|
| Advertise | Contact | About This Web Site | Webmaster Information |
|
Astonishing online blackjack tables can be found in this extraordinary online casino website.
January - 2010 February - 2010 January - 2009 February - 2009 March - 2009 April - 2009 May - 2009 June - 2009 July - 2009 August - 2009 September - 2009 October - 2009 November - 2009 December - 2009 January - 2008 February - 2008 March - 2008 April - 2008 May - 2008 June - 2008 July - 2008 August - 2008 September - 2008 October - 2008 November - 2008 December - 2008 March - 2007 April - 2007 May - 2007 June - 2007 July - 2007 August - 2007 September - 2007 October - 2007 November - 2007 December - 2007 2001-06 Blog Archives 2006-07 Blog Archives
|
The Factor Guest List Count Archives
Monday - 2-1-10 -- O'Reilly - 3,861,000 Hannity - 2,660,000 Beck - 3,069,000 Tuesday - 2-2-10 -- O'Reilly - 3,597,000 Hannity - 2,763,000 Beck - 2,945,000 Wednesday - 2-3-10 -- O'Reilly - 4,091,000 - Jon Stewart Interview Hannity - 2,684,000 Beck - 2,917,000 Thursday - 2-4-10 -- O'Reilly - 4,176,000 - Stewart Interview (Part 2) Hannity - 3,017,000 Beck - 2,977,000 Weekly Factor Average - 0,000,000
By: Steve - February 8, 2010 - 1:00pm Here is what Keith Olbermann had to say about the O'Reilly/Stewart interview Friday night. It's a little long, but worth the read. OLBERMANN: Jon Stewart and Billo, why did FOX not televised the parts in which Stewart asked him why FOX insisted you couldn't criticize Bush in war time but all it does is now criticize Obama in wartime. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) STEWART: The point is, any criticism of the president in wartime. O'REILLY: About anything? STEWART: That's what the network is about. O'REILLY: I criticized Bush all day long. STEWART: Please. (END VIDEO CLIP) ------------------------- OLBERMANN: In his much hyped interview with Jon Stewart, it was emphasized again why O'Reilly goes the way he goes, because he's live. He's on tape. Any time one of the interviewees cleans his clock, he can edit it out. Like with Jon Stewart. Fortunately for us, O'Reilly's personality is so fragile that a little faint praise from one of his betters often causes him to drop his guard and do something revealing, like putting the censored clips of Stewart on the Internet. Oops. It's easy to see why The Factor didn't bother to include any of this on the actual show. The first bit of web-only content, O'Reilly taking exception to Stewart taking him out of context on "The Daily Show." (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) O'REILLY: You take a clip and you take it out of context. You did it with me. STEWART: I disagree with that. O'REILLY: You disagree with the context? STEWART: I disagree that we took it out of context. O'REILLY: You cut it. You cut-the quotes were you mocked me- STEWART: Well, we do mock you. O'REILLY: Yes. And I mock myself. So you're in good territory with that. You showed a clip of me criticizing anti-Bush protesters. STEWART: That's right. O'REILLY: But you didn't use the whole clip. STEWART: Well, your problem was, if I recall correctly-let me see if I can get this straight. We-the idea was that Fox has become a liberal network, that you love protests against government. And we showed how during the Bush administration, you said thousands of protesters have been arrested and surveys show most protesters are loons. Is that right? O'REILLY: Right. Here's what I said. There are anti-Bush protesters here in New York. While most of these people have been peaceful, more than a thousand have been arrested. But you cut out, while most of these people are peaceful. You picked it up after. But that's OK. STEWART: The point was-let me tell you what the point was, just so I can explain, because I don't want to take things out of context. We work very hard not to. Here was the context. I don't believe we did take it out of context. What you said about the protesters in the Tea Party movement was, you know, we want-it was about the mainstream media, that they were treating the Tea Party protesters unfairly. You said we here at The Factor. You refer to it like it's the Borg, some weird sort of third person. We hear at The Factor, we treat protesters with respect and we don't refer to them as loons. O'REILLY: Unless they're arrested and hurt people. STEWART: See, that, you didn't say. (END VIDEO CLIP) OLBERMANN: On O'Reilly's show we hear Stewart saying, quote, "here is the brilliance of Fox News, what you have been able to do, you and Dr. Ailes. You've been able to mainstream conservative talk radio." But immediately after that, a lengthy exchange that was edited out, you know, just for its content. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) STEWART: So what you've done is taken a cyclonic, narrative driven news organization-media arm of a political party, of a political wing, and you've sprinkled it. With a little bit -- O'REILLY: What do you mean a little bit? From 9:00 to 4:00, when Cavuto comes on, that's like seven hours. STEWART: Not even close. Because they're also part of the journey. O'REILLY: Who is part of the journey? STEWART: The journey begins in the morning. O'REILLY: Fox and Friends. STEWART: With the wide-eyed innocence of Fox and Friends. You know, Obama has czars. I googled czar. Did you know that's a Russian word for a Russian leader? Or they will go through these children in second grade are singing the praises of Obama. Do you know they sing the praises of their leader in North Korea. Then, when the hard news comes on, they go, some people are concerned that they're indoctrinating children. (END VIDEO CLIP) OLBERMANN: On the show, Bill-O included Stewart saying that he, O'Reilly, was now the sane one on Fox News, which Stewart added is like being the thinnest kid at fat camp. And O'Reilly conceded that Sean Hannity is a Republican, but insisted that Glenn Beck is like an everyman, who never shills for the Republican party, no matter how strong his opinion of President Obama is. What you would not have seen is this exchange, the part where Stewart performs a neat, quick dissection of Neil Cavuto. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) STEWART: No, Cavuto is not sane. O'REILLY: Cavuto is insane? Neil Cavuto? STEWART: You know what's great about Cavuto? We did a piece on this, the Cavuto mark. His thing is all about questions. "Are Democrats tanking the stock market," question mark. It's all done with this kind of very subtle propaganda. It's all questions. I'm not saying Obama is a Stalinist, I'm just putting up Stalin's picture behind me. (END VIDEO CLIP) OLBERMANN: Just this week, Cavuto claimed, in question form, that maybe nothing was wrong with Toyotas, that maybe it was just an Obama plot to sell union made American cars. Finally, Stewart returned to one of his main points, that when President Bush was president, respect was not only offered by Fox News, but demanded of all the country's citizens. But when Obama was elected, Fox News reversed itself. This analysis was, again, web only, of course. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) STEWART: Fox News has done a 180 on so many integral principles of what you would imagine a news organization to be. Fox News used to be all about you don't criticize a president during wartime. It's unacceptable. It's treasonous. It gives aid and comfort to the enemy. All of a sudden, for some reason, you can run out there and say Barack Obama is destroying the fabric of this country. O'REILLY: But not in the Afghanistan situation. STEWART: They've absolutely said he doesn't know what he's doing. O'REILLY: Not here. STEWART: You're talking about- O'REILLY: Everybody here has been respectful in that theater, and not undermined anything in that theater. STEWART: That's absolutely not true. You went through the whole dithering thing- O'REILLY: -- too long to make up his mind to deploy. STEWART: That's not the point. The point is any criticism of a president in wartime- O'REILLY: About anything? STEWART: That's what the network was about. O‘REILLY: I talked about bush all day long. STEWART: Please. (END VIDEO CLIP) OLBERMANN: Just for contrast, when Stewart savaged me two weeks ago, I ran the whole thing on this show. And he didn't even do it on this show. When O'Reilly interviews Stewart live, and lets him say stuff like that on TV, not just on the net, I'll pay off part of his next harassment settlement. ----------------------- And to add what Keith said, think about O'Reilly complaining that Stewart did not air the entire clip when he talked about O'Reilly saying protestors are loons, after he had said he respects all protesters. Then O'Reilly did not air the entire Stewart interview, he left 30 minutes of it on the cutting room floor. Talk about hypocrisy, that's hypocrisy to the tenth power. What happened is when liberals protest O'Reilly calls them loons, but when conservatives protest O'Reilly said he respects all protesters. Which is a lie, because he called liberal protesters loons. Stewart busted O'Reilly for it, and O'Reilly pulled the lame you took me out of context garbage, when Stewart was right, and he did not take him out of context. Not to mention, O'Reilly runs out of context cherry picked partial clips of liberals almost every night, so he has no right at all to complain about anyone using partial clips of what he said, especially when it was in context. In fact, O'Reilly is the king of using out of context partial clips, he does it as much as anyone, if not more than anyone. And they always make liberals look bad, he never does it to make conservatives look bad. 1st Quarter oreilly-sucks.com Fund Drive By: Steve - February 8, 2010 - 11:00am Hey folks, I want to thank the people who made donations during our 1st quarter fund drive. The total was $45.00, I got one donation for $30.00, one for $10.00, and one for $5.00, which is not very impressive, but I do appreciate it very much. I get 1,500 to 2,000 page views a day, that's 28,000 page views to 3 donations. I appreciate what I got, but it's only enough to keep me going for one month. That means around the end of this month I'll have to ask for more donations. And btw, I got 3 e-mails from people saying they would send me a donation by snail mail, but I never got them. I do not know if they were serious, or if they were Republicans saying it to make me think I will get a donation from them, which they do all the time. I am writing this to thank the people who made donations, but I do have to say I am very disappointed in the amount I raised. My goal was $150.00, that would pay for 3 months of website/internet/ISP fees, and I did not even raise a third of that. So if anyone wants to make a donation for next month now, you can: Click Here To Donate! Palin Caught With Notes Written On Her Palm By: Steve - February 8, 2010 - 9:00am Who writes notes in her hand, 13 year old kids who cheat on a test in school, and Sarah Palin. How can anyone take this woman serious, she is a dummy, a dope, a moron. Her speech was ridiculous generic nonsense, when she was not attacking President Obama with false claims, it basically sounded like she had just re-written her VP campaign speech from 2008, or had someone re-write it for her. In the Q&A part of the speech she made a fool of herself, other than the notes in her hand that said: Energy, Budget Cuts, Taxes, and Lift Americans Spirit. She did not even answer the questions, one question was what is the Palin plan. And I am still waiting to hear what it is, because she never answered the question. Not to mention, what kind of moron has to write Life Americas Spirit on your hand, can't you remember that, and how is that a policy or a plan, it's not. After watching that Palin speech any clear thinking person has to see that she is a fraud, and nothing but a coached talking points reading moron. It's all a PR promotion, none of her interviews are live with anyone who would ask her tough questions. Because we saw what happens when she does live interviews, she makes a fool of herself with her crazy rambling answers. At one point Palin was asked a question and she said "I am not knowing" about something. Who says that, nobody I know of, most people say I do not know, or I don't know, but she said I am not knowing, which is something a 10 year old might say, not a woman who might run for President in 2012. In the post speech analysis even the conservative Neil Boortz said Palin did not look good, and that he would not vote for her in 2012, and that was before we found out she had notes written on her palm. And you can bet that O'Reilly will report on the Palin speech tonight and spin it to make her look smart, and as good as possible. The question is, will he mention the notes on her hand, or will he ignore it. I would say there is a good chance he ignores it, but since Andrea Mitchell made fun of Palin this morning for the hand notes, O'Reilly might mention it because it has been reported in the media. I have one last thing to say on Palin, I pray that she wins the 2012 Republican primary. Because if she does, Obama will crush her far right dumb ass. Polls right now have Obama beating her 55 to 31, with only 24% of independents voting for her. In fact, Obama beats Palin worse than any other Republican, so my message to the Republicans is to please make Sarah Palin your primary winner, because that will guarantee 4 more years of Obama. And btw, the fact that 71% of Republicans love Sarah Palin, when only 24% of independents and 5% of Democrats do, says a lot about how biased and brainwashed most Republicans are. It shows that they are out of touch with most Americans, because in the 2012 Presidential poll only 31% of ALL Americans say they would vote for her. While at the same time, 70% say she is not qualified, as Republicans voted her their #1 candidate. It's what I call being blinded by ideology. O'Reilly Caught Lying About CBS Tea Party Poll By: Steve - February 8, 2010 - 8:00am On the Friday 2-5-10 O'Reilly Factor, O'Reilly made the Tea Party convention his top story, and he had Chris Wallace on to discuss it. Here is what they said: The first National Tea Party Convention is underway in Nashville, and The Factor welcomed Chris Wallace, who will interview keynote speaker Sarah Palin on Fox News Sunday. WALLACE: "This is middle America, they're 'Joe' and 'Jan' from Indiana who own a small business. These are not radicals, but they feel radicalized and want to start this new movement. They are certainly not crackpots - I was just in a workshop and this is very practical nuts and bolts stuff about how you organize a political movement."O'Reilly said that tea partiers seem to be winning over other Americans: O'REILLY: "I don't know whether this is just a hobby or whether this is developing into a serious political movement, but there's a new poll out that shows most Americans have a favorable view of the Tea Party."Notice that O'Reilly does not name that poll, or cite any numbers. That's because he is lying, and the poll does not show that most Americans have a favorable view of the Tea Party. O'Reilly failed to name the poll, or cite any numbers from it because it says the opposite of what he claims. Billy did not name the poll or cite any numbers because they show he is wrong. Here is what the actual poll said: Nashville, Tennessee -- One-third of Americans have a favorable view of the Tea Party movement, but a plurality has no opinion at all, according to a new national poll.Now remember what O'Reilly said, "There's a new poll out that shows most Americans have a favorable view of the Tea Party." WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! The poll says one third of the people (33.3%) have a favorable view of the Tea Party. Earth to Bill O'Reilly, one third is not MOST people, it's not even 40% of the people. So you are a LIAR. Not only does it say that only 33.3% of the people have a favorable view of the Tea Party, it says 40% have never even heard of them, which is more people than have a favorable view of them. Which also proves you are a biased partisan liar who was just caught lying about a Tea Party poll. Then on top of that your girlfriend Sarah Palin does not do very well in the poll either. The poll also indicates that Americans are split on the former Alaska governor, with 43 percent seeing her in a positive light and 46 percent holding an unfavorable view. Opinion on Sarah Palin also breaks down along party lines, with seven in 10 Democrats disliking her and seven in 10 Republicans with a positive view. She has a net-negative rating among independents: 42 percent favorable and 47 percent unfavorable. And now you have the facts, the facts that show how O'Reilly spins and lies about polls to make the Tea Party look better, and my other blog posting shows how O'Reilly lies that they are not a conservative movement. It's conclusive proof that O'Reilly is nothing but a spin doctor for the Republican Party, The Tea Party, and Sarah Palin. The Real Truth About The Tea Party By: Steve - February 7, 2010 - 10:00am For anyone that does not know it, the Tea Party is a group of fringe conservatives who got together to form a new political party, because they think the Republicans in office are not far right enough. They hate President Obama, all the Democrats, and they hate moderate Republicans. And btw, you will never see any of this reported by O'Reilly, because he is pretending the Tea Party is just middle Americans who are mad over big government spending, so people will not think they are just a bunch of right-wing loons, which they are, and just like he pretends he is a nonpartisan independent so people will not think he is a right-wing loon, which they do. So they started this Tea Party nonsense because they think the Republicans who are currently in office are not conservative enough. That means if you vote for anyone linked to the Tea Party, you are voting for people who are on the fringe, as in far right conservatives. As if we did not need more evidence that the Tea Party is nothing but a group of conservatives who are mad about Republicans not being conservative enough, we have Mark Skoda, chairman of The Memphis Tea Party. He was a main part of the Tea Party convention on Saturday, including a Q&A segment that was shown on C-SPAN. On Friday foxnews.com even reported this: Tea Party Movement Produces New Political OrganizationNotice that is from foxnews.com, they admit the Tea Party is only going to support, endorse, and try to get CONSERVATIVES elected. That is not coming from NBC or MSNBC, it's coming from Fox. And yet O'Reilly denies that the Tea Party is nothing but a group of conservatives, when his own network is reporting that is exactly what they are. Here is even more from the foxnews.com article: Mark Skoda, Chairman of The Memphis TEA Party, made the announcement at a news conference in the middle of the National Tea Party Convention in Nashville.Notice this part: "Prospective political candidates will be expected to support the Republican National Committee platform." Now here is a question for Bill O'Reilly, if the Tea Party candidates will be expected to support the Republican National Committee platform, how are they not Republicans, as you claim. If they are expected to support the Republican National Committee platform, they are Republicans! And remember folks, that information is coming from foxnews.com. This one article destroys all the O'Reilly lies about the Tea Party. And it is from his own networks website. If they are just middle Americans who are opposed to big government spending, why are they expected to support the Republican National Committee platform. This one little article does two things, it is conclusive proof that the Tea Party crowd are in fact conservatives who are trying to start a new Republican Party, that is even more conservative than the Republican Party we have now. And it also shows that O'Reilly is a dishonest journalist for denying the Tea Party is conservative, when even his own fricking network is reporting they are. O'Reilly vs Stewart (The Whole Story) By: Steve - February 7, 2010 - 9:00am John Cook at Gawker.com took the full interview and put out some of the transcript, and some video showing what O'Reilly edited out, you should read (and watch) it. Here is some of it: O'Reilly boasted that his edit of their 42-minute interview for broadcast was "a fair cut" and invited viewers to have a look at the unedited version online to judge for themselves: "Some of these idiots in the press who hate us, 'O'Reilly cut the interview to make Stewart look'-OK, all of that is bull. It's a fair cut. And then when you watch the cut and watch the whole interview you'll see it." So we took him up on the offer, and guess what? If by "fair cut" O'Reilly means "cut in a manner that left some of Stewart's best lines, most effective arguments, and most convincing evidence out of the interview and hidden from the broadcast audience," then he's absolutely right. To watch the Fox News cut of this exchange, you'd think O'Reilly scored a minor point by mocking Stewart's repeated use of the word "cyclonic": O'REILLY: Cavuto sane?Here's what Stewart really said about Neil Cavuto's practice of raising "Is Obama a Stalinist?"-style questions: I know what this is. I come from Jersey-it's the same thing: "I'm not saying your mother's a whore. I'm just saying she has sex for money. With people." Fox News used to be all about, you don't criticize a president during wartime. It's unacceptable, it's treasonous, it gives aid and comfort to the enemy. All of a sudden, for some reason you can run out there and say, "Barack Obama is destroying the fabric of this country."Of course, Fox had to cut something. But they left in a lengthy and stupid bit about Jon Stewart being O'Reilly's vice president, and all sorts of lame O'Reilly banter. To his credit, O'Reilly did repeatedly point his viewers to the full interview online, so it's not like he's exactly trying to hide anything. More like he wants to look good on TV, which is basically the only thing he's ever cared about aside from smearing deep-fried chickpea balls on naked underlings in the shower. You can read and watch it all here: www.gawker.com/fox-news-censored-jon-stewart Here is the bottom line, O'Reilly did a 42 minute interview with Jon Stewart, so what he should have done is give Stewart the entire hour and show every minute of it, unedited. That's what an honest journalist would have done, but O'Reilly is not an honest journalist, so what he did was slice and dice the interview to make himself look as good as possible, while leaving some of the best stuff from Stewart on the cutting room floor. More Republican Hypocrisy On The Stimulus By: Steve - February 6, 2010 - 2:00pm The hypocrisy is stunning, and notice that O'Reilly does not report any of this, ever. The Republican South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford waged a high-profile war against the economic stimulus package last spring, claiming that accepting the $700 million for his state would lead to a thing called slavery. Even as his state's unemployment rate climbed above the national average, Sanford maintained his partisan and politically motivated refusal to take the funds. But Thursday, Sanford flew to Washington to demand $300 million in stimulus money for education, the State newspaper reports: Sanford, who spent much of last year fighting parts of the Obama administration's stimulus plan, now wants S.C. to have a piece of the $4 billion stimulus money..Sanford's trip is especially hypocritical because the majority of stimulus money destined for South Carolina was to fund education and save thousands of teachers jobs. Yet, in March, Sanford told Fox News host Glenn Beck that taking the money would be akin to "fiscal child abuse." Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC) said of Sanford's trip: "I am pleased to see that the governor is finally taking an interest in South Carolina's public schools." After going to court last year to prevent stimulus funds, Clyburn added, "his meeting with Secretary Duncan appears to be the governor's admission that the stimulus was not only necessary but effective." Sanford's objection to taking stimulus education funding became especially poignant after eight-year-old South Carolinian Ty'Sheoma Bethea famously asked President Obama to fix her crumbling school. In June, the state Supreme Court finally ordered Sanford to take the $700 million and now, Bethea's school is being rebuilt with $23.5 million of stimulus money. Sanford's opposition to taking the federal aid -- which mirrored that of other high-profile GOP governors, like Bobby Jindal (R-LA) and Rick Perry (R-TX) -- was viewed by many as an effort to lay the groundwork for a run for higher office. But after his affair dashed those hopes, Sanford seems to have gained a new interest doing what is right for his state. ALL Of Fox News Ignoring The Senator Shelby Story By: Steve - February 6, 2010 - 1:30pm Not only is O'Reilly ignoring the Republican Senator Shelby story, ALL of Fox News is ignoring it too. As the Media turn their attention to the latest snowstorm to hit the nation's capital, no matter how much snow ultimately falls, one big story has been buried by Fox. Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) has put a "blanket hold" on several of President Obama's nominations for the executive branch. The move has the effect of requiring 60 senators to vote for cloture to break it. At least someone has reported it, TPMDC's Evan McMorris-Santoro has been on the story and reported this Friday: SANTORO: Senator Shelby has placed holds on several pending nominees due to unaddressed national security concerns," Shelby spokesperson Jonathan Graffeo said in a statement. "Among his concerns" are the progress on multi-billion dollar defense contract that would see planes built in Mobile, AL and Obama's decision to scrap a $45 million FBI improvised explosive device lab Shelby secured an earmark for in 2008.White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs fired back at Shelby Friday: GIBBS: "I guess if you needed one example of what's wrong with this town, it might be that one senator can hold up 70 qualified individuals to make government work better because he didn't get his earmarks," Mr. Gibbs told reporters today.Now just imagine the outrage you would see over at Fox News if a Democrat were holding up several Presidential nominations because he did not get two earmarks. One would have to imagine Fox's outrage over the Shelby story, because as of Friday night, according to Nexis Lexis, Fox's major shows, O'Reilly, Hannity, and Beck, had not said one word about the story. Big News O'Reilly Ignored Last Week By: Steve - February 6, 2010 - 10:30am O'Reilly has been complaining that all the rest of the media is liberal, except for Fox of course, and that they are biased by ignoring important news stories that make Obama or the Democrats look bad. Which is ridiculous, because they report on almost everything, it's Fox who ignores almost every story that makes a Republican look bad. And if they do ignore a story, it's probably not something they care about, and it will not get ratings. And btw, let's say the rest of the media does lean left, as O'Reilly claims. They are in the business of getting ratings, just as the shows on Fox News are. So if most of their viewers lean left, then they are going to run stories they think their viewers will like, that will get them the most ratings. And Fox News does the very same thing, most of their viewers lean right, so they run stories they think their viewers will like the most to get then the highest ratings. So Fox and the rest of the media are doing the exact same thing, they run the stories they think will get the highest ratings from the people who watch them. But here is the problem, somehow O'Reilly has a problem with the rest of the media doing it, while he has no problem with Fox doing it. The whole thing is massive hypocrisy, and a giant double standard, from O'Reilly. Fox News ignores a ton of real news stories because they make a Republican look bad, and O'Reilly ignores them too, if not worse than Fox. Just last week O'Reilly ignored numerous news stories that made Republicans look bad, here is just a partial list: 1) O'Reilly ignored the Scott Roeder murder trial of Dr. Tiller, where the pro-life Roeder walked into a CHURCH and murdered Dr. Tiller during a CHURCH service. This is the same abortion doctor that O'Reilly himself has called "Tiller The Baby Killer" numerous times. And once O'Reilly (who is also pro-life) said if he could get his hands on Tiller he would choke him to death. It was a week long trial on tv all day every day, and then at the end Roeder was found guilty 12 to 0 after only 35 minutes. Not only did O'Reilly not mention the trial one time in a week, he did not say a word about the verdit either, and he even has two legal segment on his show every week with three different attorneys. And yet, he still never said one word about the trial, or the conviction. 2) The Sarah Palin e-mails. A thousand e-mails from Palin and her husband were made public, and they show how corrupt Palin was, yet O'Reilly never said a word about any of them. It was all over the media Friday, except on the Factor, O'Reilly ignored the entire story and never said a word about it. Maybe because he was too busy interviewing/flirting with the two Super Bowl cheerleaders. He did an entire segment with the two cheerleaders, but he had no time for the Palin e-mails. Even though it was the lead story on almost every news show in the country, except on Fox. 3) The Tancredo racist comment at the tea party convention. Even though he did a segment on the tea party, it was never mentioned. He said you should have to take a test before you can vote, which is what they used to do years ago in the south to keep blacks from voting. Tancredo was the featured speaker at the Tea Party convention. O'Reilly did a segment on it with Chris Wallace who was there live, and they never even mentioned the Tancredo racism. After they denied it was a bunch of conservatives, when all the people who run it are conservatives, and all the speakers are conservatives. What's really funny is that what Tancredo said was real racism, yet O'Reilly ignored that. But he did report on the fake racism story about the NBC menu. O'Reilly and Goldberg did a segment on that, even though it was not racism, and they both even admitted it was not racism. It's like bizarro world, ignore real racism, and report on the fake racism. 4) O'Reilly has not said a word about the Republican Senator Shelby holding up 70 of Obama nominees because he did not get 2 earmarks. Even though the guy rails against government spending, he is holding them up because he did not get some big government spending for his state. Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) is attracting a great deal of attention for putting a blanket hold on all 70 of President Obama's pending executive nominations in order secure pork for his state. According to congressional experts, Shelby's hold is both a rare and aggressive abuse of his power. Shelby had quite a very different attitude when a Republican sat in the White House. In early 2005 -- shortly after winning his fourth term to the Senate -- Shelby complained, Far too many of the President's nominees were never afforded an up or down vote, because several Democrats chose to block the process for political gain. He added, Inaction on these nominees is a disservice to the American people. 5) The fact that many sponsors pulled out of the tea party, and it was all right-wing speakers. Even though O'Reilly and Wallace claimed it was middle America. Not once did they report that many sponsors pulled out because they think it's a big scam to make money, and the group that ran it even admits they are a for-profit company. O'Reilly has never reported any of this, and he continues to lie that it's middle America, when we all know it's a bunch of right-wing loons who hate Obama. 6) O'Reilly ignored the best parts of the Jon Stewart interview, especially the part where Stewart confronts O'Reilly about him saying you must support the president during a time of war, but only when Bush was the president. O'Reilly did not air that part of the interview. And btw, it was a 42 minute interview, O'Reilly edited it down to 12 minutes, that means 30 minutes of it was left on the cutting room floor. That 30 minutes O'Reilly did not air is when Stewart made some of his best arguments, O'Reilly did not show that, and edited the interview to make himself look as good as possible, just as I expected he would. Not to mention, in the past O'Reilly claimed the Factor is never edited. then he edited 30 minutes out of the Stewart interview. 7) During an interview with Don Imus on the Fox Business Network, Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace was promoting his interview with former Alaska governor Sarah Palin. When Imus randomly asked whether she will "be sitting on your lap" during the interview, Wallace replied, "One can only hope." Friday morning, Fox and Friends host Steve Doocy asked Wallace about his comment. Co-host Gretchen Carlson was flabbergasted by the exchange between Wallace and Imus, and asked, "Would you ask that of a man?" Wallace was silent for a few seconds before stumbling over a response and changing the subject to whether she would sit on Brad Pitt's lap during an interview. O'Reilly ignored it all, even though he had Chris Wallace on his show live to discuss the interview and to report on the Tea Party convention. 8) The Tea Party convention only had 600 people show up, yet O'Reilly claims they might take over and be a serious movement. If they can only get 600 people to show up for their convention, how in the hell is that possible. Not once did O'Reilly or Wallace report that only 600 people showed up, or that the Palin speech is not even sold out. They did report that Palin is the keynote speaker, but all that does is give up more evidence that the Tea Party is all Republicans, because nobody likes Palin except Republicans. A new poll even has her #1 to be President, with Republicn voters only. With everyone else, she is dead last, and they say she is not qualified. 9) The unemployment rate dropped to 9.7%, it was reported just about everywhere on Friday, except the O'Reilly Factor, and the so-called journalist Bill O'Reilly never said a word about it, as he claims he is fair to President Obama. I guess he was too busy flirting with the two cheerleaders, in a 4 minute segment on how they are big business, when they only make a lousy $6,000 a year. 10) O'Reilly also ignored the story about Republican Congressman Darrell Issa Saying the Democratically Elected Congress Is 'Exactly The Same' As Kazakhstan's Dictatorship. During a hearing Tuesday of the Helsinki Commission that featured Kazakh foreign minister Kanat Saudabayev, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) said that Kazakhstan's nature as a virtual dictatorship doesn't concern him because "Washington, D.C. is exactly the same" because it is controlled by Democrats. Of course, Democratic-controlled Washington, D.C., is not the same as Kazahkstan. The central Asian country is classified by the CIA as an "authoritarian" state with "little power outside the executive branch." O'Reilly never said a word about it, and you know if a Democrat said something like that about a Republican majority Congress O'Reilly would be all over it. And that is just a few of the actual news stories he has ignored, in one week, because they all make Republicans look bad. Then he has the nerve to complain about the so-called liberal media ignoring important news stories, when that is what O'Reilly does every night. And for the people that do not know it, the Factor is not live, it's taped. That way O'Reilly can edit out things he does not like, ever after he said the show is never edited. The Friday 2-5-10 O'Reilly Factor Review By: Steve - February 6, 2010 - 9:30am The TPM was called Trial Errors. O'Reilly did another talking points memo on the KSM trial, he said all hell is breaking loose. Then he bragged about being right that the trial would not be held in New York. When he had nothing to do with it, Obama only changed his mind when Mayor Bloomberg wrote him a letter with the cost, and the logistics of it. O'Reilly said it was wrong to have the trial in federal court, but he says nothing about the 300 terrorists that were tried in federal court under Bush. So O'Reilly only has a problem with it when Obama does it, but when Bush did it he said nothing. Then O'Reilly has Chris Wallace on to discuss the Tea Party convention, and his interview with Sarah Palin, who is the keynote speaker. And btw, there was a big story all over the news Friday about Wallace saying he hopes Palin does the interview sitting on his lap, it was started on Imus, and the Fox & Friends show also talked about it. But O'Reilly had Wallace on his show and never said a word about it. As usual, he ignores that stuff when it involves a Republican, but if it involved Keith Olberman he would have been all over it. Wallace was live at the Tea Party convention and said it was middle America, and denied that they are right-wing crackpots. Proving he is a biased fraud of a journalist, because that is exactly what it is, and they are almost all right-wing conservatives. O'Reilly said he is not sure it is a valid movement, and then he also denied it is not just Republicans, when that is what they are. All the speakers there are Republicans, and that is a fact. But O'Reilly and Wallace dishonestly reported that the Tea Party is middle America, when they both know it's a bunch of conservatives who hate Obama. Notice that no Democratic guests were on to comment on it, that's so there is nobody to tell the truth about the Tea Party convention. Then Bernie Goldberg was on to talk about the NBC menu. Goldberg said it was not racist, and that the whole story is crazy. O'Reilly even admitted it was not racism, and yet he reported it anyway, just so the both of them could say it was not racist. And they ignored 90% of the details in the story. The only thing they mentioned is that the Chef was black. Here is the information they ignored, and never said a word about. The menu was put out by a black woman, the guy who called it racist (Questlove) was joking when he tweeted it was racist, and no other blacks who saw it thought it was racist, because the menu sign was made by a black woman, not a white person. Roots drummer Questlove went into the cafeteria at NBC and noticed a sign at the cafeteria about a meal "in honor of Black History Month" fried chicken, collard greens and black-eyed peas. The musician, decided to make a joke about it on Twitpic. Questlove realized what happened, because an hour later he tweeted, that it was all a mistake, It was a joke taken too far. The whole thing was a joke, he was not being serious. And yet O'Reilly wasted an entire segment on his so-called news show to cover this nonsense, just because he hates NBC. And O'Reilly ignored it all except that the Chef was a black woman. Then O'Reilly and Goldberg cried some more about liberal bias in the media, and how Obama should stop attacking Fox News. The whole segment was a total waste of time, it was all right-wing spin with no news. Basically it's a weekly segment for O'Reilly and Goldberg to cry that all the media is biased except for Fox News. Then O'Reilly had Geraldo on once again to discuss the money raised from The Hope For Haiti Telethon. And I refuse to report anything they said about it because Fox News did not air the telethon, so they have no right to ask about anything they do. I will say this, O'Reilly implied on the pre-show website that the money is not getting to where it should be, but Geraldo said he thinks it is, and he praised George Clooney for working to get the money to Haiti, and he said $35 million of it has already got there. So O'Reilly changed the topic as fast as possible, and talked about Michael Jacksons doctor. On the Factor preview page at billoreily.com it said this: "NBC cafeteria posts racist menu" Even though it was not racism, and both O'Reilly and Goldberg admitted it was not racism. The whole thing was a joke, and they never reported any of it. It also said this about the Haiti Telethon segment: "Where in the world is the Haiti relief money?" "Has the money raised during the Haiti relief telethon been distributed yet?" Which implies the money is not getting to Haiti, when the report Geraldo did said the exact opposite, and there was no question that the money is getting there. Then O'Reilly had a segment with Daniel Lund, about a guy who was attacked by a shark. Why, who knows, how is this news. As far as I can tell it's just tabloid garbage to get ratings. Then O'Reilly had Glenn Beck on for his regular weekly segment. They talked about the Jon Stewart interview, and of course Beck claimed Stewart was wrong about him. O'Reilly claims Beck is not a shill for the Republican party, which is just ridiculous, because that is exactly what Beck does, and so does O'Reilly. Beck tried to make jokes about Stewart, but he was not funny. O'Reilly then made a joke about Beck's motive being purely profit. Beck said his motive is to save the country, haha, yeah right. By smearing and lying about the President and the Democrats, Beck is just insane, and O'Reilly is just as bad for letting him spew out this nonsense. Then O'Reilly joked that Jon Stewart is destroying the country, when he does not even have a news show, it's a comedy show on the comedy network. The whole segment was just ridiculous, it's two right-wing spin doctors sitting around putting out right-wing spin, who agree with each other. They never really disputed anything Stewart said with facts or details, all they did was say Stewart is just a liberal who is wrong about them, and make a couple jokes about him. Then they claimed to not be shills for the Republican party, as they both do hour long shows every night with 95% Republican guests, and non-stop attacks on Obama and the Democrats on a right-wing news network. If that's not being a shill for the Republican party, what the hell is it? Okay now get this, the last segment was an interview with two cheerleaders that will be working the Super Bowl. How this is news is beyond me, and I sure as hell am not going to report on this nonsense. I love cheerleaders as much as anyone, but this is not a segment that should be on a so-called hard news show. O'Reilly tried to justify the segment by saying it was big business, with calenders and films etc. Which is just laughable, the whole thing was just a segment for O'Reilly the pervert to get close to the two cheerleaders. He asked them how much they make, and they said up to $6,000 a year, yeah that's big business Billy, NOT! Then the ridiculous pinheads and patriots and the highly edited Factor e-mails. And once again not one Democrat was on the entire show. It was all Republicans, all the time. The Thursday 2-4-10 O'Reilly Factor Review By: Steve - February 5, 2010 - 8:30am The TPM was called Stewart vs. O'Reilly The Country Reacts. O'Reilly talked about the interview with Stewart last night, and mentioned that the entire unedited interview is on foxnews.com. Basically O'Reilly put his spin on the interview, and once again denied that Beck is a conservative, which is just ridiculous. O'Reilly also cried about the rest of the media not having conservatives as anchors, when Fox has no liberals. Then O'Reilly said Fox is fair and balanced, and said if you disagree you are crazy. Then part 2 of the O'Reilly/Stewart interview was on, a shorter version. O'Reilly started with some nonsense about pretending he was the President, and he was trying to vet Stewart to be his Vice President. They talked about global warming, and O'Reilly made some lame joke about grilling a burger, or something like that. Then they talked about wars around the world, the KSM trial, Sarah Palin, and terrorism. Stewart gave O'Reilly a smackdown about terrorism. And btw, just as Wednesday night, not one Democrat was put on the Factor to discuss the Jon Stewart interview. Then the far right Laura Ingraham was on to discuss the Stewart interview. Ingraham said they looked pretty sweet together. Then she made a joke about O'Reilly and Stewart going on tour. Then Ingraham made some ridiculous comment about Stewart using the Factor to announce he is not happy with Obama. Which is just ridiculous, and total right-wing propaganda. Even O'Reilly disagreed with her, and said Stewart was on to point out the bias at Fox, as he sees it. And then of course Ingraham trashed Obama for his speech at the national prayer breakfast. She hated it, and claims Obama politicized it too much. Ingraham also attacked Hillary Clinton by misrepresenting what she said, and once again O'Reilly disagreed with what Ingraham was saying about Hillary. Then the culture warriors Margaret Hoover and Gretchen Carlson were on to discuss the Planned Parenthood ad, to counter the pro-life Focus on the Family Super Bowl ad. The PP ad just said they want everyone to have a choice, not be forced to do anything, or not. And of course Carlson loves the Tebow ad, and hated the PP ad, she called it petty. Hoover said the PP ad was ok with her, and said they have a right to air it. Then they talked about a Mother Teresa stamp, O'Reilly said loons are objecting to it, who, name them. I do not know anyone who objects to it, and btw, O'Reilly was talking about some atheist group. O'Reilly even held the culture warriors over for a 2nd segment. How many times does he hold a Democratic guest over for a 2nd segment, never. In the 2nd segment they discussed Senator Scott Brown talking about his daughters all the time. Like who cares, and how is this tabloid crap news. Billy said it has caused some controversy, ok, with who, a few old farts like O'Reilly maybe, not me. Brown was asked if his daughters wanted to pose nude what would he say, and he said it is their choice, how the hell is that a controversy. The last bit of nonsense was a study about sex scenes in movies, and of course O'Reilly gave a viewer warning and played some clips of it. How is this news? Then Megyn Kelly was on for her regular weekly segment. They talked about an IGROW superstore for pot in California, and a bullying case. O'Reilly said the whole medical marijuana thing is just a big scam to get pot legalized. Kelly agreed with O'Reilly, and claims the whole thing is just a scam. They mostly made jokes about it, and once again this is not news, and nobody cares. If someone wants to smoke pot, who cares, leave them alone. Then they talked about a 17 year old high school girl who was bullied by some mean girls and she killed herself. The school suspended two girls so far, and they might have a lawsuit. The last segment was the totally ridiculous Factor News Quiz, with Steve Doocy and Martha MacCallum. It's a total waste of time, and I do not report on it. Then the lame pinheads and patriots, where the pinhead is almost always a liberal, and the patriot is almost always a conservative, and the highly edited Factor e-mails. And btw, O'Reilly lied Wednesday night when he said John McCain was never on the Factor. He was on in 2008, let's see if O'Reilly does a correction, I bet he don't. Not to mention McCain and Palin were both going to be on the Factor in 2008 at the same time, but it had to be cancelled because of bad weather. And Cheney was all over Fox News, he just never did the Factor. UPDATE: O'Reilly did not do a correction on the Thursday night show, that McCain did not do the Factor. As I predicted, there was no correction. The Wednesday 2-3-10 O'Reilly Factor Review By: Steve - February 4, 2010 - 10:30am The TPM was called New Poll Characterizes GOP As Evil. O'Reilly talked about the poll Daily Kos had the Research 2000 polling company run for them. O'Reilly said this: O'REILLY: The radical loon website Daily Kos has a new poll out. The survey says 39% of self-identified Republicans think President Obama should be impeached, 63% believe he is a socialist, and only 42% think he was born in the United States. If you believe that poll, you also believe Nancy Pelosi once dated Dick Cheney.Wow, there is so many lies and so much right-wing spin in that I barely know where to start. To begin with, the poll does not characterize the GOP as evil, but it does show how stupid a lot of people in the GOP are. And it is a valid poll, it was not done by Daily Kos, they simply paid for it, and it was done by a valid polling company. O'Reilly just don't like the results of the poll, so he calls it a fraud, just because the Daily Kos paid for it. O'Reilly just does not like the poll because it makes his Republican friends look crazy and out of touch with reality, so he has to try and dismiss it as a fraud, even though it's a valid poll that mirrors the results of other polls on the same questions. What's also funny is that Rasmussen is a Republican who puts out biased polls that make the Democrats look bad, and yet O'Reilly has never once called any of his polls a fraud. And the poll Kos had taken asked Republicans what they thought, they answered, and that is what you got. Somehow that is fraud to O'Reilly, when all they did were ask Republicans poll questions. There was no fraud, and if I were Kos or the polling company I would sue O'Reilly for slander. Remember that Kos did not take the poll, they had Research 2000 to take the poll. Just look how O'Reilly reported it, he called it a fraud poll put out by left-wing loons, that alone shows what a biased right-wing hack he is. Because he never says that about any polls put out by the right. Then O'Reilly said Obama told Democratic Senators to turn off the cable news networks. When that is not what he said, he simply made a comment that "IF" you did not watch cable news you would see everything is not about politics. He also said that they should listen to the people, which is what they were elected to do. Obama did not advise Democratic Senators to turn off the cable news shows, he simply said they would be better off if they stopped the political games, like you see on cable news shows, and do what the people who are not on tv want. Then O'Reilly had the far right Karl Rove on to discuss it, and of course he agreed with everything O'Reilly said, because they are both Republicans who hate the Daily Kos. Mostly because they tell the truth about O'Reilly and Rove, and they hate it because they do not want the truth about them being reported. O'Reilly even denounced the Kos site as hateful and divisive. He said, "The game is to demonize the tea party people and anybody who isn't a liberal as a kook. I think these Kos people are insane." Then O'Reilly had the far right Dick Morris on to discuss the Obama statements. And of course he agreed with everything O'Reilly said. With no Democrat guest to counter any of their right-wing propaganda. Morris started out with a lie, he said the Obama job approval is down to 45, 46, or 47 percent. That's a lie, it's 51% at Gallup, and it's even up to 49% with the biased Rasmussen. Morris just made it up, and O'Reilly sat there and let him spin out that lie. Morris basically said the Republicans have been doing nothing to score political points, and that they should keep doing it, instead of working with Obama to get the country on the right track. Proving they do not want to work with Obama, as they complain that Obama will not work with them. Making them traitors in my book, yet O'Reilly and Morris call it a good political strategy. O'Reilly did admit it was not good for the country, but that it's a good political tactic to win elections this November. Now imagine if the Democratic party did that when Bush was in power, O'Reilly would call them traitors. But Republicans do it and he says nothing, except to say it's a good political strategy. Then Jon Stewart was on to school O'Reilly about his bias, and the bias at Fox News. See the videos I posted for the details. Stewart basically said Fox is an arm of the Republican party, and O'Reilly said he was insane. When it's all true, and Stewart is exactly right. Stewart said this: STEWART: Fox News is the most passionate, and sells the clearest narrative of any news organization. The brilliance of Fox News is that you have been able to mainstream conservative talk radio. But do you truly believe Fox is non-partisan, fair and balanced and trustworthy?Then O'Reilly told Stewart that he was judging the entire network by a few personalities: "That's the narrative of a couple of guys - Sean Hannity, a Republican, and Glenn Beck, who is basically everyman. He doesn't shill for any party, he just spouts what he believes." Talk about insanity, that is it. The whole network is right-wing, not just Beck and Hannity, O'Reilly is too, Cavuto is too, Kelly is too, they all are. The only guy on the entire netowrk who is even close to objective is Shepard Smith. O'Reilly even denied Beck is a Republican, and told Stewart that if you deny that you are out of your mind. Which is just ridiculous, and the only person out of their mind is O'Reilly for denying it. Beck is a total 100% right-wing shill for the Republican party. Then O'Reilly had Dennis Miller on to talk about the Stewart interview, and to my surprise Miller actually said good things about Stewart. Most likely because they are friends. Miller said this, "I think the guy's a great comic, and I find his TV skills to be 'Garroway-esque,' which is the highest compliment I can pay somebody. I agree with him about much in life, but very little in politics. He's one of the most compelling TV presences of the last twenty years and I think he believes every word he says." Then he went on to do his usual unfunny right-wing jokes about Obama and other Democrats. The last segment was the totally ridiculous body language segment with the blonde body language bimbo. I do not report this garbage because it's nonsense and not news. Then the lame pinheads and patriots and the highly edited Factor e-mails. And btw, not one Democrat was on the show to comment on the Stewart interview, only Republicans. And not only that, Jon Stewart was the only Democrat on the entire show. Bill O'Reilly Talks To Jon Stewart By: Steve - February 4, 2010 - 9:30am Here are some videos from the O'Reilly/Stewart interview, it's all pretty good, but my favorite is when O'Reilly told Stewart that if you are trying to tell me Glenn Beck is a partisan Republican I will say you have lost your mind. And if I were Jon Stewart I would have said, my God man, you need to up the dosage on your medications. Because that is exactly what Beck is, a far right partisan Republican spin doctor, and if you deny it you are out of your mind. Stewart: O'Reilly is "voice of sanity" on Fox, "which is like being the thinnest kid at fat camp" Jon Stewart explains Fox/GOP "shadow government" to O'Reilly -- "Is Glenn here? Can I get a chalkboard?" Stewart to O'Reilly: Fox News is able to "mainstream conservative talk radio" and is "in business to help Sarah Palin" Stewart: Fox turns "reasonable concerns" about Obama, economy into "panic attack about the next coming of Chairman Mao" Stewart did pretty well, but he did not do very good when O'Reilly talked about Fox News cutting away from Obama at the GOP meeting. I know the interview was edited, and Stewart may have said something about it that did not get on the air. But what I saw was not very good. Stewart let O'Reilly spin it, and lie about what happened. O'Reilly said they showed it all but about 12 minutes, and then he used a diversion trick by talking about how MSNBC and CNN did not show all of the Brown speech. What happened is that 12 minutes was all Obama talking, that's the part they cut out. And during that 12 minutes they put Rove on to spin it, then they showed all of the GOP response. O'Reilly failed to mention any of that. Not to mention, they claim to be the we report, you decide news network. So they cut away from the Obama speech, when CNN and MSNBC did not, to have Rove spin what Obama was saying, instead of doing the we report, you decide thing, it was we will not report, and tell you what to decide by Karl Rove. They had Rove spin it, as they were waiting for the GOP to respond, then they showed all of what the GOP said, with no cut away, and no spin on what they said with a Democrat guest. Stewart should have corrected O'Reilly and hammered him for that, but he said nothing. And to be fair, he might have, it could have been edited out of the interview by O'Reilly. The interview was taped, and it was clearly edited, so we do not know what all Stewart said, we just see what O'Reilly let us see. |
The Truth About Ratings For News Shows Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Spin Doctor O'Reilly Spinning Fox News Most Trusted Poll Fox News Did Not Air Hope For Haiti Telethon O'Reilly Caught Spinning Obama Terrorism Polls O'Reilly Factor Year In Review 2009 O'Reilly Caught Lying About House Ethics Committee O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Increase O'Reilly Caught Lying About Limbaugh Racism Most Factor Gear Made in Vietnam And China O'Reilly Caught Lying About Religious Festival O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Lying About CNN O'Reilly Caught Violating Journalistic Standards Again O'Reilly Caught Lying About The ACLU & Racial Profiling More Proof O'Reilly & FOX News Do Not Tell The Truth Factor Pollster Caught Writing GOP Policy Memo O'Reilly Called Bruce Springsteen Un-American & Un-Patriotic The Bill O'Reilly Senate Torture Report Countdown Clock O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Obama Approval Numbers FOX News Caught Lying About Obama Budget O'Reilly Busted For Helping GOP Smear Pelosi O'Reilly Caught Lying About Obama Earmark Promise What a Fair & Balanced O'Reilly Factor Would Look Like Military.com Report Proves O'Reilly Wrong About Homeless Vets O'Reilly Places 7th in 2008 Wingnut of The Year Award O'Reilly Denys Reality About Abstinence Only Programs Conclusive Proof O'Reilly & The Republican Party Are Both Corrupt The Right-Wing Liberal Killer Story O'Reilly Ignored The Facts About O'Reilly And GE Doing Business With Iran How to Deal With an O'Reilly Factor Ambush Interview Buzzflash Names O'Reilly Media Putz of The Week The 10 Page Hand Written Lucifer Letter I Got in 2003 Why FOX News Loves Juan Williams: The Strings And The Puppet
O'Reilly Info O'Reilly Spins Cable News Ratings Read The Letter O'Reilly Had His Attorney Send me O'Reilly Caught Lying About The NY Times JFK Terror Plot O'Reilly's Party Enrollment Form Showing Him a Registered Republican O'Reilly Wins 2004 Misinformer of The Year Award O'Reilly Death Penalty Lies O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 49 Times Since 2001 O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks Mail-to-Bill Hate-Mail FOX News Bias Transcripts Assorted
glenn-beck-sucks.com Think Progress Buzzflash Bartcop AmericaBlog Crooks & Liars Progressive Eruptions Rude Pundit Moveon.org Truthout.com Daily Beacon Mike Hersh Prison Planet Moose & Squirrel Politics & Society Apocalypse Cafe Fox News Boycott I Hate Hannity Inebriated Discourse Hannity Sucks LT Saloon NewsCorpse.com Glenn Beck Is An Idiot Nilo Radio Ranker.com
mediamatters.org fair.org alternet.org cjr.org Media Transparency conwebwatch |
| Proof The O'Reilly Factor is Biased Against Barack Obama | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/3mbiasnumbers.htm |
| Proof O'Reilly Lied About The Balance on His Show | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillybalanced.htm |
| O'Reilly Sucks Investigation: Dishonesty, Deception, And Bias By Bill O'Reilly | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreilly-investigation.htm |
| (( Right-Wing Hate Speech Ignored by Bill O'Reilly )) | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/right-wing-hate.htm |
| O'Reilly Phone Sex Scandal Information | ||
After hearing of the lawsuit O'Reilly said it was all lies, that it was a shakedown for money, that he would fight it to the bitter end with no settlement, and that he would let the courts decide the matter. That was all before O'Reilly found out she had recorded his phone calls. Then Mr. I will fight her lies to the bitter end with no settlement, paid her $10 million dollars to settle the lawsuit, get the tapes, and shut her up. The out-of-court settlement came on the eve of a courtroom fight over audiotapes, reports CBS News Correspondent Kelly Cobiella. |
