|
| Advertise | Contact | About This Web Site | Webmaster Information |
|
Astonishing online blackjack tables can be found in this extraordinary online casino website.
January - 2010 February - 2010 March - 2010 January - 2009 February - 2009 March - 2009 April - 2009 May - 2009 June - 2009 July - 2009 August - 2009 September - 2009 October - 2009 November - 2009 December - 2009 January - 2008 February - 2008 March - 2008 April - 2008 May - 2008 June - 2008 July - 2008 August - 2008 September - 2008 October - 2008 November - 2008 December - 2008 March - 2007 April - 2007 May - 2007 June - 2007 July - 2007 August - 2007 September - 2007 October - 2007 November - 2007 December - 2007 2001-06 Blog Archives 2006-07 Blog Archives
|
The Factor Guest List Count Archives
Monday - 3-15-10 -- O'Reilly - 3,769,000 NOTE: Tuesday night O'Reilly told Brit Hume he had 6 million viewers on his Monday show, notice that 3.769 million is not 6 million. Hannity - 2,937,000 Beck - 2,361,000 Tuesday - 3-16-10 -- O'Reilly - 3,525,000 Hannity - 2,411,000 Beck - 2,408,000 Wednesday - 3-17-10 -- O'Reilly - 3,650,000 Hannity - 2,565,000 Beck - 2,465,000 Weekly Factor Average - 0,000,000
By: Steve - March 21, 2010 - 11:30am O'Reilly, Lou Dobbs, and almost everyone on the right argue that we should protect our borders and not allow anyone in the country illegally. They also argue that we should deport any illegal immigrants, but they never tell you how much that would hurt the economy, the GDP, or how much it would cost. Now I agree that we should protect our borders and try to keep people from entering the country illegally. But it is impossible to deport all the illegal immigrants that are here now. You can not find them all, and the cost would be insane. None of this is ever reported by O'Reilly or Dobbs when they have their biased discussions on the issue. They just demand we protect the borders and deport all illegal immigrants. While ignoring all the details, like these. A new study released last Thursday by the Center for American Progress shows that the enforcement-only approach is not sustainable in the long-term. The CAP study says that a strategy aimed at deporting the nation's population of undocumented immigrants would cost $285 billion over five years. A deportation-only policy would amount to $922 in new taxes for every man, woman, and child in the country. O'Reilly and Dobbs never report that fact, O'Reilly has even recently said the country is broke, and that we can not afford any new spending, he even called for Obama to put a spending freeze in place. Which does not explain how we could spend $285 billion to deport all the illegal immigrants. The study also said this: The undeniable conclusion from these findings is that the federal price tag to deport all undocumented immigrants currently in the United States is prohibitive.Here is more from the study that O'Reilly and Dobbs never mention. Even if the U.S. did not try to deport every single undocumented immigrant, the costs associated with any large-scale deportation program like the O'Reilly/dobbs and the anti-immigration groups propose are significant. The CAP study estimates that it would cost $23,148 for each person to be apprehended, detained, legally processed, and finally transported out of the country. Now take that $23.000 dollars times 12 million, and that is a lot of money, that we do not have. Ultimately, anti-immigration groups couldn't even wish undocumented immigrants away for free. In a paper released in January, UCLA professor Raul Hinojosa-Ojeda published research which found that if undocumented immigrants were removed from the economy, it would reduce our GDP by $2.6 trillion over ten years. Hinojosa-Ojeda also showed that if undocumented immigrants were put on an earned path to legalization as part of a comprehensive immigration reform package, it would result in at least $1.5 trillion in added U.S. gross domestic product over 10 years. funny how O'Reilly and Dobbs never report any of that information. They fail to report it because they do not want you to have all the facts, they just want you to know what they tell you. It's called bias, they only report what they want you to see, not all the facts. More Racism & Hate O'Reilly Will Ignore By: Steve - March 21, 2010 - 10:30am Today was a sad day for the Tea Party crowd, they showed their true colors, and you can bet the farm O'Reilly will not report a word of this on Monday, as he never does. Because it involves racism and hate from the right, which O'Reilly is a part of as a Tea Party supporter and promoter. Abusive, derogatory and even racist behavior directed at House Democrats by Tea Party protesters on Saturday left several lawmakers in shock. Preceding the president's speech to a gathering of House Democrats, thousands of Tea Party protesters descended around the Capitol to protest the passage of health care reform. The gathering quickly turned into abusive heckling, as members of Congress passing through Longworth House office building were subjected to epithets and even mild physical abuse. A staffer for Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.) told reporters that Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) had been spat on by a protestor. Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), a hero of the civil rights movement, was called a 'ni--er.' And Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) was called a "faggot," as protestors shouted at him with deliberately lisp-y screams. Frank, approached in the halls after the president's speech, shrugged off the incident. But Clyburn was downright incredulous, saying he had not witnessed such treatment since he was leading civil rights protests in South Carolina in the 1960s. "It was absolutely shocking to me," Clyburn said. "Last Monday, this past Monday, I stayed home to meet on the campus of Claflin University where fifty years ago as of last Monday... I led the first demonstrations in South Carolina, the sit ins... And quite frankly I heard some things today I have not heard since that day. I heard people saying things that I have not heard since March 15, 1960 when I was marching to try and get off the back of the bus."Rep. Emanuel Cleaver's office released the following statement: For many of the members of the CBC, like John Lewis and Emanuel Cleaver who worked in the civil rights movement, and for Mr. Frank who has struggled in the cause of equality, this is not the first time they have been spit on during turbulent times.ThinkProgress is reporting that they saw racist, offensive, and threatning signs at the protest. One sign had an image of a semi-auto Browning pistol, and the text said this: If Brown can't stop it, a Browning can. Other signs had Obama as Hitler, Obama as a voo-doo witch doctor, an undocumented worker, a socialist with his head coming out a horses ass, etc. Now think about this, these are the people Fox News and O'Reilly support. Remember when Ann Coulter was simply heckled during a speech O'Reilly reported on it and called it hate from the left. But the Tea Party people spit on Democratic Congressman and call them the n-word, and O'Reilly will most likely not say a word about any of it, because he never does. And btw, if O'Reilly is a nonpartisan independent as he claims, why did the Tea Party protesters make a sign thanking, Fox, Rush, Glenn, Sean, and Bill. What say you Billy? I will report back on Tuesday and let everyone know if O'Reilly reported any of this, or not. I am betting he ignores it, just like he does anything that makes the Tea Party or any other Republicans look bad. The Friday 3-19-10 O'Reilly Factor Review By: Steve - March 20, 2010 - 10:00am Laura (far right) Ingraham hosted for O'Reilly. Here is my question, how can you claim to be a nonpartisan independent with a no spin zone, when your show is on the Fox News Network, your fill in host is the far right Ann Coulter wanna be Laura Ingraham, and no Independents or Democrats ever fill in, only Republicans, just asking. The TPM was called New Obama Health Care Strategy. Ingraham claimed that Obama is changing the focus of the health care debate away from the content of the bill to what it's going to do to the quality of our health care. This is ridiculous, and nothing but right-wing propaganda from the crazy lying Laura Ingraham. What Obama is doing is telling the people the truth about what is in the bill, to counter all the lies Ingraham, O'Reilly, and everyone at Fox News are saying about it. She is right about one thing, Obama is trying to change the focus, to what is actually in the bill, instead of all the lies the right is putting out on it. And as usual Ingraham lied about the bill increasing abortions with federal money, that's a lie, no federal money will be used for abortions. Ingraham also said the "Obama health care plan is the biggest con job that has ever been foisted on the American people. This bill will become the platform for reaching the real goal President Obama has wanted all along - a single-payer system." And my God that would be the worst thing ever, not. We should have a single payer health care system for all, then everyone would pay a set amount and have health care. Then God forbid we give all our people health care, it would be the end of the world, not. Then Dick Morris was on to spew out his Glenn Beck type insanity, Morris said: "If Obama passes this, I think he's going to use reconciliation to run the table. He'll pass amnesty for illegal immigrants, he'll pass cap-and-trade, he'll pass a public option, and he'll pass financial regulation. He's got his own little Constitution going here." Then Ingraham had two Democrats on, Mary Anne Marsh and Nancy Skinner. Ingraham asked if their party will be routed in November. Marsh said: "Democrats want health care reform, while Republicans and independents don't. But independents care more about the deficit than anything else, so if Democrats can convince some independents that the health care bill will reduce the deficit, they can win in November." And Skinner pointed out that the GOP is also wildly unpopular. "People think Republicans in Congress are just trying to block Obama and that they're doing a lousy job. As soon as this bill passes, all the fear-mongering will be over, people will be happy and the polls will change." Ingraham suggested that Democrats will pay a huge price for health care reform in November. The two guests disagreed, as I do. I think once it's passed and the people see what they are actually getting most of them will be happy, so Ingraham is just full of it. She is saying what she hopes will happen, not what is most likely to happen. If it's passed, then some jobs come back and the economy approves, the Obama approval and the approval for Congress will go back up and the Democrats will do ok in Novemebr. Then crazy Ingraham had Democratic Congressman Luis Gutierrez on, who said he will vote "yes" on health care reform. Gutierrez said: "Now I see a President who is more focused and energetic and committed. He can not unilaterally solve the plight of 10-million undocumented workers in this country, but we are going in the right direction." Ingraham implied that Gutierrez was promised something in exchange for his vote on health care. he denied that and said: "I got a commitment," Gutierrez replied, "that immigration reform will be pursued with vigor and energy. The White House is going to be engaged." Then Ingraham said he is not a good catholic because the Bishops and the church oppose abortion. Gutierrez killed her lies and spin real quick, he said he was elected to Congress by the people to represent them, not the church, and he also told crazy Ingraham to remember that there is a separation of church and state he must go by. Which crushed Ingrahams right-wing abortion nonsense real fast, then the segment was over. Then crazy Ingraham had another segment on the health care bill. She had the Fox News doctor, Manny Alvarez on. He said: "I know thousands of doctors, and I can count on one hand those who agree with this health care bill. Doctors will leave the practice if this socialized medicine bill passes, which will destroy health care as we know it in America." What a shocker, the Fox news medical analyst is opposed to the Obama health care bill, shocking, not! The other guest, emergency room physician Dr. Mark Morocco came down strongly in favor of the bill. He said: "100% of doctors have considered leaving medicine over the last fifteen years because of what's happening in this completely market-driven system we have now. What we have now is worse than socialized medicine and we have to get back to pure doctor-patient relationships." And btw, Dr. Morocco also said that a lot of people he operates on now have no health care at all, so we pay for it already, and pay more than we would under the Obama plan. Ingraham admitted that is true, but dismissed it anyway, and moved on real quick to let the Fox News guy talk again. It was sort of a balanced segment, but Dr. Morocco barely got a word in, both Ingraham and Alvarez constantly talked over him, and tried to keep people from hearing what he was saying. Ingraham and Alvarez dominated the time. Then Ingraham had two more segments on health care, where they just said the same things as in the other segments. And one segment on closing Gitmo, she said the White House is reportedly close to a deal that will close the prison at Guantanamo Bay in exchange for trying suspected terrorists in military courts. But we do not know if that is true yet or not, and if it applies to all terrorists. Only time will tell, and nobody knows for sure yet. If it is true, I would say Obama made a mistake and caved in to right-wing pressure. Which is not good, and will most likely cause his approval rating to go even lower. And btw, Ingraham was far more balanced than O'Reilly ever is, even though she is a far right nut job, she had 6 Democratic guests, to only 3 Republicans guests, 4 if you include her, which I do. This never happens when O'Reilly is the host, he usually has 6 to 8 Republican guests, and 1 to 3 Democratic guests, he never has more Democrats than Republicans, ever, not one time. O'Reilly Ignoring Republican Senator Affair Story By: Steve - March 20, 2010 - 9:30am As we all know O'Reilly has devoted a lot of reporting to the John Edwards affair story, even though he is not in the Senate anymore, or in any elected office. I would guess O'Reilly has done at least 10 segment on the John Edwards/Rielle Hunter affair story. And of course John Edwards is a former Democratic Senator. Now guess how many stories O'Reilly has done on the Republican Senator John Ensign's affair. Answer, none, zero, zip, nada. And John Ensign is a current Senator, he is serving right now, yet O'Reilly has totally ignored the story, because he is a Republican. And that's not all, just two days ago on March 18th, The National Republican Senatorial Committee was subpoenaed by a federal grand jury to provide documents from when Ensign was its chairman and having an extramarital affair with the wife of Doug Hampton, one of his top aides. But O'Reilly has still ignored the entire story, even though he does a legal segment every week with two lawyers. And that's not all, The recent issuance of subpoenas by the U.S. Department of Justice in addition to the Senate Ethics Committee indicates a new phase in the investigations, casting further doubt on the political future of Ensign, who a year ago was a rising GOP star. But O'Reilly has still ignored the entire story. This is a big story, involving a sitting Senator, sex, corruption, bribes, payoffs, and on and on, yet O'Reilly ignores it all because the Senator is a Republican. Here is more. 3-18-10 -- The subpoenas stem from probes into the allegations that Ensign tried to illegally solicit lobbying contracts from Nevada firms for his former aide. Ensign has acknowledged a nine-month extramarital affair with Cindy Hampton, who was also in the senator's employ, from December 2007 to August 2008. The two-term senator, who turns 52 on March 25, has become a somewhat isolated figure in the Senate, fighting to be heard on health care and other issues while some colleagues are hesitant to be seen with him, according to reports in the Capitol Hill press. One Nevada Republican insider who didn't want to be identified by name said people in political circles are angry at Ensign over the entire episode. "What he has done is jeopardize a U.S. Senate seat and bring embarrassment to his state, not to mention subpoenas to people who have nothing to do with it," the insider said. And that's not all, Apart from whether Ensign improperly aided Hampton in finding work, investigators area also looking into a $96,000 check that Ensign's parents made out to the Hamptons in April 2008. But O'Reilly has ignored the entire story, on a sitting Republican Senator, as he reports all the time on the John Edwards affair, who is a former Democratic Senator. This is basically the same thing John Edwards did, and yet O'Reilly never says a word about it. If that's not bias, what is? Republicans Caught Lying About Pelosi Approval By: Steve - March 20, 2010 - 9:00am The lies just never stop, yesterday while discussing the political fallout from health care on Hannity, The right-wing nut S.E. Cupp jumped in to hammer Pelosi when Sean Hannity brought up Obama's and Congress' approval ratings; Cupp falsely suggested that Pelosi has a 3 percent approval rating. Cupp announced that a new poll had Pelosi at 3 -- 3 -- 3" Hannity interjected: Percent? Cupp, laughing, replied: "Yeah -- 3," adding, "Terrible." Then she laughed some more. Too bad it's all a lie, and just more proof that nobody can trust anything a Republican on Fox News says. Here is the actual poll question: 3. Do you approve or disapprove of the job Nancy Pelosi is doing as speaker of the House?Do you see a 3% in there, I sure as hell don't. Her approval rating is 31%, not 3% as S.E. Cupp claimed. Now later in the very same poll the question asked who do you have the most RESPECT for, Obama, Pelosi, or Supreme Court Justice John Roberts. Here is question #9: 9. Which one of following people do you have the most respect for -- President Barack Obama, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, or Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts?That is where the 3% comes from, it was not her approval rating, it was in the question that asked who you have the most respect for. Proving that S.E. Cupp and Sean Hannity are about as dishonest as you can get. Because they knew exactly what was in the poll, yet they still lied about it. You may ask, how did they know, because the poll was done by Fox News, the very network they both work for. Then O'Reilly jumped on the smear Pelosi bandwagon with lies, last night he did almost the same thing as S.E. Cupp. O'Reilly couldn't help himself, saying this on his show: O'REILLY: One poll said -- you know what Nancy Pelosi's approval rating is? Three percent. It's not a straight approval rating question -- it's who do you trust? And they listed Obama, and somebody else, and then Pelosi at 3 percent."Lies, Lies, Lies. First O'Reilly used the lie that her approval rating was 3%, then he admitted it was not a straight approval rating, then he lied again by saying it's a who do you trust poll. Both lies, because it asked who do you have the most respect for, the word trust was not used anywhere, ever. Not to mention, O'Reilly never once disclosed the fact that it was a FOX NEWS POLL. Hey Billy, what happened to full disclosure, not only was there no full disclosure, there was no disclosure at all. It was a fricking FOX NEWS POLL, so of course nobody taking it is going to have any respect for Nancy Pelosi. Making that poll worthless, and yet O'Reilly, S.E. Cupp, and Hannity all lied about it. Folks, this is dishonest and biased journalism. Right here in black and white, one lies and the other one swears to it. They just make it up, and then fail to disclose that their own News Network ran the poll. O'Reilly is a biased fraud, and this just puts another nail in his coffin. It goes on forever, every day it's just more lies and more bias from O'Reilly and everyone at Fox News. Notice what O'Reilly and S.E. Cupp are not reporting, that the approval for Congress is always around 30%, because everyone hates the Congress, hell I even hate the Congress. They do not report that approval for Republicans in Congress is 25%, with 59% disapproval, they never report that. What they also fail to report is that the Repubublican leader John Boehner has a far lower approval rating than Pelosi, she is at 31%, he is at 15%, but O'Reilly and Fox never report that. Republican Mitch McConnell is even lower at 22% approval, yet they never tell you that. And this is the guy who tells he is a nonpartisan independent with a no spin zone. Which is just ridiculous, he is a partisan spin doctor, with an all spin zone, who is not even close to fair and balanced. Just read what I wrote here, it's 100% conclusive proof that O'Reilly is a liar, and a right-wing liar. Rush Limbaugh Shows How Stupid He Is By: Steve - March 20, 2010 - 8:30am I normally do not report on anything Rush Limbaugh says, just as I normally do not report what Sean Hannity says either. But this one time I will, to show what idiots Limbaugh and all the people on the right like him are. Here is the set up, on his Thursday 3-18-10 radio show Limbaugh said that Planned Parenthood is giddy because of all the new abortions that will happen if the Obama health care bill is passed. To begin with, Limbaugh is lying. There will not be any extra abortions if the Obama health care bill is passed, nothing will change, the abortion law will stay exactly the way it is right now. In fact, the bill specifically says no federal funds can be used for abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or the health of the mother, which is exactly what the law says now. But I want to address the fact that Limbaugh said Planned Parenthood will be giddy if there are more abortions. This is ridiculous right-wing propaganda, liberals that are pro-choice do not get giddy if someone has an abortion. I am pro-choice, but I do not get giddy when any woman gets an abortion. Especially if she is not married, and can not financially support the child. I believe if she does not want the child she should have it anyway, then put it up for adoption. But that is just my opinion, and I would never tell a woman what to do with her body. If she has an abortion I do not like it, but I support her decision. I am not happy, or giddy, when a woman gets an abortion, as Limbaugh claims. I am pro-choice, but that does not mean I like it when a woman gets an abortion. It means I support whatever the woman decides to do with her body, it's called freedom. In fact, I am insulted when right-wing idiots like Rush Limbaugh say liberals are giddy when women get abortions. Nothing could be further from the truth, we are not giddy, we just think it's a decision the woman should make. Idiots on the right think liberals like it when women get abortions, which is just insane. I am writing this to defend pro-choice Americans, to say Rush Limbaugh is wrong, and to say he is an idiot. What a pro-choice person supports is freedom, real freedom, not the pretend freedom the right-wing idiots like Limbaugh claim to support. I support a woman having the freedom to decide what to do with her own body, that's real freedom. Limbaugh and the pro-life idiots want to supress their freedoms, by telling them what to do with their own body, that's not freedom, it's communism. I do not support abortions, and I do not oppose them, I support letting the woman decide what she wants to do. And it would not make me happy if abortions increased, in fact, it would make me sad. Because I think that future child has a right to be born, but that is just my opinion. Who knows, a child that is aborted could grow up to cure cancer, or do something else like that, but if they are not born that can clearly never happen. That is why I believe every possible child should be born, but that is my personal opinion that I would never impose on anyone else. They also claim pro-choice means pro-abortion, this is another lie. It means just what it says, pro-choice, we support the womans right to choose whether to have an abortion or not. We are not pro-abortion, we are pro-choice and pro-freedom. And we do not run around telling women what to do with their body, or go get a gun and kill an abortion doctor. That's what they do on the right, kill doctors. Talk about radical, that's radical. And they do it over what someone they do not even know did with their own body. In closing, Rush Limbaugh is a fricking idiot. Liberals do not get giddy at the thought of increased abortions, we simply support freedom, we do not just talk it like Republicans, we actually live it and believe in it. that is why I am pro-choice, because it equals freedom. O'Reilly & Beck (The Two stooges) By: Steve - March 19, 2010 - 9:30am In video #1 Beck proves that he is a biased partisan idiot, he is saying you should leave your church if the preacher tells you to help your fellow man, which is what Churches do, yet Beck seems to not understand that. In video #2 Beck claims progressives view of social justice is a perversion of religion. When Beck can barely even spell religion, and O'Reilly is just as bad as he is for putting this nut on the air. It's amazing that Fox News can call this garbage journalism, when it's nothing more than right-wing propaganda and lies. And the sad part is that Fox is proud of Beck, hell they even defend him. When he should probably be in a mental institution getting professional help. The Thursday 3-18-10 O'Reilly Factor Review By: Steve - March 19, 2010 - 9:00am The TPM was called Obama-Care Closing In. Once again O'Reilly talked about the Obama health care bill for the hundredth time. And as usual O'Reilly spent the entire talking points memo spewing out right-wing lies to get everyone to oppose it. The only thing he reported about it that was true is that there might be a vote on the bill this weekend, most likely on Sunday. O'Reilly talked about the CBO numbers and said the Republicans do not believe those numbers, which includes him because he does not believe them either. Basically he just trashed the Obama health care bill again, for the hundredth time. But he did admit it might pass, Billy said the odds are it will pass. Then O'Reilly had Fox News Major Garrett and Carl Cameron were on to discuss it, number of Democrats on to discuss it, zero. Billy claims they are 4 votes short, but he thinks they will get those 4 votes by Sunday. Garrett and Cameron basically agreed with O'Reilly, and what they reported is nothing new. O'Reilly just reports the same old crap every night, to kill time I guess. As usual this segment was biased and one sided, with no Democrats to provide any balance. Because O'Reilly only wants the Republican point of view to be put out on the issue. Then Laura Ingraham and Leslie Marshall were on to discuss it. And for once, O'Reilly had a balanced segment, almost, it was still a 2 on 1 with O'Reilly and Ingraham against Marshall. Ingraham said it still might not pass, so she is not sure it will pass yet. Marshall said it looks like it will pass, and O'Reilly agreed with her. O'Reilly said even if it does pass O'Reilly said it will hurt Obama, Marshall said she disagrees. Then O'Reilly said talk radio will hammer him, yeah because they are all right-wing loons. Ingraham of course agreed with O'Reilly that it will hurt Obama if it passes, which may be true, or not, nobody knows yet, and most people say it will not hurt him. Only Republicans think it will, and they are biased. Then O'Reilly had the far right loon Bernie Goldberg on to attack the people who said Bret Baier was disrespectful to President Obama during his interview. Billy called them pinheads, when all they did was report what happened. It's true that he was disrespectful, Baier even said he was sorry for all the interruptions at the end of the interview, which O'Reilly has never reported btw. So if Baier had to say he was sorry, then he clearly did something wrong. O'Reilly said Baier had to interrupt because Obama was long winded. Can you imagine O'Reilly saying that about a Republican President who was being interviewed by a Democratic journalist, haha, he would never say that. Goldberg actually took Obama's side on it, and O'Reilly instantly cut him off to tell him how he is wrong. For once Goldberg disagreed with O'Reilly, then he also defended Baier, so he sort of took both sides. Goldberg said he was bothered by the constant interruptions. Then Goldberg compared it to Brian Williams interviewing Bush, and he pointed out that if he interrupted him like Baier did Obama the right would go crazy. And Goldberg was right, yet O'Reilly blew it off and dismissed it. Basically Goldberg said he thinks both sides have a point. Except Obama is the President, Baier is just a lame reporter for a biased news network. Goldberg made the same point I did, that O'Reilly would flip if a Democratic journalist interrupted Bush that much, yet he says it's ok when a Fox reporter does it. Then the culture warriors Margaret Hoover and Gretchen Carlson were on to talk about a girl scout story. Some catholic group claims planned parenthood sent out some sexual material to the girl scouts, and the girl scouts deny it. Hoover said she believes the girl scouts, Carlson said we do not know for sure. then O'Reilly moved on real quick to some Lady GaGa story, he showed a Lady GaGa video and then they talked about it. billy said it was sexual, and Carlson said it was bad. Carlson is a prude, let's face it. She thinks anything sexual is wrong and bad. Hoover was not upset, and disagreed with Carlson. Hoover called it art, and said she is an entertainer. Carlson was outraged, and called it porn, lol. It's a fricking music video, that is not porn, moron. Then O'Reilly had the crazy Glenn Beck on for his regular weekly segment. beck just said his usual crazy right-wing propaganda, but O'Reilly asked him if he is going to leave the country if Obama-Care passes. Beck said no, that he is here to stay. O'Reilly said Pelosi will not be speaker of the House this time next year, hey Billy, what happened to that no speculating rule. I guess it was just wishful thinking. Billy asked Beck about his religious nonsense, where he told people to leave any church that talks about social justice. Becks reply to O'Reilly was even dumber than his first statement on it, and he basically just dug the hole deeper. None of it made any sense, because Beck is nuts. This Beck segment is a total waste of time. It's not news, O'Reilly just does it to get ratings from the people who like Beck. The last segment was the total waste of time Great American News Quiz, where Billy gives two Republicans (Steve Doocy & Martha MacCallum) that work for Fox a news quiz, a quiz in which they get half the answers wrong sometimes, even though they work for a News Network. It's a total waste of time that I do not report on, because it's not news, and it has no news value at all. Then the lame pinheads and patriots and the highly edited Factor e-mails. And btw, O'Reilly had 9 Republicans on the show, Garrett, Cameron, Ingraham, Goldberg, Hoover, Carlson, Beck, Doocy, and MacCallum, with O'Reilly himself that's 10 Republicans, to 1 Democratic guest, Leslie Marshall. That is the most Republicans he has ever had on one show, it's a new record. Hey Billy, is 9 to 1 balance in your world. Biden was named the pinhead for making a joke about Fox News. But no conservatives are ever named pinheads for making jokes about CNN or MSNBC, which is just more evidence that O'Reilly is a biased Republican. Right-Wing Coward Sends Me An E-Mail By: Steve - March 19, 2010 - 8:30am Now this is funny, yesterday I got an e-mail from a right-wing idiot calling me a lefty douche. Here is a copy of that e-mail, notice he does not talk about anything on the website that is not true, it's just all personal insults. Subject: Nice JobI like how he put "Nice Job" in the subject line, pretending it was a positive e-mail. Like that is gonna fool me into opening it, when I have seen that trick a million times over the last 10 years. I think probly is probably, but as O'Reilly would say, I could be wrong. And for the record, I have never had Veal, Brie, or Chardonnay in my life. So I replied to the moron, and this is what I got back. Re: Re: Nice JobSo the coward sends me an e-mail with nothing but personal insults, but he was too scared to approve me for a reply, what a loser coward. This is that great and powerful Republican party we hear about, not! Right-Wing Media Lies: O'Reilly Silent By: Steve - March 19, 2010 - 8:00am Before I show you some of the lies the right-wing media is putting out, think about this. Bill O'Reilly does a once a week media bias segment with Bernie Goldberg, they discuss bias in the media, but they never discuss any right-wing bias at Fox or any other right-wing sources. Think about that, O'Reilly does a media bias segment where he complains about bias in the media. As he is doing a biased segment, that never goes after Fox or any other right leaning media outlet. Proving that it is not a fair and balanced segment, that it's nothing but a one sided biased segment with no Democratic media analyst. It's complaining about media bias, as you are being biased yourself. Now look at the partial list of lies I found just today that are being put out by the right-wing media. The Abortion Lie The right-wing media, Fox, Newsmax, Hannity, Rove, Beck, O'Reilly, Limbaugh, etc. have all reported the false claims that the Senate health care bill provides federal funding for abortion beyond the limited cases allowed by current law: rape, incest, and conditions that endanger the life of the pregnant woman. FACT: The Senate bill does not allow federal funding for abortion. The ABC World News Truth Squad even fact checked the bill and said this: "The bill makes it clear there can be no federal money for abortion." And yet, O'Reilly and the right-wing media continue to spread the lie that it does use federal money for abortion. O'Reilly even lied about it just two days ago, even though it has been proven to be a lie. The Slaughter Solution Lie The right-wing media has falsely claimed a legislative proposal being considered to finalize health care reform in the House as unprecedented, undemocratic, and unconstitutional. But the rule in question is an accepted part of House procedure, and Congress repeatedly used the rule under Republican leadership. They also report that if it is used there will not be a vote, which is another lie, because there will be a vote. The self-executing rule requires a vote to use it. And btw, not only did the the Republican Party use the self-executing rule, they "set new records" for its use. When Republicans gained power in 1995, they proceeded to set new records under Speaker Newt Gingrich. There were 90 self-executing rules used in the 104th and 105th Congresses (1995-1998). Under Speaker Dennis Hastert there were 112 self-executing rules used in the 106th, 107th and 108th Congresses. And yet they complain it's un-American, unconstitutional, and wrong to use it now, when they set records for using it when they had power. The New England Journal of Medicine Lie This is the most recent lie from the right-wing media, including O'Reilly who lied about it Tuesday night, and to this day has still not issued a correction. The New England Journal of Medicine did no such survey, and in fact, it was a non-scientific survey, not a poll. O'Reilly said the The New England Journal of Medicine did the survey. Which is a 100% lie, because the Medicus Firm, a medical recruitment firm did the survey, and it was not even published by the New England Journal of Medicine, which O'Reilly also claimed. It was a 3 month old unscientific e-mail survey, so it's basically worthless. And yet, O'Reilly and all his right-wing frieds are reporting the lie with no corrections, except for the one correction Megyn kelly put out. And then even after that, three hours later Glenn Beck reported the lie again. Those lies are just a small sample of the hundreds of lies that are put out every day by O'Reilly and numerous right-wing media sources, then they say trust us, we are the truth tellers. As they complain about bias and dishonesty in the media, while they are being more biased and more dishonest than anyone. The amount of lies from the right-wing media are stunning, yet O'Reilly never says a word about any of it, in fact, he is putting out most of the lies himself, so it would be hard for him to complain about something he is also doing. It's the ultimate hypocrisy, they complain about something they are also doing, and they are doing it more than the people they are complaining about. Another thing O'Reilly does is when some other right-wing media source puts out a known lie, he ignores it, and does not call them out for that lie. Leaving it out there so people can think it is true, he does that to help Republicans hurt Obama. Notice that he never reports on these lies, he just ignores them. That is done to make people think they are true, and to hurt Obama and the Democrats. Then he claims to be a nonpartisan independent with a no spin zone, that is fair to both sides. Yeah and I'm Tiger Woods too. Still No NEJM Survey Correction From O'Reilly By: Steve - March 18, 2010 - 9:00am Tuesday night O'Reilly said this: O'REILLY: What I'm about to tell you is simply stunning.Then on Wednesday the New England Journal of Medicine said the 3-month-old email survey was not published in or conducted by the New England Journal of Medicine. So you would think O'Reilly would do a correction on the Wednesday night show, haha, not. In fact, I predicted he would not do a correction, and I was right. On the Wednesday night Factor O'Reilly had no correction, proving that he is a fraud, a biased, lying, right-wing fraud of a pretend journalist. The New England Journal of Medicine even put out a statement saying they never did any such survey, and O'Reilly still did not do a correction. Which is about a big of a violation of journalist standards anyone could possibly do. Here are more details on the lies from O'Reilly, and the statements from NEJM. NEJM spokeswoman confirms: Survey has nothing to do with the "original research" published in The New England Journal of Medicine. Media Matters for America contacted The New England Journal of Medicine and received confirmation from spokesperson Jennifer Zeis that the study had "nothing to do with the New England Journal of Medicine's original research." Zeis also made clear that the study "was not published by the New England Journal of Medicine." The Medicus Firm conducted the survey in December 2009. The Medicus Firm is a Dallas and Atlanta based firm that recruits and places physicians in jobs, they were responsible for conducting the survey. It issued a press release about the results on December 17, 2009. The article actually appeared in an employment newsletter. The report appeared in "Recruiting Physicians Today," an employment newsletter produced by the Massachusetts Medical Society. Zeis also said that this article "was written by The Medicus Firm." Both versions of the write-up clearly indicate that the source for the survey is The Medicus Firm and provide contact information for its media relations department. List of people who reported the lie, notice it's all Republicans: Bill O'Reilly Brian Kilmeade Ed Morrissey - hotair.com Sean Hannity Marc Siegel - on Cavuto Glenn Beck also put the lie out, but he did it hours after Megyn Kelly reported it was not a New England Journal of Medicine survey. As Megyn Kelly had noted three hours earlier, the NEJM did not conduct the "survey" -- and it was "not a scientific poll." And yet, Glenn Beck reported the lie anyway. On the March 17 edition of Fox News America Live, host Megyn Kelly noted that the survey "was conducted by the Medicus Firm, which is a national physician search firm." She also added "It's not a scientific poll; it's a survey." So O'Reilly reported the lie, then found out it was a lie, and then still refused to do a correction. That's called biased and dishonest journalism of the worst kind. Bill O'Reilly, the worst journalist in the world. The Wednesday 3-17-10 O'Reilly Factor Review By: Steve - March 18, 2010 - 8:30am The TPM was called health Care Intensity. Once again O'Reilly talked about the Obama health care plan. But he did not do a correction from last night, on the New England Journal of Medicine survey lies. Only 300 people showed up for the lame protest, O'Reilly never once reported that. He also cited another right-wing poll from the Wall Street Journal that had a majority of people opposing the Obama health care plan, while ignoring all the polls that have it closer. Basically O'Reilly is a broken record, every night he just repeats his right-wing talking points on the Obama health care plan. The top story was about Dennis Kucinich changing his vote to yes. Dick Morris was on to discuss it, and the Obama health care bill, with no Democratic guest of course. Morris said the back door health care deal will not happen, and O'Reilly agreed with him. Morris predicted there will be an up or down vote on the bill, by Friday or this weekend. Morris did say he thinks it might pass by one vote, for whatever that is worth. Then 30 seconds later he said he is not sure if it will pass or not. So he does not know anything, he is just guessing. Then O'Reilly cried about Kucinich changing his vote, and said he knew he would change it, yeah right, as if he can read minds. Then O'Reilly had Brett Baier on to discuss his interview with President Obama. Baier had a testy interview with Obama, and Obama complained that Baier interrupted him too much. Which O'Reilly loved, and praised Baier for doing. Billy said it caused a big stir in Washington. Baier even admitted he interrupted Obama a lot. Then he said he was sorry for it at the end of the interview, but of course O'Reilly never showed that part. Here is what the Washington Post said about it. President Obama's interview Wednesday on Fox News Channel was a testy affair in which Obama repeatedly appeared exasperated at being interrupted and frustrated with the focus on legislative process rather than the substance of his health care proposals.Obama even had to tell Baier he can not answer his questions because he keeps interrupting him. O'Reilly loved it, and said he was very amused. After O'Reilly played the clip of Obama scolding Baier for all the interruptions O'Reilly laughed at it, because he loved the way Baier interviewed him. Baier even said it was an O'Reilly style interview, which is why Billy loved it so much. Then O'Reilly had the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano on for an interview. O'Reilly asked her about the virtual border funding, they claim it is not working, so they are using the money for something else. She said there is a better way to spend that money. O'Reilly called it a fraud and a waste, and wanted to know who did it, she said Bush did, so he instantly changed the subject. Then they talked about the drug war in Mexico, and she agreed with O'Reilly that we should work with Mexico to fight the border drug war. Then they talked about Gitmo, O'Reilly said Obama made a mistake with Gitmo, and it should not be closed. She disagreed and said Gitmo has to go, and that it has been a recruitment tool for Al Qaeda. O'Reilly said it has not been a recruitment tool, and she disagreed 100 percent. Then O'Reilly talked about Military trials vs civilian trials, and of course he wants the military, and she wants the civilian trials. Bascially she disagreed with everything O'Reilly said, except the part about working with Mexico on the border drug war. In other words, he spewed out his right-wing talking points spin, and she knocked it all down with facts. Then Megyn Kelly was on to talk about Attorney General Eric Holder who was grilled yesterday on Capitol Hill about his opinions on the rights of terror suspects. Holder said our constitution gives people rights, and O'Reilly somehow had a problem with that. O'Reilly claims a terrorist has no rights, none, and that the constitution only applies to American citizens. Megyn Kelly said Holder is right, and O'Reilly is wrong. She then said the Supreme Court ruled that once a person in in American control they have specific constitutional rights, O'Reilly said when did that happen, she said a couple years ago. Billy acted like he did not know that, which proves he is an idiot, because even I knew that. Then they talked about a stupid perfume lawsuit it Detroit, huh? Who cares about a stupid perfume lawsuit in Detroit. This segment shows just how stupid O'Reilly is, because he claims to be the best journalist in the world and he does not even know what the fricking laws are. And btw, that Supreme Court ruling was made while Bush was the President, by a right leaning court. Then the best of Dennis Miller, if there is such a thing, in my opinion there is no such thing. O'Reilly showed clips of re-runs from past Dennis Miller segments. It was old clips of Miller making jokes about liberals, and most of them were not even funny. While Miller was making his jokes O'Reilly had music playing and had his graphics people add images and sound effects, and it was lame as hell. In fact, most of it was Miller making jokes about Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Reid, and the Democratic party. One of the so-called jokes by Miller was that the Democrats have a war room for everything but war. Hahahahaha, that was so funny, not! The last segment was did you see that with Jane Skinner. They talked about Bogota Columbia, and a commercial they are running about President Bush. I mean, who cares, it never even ran in America. Not to mention, Jane Skinner said she did not even have a complaint about it, so why even report on it. O'Reilly attacked Tom Hanks once again, and then he admitted he is over-doing the Tom Hanks story. So why keep reporting it, moron. O'Reilly said Jane Skinner wanted to talk about it, yeah right, liar. O'Reilly is just mad that Hanks will not go on the Factor, and that he does not like Hanks being a liberal. In the pinheads and patriots segment O'Reilly cried about the U.S. military not flying an American flag in Haiti, Billy said what's up with that, and called them pinheads. I say who cares, what does it matter if they fly a flag or not, and that only right-wing idiots like O'Reilly would even waste time reporting on it. Miley Cyrus was the patriot for telling kids to not go on the internet. And btw, O'Reilly loved the disrespectful interview Bret Baier did with President Obama. Now imagine what he would say if someone like Keith Olbermann did the same type of interview with George W. Bush, O'Reilly would flip out, call him un-American, and call for Olbermann to be deported for being disrespectful to the President. O'Reilly Caught Lying About NEJM Health Care Survey By: Steve - March 17, 2010 - 1:00pm What I'm about to tell you is simply stunning. Not really, it's just more lies from O'Reilly about the so-called New England Journal of Medicine Doctor Survey. Here is what the lying O'Reilly said last night, I quote: O'REILLY: What I'm about to tell you is simply stunning.Too bad it's all lies, Here is what Media Matters wrote about the so-called survey. Members of the Right-wing media have seized on a dubious, three-month old email "survey" that purports to show that physicians are concerned about health care reform and that 46 percent of the primary care doctors surveyed "indicated that they would leave medicine - or try to leave medicine - as a result of health reform."Now think about this, O'Reilly claims to have a crack staff of 10 people that research everything and never make a mistake. Yet they make a massive mistake like this, which is about as big of a mistake a so-called journalist can make. The question is, will O'Reilly do a correction tonight. The fact that he would even make that dishonest claim shows what a partisan right-wing hack he is, because only right-wing spin doctors are saying it was a NEJM survey. And btw, the actual survey was also bogus, because it was an unscientific e-mail survey. It was not a real scientific survey, a real survey is random and done by phone. Internet and e-mail surveys are bogus because they are not scientific. The whole thing is dishonest garbage, by O'Reilly and all his right-wing friends. It shows that O'Reilly and his right-wing friends will do anything to make people oppose the Obama health care plan, including lie about a NEJM survey that never happened. And if O'Reilly does not do a correction tonight, his credibility is zero. Rove Caught Lying On The Factor Again By: Steve - March 17, 2010 - 10:00am Monday night O'Reilly put Karl Rove on the factor to set the record straight on people who have said he lied in his book. And btw, nobody was on with Rove, it was just Rove and O'Reilly. So during the segment Rove even lied again, as he was setting the so-called record straight. Karl Rove said this: ROVE: But let me give you an example. There are a lot of liberals, including his boss, Rick Stengel at TIME magazine, who accused Bush of saying "Go shopping" after 9/11 and condemned him for it. The only problem was Bush never said "Go shopping."Okay, in the world of Bill O'Reilly and Karl Rove that is setting the record straight. Too bad it's all lies, Rove lied and O'Reilly went along with it. After 9-11 George W. Bush told people to go to Disneyland and to shop more, this is a fact. John McCain (The Republican) even criticized Bush for saying it. Here is what McCain said about it in October of 2007 while he was running for President: McCain: John McCain said Wednesday that President Bush made a mistake after the Sept. 11 terror attacks by encouraging people to shop rather than urging citizens to join the military or volunteer.So right there you have John McCain admitting Bush told people to go shopping, and he even criticized Bush for saying it. Yet Karl Rove claims it never happened, and that Bush never said it. Then Bush said it again in 2007. Here is what Bush said in 2007: BUSH: As we work with Congress in the coming year to chart a new course in Iraq and strengthen our military to meet the challenges of the 21st century, we must also work together to achieve important goals for the American people here at home. This work begins with keeping our economy growing. And I encourage you all to go shopping more.So not only did Bush say it one time, he said it two times. Proving once again that Karl Rove is the king of liars, and nothing he says can ever be believed. And the great journalist O'Reilly sat there and let him lie his ass off when he knows Bush said it, so he is as bad as Rove. The Tuesday 3-16-10 O'Reilly Factor Review By: Steve - March 17, 2010 - 9:30am The TPM was called Physician Opposition. O'Reilly implied that as many as half the doctors in America could leave the medical profession if the Obama health care bill passes. Which is just ridiculous, and nothing but right-wing propaganda. He said the New England Journal is reporting that. O'Reilly called it stunning, when it's not even true. Then O'Reilly spent the entire talking points saying what he has said a hundred times using right-wing talking points, the Obama health care bill is bad, so everyone should be against it. And for the record, O'Reilly based his TPM on a bogus IBD poll that was not even scientific. Several Fox News media figures highlighted a recent Investor's Business Daily poll which found that "hundreds of thousands of doctors would think about shutting down their practices or retiring early if it were adopted." However, according to statistician Nate Silver, the poll is "simply not credible," and Fox News itself acknowledged that the poll is "not scientific." And yet, O'Reilly never reported any of that information, he implied it was a valid poll, and never once said it was not scientific. Then O'Reilly had Carl Cameron and A.B. Stoddard from the Hill on to discuss it. Cameron said he has the real scoop, that Pelosi does not have the votes, so they will use political tactics to pass it anyway. O'Reilly said he does not believe that will happen, and if it does it will doom the Obama administration. Stoddard said if they pass it by using gimmicks the people will not like it. She disagreed with O'Reilly that if they do that Obama is done. O'Reilly said if they do not pass it with an up or down vote Obama is done. Stoddard said as of today the Democrats do not have the votes, she said they have it 212 to 219 against it. Cameron agreed that they do not have the votes, but he said Obama may use political tactics to back door the bill to pass it. O'Reilly said no way, but then admitted he could be wrong. Then O'Reilly talked about moveon.org pressuring Democrats to vote for the Obama health care plan. O'Reilly called that radical, when it's simply what political groups do, and he had no problem when right-wing groups pressured Bush to do things. Monica Crowley and Ellis Henican were on to discuss it. Billy played the moveon.org ad, and then said it was not too bad, after he called them radical. Henican said it was just hardball politics, and claims O'Reilly is going overboard in the attacks on moveon.org. Billy called them a pressure group that is so far out there they should be living in Havana. Henican said it's Democracy in action, and pointed out that big money is being spent to oppose it but O'Reilly never says a word about that. And of course Crowley agreed with O'Reilly, so as usual it was a 2 on 1 against Henican. And btw, Henican says it will pass, and it may be done with a back door deal. O'Reilly told him he was wrong, and said if Obama does it he is done. Crowley also disagreed with O'Reilly on Obama using the back door deal to get health care passed. Henican also disagreed with O'Reilly that if Obama does the back door deal he is done. What's funny is every time Obama might do something O'Reilly don't like, he claims if he does it he's done, haha. Proving that O'Reilly is just an idiot. Not to mention he has no problem with the Insurance companies spending a million dollars a month to defeat Obama-Care, but he has a problem with moveon.org spending money to get it passed. Then Brit Hume was on to discuss it. Hume also disagreed with O'Reilly, that Obama might back door the health care bill to get it passed. Then O'Reilly said every poll says the people do not want Obama-Care. Which is a lie, once again proving that O'Reilly is just a partisan hack. Hume did agree with O'Reilly that if Obama does the back door deal it will hurt him. Hume said it will hurt them politically in the short term, but that long term it will be good for them. O'Reilly mis-stated the bill and claimed it will not take effect for 4 years, Hume corrected him and said some of it does take effect right away. Wow, O'Reilly just told Brit Hume that 6 million people watched the Factor last night, which would be the Monday 3-15-10 show. That is a 100% flat out bold faced lie. I am looking at the Monday ratings right now as I write this, O'Reilly had 3.769 million total viewers Monday. And btw, the 11pm Factor re-run had 1.520 million total viewers, so even if you add the 11pm re-run to the 8pm numbers (which is never done in the ratings business) it's only 5.289 million, which is still not 6 million viewers. Earth to O'Reilly 3.7 million is not 6 million, and 5.2 million is also not 6 million, you lying jackass. Then John Stossel was on to talk about bottled water, and if it is a rip off. And before I even report what Stossel said I can tell you that of course it is a rip off, bottled water is no better than tap water, and in soame cases it is even worse than tap water. They talked about a movie called Tapped, they said bottled water is a fraud. Stossel said tap water is just as good for you, if not better. And that 30 to 40 percent of the bottled water is tap water. Then the is it legal segment with Lis Wiehl and Kimberly Guilfoyle. They talked about the Erin Andrews stalker getting 2.5 years for taking nude photos of her and putting them on the internet. Erin Andrews was mad that the guy only got 2.5 years. Wiehl, Guilfoyle and O'Reilly all said it was not enough, and he should have got the 5 years. Then they talked about another teacher/student sex affair, the teacher was a woman who had sex with her 14 year old male student. Then they talked about an 11 year old boy who shot and killed a woman who was pregnant. The judge has to decide if he will be charged as an adult, the minor cut off age is 10 years old. Guilfoyle said 11 years old is too young to be charged as an adult, Wiehl said he should be charged as an adult. The last segment was with Charles Krauthammer. He was on to talk about the Government programs that give money to students for school etc. And of course the far right Charles Krauthammer thinks it is out of control. Both O'Reilly and Krauthammer think the Government should not pay for anything, except building roads, the military, etc. Because they are both right-wing partisans, who are opposed to the Government spending taxpayer money on anything. This segment is garbage, it's Charles Krauthammer the far right neo-con, who is only on to promote the Republican view of everything, and no Democratic guest is ever on to counter anything he says. Then the lame pinheads and patriots and the highly edited Factor e-mails. And for the record, O'Reilly had a whopping 1 Democratic guest on the show, while he had 6 Republican guests, making it 7 Republicans when you include O'Reilly as 1 person. The State Of The News Media (2009) By: Steve - March 17, 2010 - 9:00am The Pew Research Center has put out their annual Project For Excellence In Journalism Media Study for 2009, and they have some key finding I will report here. Almost all of their findings disprove what O'Reilly has said about the media, especially Fox. After President Obama took office on 1-20-09, O'Reilly said the media is kissing his butt with nothing but positive coverage about him, except for Fox of course, who he claimed was truly fair and balanced in their reporting on Obama. The PEJ study shows the exact opposite of what O'Reilly claimed. Under their Tone of Obama coverage, in the first 100 days after Obama took office they show a good balance of positive, negative, and neutral stories, except for Fox, where it was more negative than anyone else. For the media overall it was 37% positive, 23% negative, and 40% neutral. So the winner was neutral, with 40%, yet O'Reilly claimed the media was doing nothing but positive stories on Obama, as the PEJ study shows that overall the media had 23% negative stories on Obama. And btw, in the first 100 days of a new President it would be strange to not have mostly neutral or positive stories, because 100 days is not enough time to cause any negative stories, yet the media still had 23% negative stories on Obama. If you only look at cable news only, it's even more balanced. For cable news it was 32% positive, 30% negative, and 38% neutral. That is about as balanced as it gets, yet O'Reilly claimed the media was doing nothing but positive stories on Obama, when the facts show the exact opposite. Not to mention, the media should do mostly positive stories on a new President in his first 100 days. Because he has not had enough time to generate any negative stories yet. The Networks and Newspapers were a little less negative. But when you look at their positive and neutral coverage it's balanced. Networks were 40% positive, 41% neutral, and 19% negative. Newspapers were 41% positive, 38% neutral, and 22% negative. And they did run negative stories on Obama, 19 and 22 percent of the time, but O'Reilly said they did not run any negative stories on Obama. He specifically said Fox was the only media source that was doing any negative stories on Obama, and now we know O'Reilly was lying. The PEJ study also pointed out that Fox was the only media outlet in America that had a majority of negative stories on Obama in his first 100 days. Quote: "On Fox, the majority of Obama stories were clearly negative in tone, the only outlet studied where that was the case." The PEJ study also covered the Obama vs McCain presidential election. And their findings on that show a lot. On Fox News, coverage of Obama was more negative than the norm (40% of stories) and less positive (25% of stories). For McCain, the fox news channel was somewhat more positive (22% vs. 14% in the press overall) and substantially less negative (40% vs. 57% in the press overall). Yet even here, his negative stories outweighed positive ones by almost 2 to 1. The negative McCain stories on Fox were all because he was seen as too moderate by a lot of Fox anchors and analysts, who mostly supported Romney or other more conservative Republicans. Otherwise his negative stories would have been almost zero. And btw, the PEJ study also clearly shows that MSNBC is a liberal leaning news network. Which everyone already knows, and they do not claim to be a fair and balanced news network as Fox does. So they are not lying to anyone, as Fox does when they claim to be fair and balanced. CNN fell distinctly in the middle of the three cable channels when it came to tone. In general, the tone of its coverage was closer than any other cable news channel to the press overall, though also somewhat more negative than the media overall. The distinct tone of MSNBC-more positive toward Democrats and more negative toward Republicans-was not reflected in the coverage of its broadcast sibling, NBC News. Even though it has correspondents appear on their cable shows and even anchor some programs on there, the broadcast channel showed no such ideological tilt. Indeed, NBC's coverage of Palin was the most positive of any TV organization studied, including Fox News. The PEJ study also noted that Fox is a conservative news network. In talking about ratings the study says this: "And Fox, whose talk show hosts promote a populist brand of conservatism, further distanced itself from the competition. Its prime-time viewership was nearly bigger than both CNN's and MSNBC's combined." They also report that for 2009 the O'Reilly Factor averaged 3.3 million total viewers a night. Which kills the lie from O'Reilly that he is getting almost 5 million viewers a night, 3.3 million is not even close to 5 million. They killed another lie from O'Reilly too, he said ratings for liberal news show were all down, that's not true, the Rachel Maddow show had a 13% ratings increase from 2008 to 2009, which almost matched the 16% increase O'Reilly had during the same time. And btw, overall the liberal news shows on MSNBC had a 3% ratings increase. As for MSNBC, the median audience for its prime-time programming, now filled with liberal talk shows, rose 3% to 786,000 for the year. O'Reilly claimed the ratings for liberal cable news shows were crashing, when the facts show they actually had a 3% ratings increase. So as you can see, most of the media was pretty much balanced, except for Fox, who was mostly unbalanced. And the finding of the media study show that O'Reilly lies his ass off when he complains about bias from the rest of the media. What he does is measure their coverage against what Fox does, then he claims they have this giant liberal bias, because they did not report things the same way Fox did. This is a faulty and biased analysis of the media by O'Reilly. In other words, he wants all the media to be as biased to the right as Fox News is, and anyone that is not as biased to the right as Fox, he labels a liberal news source. When the facts show that most of the media is pretty much balanced, except for a few shows on MSNBC. Most of the bias is at Fox, yet O'Reilly denies that. Proving that his bias has blinded him to the truth, that most of the media is balanced, except for Fox. In O'Reillyworld, every media source that is not as biased to the right as Fox, is a liberal media source. Which is just ridiculous, and only proves what a partisan right-wing hack O'Reilly is, because only a partisan Republican would make that ridiculous claim. Tea Party Using RNC Signs At Protests By: Steve - March 17, 2010 - 8:30am I wonder if the great journalist Bill O'Reilly reported this, ummmmm, of course not. Because it is more evidence the Tea Party is a right-wing conservative movement, which O'Reilly has denied time and time again. Tea Party activists from across the country are going to Washington for a three-week long "Take The Town Halls to Washington" rally, an effort to lobby undecided House Democrats to vote against health care reform. At a press conference for the event on Friday, the Daily Caller spotted signs and buttons clearly paid for by the Republican National Committee. Tea Party activists distributed red-white-and-blue buttons and signs with the words Listen to Me! - an official RNC slogan - with disclaimers at the bottom of the signs reading Paid for by the Republican National Committee: Michael Patrick Leahy, an organizer of the Take the Town Halls to Washington protest admitted that the RNC did provide the signs.The Tea Party movement claims to be an independent, grass roots coalition unrelated to either party, but this is not the first time they have been caught using materials or logistical support provided by Republican operatives or Republican-aligned corporate front groups. Many large Tea Party protests have used signs and buses provided by right-wing groups like Americans for Prosperity. Notice that Bill O'Reilly never reports any of this news. He ignores it all, because he has claimed the Tea Party is not just a bunch of right-wing nuts. And because he wants you to think it's an independent grass roots group of Americans. So he avoids reporting any news that proves he is lying, which also proves he is a biased right-wing partisan. And btw, after it was reported that the Tea Party was using protest signs paid for by the RNC they blacked it out by putting a sticker over the part of the signs that say paid for by the RNC. Which shows that they want to hide the fact that the RNC provided them signs to use. |
O'Reilly Caught Lying About NEJM Health Care Survey O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again O'Reilly #5 On Top 25 Right-Wing Journalist List The Truth About Ratings For News Shows Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Spin Doctor O'Reilly Spinning Fox News Most Trusted Poll Fox News Did Not Air Hope For Haiti Telethon O'Reilly Caught Spinning Obama Terrorism Polls O'Reilly Factor Year In Review 2009 O'Reilly Caught Lying About House Ethics Committee O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Increase O'Reilly Caught Lying About Limbaugh Racism Most Factor Gear Made in Vietnam And China O'Reilly Caught Lying About Religious Festival O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Lying About CNN O'Reilly Caught Violating Journalistic Standards Again O'Reilly Caught Lying About The ACLU & Racial Profiling More Proof O'Reilly & FOX News Do Not Tell The Truth Factor Pollster Caught Writing GOP Policy Memo O'Reilly Called Bruce Springsteen Un-American & Un-Patriotic The Bill O'Reilly Senate Torture Report Countdown Clock O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Obama Approval Numbers FOX News Caught Lying About Obama Budget O'Reilly Busted For Helping GOP Smear Pelosi O'Reilly Caught Lying About Obama Earmark Promise What a Fair & Balanced O'Reilly Factor Would Look Like Military.com Report Proves O'Reilly Wrong About Homeless Vets O'Reilly Places 7th in 2008 Wingnut of The Year Award O'Reilly Denys Reality About Abstinence Only Programs Conclusive Proof O'Reilly & The Republican Party Are Both Corrupt The Right-Wing Liberal Killer Story O'Reilly Ignored The Facts About O'Reilly And GE Doing Business With Iran How to Deal With an O'Reilly Factor Ambush Interview Buzzflash Names O'Reilly Media Putz of The Week The 10 Page Hand Written Lucifer Letter I Got in 2003 Why FOX News Loves Juan Williams: The Strings And The Puppet
O'Reilly Info O'Reilly Spins Cable News Ratings Read The Letter O'Reilly Had His Attorney Send me O'Reilly Caught Lying About The NY Times JFK Terror Plot O'Reilly's Party Enrollment Form Showing Him a Registered Republican O'Reilly Wins 2004 Misinformer of The Year Award O'Reilly Death Penalty Lies O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 49 Times Since 2001 O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks Mail-to-Bill Hate-Mail FOX News Bias Transcripts Assorted
glenn-beck-sucks.com Think Progress Buzzflash Bartcop AmericaBlog Crooks & Liars Progressive Eruptions Rude Pundit Moveon.org Truthout.com Daily Beacon Mike Hersh Prison Planet Moose & Squirrel Politics & Society Apocalypse Cafe Fox News Boycott I Hate Hannity Inebriated Discourse Hannity Sucks LT Saloon NewsCorpse.com Glenn Beck Is An Idiot Ranker.com GlennBeckReport.com
mediamatters.org fair.org alternet.org cjr.org Media Transparency conwebwatch |
| Proof The O'Reilly Factor is Biased Against Barack Obama | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/3mbiasnumbers.htm |
| Proof O'Reilly Lied About The Balance on His Show | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillybalanced.htm |
| O'Reilly Sucks Investigation: Dishonesty, Deception, And Bias By Bill O'Reilly | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreilly-investigation.htm |
| (( Right-Wing Hate Speech Ignored by Bill O'Reilly )) | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/right-wing-hate.htm |
| O'Reilly Phone Sex Scandal Information | ||
After hearing of the lawsuit O'Reilly said it was all lies, that it was a shakedown for money, that he would fight it to the bitter end with no settlement, and that he would let the courts decide the matter. That was all before O'Reilly found out she had recorded his phone calls. Then Mr. I will fight her lies to the bitter end with no settlement, paid her $10 million dollars to settle the lawsuit, get the tapes, and shut her up. The out-of-court settlement came on the eve of a courtroom fight over audiotapes, reports CBS News Correspondent Kelly Cobiella. |
