Advertise Contact About This Web Site Webmaster Information
Website Info








If you are looking to buy prescription medications from Canada, then buy from a licensed Canadian pharmacy.



Check out Android Poker for the best poker links and apps.



RealMoneyAction.com is quickly becoming the #1 source for playing online casino games for real money. Check them out



As you already know by now that Oreilly sucks and is the biggest loser. Oreilly facts apart, many people spend their time on computers playing online poker real money games as a hobby.



Get all the news and information you will ever need about sing mobile bingo at this top mobile bingo comparison site, there is no spin here, just great reviews.



Have a look at these Bally Tech Games and vegasslotsonline.com



Check out usaonlinepokersites.com for information on playing poker in the USA.



Visit www.uspokersite.net for US online poker related information and news.



Play online poker at the most trusted online poker room in Canada 888pokercanada.com



O'Reilly Sucks
Blog Archives

January - 2012
February - 2012
March - 2012
April - 2012
May - 2012
June - 2012
July - 2012
August - 2012
September - 2012
October - 2012
November - 2012
December - 2012

January - 2013
February - 2013
March - 2013
April - 2013
May - 2013
June - 2013
July - 2013
August - 2013
September - 2013
October - 2013
November - 2013
December - 2013

January - 2014
February - 2014
March - 2014
April - 2014
May - 2014
June - 2014
July - 2014
August - 2014
September - 2014




Website Links

O'Reilly Info

The O'Reilly Iraq Apology Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Spins

Cable News Ratings

Read The Letter O'Reilly Had His Attorney Send me

O'Reilly Wins 2004 Misinformer of The Year Award

O'Reilly Death Penalty Lies

O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 49 Times Since 2001

O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks

Mail-to-Bill

Hate-Mail

O'Reilly #5 On Top 25 Right-Wing Journalist List

O'Reilly Factor Year In Review 2009

Factor Pollster Caught Writing GOP Policy Memo

What a Fair & Balanced O'Reilly Factor Would Look Like

Transcript: Bill O'Reilly v Jeremy Glick

Peabody Award Facts

Bill Clinton Enron News

Buzzflash Names O'Reilly Media Putz of The Week

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly & The Republican Party Are Both Corrupt

The Right-Wing Liberal Killer Story O'Reilly Ignored

The Facts About O'Reilly And GE Doing Business With Iran

How to Deal With an O'Reilly Factor Ambush Interview

Why FOX News Loves Juan Williams: The Strings And The Puppet

Blogroll

ultimatetop10s.com/
AmericaBlog
Progressive Eruptions
Rude Pundit
Moveon.org
Prison Planet
Apocalypse Cafe
Fox News Boycott
Inebriated Discourse
Hannity Sucks
NewsCorpse.com
Glenn Beck Is An Idiot
Ranker.com
GlennBeckReport.com
lauraingrahamsucks.com

The Factor Guest List Count

September 2014 (21 Shows) Republicans - 161 | Democrats - 30

The Factor Guest List Count Archives

Ratings: The O'Reilly Factor - Total Viewers

Monday - 9-29-14 -- O'Reilly - 2.696
Tuesday - 9-30-14 -- O'Reilly - 2.718
Wednesday - 10-1-14 -- O'Reilly -
Thursday - 10-2-14 -- O'Reilly -
Friday - 10-3-14 -- O'Reilly -

Weekly Factor Average -

The Cable News Ratings Archives

Oreilly is a polarizing figure and so is online gaming, especially at Begado Casino. There are advocates in Congress proposing a federal law, but Republican detractors. This, according to a supporter of Steve and Oreilly-sucks.com, who runs a Begado Fan Blog. The conservative approach is to stick to legitimate gaming certifications and brands like Begado, says Zachary Gleason.


The O'Reilly Sucks Blog

Stewart Slams Fox For Criticizing President While At War
By: Steve - October 2, 2014 - 10:00am

Remember back to the terrible days when George W. Bush and Dick Cheney were running the country, the economy crashed, the stock market crashed, jobs were going away at a rate of 750,000 a month, and we were in a useless and un-needed war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Almost every night O'Reilly and everyone at Fox News said it was not only un-American to criticize the President while we were at war, it was borderline treason. At one point O'Reilly even called people who simply disagreed with the President traitors, then after taking some massive heat for it he changed it to calling them bad Americans.

He even called for some of the dissenters to be tried for sedition. As in Professor Ward Churchill, here is a partial transcript with Grege Noone, Former. Judge Advocate General, from April of 2005 when Bush was still in office:
O'REILLY: OK, would you -- the last treason case was brought in 1949 in the USA. Do you think that Churchill runs the risk of being tried for treason here?

NOONE: In my opinion, Bill, no. There have been only been 30 prosecutions in the history of the United States. The last eight or so related to World War II, what you're talking about.

O'REILLY: All right, he's not there yet. All right, let's go to sedition, a federal crime supporting revolution against the government. Certainly he's doing that, or supporting an enemy of the nation in time of war through speeches, publications, and organizations. Certainly he's doing that.

The problem is we're not in a time of war because Congress hasn't declared war.

NOONE: Right.

O'REILLY: Can you get him on sedition anyway?

NOONE: No, I don't think we can. I mean, you know, this guy -- I think the only thing we can charge him with at this point is exceeding his 15 minutes of fame and give him a one-way ticket back to obscurity. This is guy is not someone who's going to rise to the level of treason or sedition.
Now think about that, if we use O'Reilly's own argument today from 2005 he is guilty of sedition. Because O'Reilly is slamming the President every day, while we are at war, O'Reilly himself even says we are at war with ISIS and slams Obama for not declaring we are at war.

So using O'Reilly own position on the issue of criticizing the President during a time of war, he is guilty of sedition.

Jon Stewart even slammed the morons at Fox for that very thing a few days ago.

Stewart: "F...you and all your false patriotism. When Bush took us to war, any criticism was shouted down as treasonous. But a president you don't like has the country poised on the same precipice (and) no transgression -- no matter how immaterial and ridiculous -- is too small to cite as evidence that this president isn't as American as you are."

That was Jon Stewart pummeling the people at Fox and finally doing what's needed to be done for months into years now.

As Bob Cesca has documented so well, Fox News's flexible stance on criticizing the president while troops are in harm's way has always amounted to the worst and most indefensible kind of hypocrisy. And yet to the best of my knowledge no one with any real authority in the media has ever called them to the carpet on this.

No one with the clout of a Jon Stewart -- and certainly no one who's ever appeared on Fox News -- has been able to force guys like Hannity and O'Reilly and the rest of the self-righteous bloviators who circled the wagons around the office of "The President of the United States" for eight years to explain their behavior over the last six.

In other words, it proves their right-wing bias and their double standards, to them it's wrong to criticize the President during a time of war, but only when a Republican is in the White House, when a Democrat is there suddenly it's not only ok, it's encouraged daily by O'Reilly and Fox.

The explanation for why it's suddenly okay to disregard their past articles of faith and tear down this president for everything from latte salutes, to teleprompters, to his affinity for spicy mustard and gherkins, to mom jeans and tan suits is nothing more than cheap partisan politics.

But rarely has there been an example of their own naked hypocrisy that's so easy to throw back in their faces. Hannity would have nowhere to run if someone forced him to try to explain why he once said it was almost treasonous to attack the president during war-time but now apparently thinks it's perfectly alright.

Watching him attempt to weasel out of his past remarks or jump through semantic hoops to get himself off the hook now would be entertaining as hell. But you'll never get him in that position.

As for Eric Bolling, who has a history of letting Stewart get under his skin, he'll probably just say that he wasn't at Fox News during most of the Bush years and therefore can't be held accountable for what the rest of the bellicose white guys at the network were saying back then.

But Stewart's smackdown of Fox News overall double-standard remains -- and it's going to go unanswered for the simple reason that Fox News has no answer to it, because other than patent dishonesty, there is none.

It's flat out bias and dishonesty, to O'Reilly you are a traitor if you criticize the President during a time of war when we have a Republican President. But it's fine to do it when a Democrat is in the White House.

The Tuesday 9-30-14 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - October 1, 2014 - 11:00am

The TPM was called: President Obama Gets Blowback from the Intelligence Community. The biased and dishonest Bill O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: There is deep anger among some working in American intelligence agencies. That's because president Obama told '60 Minutes' it was an intel failure - not his fault - that ISIS grew into a monster. President Obama has not taken responsibility for the botched intelligence on ISIS, and that has led to some evaluations.

On November 13th, 2013, State Department official Brett McGurk told Congress that 'ISIL is growing roots in Syria and in Iraq.' That means the president had to know that the State Department believed ISIS was a threat. Talking Points believes Mr. Obama does not want to engage the war on terror. Yes, he will order drone strikes and some Special Forces activity, but he does not want the USA to launch major offenses to degrade terror groups.

The president looks away, hoping that a situation like ISIS and Syria will go away. And now President Obama is paying a price for his passive approach to the jihad, and the anti-terror situation is bleak. For decades Pakistan has undermined Afghanistan and America by harboring the Taliban. President Obama is well aware of that. Iran has funded Hezbollah and trained a variety of Shi'a terrorists on Iranian soil.

President Obama, well aware. The al Qaeda leader al-Zawahiri is still at large, but where is he? Some country has to have him, but the pro-terrorist nations around the world do not fear the United States. What did we do to Pakistan when they harbored bin Laden all those years? Nothing. And when the Pakistanis imprisoned the man who helped bring down bin Laden, President Obama again did nothing. So Mr. Obama's resume on terrorism is about as weak as you can get. And that's a fact.
Comment: Haha, those are not facts, they are mostly the opinion of the biased right-wing hack Bill O'Reilly, to call them facts is laughable.

Then the Democrat Kirsten Powers and Republican Monica Crowley critiqued the Talking Points Memo and the failure to confront ISIS earlier.

Powers said this: "I don't think the case you made shows that President Obama is in denial. You're suggesting that people were ringing alarm bells over ISIS, but that's not what those clips show. I think President Obama knew they were a threat, but I don't think he knew that they were going to overrun Iraq."

Crowley said this: "This is a man who won the presidency as an anti-war leftist, and he is completely committed to that. He has spent his president minimizing the jihadist threat, so when it came to ISIS he lapsed into his pattern of deny, deflect, delay, and then stonewall."

Comment: Once again, those are opinions, one from a Democrat and one from a Republican, they are speculating and they are not facts.

Then Karl Rove was on, he talked about 42-year-old Omar Gonzalez, who recently scaled the White House fence and actually entered the building.

Rove said this: "This is very troubling. This guy got through the front door and went a long distance before being tackled by an off-duty officer. There's supposed to be an alarm that goes off when there is a breach, but that alarm apparently did not go off. There may be some mitigating circumstances, but they have to change the procedures."

O'Reilly then called for the firing of Secret Service boss Julia Pierson, saying this: "The culture is undisciplined and slipshod at the White House. That man could have had a suicide vest on, he could have blown up the White House. She has to go and the whole culture has to change!"

And for once I agree with O'Reilly, when someone gets over the fence and inside the White House whoever is in charge of security has to be fired, and should have been fired yesterday.

Then Howard Kurtz was on to talk about how the media reports on Obama.

Kurtz said this: "Whatever romance existed between Obama and the media is over. It's a bad marriage and journalists are now quick to push back against what they see as excuses. It started with the botched ObamaCare rollout and then the VA scandal. The press likes it when the president takes personal responsibility for screw-ups, not when he pushes it off to other agencies, and they're now trying to hold him accountable."

But of course O'Reilly was not buying it, he argued that most major media outlets are still very reluctant critics, saying this: "They're embarrassed because they threw in with President Obama early and now it's all coming apart. But their heart isn't in it."

Comment: To begin with, the media has never thrown in with President Obama, that is a right-wing myth. They reported honestly about him, which O'Reilly hated, because he wanted them to report on him like he does and like Fox does, in a biased way. And nothing is coming apart, things are getting better, yes we have a problem with ISIS, but they are not a threat to anyone on American soil, which is what Homeland Security said.

Then O'Reilly has the crazy right-wing nut Congresswoman Michele Bachmann on for some strange reason, she is retiring at the end of the year, and she joined The Factor and discussed President Obama's delayed response to the ISIS threat.

Bachmann said this: "We heard about the group almost two years ago, and we watched as the hoof beats got louder. Before Christmas of 2013 we knew this was a real problem and the president had at least as much information as we had. The administration lived in a fantasy world where they pulled all the troops out of Iraq and kept saying they had Al Qaeda on the run. They couldn't take the fact that reality didn't match up with their fantasy."

Comment: Once again, that is all right-wing talking points and her opinion, not facts.

Then Charles Krauthammer was on, he laid out his concerns about Iran's nuclear future. Notice that O'Reilly did not call Krauthammer dumb for saying his 25,000 man mercenary army is a bad idea, he only called Colbert dumb for basically saying the same thing Krauthammer said about it.

Krauthammer said this: "This is the biggest story, and history will remember this year for our surrendering Iran. It's not being talked about, partly because we are trying to get Iran to tacitly help us with the war on ISIS, and most importantly because President Obama gave up on these negotiations long ago. He weakened the sanctions when sanctions were the only thing that brought Iran to the table in the first place. Iran is a few months away from a bomb - we know it, Obama knows it, Iran knows it, and the world knows it."

O'Reilly said he was worried about the possibility of another conflagration in the Middle East, saying this: "If you're correct in all this, Israel is going to do something. They're not going to sit back and let Iran get these weapons."

Comment: And I say so what, let Israel deal with it.

And finally, the lame Factor tip of the day that was once again not a tip, just O'Reilly promoting a book about pop music.

Republican Quotes About Not Criticizing The President During Wartime
By: Steve - October 1, 2014 - 10:00am

President Obama launched the first sorties into Syria, targeting ISIS terrorists. Within 24 hours, however, Republicans everywhere decided to turn an awkward salute into a near-impeachable crime against humanity, thus violating one of their most sacred rules from the Bush administration era: never criticize the commander-in-chief during wartime.

Here's just a reminder of what I thought was the rule about this kind of behavior (note that O'Reilly and Hannity have been especially critical of Obama):
"You don't criticize the commander-in-chief in the middle of a firefight. That could be construed as putting U.S. forces in jeopardy and undermining morale."

--Bill O'Reilly, April, 2004

"The only ideas that they espouse are ways to undermine the troops in harm's way and undermine their commander in chief while they're at war. Your candidates have no idea how to keep this economy strong."

--Sean Hannity, 10/18/06

"He's the commander-in-chief. And what I find frankly repugnant about you and some of your fellow Democrats -- you have undermined our president..."

--Sean Hannity, 03/19/06

"You know, Norman, those comments while we are at war, while troops are in harm's way, while he is the commander in chief, do you not see the outrage in that?"

--Sean Hannity, 11/12/07

"I have had it with members of your party undermining our troops, undermining a commander in chief while we are at war..."

--Sean Hannity, 11/05

"I've held this in long enough. I really suspect that these liberal tactics are damaging, maybe even killing the morale of our troops."

--Rush Limbaugh, 6/14/07

"Can we do it without distorting their legacies and pandering to anti-American elites worldwide and using their deaths to embarrass and undermine our commander in chief?"

--Michelle Malkin, 11/23/05

"On the other hand, if Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democrat Congress are successful in undermining the commander-in-chief (thereby emboldening the terrorists to kill more Americans in Iraq)..."

--Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, 04/11/07

"And furthermore, one of the fundamental principles we have in America is that the president is the commander in chief of the armed forces and attempts to undermine the commander in chief during time of war amounts to treason."

--Pat Robertson, 12/07/05

"While young Americans are dying in the sands of Iraq and the mountains of Afghanistan, our nation is being torn apart and made weaker because of the Democrats' manic obsession to bring down our commander in chief."

--Zell Miller, Republican National Convention, 9/01/04

"Through their relentless, vicious attacks on Bush, they systematically undermined the public's confidence in the war and our ability to optimally wage it."

--Conservative Columnist David Limbaugh
Funny how O'Reilly and Hannity never mention any of this now, while they slam Obama every night during a time of war. Here is the way I see it, you either support the president in wartime or you don't. You can't have it both ways. Unless you work for Fox News, because they clearly can have it both ways.

O'Reilly: Un-Scientific Website Poll Proves 70% Support His Mercenary Plan
By: Steve - October 1, 2014 - 9:00am

Now this is not only funny, it's sad. After the COMEDIAN Stephen Colbert took down O'Reilly for his insane 25,000 man mercenary army idea O'Reilly went nuts and attacked Colbert, even though Colbert is just a COMEDIAN who has a show on the Comedy Network.

Colbert destroyed O'Reilly by comparing his plan to one that Colbert had when he was in grade school. Colbert brought out his old 4th-grade notebook, which contained 'Stevie's Sooper Soljer Sqwad' made up of double mutant ninja super soldiers with laser nunchucks.

Colbert also played clips of Fox News personalities criticizing O'Reilly's plan, including a Factor Regular Charles Krauthammer (who even O'Reilly says is smarter than he is) who said his plan is off the wall, too expensive, and said it will never work.

But O'Reilly did not attack Krauthammer or anyone at Fox, he goes after a COMEDIAN on the Comedy Network.

O'Reilly didn't take too kindly to Colbert viciously taking him down. In O'Reilly's 'Tip of the Day,' he explained to his viewers that you need to run away when dealing with "dumb people," claiming that Colbert has no idea how to fight a jihad. As if he does, when he dont.

Notice that O'Reilly did not have an actual segment on it, with guests from each side so that it is at least almost a balanced debate, the coward used his tip of the day to slam Colbert because then nobody could disagree with him or argue that his mercenary army idea is stupid. So much for fair and balanced debate.

Before chastising Colbert "and his ilk, aka liberals" O'Reilly showed poll results claiming that 70% of people are in favor of his plan. Of course, the poll was on his personal website, and only of the show's audience, and not a scientific poll.

On the Factor polls it says this: "These polls are not scientific. Only one vote per visitor per poll is counted by the system."

They are not scientific because they are website polls, taken on a personal website by people who watch his show and then visit the website to vote, in other words, these type of polls are worthless.

And yet, O'Reilly called Colbert dumb for disagreeing with him, called liberals dumb, which implies that only Colbert and his liberal friends think his mercenary army is a bad idea. While claiming that 70% of the people agree with him so he must be right. Except 70% of the people do not agree with him, 70% of the biased people who watch his show and then voted in the website poll agree with him, which turns out to be about 15,000 people.

Not to mention, 30% of the people disagreed with him, in his own poll on his own website, which is not good for O'Reilly. Basically O'Reilly implied that 70% of the American people agree with him on the mercenary army idea, based on the poll he ran on his website, that is not a scientific poll. Which is a lie, and he knows it.

The fact is, O'Reilly has been slammed by everyone over his stupid mercenary idea ever since he first brought it up. The only people he can claim support him on it are the former CEO of Blackwater and Henry Kissinger. Basically, a guy who would profit greatly from a large-scale mercenary operation and another guy who was Nixon's Secretary of State when Nixon was illegally bombing Cambodia.

Everyone else has mocked O'Reilly for his crazy plan, regardless of ideological bent. But he still refuses to admit it, and then attacks a COMEDIAN claiming all liberals are dumb because they do not support his insane plan to fight terrorism and his biased and unscientific website poll (where he only got 70% support for it) proves he is right.

Now think about this, O'Reilly claims to have an independent, hard news no spin zone show, that only deals in the facts with no speculation allowed. Then he comes up with this crazy mercenary army idea, everyone says it is a bad idea, even most conservatives, and he refuses to admit it, then attacks a COMEDIAN and all liberals, claiming they are dumb because they do not agree with his crazy idea.

He has no facts, he is not a military expert, he is not in Congress, he was dead wrong about Iraq, and he has no experience in fighting terrorism. But he wants you to all support his army idea, based on nothing but a biased personal website poll that he himself admits is not even scientific, wow!

The Monday 9-29-14 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - September 30, 2014 - 11:00am

The TPM was called: Why President Obama and Congress are Not Protecting Us Effectively. The biased and dishonest Bill O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: If you are not troubled about how the USA is being run, you are not paying attention. The threat from Islamic killers is growing, and our response is disorganized to say the least. But even more dangerous than that is the fact that our government is caught by surprise time after time. That is simply unacceptable, and the one body that could do something about it is Congress.

The House and Senate have oversight on the president and how he conducts himself in office, yet our Congress people and Senators say little. A few like John McCain and Lindsey Graham have been outspoken about the danger to America, and they have been vilified by the left as warmongers. On the Democratic side we hear gibberish, foolish rationalizations, or attacks on people like me, who are pointing out the danger of the worldwide jihad.

Last night on '60 Minutes,' President Obama stuck by his talking points, saying this: 'We've got to get Arab and Muslim leaders to say very clearly, these folks do not represent Islam.' So let me get this straight: President Obama believes that he is going to get Muslim leaders to speak out against the jihad? Most Muslims are peaceful people, but Muslims are afraid that if they do speak out they will be killed by the jihadists. However, in his interview last night President Obama remained positive, saying there is 'an unprecedented international coalition.'

The fact is that out of the 62 coalition nations only four will attack ISIS inside Syria. That is a very weak coalition, a bunch of nations that are talking but are not acting. The sad fact is that the United States is the only nation on the Earth capable of destroying the jihad. China and Russia could do it, but will not because they want to see America damaged. Their capabilities are directed toward expanding their power, not fighting evil.

The jihadists well understand that the West does not have the will to defeat them. That's why they behead people on camera. These savages do not fear reprisals because the reprisals are so weak. The jihadists are all over the world now, and our government is befuddled to say the least. President Obama and leaders of Congress need to sit down and find out why we are so often taken by surprise by dangerous situations. There is something very wrong here, and it's just a matter of time until more Americans die because of it.
And all of that is propaganda, nothing but lies and right-wing propaganda. Because Obama and even the Congress have protected us, there are no terrorist attacks by ISIS in America, none, so O'Reilly is lying. Then he basically blames President Obama for the journalist beheadings, when Bush was not blamed for them by O'Reilly when it happened during his time in office.

O'Reilly even said the interviewer on 60 minutes was bad because he did not ask Obama if he was to blame for the beheadings, which is just ridiculous. And only a right-wing nut would blame President Obama for beheadings in a war Bush started. O'Reilly is an insane right-wing hack who hates Obama and blames everything on him, and the truth is that if Obama does not do what O'Reilly wants him to he says Obama is not protecting us, it's just insane.

Then Brit Hume was on with his observations on President Obama's Sunday night '60 Minutes' interview. And of course no Democratic guest was on for balance, just two Republicans putting their right-wing spin on it.

Hume said this: "The thing that was most striking, was his effort to blame the intelligence community and its leader Jim Clapper for failing to see the strength of ISIS in Iraq. But even if we assume that there had been no intelligence, back in February ISIS had crossed into Iraq from Syria and captured Fallujah and Ramadi. So their capacities were unmistakable and the fact that we missed the whole thing is absurd. In the sense of taking responsibility, President Obama is weak. But he's strong and stubborn when it comes to sticking to policies even when they're manifestly failing."

Then the Republican Bernie Goldberg was on to grade Steve Kroft's '60 Minutes' interview with President Obama. And as usual no Democratic guest was on for balance, it was total one sided bias from Mr. so-called fair and balanced O'Reilly.

Goldberg said this: "I'll be diplomatic and say it was somewhere between an 'A' and an 'F,' President Obama is very slick and if you are going to stand a chance of getting information, it has to be with follow-up questions. I think Steve Kroft's questions were fine, but the follow-ups not so much."

O'Reilly advised questioners to be more combative when interviewing President Obama, saying this: "They don't debate the president, which is the only way you'll get anything out of him. You have to say, 'Mr. President, isn't it your fault that these two American journalists were beheaded because if you had taken action last March the ISIS guys might be dead by now?'"

And now here is the truth, to O'Reilly and Goldberg think no journalist ever does a good job when they interview the President, because they are not tough enough on him. In their world if you do not do it the way they would you are a bad journalist. Which is just garbage, because nobody thinks that, except other right-wing loons.

Then Megyn Kelly was on to discuss the recent shooting of a cop in Ferguson, Missouri. And as expected, no Democratic guest was on for balance, none. Notice that O'Reilly has ignored all the other news stories about Ferguson in the last week or so, but as soon as a cop gets shot he is all over it, which is 100% bias from O'Reilly by cherry picking the stories about Ferguson he reports on.

Kelly said this: "This happened under strange circumstances. Police first said that this officer saw two suspects trying to burglarize a community center. But then the police changed their story and said no one was trying to burglarize the center and there was just one shooter. The suspect is still at large."

Kelly also predicted that Marine Sergeant Andrew Tahmooressi will soon be released from the Mexican jail where he has languished for six months, saying this: "He has already spent more time in jail than virtually any other soldier, and apparently things are getting a lot more friendly between the prosecution and the defense attorney."

Then the worthless moron Jesse Watters was on, he visited the college town of Princeton, New Jersey, where he interviewed some attendees at an American Civil Liberties Union conference.

Here are a few of their statements: "I'm opposed to the war on terror, I think it's way too broad" ... "You can't just prosecute a war because we wish to execute everyone who might do us harm" ... "They have very extreme agenda, but we have people in this country like fundamentalist Christians who have very extreme agendas" ... "If someone sells a little meth on the corner, I don't think he needs to go to prison for a long time."

Watters revealed that he got out safely and is not a card-carrying member of the ACLU ... yet.

Whatever that means, it's just nonsense. The Jesse Watters segment is worthless garbage, it is not news and has no news value, O'Reilly only does it because he thinks it's funny to send the moron Watters into liberal areas to ask them questions and make them look stupid. While never doing the same thing to conservatives, it's a totally biased and not funny attack on liberals, and it has zero news value.

And finally, the lame Factor tip of the day called: Dealing With Dumb People. Billy said this: "When you encounter an ideologue who mocks or criticizes you but has nothing constructive to say, run fast!"

Which is just laughable, O'Reilly claimed that only the dumb liberals on the left like Stephen Colbert oppose his 25,000 man mercenary army, and that they have no clue how to fight terrorism. When it's a lie, because most military experts oppose his plan, and some conservatives, including Charles Krauthammer. So O'Reilly flat out lied and used the tip of the day to do it.

O'Reilly: Only Dumb People Like Colbert Oppose His Mercenary Army Idea
By: Steve - September 30, 2014 - 10:00am

Monday night Bill O'Reilly lost his mind even more, doing a segment where he said only dumb people like Stephen Colbert oppose his 25,000 man mercenary army idea. Which is not only wrong, it's a lie.

Because almost everyone is opposed to it, including most military experts, and even his neo-con good friend Charles Krauthammer is opposed to it.

Quote: O'Reilly: "Only Dumb People Like Stephen Colbert Oppose Anti-Terror Mercenary Army Idea."



O’Reilly insisted that his plan is a good one and only "dumb people" disagree. And not only are Colbert and everyone else who are mocking him dumb, they’re also ignorant and vacant and have nothing to contribute to the conversation, simply because they think his idea is silly.

And now the facts: The right has also mocked his plan. Charles Krauthammer told O'Reilly to his face that his plan was off the wall. Notice O'Reily does not mention that, instead he goes after Colbert.

O'Reilly was also called out for his nonsense by U.S. Naval War College Professor Tom Nichols, Ph.D., a national security expert, who called his idea "terrible" and "immoral" and pointed out that "it is a morally corrosive idea to try to outsource our national security."

But O'Reilly did not call him dumb, and let's remember that O'Reilly was never in the military. So he has no military experience, none.

And last week his cohort over at Fox news Charles Krauthammer took his turn telling him his plan was never going to work. Who O'Reilly calls a smart guy and even says he is way smarter than he is.

Krauthammer told O'Reilly, "With your idea you've gone from out of the box to off the wall."

Krauthammer said that Americans have trouble bearing the losses of using our own infantry, and that O'Reilly's idea does not solve the problem because the U.S. would still have Americans in command and Americans who could sign up for the army. If we lose them, we won't suffer less, he argued.

O'Reilly countered that it's not fair for the U.S. to have to fight the brunt of terror all over the world and said we need an alternative.

"The terrorists know there's no will to fight them in the West, this would change that mentality," O'Reilly argued.

"Saying that something is needed is not an argument for why it's gonna work," Krauthammer remarked, arguing that the U.S. would inevitably suffer losses through this highly paid mercenary army.

He noted another problem, which is the people who would likely sign up for the mercenary army.

"The problem is do you really wanna be running around the world responsible for a band of desperados, do you want to recruit from the same pool that ISIS is?"

Not to mention the cost, if you paid them each $100,000 a year it would cost $2.5 billion, and that is not including the cost for training, logistics, command, medical care, etc.

O’Reilly said he has confidence that this could work, but he appreciates Krauthammer's dissent. But notice he did not call Krauthammer dumb, as he did with Colbert.

In reality, only a few people agree with O'Reilly that it's a good idea, most military experts and even Charles Krauthammer think it's a bad idea that will never work and just be a massive waste of money. But O'Reilly does not have the guts to call them dumb, he can only say it about Stephen Colbert, proving what a coward he is and what a biased hack he is.

The Republicans Love 2 Things: Ted Cruz & Religious Liberty
By: Steve - September 29, 2014 - 11:00am

How do you say winning? If you’re a conservative, you pick the driver of a very unpopular event, the government shutdown, as your next presidential pick because you enjoy losing badly.

Far-right first term Senator Ted Cruz Cruz won the #1 spot in the Values Voter Summit straw poll at 25%, with Dr. Ben Carson coming in next at 20%. Former Governor Mike Huckabee came up third and Senator Rick Santorum won fourth place.

And all 4 of them are extreme far-right Republicans that will never be the President, because they are too far to the right and out of the mainstream. But Republicans love them, because they are just like them, out of the mainstream.

Last year, Cruz beat Carson by a much wider margin with 42% on the heels of shutting down the government.

Yes, shutting down the government is what the conservative base likes. They want senators who don’t do their jobs, but instead make things worse for the average American -- anything to spite President Obama.

Now get this, the conservatives who were polled said the most important issue to them was "religious liberty."

And yes, I am not kidding. The Republicans at the voter values summit actually think religious liberty is the most important issue facing America today. Not the economy, not jobs, not health care, not unemployment, not the stock market, not immigration, they went with religious (fricking) liberty. And they wonder why they are seen as out of the mainstream, come on.

This even got Republicans very excited on Twitter, after they convinced themselves that they could win the White House on it because it's HUGE. The problem for the Republican Party is that their definition of religious liberty is very exclusionary and thus the opposite of the idea of religious liberty.

Republicans fight for liberty for Christians, while demonizing other religions, especially their misinformed ideas of Muslims. In other words, they believe in religious liberty, as long as you are a christian, they are against religious liberty for everyone else.

Liberty sounds all exciting and Ted Cruz delivered a bit of a sermon at the Value Voters Summit, so it seems like a perfect match. But Cruz delivered more of a heady brew of persecution and delusion, culminating in him announcing that when Republicans take back the White House in 2017, they will repeal every word of Obamacare. Even though it's working and everyone that has it, likes it, he still plans to try and repeal it, too bad for him it will never happen.

Cruz said this: "In 2017, with a Republican president in office, we're going to sign legislation repealing every word of Obamacare. Brace yourselves for the smarm, Weeping may endure for a night but joy cometh in the morning."

Which is just ridiculous and Cruz is insane, because even if the Republicans win the White House (not gonna happen) they will never be able to repeal Obamacare. They do not have the votes, and it is just too late, especially when they have no plan to replace it.

They will never repeal every word of Obamacare because just like Social Security, people need it and want it. In two more years, it will be even more popular and Republicans will have to offer an alternative that people want if they plan to try and destroy it.

Ted Cruz said he has a plan, but in truth, Barack Obama used the conservative plan. Barack Obama used the market based plan based on competition between private companies that was the conservative approach to the healthcare problem. Republicans objected because they didn't want a win for Obama, but now they are left fighting the battle of fools -- fighting against their only idea, with no alternative.

Luckily for Republicans, their base is easily manipulated about what issues they are supposed to care about, hence they care most about something that is not an issue. Religious liberty? The biggest religion in this country is Christianity and it’s not being threatened. The President is a Christian. No one is coming for Christians, no matter how persecuted they like to pretend they are.

But hey, being persecuted pays well for Cruz, Palin, etc. The idea that they are being persecuted is romantic and it isolates the base -- if everyone else is out to get you, they can't be trusted. The only people the base can trust are the people they are sending their money to and voting for. Well played.

If Cruz wants the big love from the base, he's going to need to make a big gesture of destroying the country in a way he can pretend is hurting Obama and not the people. Of course, none of this hurts Obama -- it only hurts the very people voting for Cruz.

And I hope the Republicans do run Ted Cruz against Hillary Clinton, because she will crush him.

More Good Economic News O'Reilly Has Totally Ignored
By: Steve - September 29, 2014 - 10:00am

Once again we have good economic news, and Bill O'Reilly does not say a word about it, even though he is telling people the economy is in chaos because of the bad liberal policies from President Obama. Despite the fact he is wrong, and lying, because the economy is doing good, jobs are back, and the stock market is at record highs.

O'Reilly ignores it all to claim the economy is doing terrible, to make Obama look bad, which is just more proof he is a biased right-wing hack, and not a real non-partisan journalist.

From Bloomburg news:

Economy Grew 4.6% in Second Quarter, Most Since 2011

The U.S. economy expanded in the second quarter at the fastest rate since the last three months of 2011 as companies stepped up investment and households boosted spending.

Gross domestic product grew at a revised 4.6 percent annualized rate, up from a previous estimate of 4.2 percent, Commerce Department data showed today in Washington. The increase matched the median forecast of 81 economists surveyed by Bloomberg and followed a 2.1 percent decline in the first three months of the year.

Busier assembly lines at the nation's factories and job growth that's kept Americans spending indicate companies are a bit more upbeat about the prospects for demand. As the world's largest economy and labor market improve, Federal Reserve policy makers are debating how much longer to keep interest rates near zero.

"We definitely see momentum," in the U.S. economy, said Brittany Baumann, an economist at Credit Agricole CIB in New York, which correctly forecast GDP. "Consumer spending should benefit from strengthening labor conditions and improved financial conditions," while business investment should also continue, she said.

Forecasts for second-quarter GDP, the value of all goods and services produced in the U.S., ranged from gains of 3.4 percent to 5 percent, according to the Bloomberg survey. The estimate is the third and final for the quarter.

Thursday's report also showed before-tax corporate profits rose 8.4 percent last quarter, the most since the third quarter of 2010 and compared with a previously reported 8 percent gain.

Koch Brothers Group Tried To Register A Cat To Vote
By: Steve - September 28, 2014 - 11:00am

Americans for Prosperity claims they stand for free markets and liberty and against Kenyan socialism and voter fraud. That's why it's so important to AFP to make sure that you and your cat are ready to vote in North Carolina next month.

Among AFP's many conservative causes, the Koch brothers-funded group claims to be concerned about the integrity of the American voting process, watchdogging liberal voter drives and saying it "will not tolerate those who would cheapen the vote."

But according to the Raleigh News & Observer, AFP's North Carolina office just sent "hundreds of North Carolinians -- and one cat" a voter-registration guide riddled with errors:
The information -- an "official application form" -- was sent by Americans for Prosperity, a national conservative group with a state chapter based in Raleigh.

Since then, hundreds of people who received the forms have called and complained to the State Board of Elections, said Joshua Lawson, a public information officer for the board.

"It's unclear where (Americans for Prosperity) got their list, but it's caused a lot of confusion for people in the state," Lawson said.

One resident even received a voter registration form addressed to her cat, he said.
Among other errors, the forms apparently instructed registrants to mail completed forms to a state office, complete with the wrong address for that state office.

But registration forms are supposed to go to an applicant's county board of elections. AFP's "official" forms also listed the wrong deadline to get registered in time for November's election. That deadline, according to North Carolina officials, is actually Oct. 10.

So it looks like AFP is deliberately misinforming residents to screw up their chances to turn out on Election Day? Some recipients are wondering this:
Alison Beal of Wake Forest received one of the forms at her home, but it was addressed to her brother-in-law, who lives in Caldwell County.

Beal is not a member of Americans for Prosperity and says her brother-in-law would not be a member either.

Beal said she thinks the false information could be an honest mistake but said it could also deter people from registering.

"It seems like something you would want to pay attention to, if you really want to get people to register to vote," Beal said.
She added: "People don't really know, they assume what they get in the mail is true."

O'Reilly Puts Foot In Mouth Again Over Womens Rights
By: Steve - September 28, 2014 - 10:00am

Friday night Bill O'Reilly downplayed the Gender Wage gap, saying this: "Statistics Don't Include The Emotional Difference Between Men And Women."

Which is not only stupid, it's insane. Here is Billy in action:



"Can women save the Democratic Party?"

I did not know the Democrats needed saving? Worry about your own party fool - Republicans have only won 1 presidential election in terms of the popular vote since 1992. You get smashed by any nonwhite group and whites are a decreasing demographic in America.

And what in the hell does emotion have to do with equal pay?

So according to Bill O'Reilly, women don't deserve equal pay for equal work because those silly, hysterical women just can't keep their heads screwed on straight.

And the Republicans wonder why they are losing the womens vote, just look at O'Reilly, he is one reason. Another reason is the Republican party thinks woman are 2nd class citizens who should always wear skirts and be in the kitchen or the bedroom.

The Friday 9-26-14 O'Reilly Factor Review
By: Steve - September 27, 2014 - 11:30am

The TPM was called: Can American Women Save the Democratic Party? The biased and dishonest Bill O'Reilly said this:
O'REILLY: The majority of Americans are not happy with President Obama's job performance, and that is having a deleterious effect on the Democratic Party. In fact, the only thing, the only thing that can save the Democratic Party is women voters. Enter the first lady, Michelle Obama. In a speech at the United Nations this week, she asked, 'do we truly value women as equals, or do we see them as merely second class citizens?'

Those words imply that America is not fair to women, and that is a highly charged statement. On average, women make 81% of what men make in the private marketplace. However, American women are better educated than men, and what the stats cannot define is the emotional differences between men and women. There are approximately 5-million stay-at-home moms and millions of other American women work part-time, devoting most of their efforts to looking out for their kids.

That's a huge factor in the economic comparisons, but it is often underplayed. So the first lady should understand the invalid comparisons that are being made in the gender discussion. It is true that only 15% of women hold top executive positions in the Fortune 500 companies, and that an old boy network makes it tougher for the ladies to gain power. That does not seem to be fair, but life is not fair. No government will be able to impose so-called fairness.

Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party will try to convince voters that the fix is in against American women, that theme will be front and center in the upcoming presidential campaign. But I do not believe there is a war on women, I do not believe our capitalistic system is holding the ladies back. I believe some stupid men are, but that's something individual companies will have to deal with.

Finally, we have all seen what's happened in the past six years that President Obama has tried and tried to impose social justice. The progressive vision of enforced equality leads to gross injustices and economic stagnation. Many companies now fear women: they are afraid of lawsuits, controversy, and negative branding. And believe me, that's a big reason some women are held back.
To begin with, I did not know the Democratic party needed saving, they have the White House and the Senate, which does not sound like it needs saving to me, and the Republican party polls far worse, so they are the party that needs saving. Then O'Reilly admits women only make 81% of what a man does, even though in the past he has claimed that number is not true. Then later in his TPM he admits it is not fair to women, so what does he say to that, life is not fair, which is insane.

O'Reilly contradicts himself in his own TPM, as if he has lost his mind. O'Reilly said this: "I do not believe our capitalistic system is holding the ladies back. I believe some stupid men are, but that's something individual companies will have to deal with."

Which is pure insanity, because those men are the capitalistic system, and their companies will never do anything about it. The government needs to pass laws making it illegal to pay women less for the same job, but that will never happen because O'Reilly's right-wing friends in Congress keep voting against the equal pay for women act. Then he claims there is no war on women by Republicans, which is just laughable. You are looking at it in action, from O'Reilly, Dobbs, and the Republicans.

And yes, some women choose to stay at home and raise their kids, which has nothing to do with them being paid less for doing the same job. So O'Reilly's argument does not even make sense, especially when he admits it is unfair to women, then says life is unfair and you should just like it.

Then two Democratic strategists were on to disagree with O'Reilly, Mary Anne Marsh and Marjorie Clifton.

Clifton said this: "You made a lot of important points, but what's missing is whether the choices are actually real. The data does not reflect what happens once women get into the workforce and once they get the education. There are still gaps in pay and a lot of that has to do with bias in the workplace."

Marsh insisted that gender bias is obvious in America, saying this: "Women are the majority, yet they are woefully underrepresented in the places that matter - government and business. We have not elected a woman present, that's shameful! Women have a tougher time raising the money and they don't make enough to subsidize their own campaigns."

Then the old biased right-wing fool Lou Dobbs was on to discuss it, and of course he agreed with O'Reilly.

Dobbs said this: "The idea that women are somehow the target of oppression in this country is utter madness. Women getting education and advanced degrees vastly outnumber men. Can more be done? Yes, but the same can be said for men. Women are far more involved in rearing children than men, and that is an impediment to their careers and earning power. Women are a majority in our workforce and a majority in our population, yet they have protected rights."

Nobody said they are the target of oppression, what they are saying is that in some cases a women makes less than a man for doing the same job, and that is a fact that Lou Dobbs will not admit.

Then Heather Nauert was on for mad as hell, she answered letters from some ticked-off viewers, among the Sue Morgan of Michigan, who got peeved when "global warming" marchers left tons of garbage in their wake last weekend.

Nauert said this: "What a mess they left, and that has a lot of people upset. It's the hypocrisy, saying they want to recycle and get rid of pollution. They left behind seven-and-a-half tons of garbage for New York's sanitation to clean up."

Which is just laughable, because O'Reilly and Fox never even reported on the climate change march, so if you do not report on it you have no right to talk about it. Not to mention this, when Republicans protest these same people never say one word about the garbage they left behind. And btw, they also never mentioned how much money those 300,000 people spent in the city, which far outweighed the cleanup cost.

Another viewer, Arizonan Jerry Clark, is tired of hearing the phrase 'boots on the ground.' O'Reilly reassured Clark that he is not alone: "We are with you, Jerry, and anyone who says 'boots on the ground' here has to pay $100 to Wounded Warriors. It's a cliche that is banned here."

Are you kidding me? $100 dollars, that's nothing, it should be $1000, or $10,000, you are all millionaires.

Then O'Reilly talked about Marine Sergeant Andrew Tahmooressi, who has been in a Mexican jail for more than six months, ever since he claimed to have made a wrong turn and entered Mexico with three guns. O'Reilly spoke about the dire situation with his mother, Jill Tahmooressi.

Tahmooressi said this: "He is very despondent. He's in solitary confinement, and he is losing hope that he's going to get out of jail. He's not allowed a radio or television, he's allowed the Bible and one book, and he has no way to exercise."

Then Greg Gutfeld and Bernard McGuirk were on, they talked about New York Yankees star Derek Jeter, who smacked the game-winning hit in his final appearance at Yankee Stadium.

"Obviously those were all actors, and this was done on a sound stage. Actually, he's an amazing athlete who kept his lifestyle private and stayed with one team for twenty years. Also, he's a conservative because he always hits to right field."

McGuirk complained that the hype surrounding Jeter is vastly overblown, saying this: "You guys have to take it down a notch because he didn't play well this year, he was almost hurting the team. And this game was meaningless."

And that was it, not one word about the GDP increasing to 4.6%, nothing about the stock market setting record highs, nothing about housing starts going up, and on and on. O'Reilly continues to ignore all the good economic news, because it makes Obama look good and he does not want to do that. Which is why all he talks about every night is ISIS and the Obama poll numbers.

And finally, the lame Factor tip of the day that was once again not a tip, just O'Reilly telling people to visit his website and read his insane 25,000 man mercenary plan to fight terrorism that will never happen and never work.

Hot Links

Under Bush O'Reilly & Fox News Did Not Blame Him For Beheadings

Study Finds Fox News Only Tells the Truth 18% of the Time

More Republican Corruption O'Reilly Has Ignored

Jon Stewart Destroys O'Reilly & Fox For Ferguson Shooting Bias

O'Reilly Caught Lying About ISIS Threat & Juan Williams

NY Times Charles Blow Says Bill O'Reilly Is The Race Hustler

Homeland Security Shows Gutfeld & Baker Are Liars

More Republican Corruption O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Cost Of Obamacare

Bill O'Reilly Is Lying To You About Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Electic Car Company Success

The Most Annoying Celebs Who Should Go Away

Bias Alert: O'Reilly Spins Presidential Election Media Study

O'Reilly & Fox Still Ignoring GOP Voter Registration Fraud Story

Biased O'Reilly Tells Romney To Call Obama A Socialist

O'Reilly Slams Obama With Dishonest Tip Of The Day

O'Reilly & Brit Hume Spin And Lie For Mitt Romney

Fox Promotes Ridiculous Study Of Doctors & Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media & Obama

Low Gas Prices Shut O'Reilly & The Repiblicans Up Fast

I Am Waiting For The O'Reilly Health Care Bill Apology

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About The Media

O'Reilly Ignores MRC Calling For Sharpton Firing

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Wrong On The Deficit

O'Reilly & Fox Lie That Obama To Blame For High Gas Prices

Scientist Group Slams Celebs Like Snooki & O'Reilly

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About America

O'Reilly & Ingraham Lied About Planned Parenthood (Again)

Fox Unemployment Chart Shows Their Right-Wing Bias

U.S. Troops Burn A Box Of O'Reilly's Books

Kelly & O'Reilly Make Up Another Green Energy Scandal

O'Reilly Ignoring All The Stock Market Increases

O'Reilly Flat Out LIED About The Debt Obama Added

O'Reilly Caught Doctoring Florida Mans E-Mail

O'Reilly Ignored Michele Bachmann Church Scandal

O'Reilly & Morris Lied About The Debt Polls

O'Reilly Hypocrisy On The West/Schultz Story

The Truth About Those Bush Tax Cuts

Number Of Tea Party Events Down 50 Percent

NWLC Says O'Reilly Statement Made Up & Offensive

Video Proof O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Hack

O'Reilly Gets It Totally Wrong On Norway Terrorist

Norway Terrorist Info O'Reilly Ignored

O'Reilly Ignoring Ensign/Coburn Hush Money Scandal

O'Reilly Calls Obama Health Care Waivers A Scam

O'Reilly Complains About Losing In His Own Poll

O'Reilly Ignores Republican Hypocrisy On Judicial Filibusters

O'Reilly Ignoring Republican Unpopularity

O'Reilly Tells GOP How To Beat Obama With Scare Tactics

O'Reilly & Fox Are Lying To You About The Debt

O'Reilly Spins The 2008 Presidential Media Study

Important Tax Information Bill O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Ignored McCain Op-Ed On Bin Laden

O'Reilly Scrubs Website & Podcast Of False Obama Claims




O'Reilly Ignored DOJ Black Panther Report

O'Reilly Still Ignoring Wisconsin Judge's Order Story

O'Reilly Ignored Jobs & Unemployment Report

Fox News Town Hall Protester Hypocrisy & Double Standards

O'Reilly & Varney Speculate About Oil Prices

O'Reilly Spins The Quinnipiac Temperature Poll

O'Reilly Proves How Stupid He Is Again

How O'Reilly Puts Out Right-Wing Propaganda

Fox News Insider Admits They Make Things Up

Luntz Admits Fox Has Anti-Obama Focus Groups

Reagan SG Says Health Care Bill Constitutional

O'Reilly Ignores Gore Answer To His Question

O'Reilly Wonders How The Moon Got There

More Republican Hate & Racism O'Reilly Has Ignored

Another Poll O'Reilly Has Totally Ignored

O'Reilly Thinks We Are Still In A Recession

O'Reilly's Nazi Comment Defense Was Laughable

Fox News The Least Trusted Cable News Network

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media (Again)

O'Reilly Claims Estate Tax A Seizure Of Property

O'Reilly Called Bernie Sanders A Loon

Bloomberg Tax Cut Poll Proves O'Reilly Was Lying

O'Reilly Ignored Positive DADT Study & Story

O'Reilly & Fox Ignore Judge Being A 9-11 Truther

More Real News O'Reilly Has Ignored

More Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Ratings

O'Reilly Got The Ireland Economic Crisis Wrong

O'Reilly Ignored The Tom Delay Conviction Story

Women Of America: You Need To Read This

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly Is Dishonest & Crazy

O'Reilly Nazi Comparison Hypocrisy

O'Reilly Ignores New Poll While Promoting Paladino

Andrew Sullivan Called O'Reilly A Dishonest Propagandist

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Nevada RCP Senate Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Right-Wing Abortion Bomber Terrorism Story

Fox & O'Reilly Ignored Friday Pro-Mosque NY Rally

O'Reilly Busted For Health Insurance Premium Lies

Most Factor Gear Made in Vietnam And China

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

O'Reilly Busted For 1st Time Retraction Lie

The Bill O'Reilly Non-Apology Shirley Sherrod Apology

O'Reilly & The Right Are Racist Idiots

O'Reilly Ignored Tea Party Express Racism Story

O'Reilly Compares Gay People To Al-Qaeda

Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Rating Polls

O'Reilly Ignored Mark Kirk Military Award Lie Story

Where Are The Sedition Charges Now O'Reilly

O'Reilly Caught In A Massive Lie About Jail Time

O'Reilly Running Ads For Emergency Food Supply

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Tea Party Militia Links

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Gallup Tea Party Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Harris Poll Showing Republicans Are Stupid

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Health Reform Bill Tax

O'Reilly Caught Lying About NEJM Health Care Survey

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

The Truth About Ratings For News Shows

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Spin Doctor

O'Reilly Spinning Fox News Most Trusted Poll

Fox News Did Not Air Hope For Haiti Telethon

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Obama Terrorism Polls

O'Reilly Caught Lying About House Ethics Committee

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Increase

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Limbaugh Racism

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Religious Festival

O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Lying About CNN

O'Reilly Caught Violating Journalistic Standards Again

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The ACLU & Racial Profiling

More Proof O'Reilly & FOX News Do Not Tell The Truth

O'Reilly Called Bruce Springsteen Un-American & Un-Patriotic

The Bill O'Reilly Senate Torture Report Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Obama Approval Numbers

FOX News Caught Lying About Obama Budget

O'Reilly Busted For Helping GOP Smear Pelosi

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Obama Earmark Promise

Military.com Report Proves O'Reilly Wrong About Homeless Vets

O'Reilly Places 7th in 2008 Wingnut of The Year Award

O'Reilly Denys Reality About Abstinence Only Programs




Proof The O'Reilly Factor is Biased Against Barack Obama
O'Reilly said he is a non-partisan Independent, who is fair to both sides, and that he has been fair to Barack Obama. To check that claim I did a 3 month study of the Factor, it started on August 1st, 2008, and ran until October 31st, 2008. I watched the Factor every night and counted the negative and positive comments for Obama and McCain.

Visit the web page I set up, and you will see the stunning bias from O'Reilly and his mostly Republican guests against Barack Obama. Then you will see there is no doubt Bill O'Reilly is a dishonest and biased Conservative. This study is conclusive proof that O'Reilly is in the tank for John McCain.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The 3 Month Factor Bias Study:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/3mbiasnumbers.htm

Proof O'Reilly Lied About The Balance on His Show
O'Reilly claims the factor is balanced, and that he personally makes sure every week he has an equal number of Republican and Democrat guests. This is a bold faced lie, and I can prove it. I put together a web page that shows the guest list from the factor for the last 2 weeks. Read it and you will see with your own eyes that Bill O'Reilly is lying when he says the factor is balanced.

And remember that we are 3 weeks before a major Presidential election, or the Republican bias numbers would be worse than it is normally. O'Reilly is actually having more Democrats on than he usually does, and the balance is still not even close. If we were not so close to an election it would be a lot worse.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The Lies About The Factor Balance:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillybalanced.htm

O'Reilly Sucks Investigation: Dishonesty, Deception, And Bias By Bill O'Reilly
O'Reilly claims there are no Republicans or Conservative groups that rival George Soros. O'Reilly said the top three conservative tax-exempt foundations are totally dwarfed by Soros and the radical Ford Foundation. And that they have 15 times more the assets. George Soros net worth is $8.5 billion, the Ford Foundation has a net worth of $13 billion. But the seven billionaires who donate to Newt Gingrich and other right-wing causes have a combined net worth of $34.8 billion dollars.

Somehow O'Reilly claims that Soros and the Ford Foundation have 15 times more the assets than anyone on the right. When the seven billionaires alone who give money to Newt, have roughly $14 billion more than Soros and the Ford Foundation combined.

Visit the web page below to see the massive money O'Reilly has ignored from the right:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreilly-investigation.htm

(( Right-Wing Hate Speech Ignored by Bill O'Reilly ))
O'Reilly claims there is no hate on the right, that it's all on the left. But the way he defines hate is ridiculous, if a liberal blog or website writes an article that criticizes George W. Bush (or any Republican) O'Reilly calls it hate. When it's not hate, it's reporting the facts, there is no hate. A great example is when websites like oreilly-sucks.com, mediamatters.org, etc. criticize O'Reilly he calls it hate, and says they are hate groups who lie about him.

That is a lie, it is not hate, and they are not hate websites. There is real hate on the internet, but O'Reilly does not report it, because most of it is from the right. I have documented this hate in my blog and on a web page, all of it was ignored by Bill O'Reilly, and it was never reported on the Factor.

Visit the web page below to see the massive right-wing hate O'Reilly has ignored:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/right-wing-hate.htm


www.oreilly-sucks.com Privacy Policy

Copyright 2001 - 2014


eXTReMe Tracker