPHonest.com DOES NOT say VanderSloot hates gays or even that he is anti-gay. It says that he is "a bitter foe of the gay rights movement," which he clearly is. So the only smearing and sliming going on is by Bill O'Reilly.

The Monday 5-14-12 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - May 15, 2012 - 11:00am

The TPM was called: Does the Democratic party hate the rich? Crazy O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: Growing up on Long Island, my folks didn't have much, we didn't have air conditioning, never bought a new car, ate SpaghettiOs and tuna. But never once did my parents show jealousy toward the rich people in Garden City a few miles away. America fifty years later is a much different place; now we have class envy stoked by the Democratic Party.

Ironically, the media is part of the anti-affluent jihad, while many in the media are wealthy themselves. Same thing in Hollywood, where you have these pinheads supporting the Occupy Wall Street protesters. A Gallup poll asked whether the U.S. benefits from having a class of rich people. 46% of Democrats believe wealthy Americans provide no benefit to the country whatsoever.

I take that personally because I, against all odds, have become a rich guy. And here's exactly what I do for my country: I pay all my taxes and my foundation gives away millions of dollars to the poor, to military families in need, and to fight disease worldwide.

I employ dozens of people at BillOReilly.com, and because The Factor is successful, people are hired by the News Corporation to work on the program. Recently I thought about retiring, but I added it up and more than 60 people would have lost their jobs had I packed it in. So now I hear that almost half of Democrats believe I provide no benefit at all to America? Off-the-chart dumb!

The bottom line: Jealous pinheads hurt the country, while I and others like me are helping it.
And as usual O'Reilly is lying and wrong. To begin with, people like you are hurting the country, not because you are rich, because you are a biased lying hack. And the Democrats do not hate the rich, the simply want them to pay more in taxes compared to what they make, it's that simple. In fact, we like the rich, and we are glad they employ people. So O'Reilly is not only a liar, he is a right-wing liar who is trying to make the Democrats look bad.

And btw, O'Reilly acts like he grew up poor. Which is also a lie, his Father was an accountant for an oil company, he paid for Bill and his sister to go to private schools with no financial aid, Bill even went to school in England for a year, to avoid the draft. His Father was just cheap on some things, but he did have money.

Then Kirsten Powers and Mary Anne Marsh were on to talk about their party's so-called disdain for wealthy Americans. Powers said this: "I don't think they're demonizing the rich, the issue is class. This country was founded on the idea of not having an aristocracy and different classes of people living radically different lives. The question for me is why so many Republicans think we should have a rich class."

Marsh argued that America has become more difficult for the middle class, saying this: "The majority of people, including Democrats, still want to be rich. But what has changed is their ability to move up the economic ladder by working hard and playing by the rules. We have an economy that rewards those who least need it at the expense of the people who can least afford it."

O'Reilly said this: "I think the Democratic Party should be ashamed of itself for having 46% of it saying guys like me do nothing for the country."

Then Bernie Goldberg was on to discuss Barack Obama, who endorsed same-sex marriage, Newsweek magazine praised him as 'the first gay president.'

Goldberg said this: "As a desperate business decision. I fully understand this. You put Barack Obama on the cover, give him a multi-colored halo, and maybe you'll sell a few copies at the newsstand. But as a journalistic decision it's downright embarrassing. Liberals make fun of conservatives when we say the media is trying to portray Barack Obama as a messiah, but then they go and do precisely that. If Newsweek put Jesus on the cover, he probably wouldn't get a halo because it might offend some of their liberal readers."

Then Mary K. Ham and Juan Williams were on to talk about President Obama's campaign that is marketing baby clothing declaring that "my two dads" or "my two moms" support the President.

Williams said this: "We are at a point now, where more and more Americans think gay people should be respected and not stigmatized. But if you wore a t-shirt that made a big deal about having a mom and dad, a lot of people would see that as intentionally antagonistic toward gay people."

Ham pointed out that former Vice President Cheney actually came out in favor of gay marriage before President Obama, saying this: "If Obama truly believes himself to be a leader on liberal social issues, you have to 'evolve' a few years before Dick Cheney, not after Dick Cheney. The President is getting credit from liberal activists for being 'brave' when he's really made a political decision here."

O'Reilly complained that anti-gay marriage folks are being demonized, saying this: "There are good people who support traditional marriage and society should respect both points of view."

Then O'Reilly had the Republican Frank VanderSloot on, who has been personally attacked after donating $1 million to a pro-Romney organization.

VanderSloot said this: "The Obama campaign published a list of eight individuals who supposedly have 'less than reputable' records, which was news to me. Within hours of that, all kinds of things started to appear on the Internet, rewriting history about all kinds of things I'm supposedly guilty of. Phone calls started coming in and we had customers who wanted to cancel their business."

VanderSloot explained how he fought back against the accusations, saying this: "I started having conference calls with our customers and explaining my real positions, and we put up a website of our own to try to handle all of these accusations. Everything is turning around now and heading in the opposite direction."

And of course O'Reilly denounced the left-wing smear merchants who attacked VanderSloot, saying this: "They slimed you, they smeared you, and some believe this is political terrorism."

But of course when Bill Maher was attacked for donating $1 million dollars to an Obama superPac O'Reilly not only did not defend him, he joined in on the attacks. Making him a massive hypocrite with double standards depending on whether you are a Democrat or a Republican.

Then Brit Hume was on, he blasted the Washington Post for running a lengthy piece alleging that Mitt Romney once bullied another young man in high school.

Hume said this: "My objection to the story is very simple. It did not connect this event when he was 17 or 18 years old with other events in his life which would have formed a pattern and told us something about Romney's character. Indeed, much of what we know about Romney's personal character is that he's been an upright guy and very generous to his employees. I think the story was a very small footnote, but they built it up, splashed it on the front page, and ran a story that went on for 5,000 words. It's a wonderful example of how bias works."

And finally in the last segment O'Reilly had his ridiculous one sided Factor Reality Check. That I do not report on because it's just O'Reilly by himself putting his right-wing spin on something someone else said, and it's always about a liberal, he never does reality checks on conservatives. Not to mention, there are no reality checks, it's just the opinion of O'Reilly.

Then the highly edited Factor mail, and the lame as ever pinheads and patriots garbage.

More Proof Increased Oil Production Will Not Lower Gas Prices
By: Steve - May 15, 2012 - 10:00am

More domestic drilling does not make America less susceptible to global supply disruptions or protect consumers from gasoline price volatility, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

The CBO report reviewed different policies intended to make the country more energy secure, concluding that the only effective tool for shielding businesses and consumers from price spikes is to use less oil.

Because oil is sold on the global market, CBO concludes that increasing domestic oil production would do little to influence rising gas prices in the U.S.

These findings back up historical experience. According to an analysis of 36 years of gasoline prices and domestic oil production conducted by the Associated Press, there is zero statistical correlation between increased drilling and lower prices at the gas pump.

But Republicans keep beating that dead horse anyway.

The CBO report says that even if increased drilling did substantially lower gas prices (which it has not) the agency says those lower prices would actually make the country less secure from price shocks.

The report also says that even if the United States increased production and became a net exporter of oil, U.S. consumers would still be exposed to gasoline prices that rose and fell in response to disruptions around the world.

In contrast, policies that reduced the use of oil and its products would create an incentive for consumers to use less oil or make decisions that reduced their exposure to higher oil prices in the future, such as purchasing more fuel-efficient vehicles or living closer to work.

Such policies would impose costs on vehicle users (in the case of fuel taxes or fuel-efficiency requirements) or taxpayers (in the case of subsidies for alternative fuels or for new vehicle technologies). But the resulting decisions would make consumers less vulnerable to increases in oil prices.

The solution is clear: the only way to make America more energy secure is to use less energy.

Even Mitt Romney understood this in 2007 when he admitted that “these high gasoline prices are probably here to stay” and advocated 50-mpg fuel efficiency standards, public transportation, electric vehicles, and renewable alternatives.

But today, Romney champions opening up virtually every possible area of the U.S. to oil drilling — disingenuously claiming it will make consumers more secure.

Romney recently said this: “The best thing we can do to get the price of gas to be more moderate and not have to be dependent upon the cartel is: drill in the gulf, drill in the outer continent shelf, drill in ANWR, drill in North Dakota, South Dakota, drill in Oklahoma and Texas."

Even as the analysis piles up showing that increased domestic drilling is not an effective solution to high gas prices or energy security, Republican political leaders continue to repeat these false claims.

What we need are proven ideas to help us make America more efficient and less dependent on oil, not insane Drill-Baby-Drill nonsense that does nothing to address the actual problem.

The Friday 5-11-12 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - May 12, 2012 - 11:00am

The TPM was called: Exaggerating and justifying bad behavior in politics. Crazy O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: One of the really annoying things about my job is when I confront a political partisan with a fact, then they dodge by dredging up a diversion to pettifog the issue. The Washington Post is reporting that when Mitt Romney was 18 years old he hazed a gay guy in prep school.

Instead of dealing with the absurdity of that story, some pundits are referring to other politicians doing even worse stuff. We often justify bad behavior by pointing to other bad behavior, which is what is done in third grade. Let's take a look at this prep school thing: It's dumb, but everybody does stupid things in high school.

If Mitt Romney was hazing people all the time, if he had shaved Barney Frank's head while Governor of Massachusetts, then we might have a story. But a prep school prank? C'mon! Talking Points wants to ask the Washington Post, what is the statute of limitation on bad behavior? Does it ever run out? This is politics in America today, gotcha, getcha, humiliate you. The Romney story means nothing!
O'Reilly and the far-right press now think it's pointless to look into a candidate's past in search of clues about his personality and clues to what shaped him into an adult. Suddenly they mock efforts by the press to paint a detailed personal portrait of would-be presidents by combing over their biographies.

Suddenly right-wing bloggers are strongly opposed to vetting. The same type of partisan media pursuers who obsessed over which elementary school Obama attended overseas as a child, and the same ones who have spent years obsessing over Obama's birth (you can't go back any further than that), suddenly think reporting out disturbing incidents from Romney's high school days is out of bounds.

It's amazing how the vetting urge dissipates when the target shifts from a Democrat to an Republican.

Then O'Reilly had two political strategists on to discuss it. Hlinko said this: "I do think this went beyond a prank," said Democrat John Hlinko. "A prank is short-sheeting a bed, but Mitt Romney led a group of students who assaulted a guy. I agree that we've all done stupid things as kids, but this was assaulting a kid."

Republican Chris Begala denounced the Washington Post for even running the story, saying this: "I see the Post writing a clear political hit piece. It's biased and it's also corrupt because the family of the alleged victim has come out to say he would be furious at this agenda-driven story."

The Factor criticized Hlinko for playing politics with an old and flimsy story, saying this: "Romney was 18, but you are going to sit there and condemn Romney and say he's not fit to be president for what he did at 18."

Then O'Reilly talked about the group "Restore Our Future," which is working to elect Mitt Romney, that has a new ad blasting Obama supporters Bill Maher and Hilary Rosen for mocking Ann Romney. And you can bet O'Reilly will show every ad Romney or any right-wing group runs to help them, while not showing any pro-Obama ads.

Michelle Fields and Leslie Marshall were on. Marshall said this: "Bill Maher doesn't work for the President, and most people know that Hilary Rosen doesn't speak for all of us women on the left. This ad doesn't make the Romney campaign look much better than they're trying to make the Obama campaign look."

But Fields defended the ad as fair and effective, saying this: "I think it debunks the myth that the Romneys can't relate to the American people. If you watch this ad you see that Ann Romney has overcome some serious adversity, which is something Americans can relate to. Hilary Rosen did visit the White House plenty of times and Maher has given tons of money to Obama, so I think it's fair."

Then O'Reilly had the Republican Adam Carolla on to cry about what he claims is bias at CBS News. While interviewing former CIA agent Jose Rodriguez, "60 Minutes" correspondent Lesley Stahl seemed to disapprove of the techniques he used to elicit information.

Adam Carolla disapproved of Stahl, saying this: "It's so easy to sit in the cheap seats and snipe at these guys who are trying to get information that will save American lives. We say 'torture doesn't work,' but it's been around for 5,000 years, most stuff that doesn't work goes the way of the dodo bird pretty quickly. So my question to Lesley Stahl is, what would you use to replace enhanced interrogation to get information out of people who are trying to kill Americans."

Playing devil's advocate, The Factor suggested that Stahl was simply trying to get Rodriguez riled up and passionate: "She was 'bear-baiting,' putting a little carrot by the bear so the bear gets angrier and angrier. That's a technique people use on television and I think you have to give her the benefit of the doubt."

Then Lou Dobbs was on to talk about the biased Rasmussen Poll that has Mitt Romney leading President Obama by seven points among likely voters. Which is just laughable, because it's a biased poll, and it was taken by LIKELY voters not registered voters.

Dobbs said this: "If we have to pick one event that caused this, the obvious one is the President's statement that he now supports same-sex marriage. That's the only variable at work here."

But here is something you will never hear on the Factor, another poll says 6 in 10 people will not change their vote because Obama is for gay marriage.

Dobbs turned to the massive loss suffered by banking giant JPMorgan Chase last week, saying this: "There was a $2 billion trading loss, which shook the markets and the banking industry. They used derivatives and their CEO Jamie Dimon is rattled because they haven't learned their lesson."

And finally Arthel Neville and Greg Gutfeld wrapped up the week with the dumbest people segment. Neville singled out a new website that helps prison inmates find love mates, saying this: "I don't know who's dumber, the people writing to the prisoners or the prisoners themselves. Prison is not a place for personal privileges!"

Gutfeld went with Barney Frank, who announced that he won't be inviting the President to his wedding, saying this: "He doesn't want his guests to have to go through a metal detector, which leads me to wonder what kind of awesome, freaky gifts they're bringing. This is going to be a great reception! But the President would ask everyone to spread the gifts around, and he would be angry because there's no dog on the menu."

Then the highly edited Factor mail, and the lame as ever pinheads and patriots garbage that nobody cares about.

O'Reilly Ignored Racist Trayvon Martin Gun Target Story
By: Steve - May 12, 2012 - 10:00am

An unidentified individual from Virginia is hoping to cash in on the tragic death of Trayvon Martin by selling gun range targets meant to resemble him.



While the targets do not have an actual photo of Martin, they do depict a silhouette of a hoodie clutching a can of iced tea and a pack of Skittles hanging out of the pocket, details pulled directly from the descriptions of Trayvon Martin on the night of February 26, when he was shot and killed by George Zimmerman.

According to a local news station in Orlando, the seller of the targets readily admits he’s hoping to make a profit over the tragic shooting of a teenager:
In an email exchange with reporter Mike DeForest, the seller wrote, “My main motivation was to make money off the controversy.”

The seller would not disclose how many paper targets had been made, but said in an email, “The response is overwhelming. I sold out in 2 days.”

Some of those targets were sold to two Florida gun dealers, according to the seller.
The fact that he sold out in 2 days is pretty clear proof there are a lot of racists left in America, a fact that O'Reilly continues to deny.

The listing, which appeared to have been posted on the online gun outlet store gunbroker.com, has been removed, although as of publication the Google Cache of the page is still available. For $8 plus shipping, anyone could purchase a 10-pack of the paper targets.

Mark O’Mara, the lawyer for Trayvon’s killer George Zimmerman, strongly rebuked the targets, calling it “hate-mongering.”

O'Reilly ignored this story because he does not want to report on the racism from the right, as he denies they are even racist.

The Thursday 5-10-12 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - May 11, 2012 - 11:00am

The TPM was called: The Politics of Gay Marriage. Crazy O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: With President Obama now telling the nation that he supports the right of homosexuals to marry, the issue becomes significant in his bid to be reelected. The economy will drive the vote, but social issues like gay marriage are important to many Americans.

My take is that it's a matter of conscience. Unlike abortion, no one gets hurt when gays marry, but it does have deep implications for what kind of society we want to be. Therefore, individual states should decide the question. So far seven states have made gay marriage legal, but 38 states have passed legislation opposing gay nuptials.

For President Obama, this is not a winning hand, he can pretty much say goodbye to North Carolina, which overwhelmingly voted against gay marriage this week. He may also lose currency in Virginia, Nevada, Florida and Ohio. The media, of course, is very happy about the President's change of heart.

And largely because of the press, it's just about impossible to have an honest debate about gay marriage. If you oppose it, you're a 'bigot' and a 'homophobe.' Most of the media will not even consider the traditional point of view on marriage. Again, gay marriage is a matter of conscience and it's the responsibility of the states to regulate it as they see fit.

The politics of gay marriage will most likely hurt President Obama's reelection chances, but it's doubtful that will be reported by the national press.
And now here is my take, I do not care if gay people marry or not, it is not an issue with me. But I will say this, anyone who is opposed to it is not for freedom, because in a so-called free country anyone should be able to marry anyone else, man or woman. And anyone who claims to support freedom, but is opposed to gay marriage, is a hypocrite that only says they support freedom.

Then O'Reilly talked about President Obama's declaration with political scientist Larry Sabato and Democratic strategist Margie Omero. Omero said this: "The question is whether this is a vote driver for the election, and I think folks who are strongly in favor of or against gay marriage have already made up their minds."

But Sabato suggested that same-sex marriage could have an impact, saying this: "This will be an election fundamentally about the economy, but millions of people will vote on social issues, whether it's abortion or guns or gay marriage."

The Factor declared that President Obama's endorsement of gay marriage will cost him in November, saying this: "He is not going to get one vote by coming out in favor of gay marriage, all liberal people were going to vote for him anyway. The swing state independents will swing more to Romney."

Now that may or may not be true, O'Reilly has no clue and what he said was pure speculation, which he claims to not allow on his show. O'Reilly also said something really stupid, he said all the people who oppose gay marriage will now stop voting for Obama. Which is just ridiculous, because some people who oppose gay marriage will still vote for Obama, and that one issue will not make them change their vote.

Then Jeanine Pirro and Gretchen Carlson were on to discuss Judge Michael Urbanski, who said that Moses had it all wrong, and has implied that six commandments are sufficient, at least in one location.

Carlson said this: "A school board in Virginia is being sued by a student and the ACLU, because they have the Ten Commandments posted on the grounds of a school. If it were there for religious purposes there would be a case, but the school says it's there as a historical document."

Pirro, a former judge herself, blasted Urbanski for his intolerance toward Christianity, saying this: "His suggestion that we get rid of the first four commandments is blasphemous, he is there to decide man's law and not God's law. I think the Ten Commandments will stand because the school also has the Declaration of Independence and the Star-Spangled Banner on display."

O'Reilly said this: "This was a provocation directed at people of faith, another example of our secular system saying we don't have any respect for you."

Then Father Jonathan Morris and Jonathan Merritt were on to talk about students at Jesuit-run Georgetown University, who have invited Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, a fierce defender of abortion, to speak at the school's graduation.

Morris said this: "The Jesuits and the board, are inviting the architect of the mandate that requires religious organizations to provide contraception and abortifacients. They're sticking their fingers in the eyes of the Catholic bishops and the church. It would be fine if she was there for a debate, but they are honoring her at a graduation ceremony!"

Merritt, despite describing himself as pro-life, contended that Sebelius should be invited, saying this: "We're living in a culture where everybody has a right to everything, and people think they have a right not to be offended, not to have to listen to somebody they disagree with. Let her give her arguments and I'll give mine."

O'Reilly reminded everyone that Sebelius, while governor of Kansas, saying this: "She actively supported a doctor (Tiller) who was killing babies up until a minute before they were born for no reason."

Which is ridiculous, and O'Reilly has no proof of that. What Dr. Tiller was doing was 100% legal and it was done for medical reasons, and he was even found guilty of the charges. O'Reilly has even called him Tiller The Baby Killer in the past, but he sure never reported any of that during this segment Thursday night.

Then the former FBI agent Ali Soufan was on to dispute what former CIA agent Jose Rodriguez, who was involved in the waterboarding of suspected terrorists said, he insists that enhanced interrogation helped foil terror plots and saved lives.

Soufan said this: "Mr. Rodriguez is totally wrong. The CIA's own investigation of the program revealed that not one imminent attack was stopped because of enhanced interrogation techniques. I don't think we need waterboarding to save lives."

But O'Reilly still maintained that enhanced interrogation may have prevented attacks, saying this: "You weren't there when Abu Zubaydah was being waterboarded and Rodriguez says the waterboarding led to very vital intelligence and saved thousands of lives. If I were you, I don't think I could call him a liar if I wasn't there."

Which is also ridiculous, because Soufan knows what info they got and he says what Rodriguez said is a lie that the right is putting out to justify torture under Bush. And of course O'Reilly supports and defends it, because he is a biased Republican who is covering for Bush and the torture he approved.

Then Megyn Kelly was on to talk about a New York court that dismissed child porn charges against a college professor, declaring it perfectly legal to watch child pornography on the Internet.

Kelly said this: "The judges are focused on the language of the statute, and in New York State to be guilty of possessing child pornography you have to actually 'possess' it. So if you download or save it, you're guilty, but if it's just in the cache of your computer, that doesn't qualify. The New York legislature needs to revise the law, which is thirty years old."

Kelly also assessed the prosecution's case against former Senator John Edwards, who is accused of illegally misusing campaign funds, saying this: "They presented a solid case and could get a conviction. The prosecution needed to prove that he knew about the payments that were being made to his mistress and that the payments were meant to hide the affair from the American public."

And finally Martha MacCallum and Steve Doocy were on for the total waste of time Factor News Quiz, that I do not report on because it's nonsense. But I will say this, MacCallum and Doocy are idiots, they work for a news network and they still get most of the questions wrong.

Then the highly edited Factor mail, and the lame as ever pinheads and patriots garbage.

Fox Now Asking If Drop In Gas Prices Is A Bad Thing
By: Steve - May 11, 2012 - 10:00am

If you wanted a perfect example of right-wing bias (by Fox News against President Obama) you could not find a better example than this.

For months and months Fox News has hyped the rise in gasoline prices, blaming President Obama even though experts agree that worldwide market factors, not U.S. policies, set gas prices. So what is Fox saying now that gas prices are falling?

They are asking if the drop in gas prices is a good or a bad thing. Really? Are they serious, yes they are, because they are biased right-wing hacks.

Stuart Varney, the Fox Business host, tried to explain the claim that the recent gas price drop might be "BAD," saying it may be "just a sign of a weakening economy."

The Wall Street Journal reported that one of the reasons for the drop in gas prices was the "softening economies in the U.S. and Europe," along with easing tensions in Iran and changes in the oil market.

Note that Fox is now raising how worldwide economic factors are affecting gas prices, after spending weeks blaming Obama for the price increase since the president's inauguration.

Fox won't explain that the extremely low price in January 2009 was a short-lived drop caused by the massive economic recession. In fact, last week on Fox News, Varney explicitly said with a straight face that the price increase since the bottom of the recession had "everything to do with" Obama, but the recent drop in gas prices "has nothing to do with" him.

Which is the exact same thing O'Reilly does on the stock market reporting. When the market drops O'Reilly blames Obama and says wall street does not like his liberal policies. But when the market goes up O'Reilly does not give Obama credit for it, in fact, he ignores it and does not even report the increases. He also fails to mention the DOW is up 6,000 points since Obama took office. Not once has O'Reilly reported it.

And btw, Varney said the exact opposite during the 2011 price spike, acknowledging that "higher gas prices are the result of the expanding global economy and turmoil in the Middle East," not Obama's drilling policies.

This isn't the only issue on which Varney -- who has admitted that he is "very partisan" -- reversed himself recently. It's almost as if there's something different about 2012 that would make Fox's purported economic analyst revise his commentary.

Fox Hosts Conservative Who Said Women Should Not Vote
By: Steve - May 11, 2012 - 9:00am

Back in March Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson gave a sermon in which he spent 10 minutes lecturing his audience about how women have destroyed America. Lee is a radical Republican pastor who says that allowing women to vote was “one of the greatest mistakes that America made.”

“Look at every place where a women is in control,” said Peterson. “You see nothing but confusion. There’s no good in it at all, none.”

Peterson’s sermon began with comments about Sandra Fluke, doubling down on Rush Limbaugh’s slut remarks. But halfway through his speech, he said women are evil:
PETERSON: “I think that one of the greatest mistakes that America made was to allow women the opportunity to vote. We should have never turned that over to women.”

“It was a big mistake, these women are voting in the wrong people. They’re voting in people who are evil, who agree with them. Men in the good old days understood the nature of the women, they were not afraid to deal with them.”

“Wherever women are taking over, evil reigns.”
Then just last week, Sean Hannity, who even sits on the board of Peterson’s group BOND: Brotherhood Organization for a New Destiny, invited him to sit on his Great American Panel once again to discuss the president’s comments on the one-year anniversary of the death of Osama bin Laden.

But the conversation never quite made it that far. Because Kirsten Powers, a Democratic Fox News columnist and political analyst, abandoned the segment to hit back against Peterson and his anti-women views, over the objections of Hannity who wanted to spend his time attacking President Obama.

For two minutes, Powers and Peterson exchanged barbs while Hannity and the third panelist, Indiana state Treasurer Richard Mourdock (R), sat quietly on the sidelines. Powers told Hannity that she had no idea Peterson would be a guest on the show alongside her, and invited him to repudiate Peterson’s remarks (and Hannity declined).

Peterson has made appearances on Fox News for years, fielding frequent invites from Hannity in particular despite Peterson’s history of hateful comments.

And it’s not like Hannity had no warning. Peterson has previously said he “thanks God for slavery, because had it not, the blacks that are here would have been stuck in Africa.”

He also called the victims of Hurricane Katrina “welfare-pampered,” “lazy,” and “immoral.”

And while Powers was outraged at Fox News decision to offer Lee a national platform, Hannity was unapologetic, quickly shutting down the discussion and moving on to his normal agenda of attacking the president.

Peterson was also a regular on the Glenn Beck show when it was on Fox. And of course you never hear a word about any of this from O'Reilly, but if Peterson was on MSNBC or CNN O'Reilly would be all over it like white on rice.

Hot Links

O'Reilly Ignores MRC Calling For Sharpton Firing

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Wrong On The Deficit

O'Reilly & Fox Lie That Obama To Blame For High Gas Prices

Scientist Group Slams Celebs Like Snooki & O'Reilly

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About America

O'Reilly & Ingraham Lied About Planned Parenthood (Again)

Fox Unemployment Chart Shows Their Right-Wing Bias

U.S. Troops Burn A Box Of O'Reilly's Books

Kelly & O'Reilly Make Up Another Green Energy Scandal

O'Reilly Ignoring All The Stock Market Increases

O'Reilly Flat Out LIED About The Debt Obama Added

O'Reilly Caught Doctoring Florida Mans E-Mail

O'Reilly Ignored Michele Bachmann Church Scandal

O'Reilly & Morris Lied About The Debt Polls

O'Reilly Hypocrisy On The West/Schultz Story

The Truth About Those Bush Tax Cuts

Number Of Tea Party Events Down 50 Percent

NWLC Says O'Reilly Statement Made Up & Offensive

Video Proof O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Hack

O'Reilly Gets It Totally Wrong On Norway Terrorist

Norway Terrorist Info O'Reilly Ignored

O'Reilly Ignoring Ensign/Coburn Hush Money Scandal

O'Reilly Calls Obama Health Care Waivers A Scam

O'Reilly Complains About Losing In His Own Poll

O'Reilly Ignores Republican Hypocrisy On Judicial Filibusters

O'Reilly Ignoring Republican Unpopularity

O'Reilly Tells GOP How To Beat Obama With Scare Tactics

O'Reilly & Fox Are Lying To You About The Debt

O'Reilly Spins The 2008 Presidential Media Study

Important Tax Information Bill O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Ignored McCain Op-Ed On Bin Laden

O'Reilly Scrubs Website & Podcast Of False Obama Claims

O'Reilly Ignored DOJ Black Panther Report

O'Reilly Still Ignoring Wisconsin Judge's Order Story

O'Reilly Ignored Jobs & Unemployment Report

Fox News Town Hall Protester Hypocrisy & Double Standards

O'Reilly & Varney Speculate About Oil Prices

O'Reilly Spins The Quinnipiac Temperature Poll

O'Reilly Proves How Stupid He Is Again

How O'Reilly Puts Out Right-Wing Propaganda

Fox News Insider Admits They Make Things Up

Luntz Admits Fox Has Anti-Obama Focus Groups

Reagan SG Says Health Care Bill Constitutional

O'Reilly Ignores Gore Answer To His Question

O'Reilly Wonders How The Moon Got There

More Republican Hate & Racism O'Reilly Has Ignored

Another Poll O'Reilly Has Totally Ignored

O'Reilly Thinks We Are Still In A Recession

O'Reilly's Nazi Comment Defense Was Laughable

O'Reilly Caught Lying About China & India

Fox News The Least Trusted Cable News Network

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media (Again)

O'Reilly Claims Estate Tax A Seizure Of Property

O'Reilly Called Bernie Sanders A Loon

Bloomberg Tax Cut Poll Proves O'Reilly Was Lying

O'Reilly Ignored Positive DADT Study & Story

O'Reilly & Fox Ignore Judge Being A 9-11 Truther

More Real News O'Reilly Has Ignored

More Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Ratings

O'Reilly Got The Ireland Economic Crisis Wrong

O'Reilly Ignored The Tom Delay Conviction Story

Women Of America: You Need To Read This

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly Is Dishonest & Crazy

O'Reilly Nazi Comparison Hypocrisy

O'Reilly Ignores New Poll While Promoting Paladino

Andrew Sullivan Called O'Reilly A Dishonest Propagandist

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Nevada RCP Senate Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Right-Wing Abortion Bomber Terrorism Story

Fox & O'Reilly Ignored Friday Pro-Mosque NY Rally

O'Reilly Busted For Health Insurance Premium Lies

Most Factor Gear Made in Vietnam And China

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

O'Reilly Busted For 1st Time Retraction Lie

The Bill O'Reilly Non-Apology Shirley Sherrod Apology

O'Reilly & The Right Are Racist Idiots

O'Reilly Ignored Tea Party Express Racism Story

O'Reilly Compares Gay People To Al-Qaeda

Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Rating Polls

O'Reilly Ignored Mark Kirk Military Award Lie Story

Where Are The Sedition Charges Now O'Reilly

O'Reilly Caught In A Massive Lie About Jail Time

O'Reilly Running Ads For Emergency Food Supply

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Tea Party Militia Links

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Gallup Tea Party Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Harris Poll Showing Republicans Are Stupid

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Health Reform Bill Tax

O'Reilly Caught Lying About NEJM Health Care Survey

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

The Truth About Ratings For News Shows

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Spin Doctor

O'Reilly Spinning Fox News Most Trusted Poll

Fox News Did Not Air Hope For Haiti Telethon

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Obama Terrorism Polls

O'Reilly Caught Lying About House Ethics Committee

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Increase

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Limbaugh Racism

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Religious Festival

O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Lying About CNN

O'Reilly Caught Violating Journalistic Standards Again

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The ACLU & Racial Profiling

More Proof O'Reilly & FOX News Do Not Tell The Truth

O'Reilly Called Bruce Springsteen Un-American & Un-Patriotic

The Bill O'Reilly Senate Torture Report Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Obama Approval Numbers

FOX News Caught Lying About Obama Budget

O'Reilly Busted For Helping GOP Smear Pelosi

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Obama Earmark Promise

Military.com Report Proves O'Reilly Wrong About Homeless Vets

O'Reilly Places 7th in 2008 Wingnut of The Year Award

O'Reilly Denys Reality About Abstinence Only Programs




Proof The O'Reilly Factor is Biased Against Barack Obama
O'Reilly said he is a non-partisan Independent, who is fair to both sides, and that he has been fair to Barack Obama. To check that claim I did a 3 month study of the Factor, it started on August 1st, 2008, and ran until October 31st, 2008. I watched the Factor every night and counted the negative and positive comments for Obama and McCain.

Visit the web page I set up, and you will see the stunning bias from O'Reilly and his mostly Republican guests against Barack Obama. Then you will see there is no doubt Bill O'Reilly is a dishonest and biased Conservative. This study is conclusive proof that O'Reilly is in the tank for John McCain.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The 3 Month Factor Bias Study:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/3mbiasnumbers.htm

Proof O'Reilly Lied About The Balance on His Show
O'Reilly claims the factor is balanced, and that he personally makes sure every week he has an equal number of Republican and Democrat guests. This is a bold faced lie, and I can prove it. I put together a web page that shows the guest list from the factor for the last 2 weeks. Read it and you will see with your own eyes that Bill O'Reilly is lying when he says the factor is balanced.

And remember that we are 3 weeks before a major Presidential election, or the Republican bias numbers would be worse than it is normally. O'Reilly is actually having more Democrats on than he usually does, and the balance is still not even close. If we were not so close to an election it would be a lot worse.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The Lies About The Factor Balance:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillybalanced.htm

O'Reilly Sucks Investigation: Dishonesty, Deception, And Bias By Bill O'Reilly
O'Reilly claims there are no Republicans or Conservative groups that rival George Soros. O'Reilly said the top three conservative tax-exempt foundations are totally dwarfed by Soros and the radical Ford Foundation. And that they have 15 times more the assets. George Soros net worth is $8.5 billion, the Ford Foundation has a net worth of $13 billion. But the seven billionaires who donate to Newt Gingrich and other right-wing causes have a combined net worth of $34.8 billion dollars.

Somehow O'Reilly claims that Soros and the Ford Foundation have 15 times more the assets than anyone on the right. When the seven billionaires alone who give money to Newt, have roughly $14 billion more than Soros and the Ford Foundation combined.

Visit the web page below to see the massive money O'Reilly has ignored from the right:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreilly-investigation.htm

(( Right-Wing Hate Speech Ignored by Bill O'Reilly ))
O'Reilly claims there is no hate on the right, that it's all on the left. But the way he defines hate is ridiculous, if a liberal blog or website writes an article that criticizes George W. Bush (or any Republican) O'Reilly calls it hate. When it's not hate, it's reporting the facts, there is no hate. A great example is when websites like oreilly-sucks.com, mediamatters.org, etc. criticize O'Reilly he calls it hate, and says they are hate groups who lie about him.

That is a lie, it is not hate, and they are not hate websites. There is real hate on the internet, but O'Reilly does not report it, because most of it is from the right. I have documented this hate in my blog and on a web page, all of it was ignored by Bill O'Reilly, and it was never reported on the Factor.

Visit the web page below to see the massive right-wing hate O'Reilly has ignored:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/right-wing-hate.htm

O'Reilly Phone Sex Scandal Information
On October 13, 2004 FOX News producer Andrea Mackris filed a lawsuit against Bill O'Reilly.

In that lawsuit she claims he subjected her to repeated instances of sexual harassment and spoke often, and explicitly, to her about phone sex, vibrators, threesomes, masturbation, the loss of his virginity, and sexual fantasies.



After hearing of the lawsuit O'Reilly said it was all lies, that it was a shakedown for money, that he would fight it to the bitter end with no settlement, and that he would let the courts decide the matter. That was all before O'Reilly found out she had recorded his phone calls. Then Mr. I will fight her lies to the bitter end with no settlement, paid her $10 million dollars to settle the lawsuit, get the tapes, and shut her up. The out-of-court settlement came on the eve of a courtroom fight over audiotapes, reports CBS News Correspondent Kelly Cobiella.

The smokinggun.com has the entire 22 page lawsuit

Start an online petition to send a message.

www.oreilly-sucks.com Privacy Policy

Copyright 2001 - 2009

eXTReMe Tracker