O'Reilly Sucks
Blog Archives

January - 2017
February - 2017
March - 2017
April - 2017

January - 2016
February - 2016
March - 2016
April - 2016
May - 2016
June - 2016
July - 2016
August - 2016
September - 2016
October - 2016
November - 2016
December - 2016

January - 2015
February - 2015
March - 2015
April - 2015
May - 2015
June - 2015
July - 2015
August - 2015
September - 2015
October - 2015
November - 2015
December - 2015

January - 2014
February - 2014
March - 2014
April - 2014
May - 2014
June - 2014
July - 2014
August - 2014
September - 2014
October - 2014
November - 2014
December - 2014

Website Links

O'Reilly Info

The O'Reilly Iraq Apology Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Spins

Cable News Ratings

Read The Letter O'Reilly Had His Attorney Send me

O'Reilly Wins 2004 Misinformer of The Year Award

O'Reilly Death Penalty Lies

O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 49 Times Since 2001

O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks



O'Reilly #5 On Top 25 Right-Wing Journalist List

O'Reilly Factor Year In Review 2009

Factor Pollster Caught Writing GOP Policy Memo

What a Fair & Balanced O'Reilly Factor Would Look Like

Transcript: Bill O'Reilly v Jeremy Glick

Peabody Award Facts

Bill Clinton Enron News

Buzzflash Names O'Reilly Media Putz of The Week

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly & The Republican Party Are Both Corrupt

The Right-Wing Liberal Killer Story O'Reilly Ignored

The Facts About O'Reilly And GE Doing Business With Iran

How to Deal With an O'Reilly Factor Ambush Interview

Why FOX News Loves Juan Williams: The Strings And The Puppet


Progressive Eruptions
Rude Pundit
Prison Planet
Apocalypse Cafe
Fox News Boycott
Inebriated Discourse
Hannity Sucks
Glenn Beck Is An Idiot

The Factor Guest List Count

April 2017 (12 Shows) Republicans - 85 | Democrats - 11

The Factor Guest List Count Archives

Ratings: The O'Reilly Factor - Total Viewers

Monday - 4-17-17 -- O'Reilly - 3.150 - Dana Perino Hosted
Tuesday - 4-18-17 -- O'Reilly - - Dana Perino Hosted
Wednesday - 4-19-17 -- O'Reilly -
Thursday - 4-20-17 -- O'Reilly -
Friday - 4-21-17 -- O'Reilly -

Weekly Factor Average -

The Cable News Ratings Archives

The O'Reilly Sucks Blog

Mental Health Professionals Warn That Trump Is Mentally Ill

Eight hundred mental health professionals have come together to issue a warning to the American people about the dangerous mental state of Donald Trump.

Here is a statement:
This moment led to an open town-hall meeting on Thursday, at Yale Medical School, to discuss it. Dr. Bandy X. Lee, A Yale psychiatry professor who along with Dr. Gartner called the meeting, puts it this way: "We have a Duty to Warn, about a leader who is dangerous to the health and security of our patients."

She has formed a coalition by that name, and it now comprises 800 mental health professionals who are "sufficiently alarmed that they feel the need to speak up about the mental-health status of the president."

Gartner has posted a similar petition on the Web, signed by 41,000 people, a high proportion of them from mental-health practitioners.
Rumors and discussion about the mental states of presidents go back almost as far as the nation itself, but there is something different about Trump. The warnings aren't coming from political opponents, talk radio shows, and partisan media.

The warnings concerning Trump are coming from professionals and experts who are concerned that this president's mental condition is dangerous. This isn't some partisan move to smear a president. It is an alarm bell that is being sounded by people who know trouble when they see it.

If the president is mentally ill, the American people deserve to know, because this country must have a fit and healthy leader who is of sound mind and body.

WOW: Here Is A Perfect Example Of O'Reilly's Fans

This is a great example of a typical O'Reilly fan, and btw, over the 17 years I have done this website I would bet I have got a hundred e-mails just like this. Some of his fans are so stupid they think I am Bill O'Reilly, and they send me e-mails telling me something, thinking they are talking to O'Reilly.

I will not use her name, or publish her e-mail address. I will just say it was sent at 3:25am Thursday night. It's like Trump sending out some crazy tweet at 4am, same thing, some nut up at 3am writing this nonsense.

Here is the e-mail, word for word, it was one big paragraph:


Dear Bill,
So many people are outraged that you have been let go from Fox news but why are you giving up so easily. The complaints from these women are RIDICULOUS. They are complaining that you flirted inappropriately with them. Who cares??!! Why should you lose your career because they were offended. It's too bad if they don't like you. You should have your day in court and if you are found guilty THEN you can decide whether to leave or not. There will be plenty of advertisers who will advertise with you if asked. Why are you giving up so easily; these women are fake's who are acting like they have been wronged. You didn't rape or assault anyone and you have committed no crime. You need to fight this. Thank you. Sxxxxxy

It's Official: Bill O'Reilly Has Been Fired By Fox News

And as someone who has wrote about O'Reilly on this website for 17 years, I have to say it is about time. O'Reilly does not deserve a tv news show, he is a fraud, a liar, a con man, and a scammer. His claims of being a non-partisan Independent with a no spin zone were just laughable.

I have 17 years of documented and proven right-wing bias from O'Reilly and the 98% Republican guests he had on his show. He was as big of a biased Republican as Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, or Rush Limbaugh.

The entire hour every night was 98% right-wing propaganda that said all liberals are evil and all Republicans are great. O'Reilly did nothing but slam Obama for 8 years for everything he did, while praising the Republicans, George W. Bush and Donald Trump.

In O'Reillyworld Obama was the devil and Trump is a God. No matter what Obama did O'Reilly slammed him for it as if the RNC had wrote his talking points, and no matter what Trump did O'Reilly defended it and paraised him for being a great President.

From what we can tell it looks like O'Reilly was just a dishonest old right-wing pervert who sexually harassed all the good looking women he came in contact with, and that is what took him down, not all the bias and lies he told on a nightly basis, which is sad. It's sad because he was allowed to spew out all his lies, but that is what we have with free speech.

I am sad to say this and happy, but I will be shutting this website down on April 30th. I think I did a service to the country by documenting the bias and lies from O'Reilly, yes I also have a bias, as everyone does, but I was not on tv saying I am a non-partisan Independent with a no spin zone.

And even with my bias against Republicans, it does not disprove what I reported, I documented the bias, the hypocrisy, the double standards, and the lies from O'Reilly, with his own transcripts and video.

In closing, I would like to say Bill O'Reilly is one big jerk, and people like him are what gives the media a bad name, but we will all be better off with him off the air. I also want to point out that he was a massive coward, he came off as some kind of tough guy, but even after asking multiple times to be a guest on his show to debate him he never said yes, in fact, he would never even reply to my e-mails.

Bill O'Reilly was afraid to have me on his show, because he knew I would be prepared with examples of his bias, his hypocrisy, his double standards, and his lies. So I hope he actually retires and goes away, America does not need propagandists like him lying to the American people.

One last thing, everyone seems to be claiming credit for O'Reilly getting fired. But the main reason he was fired is The New York Times. After the New York Times published the $13 million dollar sexual harassment settlment story, all his advertisers started pulling out of his show. That is what led to everything else, there are other reasons he was fired, but the main thing was the New York Times story.

Which is really funny, because O'Reilly spent 20 years trashing the Times, simply because he disagreed with them politically, and they finally got their revenge. It took them a while, but they got him, and I say good f-ing job.

After Trump Fired All 93 Federal Prosecutors None Have Been Replaced

A month after firing all the federal prosecutors, the Justice Department does not have any U.S. attorneys in place.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Donald Trump have both said law enforcement is a top priority. But the attorney general does not have a single U.S. attorney in place to lead his tough-on-crime efforts across the country.

Last month, Sessions abruptly told all the U.S. attorneys to submit their resignations immediately - and none of them have been replaced.

"We really need to work hard at that," Sessions said when asked Tuesday about the vacancies as he opened a meeting with federal law enforcement officials. The 93 unfilled U.S. attorney positions are among the hundreds of critical Trump administration jobs that remain open.

Sessions is also without the heads of his top units, including the civil rights, criminal and national security divisions, as he tries to reshape the Justice Department.

Donald Trump Just Can Not Tell The Truth About Anything

Remember way back to about two days ago when the serial liar Trump said he was "sending an armada" to the Korean Peninsula. Well, it was all lies. The armada was never sent, so either Trump lied again, or he does not even know what his own Navy is doing, either way it's scary.

When Trump claimed that an American aircraft carrier was heading toward waters near North Korea, it was actually sailing in the opposite direction, The New York Times and Defense News report.

Amid growing tensions between the U.S. and North Korea, U.S. Pacific Command announced on April 8 that the USS Carl Vinson strike group would sail north to the western Pacific after departing Singapore that day. An American official told Reuters at the time that the ships move toward the Korean Peninsula was a show of force directed at the regime of Kim Jong Un.

U.S. National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster told Fox News the next day that the group was being rerouted from Singapore toward the Korean Peninsula as a prudent show of force.

Just days after the announcement about the strike group's new course, President Trump weighed in on the North Korean threat. "We are sending an armada, very powerful. We have submarines, very powerful, far more powerful than the aircraft carrier," Trump told Fox on April 12.

But Defense News pointed out on Tuesday that photos released by the U.S. Navy showed the aircraft carrier passing through the Sunda Strait in Indonesia, about 3,500 miles from the Korean Peninsula, last Saturday. It was moving away from North Korea when U.S. officials said it was moving toward the peninsula, the Times confirmed on Tuesday.

CNN's Jim Acosta tweeted that an administration official blamed the mix-up on a miscommunication.

Trump Is A Dishonest Clown Who Does Not Buy American

Almost all his products are made in foreign countries, China and Bangladesh to be exact. And Ivanka Trump does the exact same thing, they both get their products made in foreign countries, so they can increase profits at the expense of the American workers.

This week President Trump signed an executive order billed as Hire American, Buy American. A preview of the order described to reporters Monday explains the contours of the second half of that title: Government agencies will be encouraged to give priority to American companies when awarding contracts, with a review of waivers and exemptions that allowed the use of foreign-made products.

This is a remarkably hypocritical position for Trump, as it has been since the outset of his campaign. Why? Trump has sold foreign-made products under his name for years.

In a 2012 segment made famous last year, former CBS talk show host David Letterman confronted Trump on his clothing line.

"Where are the shirts made?" Letterman asked. Bangladesh.

"Well, it's good," Trump replied. "We employ people in Bangladesh. They have to work, too."

Trump's affinity for producing his clothing line overseas is so well-established that even foreign leaders have used it to score points against him.

Trump has defended this practice in the past. Last July, he told ABC's George Stephanopoulos that he bid out production for his ties, but you have "companies over in different countries where they devalue their currency and they make it impossible for American companies to compete."

Earlier this week, Trump decided against formally labeling China - where many of his ties were made - as a currency manipulator. His daughter, now an unpaid White House staffer, continues to do so.

An investigation by NBC News found that Ivanka Trump's clothing line also continues to bring in products made overseas.

"Since Election Day, the apparel brand run by Trump's daughter has imported 56 shipments of Ivanka Trump products from China and Singapore, part of a total of 215 shipments from Asia since Jan. 1, 2016."

After she introduced her father at the Republican National Convention in July, her company's official Twitter account plugged the dress that she wore during that speech - a dress that was imported from an overseas manufacturer.

On Tuesday, the Associated Press reported that Trump's company had secured trademark protection from the Chinese government to sell products in that country. The trademarks were granted the same day that Trump and her father dined with the Chinese president.

Trump also buys foreign products for his hotels and properties.

In October, the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump buildings frequently used imported steel in their manufacture.

Trump and his family have consistently sought to hire foreign workers. Even the hire American part of Trump's executive order is hypocritical.

Since 2013, in just 4 years Trump properties Mar-a-Lago, Trump Vineyards and Trump National Golf Club have sought to fill more than 500 positions with foreign workers under the H-2A visa program. In total, those positions would have earned almost $1 million a month for Americans who could also do the job, in salary over their durations.

New Bill O'Reilly Accuser Says He Called Her Hot Chocolate

Bill O'Reilly used to leer at an African-American Fox News clerical worker and called her "hot chocolate," according to attorney Lisa Bloom.

The woman worked for a different broadcaster in 2008 while this was going on, but The O'Reilly Factor host's office was near her desk.

"He would never talk to her, not even hello, except to grunt at her like a wild boar," Bloom tells The Hollywood Reporter. "He would leer at her. He would always do this when no one else was around."

Bloom says she spoke with three witnesses who knew the woman at the time and confirmed she was upset and stressed at the end of each workday. "She's not asking for any money," says Bloom. "She just wants everyone to know her story."

At the time, Bloom says the woman valued her job too much to risk speaking up.

"She was afraid if she told him to knock it off she'd get fired," Bloom says. "Now that she's aware this is all in the news, she's decided to phone in a complaint to the Fox News hotline."

Bloom is also representing radio personality Wendy Walsh, who says she was forced out of the network after refusing O'Reilly's advances.

The allegations against O'Reilly follow a flurry of litigation and press involving women who say they were harassed by and-or retaliated against by ousted-CEO Roger Ailes. Gretchen Carlson was the first to sue last summer, and several other women have filed litigation since. Ailes was terminated shortly after Megyn Kelly spoke with Fox investigators about her experience, which she details in her book.

Earlier this month, Bloom sent a letter to the New York State Division of Human Rights asking it to intervene at Fox News and calling the network a "cesspool of sexual harassment, intimidation and retaliation."

Things Are Not Looking Good For Bill O'Reilly

Gabriel Sherman from New York Magazine is reporting this:

With only six days remaining in Bill O'Reilly's vacation, the pressure on the Murdoch family to decide the embattled commentator's fate is intensifying. Three sources with knowledge of the discussions said that, while no final decision has been made, the Murdochs are leaning toward announcing that O'Reilly will not return to the air.

The prospect of dumping O'Reilly - once unimaginable - has gained steam this week due in part to street protests outside Fox News headquarters and advertiser boycotts on O'Reilly's air. One network insider said Fox executives are alarmed by the severity of the ad-revenue decline.

"It's worse than Glenn Beck," the insider said, referring to the advertiser revolt that helped derail Beck's Fox News career in 2011.

The Murdochs are also dealing with a restive workplace. Female Fox News employees are growing increasingly frustrated that the Murdochs have not forcefully confronted the company's culture of sexual harassment in the wake of removing Roger Ailes.

"Morale is awful," one Fox female executive told me yesterday, adding that employees are wondering if budgets have been cut to pay for sexual-harassment settlements. "There's been no word from management to calm the masses."

Initially, according to sources, Lachlan was aligned with his father, but in recent days he has leaned more in his brother James's direction. "The three are fighting," the insider said.

In some ways, deciding O'Reilly's fate is more complicated than the decision to oust Ailes last summer. O'Reilly is Fox's highest-rated host and the linchpin of the prime-time schedule, so his removal could have immediate effects on the network's ratings.

And btw, the Wall Street Journal, that is owned by Rupert Murdoch had this as a headline on Tuesday.

Fox Is Preparing to Cut Ties With Bill O'Reilly

By Joe Flint
April 18, 2017 9:50 p.m. ET

Fox News is preparing to cut ties with its biggest star, Bill O'Reilly, according to people close to the situation.

The Washington Times and Matt Drudge are also saying O'Reilly will be fired.

With Mr. O'Reilly, so many shoes have dropped that he's looking like Imelda Marcos. Just two weeks ago, The New York Times reported that Fox paid out $13 million to five women who accused the bombastic bloviator of sexual harassment. O'Reilly told The Times that he settled only to avoid hurting his family.

Well, that isn't what an innocent man would do. Accuse me of sexual harassment and we're going all the way to the Supreme Court if we have to. I'm not paying a dime if I'm not guilty. Only guilty people pay out settlements, which are better known by this term: hush money.

Matt Drudge also sees the end coming, writing this:

"O'Reilly has had tremendous run. Very few in the business get to decide when and how things end. Media is most brutal of all industries," Drudge tweeted out minutes after the hot chocolate story hit the web.

Drudge is right, except Billy isn't exactly deciding when and how things end, although he can't be surprised - after his despicable actions - when the hammer comes down.

Nationwide Tax Day Marches Demand Trump Releases His Tax Returns

Tens of thousands of activists demonstrated in cities across the country on Saturday -- the date when Americans taxes are normally due -- to demand the release of President Donald Trump's tax returns.

The largest marches took place in New York City and Washington, D.C. Some 100 other cities hosted smaller marches.

Protest organizers estimated that over 25,000 people attended the rally in Washington, D.C., and 20,000 people participated in New York City.

Together, the rallies across the country were among the largest anti-Trump demonstrations since the Women's March drew millions of people into the streets on Jan. 21.

"Trump says only the media cares about this taxes. Today, we've proved him wrong. It's time for Trump to come clean, so we know who he's really working for," said Working Families Party national membership director Nelini Stamp, a keynote speaker at the New York City, in a statement following the march.

And btw folks, Trump could care less, in fact, he tweeted that all the people who protested should be investigated, which is un-American.

In Washington, D.C., the march began with a rally at the U.S. Capitol followed by a parade down Pennsylvania Avenue, past the Internal Revenue Service headquarters and the Trump International Hotel -- where protesters chanted shame in unison.

The rally at times played the role of an all-purpose demonstration against Trump, replete with derisive condemnations of the president -- including references to alleged collusion of staff members from his presidential campaign with the Russian government.

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), the ranking member on the House Financial Services Committee, gave one of the most impassioned speeches at the U.S. Capitol. Waters, who has become a leading voice of opposition to Trump, vowed to impeach the president for his contemptible actions, as she led the crowd in a chant of impeach 45.

"I have laryngitis. But the only way I would not have been here with you today is if they cut my throat and stopped me from talking," she declared. "If he thinks he can get away with playing king, he's got another thing coming!"

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the ranking member on the Senate Finance Committee, declared during his speech, "We are taking the gloves off to say knock off the secrecy Mr. President and publicly release your own tax returns!"

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) was another leading Democrat to address the D.C. crowd, along with several policy experts and progressive leaders.

The rallies also featured Donny the Tax March Chicken, an inflatable chicken made to resemble Trump. The gag is intended to mock Trump for being too chicken to reveal his tax returns.

Trump is the first president in four decades who has not released his tax returns or comparable financial information. The practice became a tradition when former President Richard Nixon released his returns after he was audited.

In January, Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway insisted that Trump would never release his returns, arguing that his election proved that "people didn't care" about it. And as usual, she is clueless, just as the clown Trump is. Because all the polls say a majority want him to release his tax returns.

Trump's critics believe his refusal to disclose his tax returns is a sign that he has something to hide. Questions about his motives have led to speculation that they contain evidence of either major tax avoidance or financial ties to figures close to the Russian government.

The FBI confirmed in March that it is investigating Trump associates for their possible ties to Russia, raising the possibility that the president's allies participated in the alleged Russian interference efforts in some capacity.

News Panel Laughs At Trump Supporters Trying To Defend Golf Trips

Now this was funny, Trump and other Republicans (including Bill O'Reilly) used to slam Obama every time he played Golf, over and over, then on top of that Trump said if he was the President he would never spend taxpayer money playing Golf, he said he would be too busy doing the job of president.

Now Trump is Golfing almost every weekend, and spending 50 times more than Obama did doing it, but the Trump supporters still defend it. Except for O'Reilly, he just ignores it and never says a word about it.

In Donald Trump's first 81 days in office, he has spent 21 of them at his Mar-a-Lago resort at a total cost to taxpayers of around $21.6 million -- just on those trips.

During President Obama's eight years in office, taxpayers spent $97 million on extracurricular expenses for himself and his family. That means we're on pace to spend more on Trump's extracurricular expenses in the first 365 days of his administration than we did during Obama's entire 8 years in office.

Being that Republicans like to champion themselves the party of fiscal responsibility, while Trump, himself, frequently attacked Obama for playing golf, you would think this outrageous hypocrisy would be indefensible, right?

Wrong ! The Trump administration and his supporters are laughably trying to defend this hypocritical behavior and the outrageous amount of money taxpayers are paying so that Trump can spend roughly one-fourth of his time golfing.

This was the topic on CNN that saw Don Lemon and two other panelists bursting into laughter at Trump supporters Ben Ferguson and Kayleigh McEnany desperately trying to spin this glaring contradiction from the Trump, the GOP, and the conservative media.

"We crunched the numbers and found that president has spent six weekends and a total of 21 days at Mar-a-Lago, the total cost of those trips around $21.6 million," Lemon stated.

"Just for pure numbers sake, in the first 81 days of office, President Obama went to the golf course course zero times," panelist Bakari Sellers added. "Let's talk about the fiscal accountability or lack thereof and the fact is Trump is on a pace to spend more money traveling in his first year."

Lemon when on to say that after all the things Trump said about Obama going golfing, if you "don't see the hypocrisy in that, then you don't want to see it, you're blind."

While the CNN host gave Ferguson and McEnany chances to defend Trump, both did everything they could to talk about anything but golf. After McEnany comically tried to claim that liberals have been hypocritical about Syria, as Lemon mockingly reminding her that the topic was about his golf trips, Ferguson went on to claim that Trump's using these trips as tools to build relationships with other world leaders.

"He can't do that in D.C., Camp David?" Lemon said, clearly trying to hold back laughter.

This prompted Ferguson to then claim that the choice of a Florida location is about better weather, at which point Lemon sarcastically quipped that "your golf clubs don't work in the cold," before reminding him that the temperatures were in the 50's in D.C. this weekend.

"You never criticize, we show the tape of the president being hypocritical and you go, 'no he's not.'" Lemon stated. "You can't even acknowledge it and you have no credibility when you do that."

If you can watch the clip, I would suggest that you do. There were moments you could tell that even Ferguson and McEnany were trying not to laugh at the fact that they knew there wasn't a credible defense for this glaring hypocrisy.

It's probably not a professional look to have a panel discussion filled with frequent laughter, but even I was laughing at the completely absurd ways Ferguson and McEnany were trying to defend Trump.

As Don Lemon stated, anyone still defending Donald Trump, especially now, has lost any and all credibility. Not that they really had much to begin with if they were gullible enough to ever support and defend this unqualified clown who is now in the White House.

Betsy DeVos Brother Had Secret Meeting To Establish Trump-Putin Back Channel

The United Arab Emirates arranged a secret meeting in January between Blackwater founder Erik Prince and a Russian close to President Vladi­mir Putin as part of an apparent effort to establish a back-channel line of communication between Moscow and President-elect Donald Trump, according to U.S., European and Arab officials.

The meeting took place around Jan. 11 -- nine days before Trump's inauguration -- in the Seychelles islands in the Indian Ocean, officials said. Though the full agenda remains unclear, the UAE agreed to broker the meeting in part to explore whether Russia could be persuaded to curtail its relationship with Iran, including in Syria, a Trump administration objective that would be likely to require major concessions to Moscow on U.S. sanctions.

Though Prince had no formal role with the Trump campaign or transition team, he presented himself as an unofficial envoy for Trump to high-ranking Emiratis involved in setting up his meeting with the Putin confidant, according to the officials, who did not identify the Russian.

Prince was an avid supporter of Trump. After the Republican convention, he contributed $250,000 to Trump's campaign, the national party and a pro-Trump super PAC led by GOP mega-donor Rebekah Mercer, records show.

He has ties to people in Trump's circle, including Stephen K. Bannon, now serving as the president's chief strategist and senior counselor. Prince's sister Betsy DeVos serves as education secretary in the Trump administration. And Prince was seen in the Trump transition offices in New York in December.

U.S. officials said the FBI has been scrutinizing the Seychelles meeting as part of a broader probe of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election and alleged contacts between associates of Putin and Trump. The FBI declined to comment.

The Seychelles encounter, which one official said spanned two days, adds to an expanding web of connections between Russia and Americans with ties to Trump -- contacts that the White House has been reluctant to acknowledge or explain until they have been exposed by news organizations.

"We are not aware of any meetings, and Erik Prince had no role in the transition," said Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary.

A Prince spokesman said in a statement: "Erik had no role on the transition team. This is a complete fabrication. The meeting had nothing to do with President Trump. Why is the so-called under-resourced intelligence community messing around with surveillance of American citizens when they should be hunting terrorists?"

The Seychelles meeting came after separate private discussions in New York involving high-ranking representatives of Trump with both Moscow and the Emirates.

The White House has acknowledged that Michael T. Flynn, Trump's original national security adviser, and Trump adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner met with the Russian ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak, in late November or early December in New York.

Trump Believes Fox & Friends More Than His Own Intelligence Community

He trusts the 3 biggest morons on tv, just watch them for a day, it's like the 3 stooges went to work for the RNC and they put them on tv to do a fake news show, they simply do a biased opinion show on Fox News. They are not journalists, they are propaganda puppets for Trump and the Republicans, who agree with every position Trump and the Republican party has, no matter how insane it is, or how many Americans oppose it.

President Donald Trump recently promoted a Fox & Friends report that the previous administration spied on him during the election -- an idea that has been widely debunked.

As Trump congratulated Fox & Friends on its amazing reporting, he was ignoring analysis from his own intelligence officials that there's no evidence such surveillance occurred.

Just minutes earlier, Trump's favorite morning show tweeted that a new report over the weekend shows a very high up Obama official unmasking Trump associates for political purposes.

Which is a lie, if they were unmasked it was simply because it was known who they were while a foreigner was on a FISA wiretap. The story was made up by some unverified right-wing source, and is not true. And if they were talking to someone under a FISA warrant, they have bigger problems then being unmasked to a government official.

Trump often praises the morons and tweets about stories its hosts have recently discussed.

Trump has for weeks claimed that former President Barack Obama spied on him. But FBI Director James Comey last month told Congress that there is no information to support the president's claims. National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers made a similar comment. And James Clapper, who served as director of national intelligence during the time the alleged spying would have occurred, has also denied the reports.

Several members of Congress have called on Trump to retract the allegations, but so far he has refused. And btw folks, Trump staffers said when he did the crazy tweet he did not even know how a FISA warrant works.

Trump claims the real story is the leakers, not that people in his campaign could have been working with the Russians to steal an American presidential election, which is just laughable. The real story is Russians working with Trump, and maybe his campaign to steal the election from Hillary Clinton. The leakers are doing the American people a favor, and should be seen as great Americans, not criminals.

Trump Lied About Adding Former Lobbyists To Swamp

Trump said he would drain the swamp and ban lobbyists, now he is giving them ethics waivers so he can hire them to work for him.

Some new Trump officials are working on policies that will benefit clients they recently served. Far from fulfilling his campaign promise to drain the swamp in Washington, President Trump is filling it with former lobbyists and consultants.

The president has relaxed ethics regulations, eliminating a requirement barring lobbyists from joining agencies that they lobbied up to two years prior.

The New York Times have highlighted some especially worrisome hires in the executive branch, including White House energy adviser Michael Catanzaro, a former oil and gas company lobbyist, and Geoff Burr, a former construction industry lobbyist now working at the Department of Labor.

A lobbyist may "un-register on Monday and enter the Trump Administration on Tuesday," Craig Holman of the watchdog group Public Citizen told said - and could also quickly return to the private sector.

Just last week, Bloomberg revealed that Marcus Peacock, a top Trump aide who worked briefly in the Office of Management and Budget, will join the lobbying group the Business Roundtable. Peacock has recused himself from lobbying the OMB for just six months - even though he agreed not to lobby his former agency for five years, according to Bloomberg.

Trump is also issuing other ethics waivers, but that's difficult to determine because granted waivers are generally kept secret, the Times reports. The president is also keeping White House visitor logs secret, making it difficult to track corporate representatives meetings with federal officials as they create new policy.

Here Is One Big Problem With Cable News Shows

They put people on the air who flat out lie over and over and over, time after time, and they just keep putting them back on the air, even though they are proven liars and almost everything they say is a lie. Which is why I do not watch a lot of cable news, because they keep using proven liars, who do nothing but lie.

They should warn them after getting caught in a lie, then give them a 2nd chance, then on the 3rd strike you are out and off the network forever. But they do not do that, they just let them lie to the American people over and over and they do not do a damn thing about it.

Now I am not talking about someone who makes a small mistake, like they say 40,000 people were hurt or whatever, and it was actually 38,000, those are actual mistakes. I am talking about paid spin doctors who are only on the air to lie and spin the American people with their dishonest lies and pure propaganda.

If cable news ever wants to get any credibility they need to get rid of the liars. Only about 30% of the people trust what they get from the cable news networks, and I bet it's even less, some people may trust them when they should not be, especially if you are watching Fox. I would bet 90% of what they report is spin or lies, so they can not be trusted at all.

Another problem is they let Trump get away with his distraction plan, it was nothing but Russia talk and how Trump is doing so bad as President, then Trump bombs Syria with a bogus mission that did almost nothing and they even warned them the bombs were coming, and the media fell for it hook line and sinker, then they report on it 24/7 for 2 weeks.

Then he drops the MOAB on Afghanistan, for the same reason, to distract everyone from his scandals, and the media falls for it. This was done to get the media talking about bombs instead of the FBI and Congress investigating Trump for collusion with Russia.

Those bombings should be reported, for an hour or so, then go back to the real news, do not spend 2 weeks on a bogus bombing story. Malcolm Nance said the 59 bombs were a joke, they told the Russians they were coming so they got everyone and everything moved, it did nothing, and they hit nothing, it was a big scam by the clown President.

Impeachable Level Offense Found In Evidence Of Trump/Russia Collusion

In an exclusive published in The Guardian that discredits even further President Trump's unfounded accusations that President Obama wiretapped him there's a bomb of its own at the very end, with a source claiming that the official investigation now has specific concrete and corroborative evidence of collusion.

One source suggested the official investigation was making progress. "They now have specific concrete and corroborative evidence of collusion," the source said. "This is between people in the Trump campaign and agents of Russian influence relating to the use of hacked material."

This will be the turning point in the Trump Russia scandal. This is the smoking gun, the impeachable offense.

The article notes that at least seven countries tried to alert the United States about the Trump campaign conversations with Russia, which the GCHQ first became aware of in 2015.

Basically the entire Western SIGINT alliance knew there was something rotten between Trump and Russia.

"It looks like the [US] agencies were asleep," the source added. "They [the European agencies] were saying: 'There are contacts going on between people close to Mr Trump and people we believe are Russian intelligence agents. You should be wary of this.'

"The message was: 'Watch out. There's something not right here.'"

Malcome Nance pointed out that no matter how troubling the alerts were, "The FBI is the only agency that can touch those foreign intell reports. Until a FISA is obtained allied collection on US citizens is off limits."

We now know that there was a FISA warrant on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. This warrant was renewed more than once. They got the FISA warrant because there was probable cause that the target was a foreign agent, and that he knew he was working with Russian agents.

The Gang of 8 were told in August and September that Putin might be trying to help Trump win the election.

Team Trump keeps crying persecution, but there is evidence that they were in constant dialogue with Russia and that Russia wanted Trump to win. The smoking gun is proof of collusion. That's what the hold up has been.

The Guardian's source says they have specific concrete and corroborative evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia relating to hacked material. This claim echoes the spy chatter that's been going on for months now, and also echoes the partially corroborated dossier by the British spy. That dossier has only been corroborated in parts, but many of those parts went to the more important claims rather than the salacious claims that made headlines.

This is only one step in a long investigation, but it is a big deal. Except to O'Reilly, who has dismissed the whole story and refused to report on it, because it involves his friend Trump. Now imagine what O'Reilly would be saying if all this came out about a Democrat, especially Hillary Clinton. They wanted her put in jail over some harmless e-mails, if she had won and was linked to Russia they would want her burned at the cross, but when it's Trump O'Reilly will not even report on any of it.

Dishonest Trump Administration Will Not Release Visitor Logs

As usual the clown Trump is a liar and a hypocrite, because Trump criticized the Obama administration for a lack of transparency. The Washington Post reported that the Trump administration will not make its records of visitors to the White House available to the public.

The decision is a departure from the Obama administration, which did release the logs. Michael Dubke, the White House communications director, said that the White House's decision was made out of concern for national security and privacy, and to protect President Donald Trump's ability to discreetly seek counsel.

Citing "the grave national security risks and privacy concerns of the hundreds of thousands of visitors annually," the White House said in a statement that it would "disclose Secret Service logs as outlined under the Freedom of Information Act."

The logs will remain private until five years after Trump leaves office.

The White House says it will honor public information requests to parts of the White House legally classified as agencies, such as the Office of Management and Budget.

Trump has faced numerous questions about potential conflicts of interest after refusing to release his tax returns. Trump, who as a candidate pledged to "drain the swamp" of Washington insiders, had previously accused then-President Barack Obama of a lack of transparency.

And now Trump is not only not draining the swamp, he is making the swamp bigger.

White House officials said they expect criticism of the new policy, but believe it is necessary to preserve the ability of the president to seek advice from whomever he wants, with some discretion.

Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.) sharply criticized the news on Friday.

"Once again, the Trump White House is stonewalling information that Congress and the American people have a right to see."

Faiz Shakir, national political director of the ACLU, said in a statement that "the only reasonable conclusion is to believe the Trump administration has many things it is trying to hide."

Noah Bookbinder, executive director of the group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said his group would fight the Trump administration in court to release the records.

"It's disappointing that the man who promised to drain the swamp just took a massive step away from transparency by refusing the release the White House visitor logs that the American people have grown accustomed to accessing over the last six years and that provide indispensable information about who is seeking to influence the president," Bookbinder said in a statement.

"This week, we sued the Trump administration to make sure they would release the logs. It looks like we'll see them in court."

And of course O'Reilly and all of Fox News are silent about it, even though they slammed Obama for not making them public as fast as they wanted them to, and Obama eventually did make them public. O'Reilly even said the American people deserve to see who is going into the people's White House, when Obama was in office, but under Trump he says nothing.

Notice a different person hosting the Factor every night, it's like they are looking to see who gets the highest ratings, and that will most likely be the new host if O'Reilly gets fired. And right now, Bolling is winning with 3.111 million viewers.

Scarborough Said Ann Coulter & Sean Hannity Are On Putin's Side

"Vladimir Putin has learned the same thing about Donald Trump that Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton did," crowed the conservative Joe Scarborough. "He is unpredictable."

Scarborough continued:

"How fascinating that Vladimir Putin, if he thought he was going to influence politics in America, it hasn't turned out that way," he said. "Other than he's got Ann Coulter on his side, so he's got that. But other than that, it's not working out very well for Putin."

"Wow," said fellow host Mika Brzezinski.

"Oh wait and Sean Hannity, he's got Sean Hannity on his side," Scarborough added for good measure.

The panel, which included show regulars, Richard Haas and Willie Geist expressed a general fascination with the swiftly souring relations between Trump and his Russian counterpart in the aftermath of the president's recent airstrike against Syria.

"This is not what Putin bargained for" said. Haass.

Trump's Fox Legal Hero Says Syria Attack Illegal & Unconstitutional

The so-called great legal mind Trump quoted in his tweet about Obama wiretapping him now says the Trump attack on Syria was illegal and unconstitutional, and of course Trump never says a word about it, he just ignores it. He went to the O'Reilly crisis management school, quote them as a great source if they say something good about you, ignore them when they say something bad.

Former Judge Andrew P. Napolitano write this on foxnews.com Wednesday:

Last week, as Holy Week was approaching, the United States launched 59 cruise missiles at a Syrian airfield.

Trump argued that the gas could only have been deployed intentionally by the Syrian government on its own people and that that behavior was so repellant, so contrary to civilized moral norms, so disruptive to the world order as to constitute a national security threat to the United States -- hence his use of force. Was his action legal?

Syria, along with the United States, is a signatory to the United Nations Charter. The U.N. Charter is a treaty signed by President Harry Truman and ratified by the U.S. Senate. Under the Constitution, treaties are the supreme law of the land, alongside the Constitution, and the federal government has a moral and legal obligation to be bound by them.

The U.N. Charter limits member nations use of military force to defensive responses to actual attacks, pre-emptive strikes prior to nearly certain attacks and correctives pursuant to U.N. consent or pursuant to another treaty obligating military force to help an ally.

Under this international law, military force must be a last resort, used only when necessary to fight back or to prevent an imminent attack. It also must be proportional to the harm it seeks to eradicate and be likely to produce the result it seeks. Anything short of this violates international law, to which the U.S. is bound by numerous treaties.

Syria is not a threat to the U.S., nor is it likely to become one. Nor is the argument that we needed to send a message to Syria lest it use poison gas on the U.S. a valid legal argument or a realistic political one. Were this subjective fear a valid legal basis for the use of military force, the president could send missiles anytime and anywhere at anyone or anything with legal impunity.

The president's revulsion at the sight of children suffering from the effects of poison gas is an emotional reaction -- a very human and utterly normal one. Yet it in no way legally justifies an attack on a sovereign nation.

In addition to various treaties, the president is subject, of course, to the Constitution, which provides that only Congress can declare war. Yet Congress gave the president a small window in which to use military force on his own in the War Powers Resolution of 1973.

That law was written in the midst of President Richard Nixon's undeclared war in Cambodia to limit the president's emergency use of military force absent a declaration of war from Congress to defensive strikes, pre-emptive strikes and treaty obligations.

Did Trump have all the intelligence he needed in front of him before he attacked Syria? Apparently not. Did he use proportional force defensively or pre-emptively to prevent harm to the U.S.? Clearly not.

Can he legally use military force to punish or to teach a lesson to another sovereign state that poses no threat to the U.S.? Absolutely not, or there will be no end to government violence.

Former Trump Campaign Manager Registers As A Foreign Agent

President Donald Trump's former campaign manager Paul Manafort will register with the Department of Justice as a foreign agent, according to reports by The Associated Press and NBC News.

Manafort led lobbying efforts on behalf of the European Centre for a Modern Ukraine, a front group for former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, in the United States from 2010 to 2014.

The AP verified on Wednesday that Manafort received at least $1.2 million of a suspected $12.7 million in off-the-books payments from Yanukovych's political party while the Russia-allied leader was still in power.

Manafort will be the second top Trump aide to retroactively register as a foreign agent. After Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn resigned as Trump's national security adviser, he acknowledged that he had worked as an agent of the Turkish government to pressure the U.S. to extradite exiled cleric Fetullah Gulen, whom the Turkish government blames for a failed coup in 2016.

When he said it was "time to drain the swamp in Washington, D.C.," Trump attacked his opponent, Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, for taking "massive sums of money from registered foreign lobbyists." He further stated that he would ban members of his administration from becoming foreign agents and ban foreign lobbyist contributions.

The Washington Post reported Tuesday that the FBI had sought and obtained a warrant from a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to monitor Carter Page, another former Trump campaign adviser, to investigate whether he was acting as a foreign intelligence asset of the Russian government.

It is ironic that two members of Trump's campaign, including his longest-serving campaign manager and his closest national security adviser, have since turned out to be foreign agents, while another is suspected of being a foreign intelligence asset.

And O'Reilly does not say a word about any of it, probably because he is on a forced two week vacation that he may never come back from.

Fox News Host Admits He Has A Bias Against Democrats

And of course Bill O'Reilly and Bernie Goldberg have not said a word about it, even though they both do a weekly media bias segment on the O'Reilly Factor. A segment where they claim to be non-partisan Independent who judge the media fairly, then they spend the entire segment crying about so-called liberal media bias, while almost never talking about conservative media bias at Fox News.

It's actually laughable, you have two conservatives (and no liberals) doing what they claim is a non-partisan media bias segment, where the two conservatives give their biased opinion of what they see as liberal bias, when in reality to them any reporting that does not have a right-wing bias is liberal bias to them. It's what they see, not reality. And they never talk about right-wing bias at Fox or any other conservative news sources. In fact, O'Reilly even denies there is right-wing bias at Fox, which is just ridiculous.

So Stuart Varney basically admitted he has a bias for Trump and against Obama when the bad jobs report came out for March. And then after admitting he has a bias, he still refused to blame Trump for the bad jobs report, even though they blamed Obama when it was not great, including Trump, who has been silent, but when the February report came out and it was pretty good, Trump took credit for it, even though he had nothing to do with it because it was only a month after Obama left office.

Fox Business host Stuart Varney admitted on air to a clear double standard on how he and Fox cover the monthly jobs report for presidents of different political parties. Less than an hour after a disappointing jobs report was released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Varney revealed that if a similarly weak report had been published under President Barack Obama, he would have castigated the president as a failure -- something he admittedly wouldn't do to President Donald Trump.

On April 7, the BLS reported that the economy added just 98,000 jobs in March while the unemployment dropped slightly to 4.5 percent. The report also revised down the number of jobs created in January and February by 38,000. Though the improved unemployment rate is the lowest in 10 years, the number of new jobs created was far lower than the 175,000 jobs economists expected for the month.

Less than an hour after the report was announced, Varney called it a very weak jobs report but refused to lay blame on Trump. Varney admitted that, had this report come out during the Obama administration, "we would be all over them for the failure of the president's economic policy."

Varney repeatedly downplayed positive economic indicators during the Obama administration. Just one year ago, he tried to spin the March 2016 jobs report by questioning the quality of the 215,000 new jobs created. Months earlier, he had claimed that 292,000 new jobs created in December 2015 were modest by historical standards, even though it was one of the strongest reports of the entire year and showed nearly three times the number of jobs shown in the March 2017 report.

Varney's momentary break of character shines a light on his network's fair and balanced charade, but the spectacle has been on full display since Trump took office. Fox News praised a solid January jobs report as fantastic news, and wrongly credited Trump for creating jobs that actually predated his inauguration.

A month later, Fox personalities, including Varney, lauded a solid February jobs report as proof that Trump is simply winning everywhere and held it up as evidence of the beginnings, of a potential Trump Economic Era.

The rest of Fox News reported that the same jobs report Varney described as weak would stand as part of the most successful day of Trump's presidency.

Partial transcript:

STUART VARNEY (HOST): Look, if we'd have had 98,000 new jobs in any month during the Obama administration, we would be all over them.


VARNEY: Failure of the president. Failure of the president's economic policy. Okay? Why shouldn't I say that now about Mr. Trump?

JOHN LONSKI: Well go ahead.

VARNEY: No, I'm not gonna do that.

Even Chris Wallace At Fox Slammed EPA Chief Pruitt Over Climate Denial

Even some people at Fox News can't believe that the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Scott Pruitt, doesn't accept the basic scientific finding that carbon dioxide is a primary contributor to recent global warming.

To promote President Trump's crazy plan to gut the EPA and U.S. climate action, Pruitt has been pushing his dangerous beliefs on all the major networks.

And Bill O'Reilly, who says he believes in Global Warming, saying we all want clean air and water, does not say one word about Trump's EPA head saying Global Warming is not cause by people.

O'Reilly has not discussed it, he has not said one word about it, even though you would think if someone really believed in Global Warming they would report on Trump putting someone in charge of the EPA who says it is not caused by people, when all the actual science says it does.

Fact checkers said Pruitt was caught in 4 lies about climate change in just this one interview alone.

Pruitt may have thought the Murdoch-owned network that has led the way on attacking climate science for two decades would be a friendly audience. He was wrong.

Fox News Sunday anchor Chris Wallace thoroughly debunked Pruitt for defending his absurd claim that CO2 is not a primary contributor to the global warming that we see.

Wallace was having none of it, saying this: "Mr. Pruitt, there are all kinds of studies that contradict you."

He quotes the conclusion of the world's leading climate scientists in the U.N.'s 2013 assessment of the scientific literature that there is a 100 percent chance "human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century."

Pruitt hems and haws and tries to gloss over his statement. Wallace then blasts him for "sugarcoating what you said," and reduces the question to its simplest form. "What if you are wrong?" asks Wallace.

"What if, in fact, the earth is warming, what if it is causing dramatic climate change and we as humans through carbon emissions are contributing to it? Simple question, what if you are wrong?"

Pruitt refuses to admit that possibility, but he did get Pruitt to concede CO2 makes some contribution, "the issue is how much we contribute to it," implying the science is not proven. So Wallace said the overwhelming majority of climate scientists  understand that humans are the primary cause of climate change and thus are the primary solution.

And btw, the UN assessment of climate science that Fox News cited states clearly, "The best estimate of the human-induced contribution to warming is similar to the observed warming over this period."

That is, the best estimate by scientists is that humans are responsible for all of the warming we have suffered since 1950! And every major government in the world signed off on this finding.

So I give a little credit to Chris Wallace for slamming Pruit's lies. For which I am sure he got a ton of hate mail from his uninformed far-right viewers. What a crazy world it is where Fox News takes on the role of defender of climate science. It seems even they draw the line at some lies.

Too bad O'Reilly does not do the same, if O'Reilly and others at Fox called out the Pruitt lies it might force him to admit the truth. But O'Reilly and pretty much everyone else at Fox say nothing.

Senator Warner Explains Exactly What Russia Did In The 2016 Election

And while they were doing this you had Donald Trump and Bill O'Reilly calling for Russia to hack Clintons emails. Then on top of all that you had 5 or 6 people in the Trump campaign secretly meeting with Russians and later lying about the meetings, including Donald Trump, who had secret meetings with Russians at Trump Tower. General Flynn was even fired over it, and the current Attorney General Jeff Sessions had to recuse himself from the investigation because of it.

Many other people in the Trump campaign also had meetings with Russians that were not disclosed, including Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law, who just reported he had meetings with Russians. This is big, and to this day Bill O'Reilly is ignoring it all, he even denies that Trump is being investigated by the FBI, when the FBI even admitted it in a public hearing.

Trump and his people are trying to cover it all up, and Bill O'Reilly is trying to help them. Then he attacks a Congresswoman who spoke out about it, even saying she is being un-patriotic, when it is Trump and O'Reilly who are being un-patriotic. Especially O'Reilly, who is trying to help Trump cover it up by ignoring the story and not investigating it himself.

Bill O'Reilly is not being a patriot, and he is part of the cover up, and that is a fact. Now here is what Senator Warner said, information that O'Reilly is ignoring.

SEN. MARK WARNER (D-VA): As this hearing begins, let's take just one moment to review what we already know. Russia's president, Vladimir Putin, ordered a deliberate campaign carefully constructed to undermine our election.

First, Russia struck at our political institutions by electronically breaking into the headquarters of one of our political parties and stealing vast amounts of information. Russian operatives also hacked emails to steal personal messages and other information from individuals ranging from Clinton campaign manager John Podesta to former Secretary of State Colin Powell.

This stolen information was then weaponized. We know that Russian intelligence used the quote, unquote "Guccifer 2" persona, and others like Wikileaks, and seemingly choreographed times that would cost maximum damage to one candidate.

They did this with an unprecedented level of sophistication about American presidential politics that should be a line of inquiry for us on this committee, and candidly, while it helped one candidate this time, they are not favoring one party over another and consequently should be a concern for all of us.

Second, Russia continually sought to diminish and undermine our trust in the American media by blurring our faith in what is true and what is not. Russian propaganda outlets like RT and Sputnik successfully produced and peddled disinformation to American audiences in pursuit of Moscow's preferred outcome.

This Russian propaganda on steroids was designed to poison the national conversation in America. The Russians employed thousands of paid internet trolls and botnets to push out disinformation and fake news at a high volume, focusing this material onto your Twitter and Facebook feeds and flooding our social media with misinformation.

This fake news and disinformation was then hyped by the American media echo chamber and our own social media networks to reach and potentially influence millions of America. This is not innuendo or false allegations.

This is not fake news. This is actually what happened to us. Russia continues these sorts of actions as we speak.

Republicans Voted To Take Retirement Accounts Away From Low Income Workers

Open your eyes America, this is what Republicans do when you vote them into power with a majority in the House and or the Senate. And of course you will never hear O'Reilly report on this, because he supports it and he supports the Republicans.

By a 50-49 vote, Senate Republicans have rolled back an Obama regulation that allowed states to create retirement accounts for low-income workers whose employers did not provide them.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell lied that the rule undercut private sector business, "Under the guise of helping more people save for the future, it undercut a system of private retirement savings that has served millions of Americans very well for decades. The end result would be more government at the expense of the private sector."

That's a lie and the truth is that the vote actually showed who the Senate Republicans works for. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) pointed out before the vote that Republicans have not put up a single piece of legislation to help working families in this Congress.

Warren asked, "Why on earth are they now voting to make it harder for cities and states to harm their own citizens save for retirement? Why? Three words. Chamber of Commerce."

She added: "The Chamber of Commerce and the trade associations for the giant financial firms have been fighting tooth and nail to kill these retirement intiatives. All because the giant fiancial firms that the Chamber of Commerce and trade asssociations represent are worried that these city and state plans might actually offered better investment products with lower fees."

Helping low-income people save for retirement by offering them products that might be more affordable is not the Republican way. When Republicans talk about removing burdensome regulations for the American people, the people that they are really helping are corporations and financial firms.

Some small business owners are even condemning the Republican vote, "Small business owners wear many hats, but being investment advisers should not be one of them," said Lisa Hagerty, a small business owner in Stowe, Vermont. "Programs like this that put small business owners in the best position care for themselves throughout their lives, while helping employees do the same, are a no-brainer. So why are Republicans in Congress dismantling them?"

Republicans just made it more difficult for low income workers to save for retirement, and that is the way that they want the labor force to work.

In Republican economic ideology, there is no ladder of opportunity for the poor. Everything that this Republican Congress and President have done is designed to keep poor people poor.

An ample supply of low income workers is needed so that rich people can get even richer. And senate Republicans sent the message that retirement is only an option for the wealthy. If you living paycheck to paycheck, Republicans are making sure that retirement isn't for you.

The FBI Got A FISA Warrant In 2016 For Trump Adviser Carter Page

The FBI secured a court order in 2016 to secretly surveil the communications of Carter Page, a foreign policy adviser to Donald Trump's presidential campaign, as the agency investigates possible ties between the campaign and Russia, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday.

Citing law enforcement and other U.S. officials the Post reported that the warrant for Page was obtained last summer by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Justice Department from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The report also says the FISA order was renewed at least 2 times, if not more. Doing that shows they were getting good information, or the FISA judge would not have allowed them to renew it more than once.

The judge was convinced there was probable cause to believe Page was acting as an agent of Russia, the Post said. And btw, Page says he did nothing wrong and did not even know they were Russian agents, but the report says he did know they were Russian agents and that he was knowingly working with them.

Page has denied in media interviews that he worked with the Russians to influence the election.

In a statement to Reuters on Tuesday, Page said the court order was evidence that the administration of former President Barack Obama wanted to "suppress dissidents" who opposed its foreign policy.

"It will be interesting to see what comes out when the unjustified basis for those FISA requests are more fully disclosed over time," he said.

Then again, maybe he will be put on trial for sedition or possibly even treason, and maybe a bunch of Trump administration and or campaign staffers will also be put on trial, and maybe it brings down the entire Trump administration.

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The White House and FBI also declined to comment.

The FBI and both congressional committees are investigating whether Russia tried to influence the election in Trump's favor, by hacking Democratic operatives emails and releasing embarrassing information, or possibly by colluding with Trump associates.

New York Magazine Reports O'Reilly Might Get Fired

New York magazine's Gabriel Sherman is reporting that multiple Fox News sources are saying Fox News host Bill O'Reilly could be off the air permanently.

Under pressure from advertisers and the network, O'Reilly announced on the April 4 edition of his show that he was taking a sudden two week vacation. According to Sherman, James Murdoch the CEO of Fox News parent company 21st Century Fox, "would like O'Reilly to be permanently off the air."

James father Rupert, older brother Lachlan, and Fox News co-president Bill Shine are pushing for O'Reilly to remain on air:

Embattled Fox News host Bill O'Reilly announced tonight that he is taking a vacation. O'Reilly's decision to go off the air in the midst of a sexual harassment scandal and advertiser boycott arguably has the appearance of a suspension, but O'Reilly worked to dispel that notion. He announced that he'd scheduled his trip last fall - well before the New York Times reported he paid $13 million to settle harassment claims. A Fox News source told me O'Reilly plans to return to his show on April 24.

But according to four network sources, there's talk inside Fox News that tonight's show could be his last.

Lawyers for the law firm Paul, Weiss, hired last summer by 21st Century Fox to investigate Roger Ailes, are currently doing a deep dive investigation into O'Reilly's behavior. They're focused now on sexual harassment claims by O'Reilly guest Wendy Walsh after she reported her claims via the company's anonymous hotline.

Shine remaining in O'Reilly's corner comes as no surprise as he been accused of coordinating a campaign to silence women who have reported sexual harassment at the network. In a complaint filed last year, former Fox host Andrea Tantaros claimed she met with Shine seeking relief from sexual harassment at Fox News, but he told her she needed to let this one go.

Fox News contributor Julie Roginsky alleged that Shine retaliated against her after she refused to publicly attack an accuser of former Fox News CEO Roger Ailes and Sherman previously reported that Shine played a key role in smearing Rudi Bakhtiar, who claimed she was fired from Fox News after complaining about sexual harassment.

The report of O'Reilly's possible departure comes as Fox News continues to lose advertisers following a New York Times report that five women received payments totaling nearly $13 million from either O'Reilly or 21st Century Fox in exchange for agreeing to not pursue litigation or speak about their accounts of sexual harassment involving O'Reilly.

Sherman said that while O'Reilly is on vacation the people at Fox will decide if they plan to fire him or not.

"The assumption is that he'll exit in a non-embarrassing way, a senior Fox News staffer was quoted as saying.

Until it's actually official, those participating in @StopOReilly effort as well as participants in groups like Sleeping Giants, should not take anything for granted and continue their work and effort.

Trump Cover-Up Crumbles As Nunes Sources Outed As White House Officials

The Trump conspiracy to distract from the Russia scandal has crumbled as House Intelligence Committee Chair Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) sources have been outed as being two White House officials.

The New York Times reported, "Several current American officials identified the White House officials as Ezra Cohen-Watnick, the senior director for intelligence at the National Security Council, and Michael Ellis, a lawyer who works on national security issues at the White House Counsel's Office and formerly worked on the staff of the House Intelligence Committee."

The whistle blower type people that Nunes has been referring to were not whistle blowers at all. As has been suspected by Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee, Nunes sources were the same White House that he is supposed to be investigating.

The two press conferences and the rush to meet with Donald Trump at the White House was all an act of political theater. Trump already knew what Nunes briefed him on because the information came from his own people.

Trump and his administration are often compared to Richard Nixon, but Nixon would be insulted to be compared to such an inept cover-up.

Nunes is working with the White House to bury the Russia scandal. As long as Devin Nunes chairs the investigation into potential coordination between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, the House Intelligence Committee will have zero credibility.

The connections to the Russia scandal and the president himself have grown after it was revealed one of Nunes sources was personally kept on the White House staff by Donald Trump.

Trump personally intervened to keep one of the two Nunes leakers, 30 yr old Ezra Cohen-Watnick, in the NSC, against NSA McMaster's advice.

Ezra Cohen-Watnick is also directly connected to former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.

Devin Nunes got his information from the White House, but not just from the White House, from a Flynn connected staff member in the White House. And it is now impossible to believe that the White House is not hiding something as it relates to Russia.

The revelation that the White House and the House Intelligence Committee chairman are working together to sabotage an investigation confirms that an independent non-partisan investigation must be taken up to get the bottom of what happened during the 2016 election.

And of course Bill O'Reilly has not and will not report any of this, he just ignores it all because it is about a Republican and his friend Donald Trump. Just imagine what O'Reilly would be saying if all this had happened to Hillary Clinton, he would call for civil war and armed revolt.

The connections directly to Donald Trump are expanding. When the truth is finally exposed on Russia, impeachment should be on the table. I would also add charges of sedition, or maybe even treason.

Trump Russia Dossier Key Claim Verified

Here is some news O'Reilly has never talked about, and never will, because it makes Trump look really bad, and possibly even guilty of treason. Now some of these claims have not been verified, but a lot of them have been proven to be true.

And the guy who made these claims is known to be a valid source of good information. But O'Reilly refuses to report on any of it, let alone do his own investigation, like a real journalist would. I will not quote the entire story, just some key points from it.

Now think about this, these claims made are from a British Intelligence expert, and this article is from the bbc.com, so it's not coming from a liberal or a Democrat in America, the people O'Reilly claims hate Trump and do nothing but lie about him. It's from England, from people who are not Democrats or liberals, they are not even Americans.

The BBC has learned that US officials "verified" a key claim in a report about Kremlin involvement in Donald Trump's election - that a Russian diplomat in Washington was in fact a spy.

So US officials verified one of the key claims in the report from Chris Steele, the British intelligence expert who wrote it. Which shows that he was not just making stuff up to hurt Trump, and it gives him credibility.

Now as of today, no single piece of evidence has been made public proving that the Trump campaign joined with Russia to steal the US presidency. But the FBI Director, James Comey, told a hushed committee room in Congress that this is precisely what his agents are investigating.

That tells you they have probable cause to investigate, or else they would just say there is nothing there and we are not doing any investigation. The fact that they are doing an investigation tells you they have some evidence that shows some guilt of something, they just do not have the proof yet.

Some on the right say they have not found anything, but some former senior officials say it is because of failings in the inquiry. They claim that if you dig deep enough you will find something.

Last June, Steele began sending pages of what would later be called his dossier. In light of his earlier work, the US intelligence community saw him as "credible" (their highest praise).

The FBI thought the same; they had worked with Steele going back to his days in MI6.

He flew to Rome in August to talk to the FBI. Then in early October, he came to the US and was extensively debriefed by them, over a week. He gave the FBI the names of some of his informants, the so-called "key" to the dossier.

But the CIA never interviewed him, and never sought to. This comes from several people who are in a position to know. They are alarmed at how the investigation is going, and worry it is being fumbled.

One said: "The FBI doesn't know about Russia, the CIA knows about Russia. Any sources Steele has in Russia, the FBI doesn't know how to evaluate."

"The Agency does. Who's running this thing from Moscow? The FBI just aren't capable on that side, of even understanding what Chris has."

Several sources have told me that late last year Steele himself grew increasingly disillusioned with the FBI's progress. So in October, pages from his reports were given to a few American journalists.

In early December, the whole thing, 35 pages, was sent to Senator John McCain, who pressed the FBI director to investigate exhaustively.

The following month, the intelligence agencies briefed both then-President Barack Obama and Trump about the dossier - and the entire contents were published by Buzzfeed.

In the report, Steele spoke of an "established operational liaison between the TRUMP team and the Kremlin, an intelligence exchange had been running between them for at least 8 years."

Members of the Obama administration believe, based on analysis they saw from the intelligence community, that the information exchange claimed by Steele continued into the election.

"This is a three-headed operation," said one former official, setting out the case, based on the intelligence: Firstly, hackers steal damaging emails from senior Democrats. Secondly, the stories based on this hacked information appear on Twitter and Facebook, posted by thousands of automated "bots", then on Russia's English-language outlets, RT and Sputnik, then right-wing US "news" sites such as Infowars and Breitbart, then Fox and the mainstream media. Thirdly, Russia downloads the online voter rolls.

And we now know that all of that did happen.

The voter rolls are said to fit into this because of "microtargeting". Using email, Facebook and Twitter, political advertising can be tailored very precisely: individual messaging for individual voters.

"You are stealing the stuff and pushing it back into the US body politic," said the former official, "you know where to target that stuff when you're pushing it back."

"You can figure what your target demographics and locations are from the voter rolls. Then you can use that to target your bot."

For instance, the US intelligence agencies said last October that the voter rolls had been "scanned and probed" from a server in Russia.

"I hear a lot of people comparing this to Watergate," said Congressman Eric Swalwell, a Democrat who sits on the House Intelligence Committee. Let me just tell you, the complexity of this case is unlike anything we've ever seen. Watergate doesn't even come close."

The investigation, then, is into a range of possibilities: at one end, unwitting co-operation with Russia by members of the Trump campaign; at the other conscious "co-ordination".

Hillary Clinton's former campaign manager, Robby Mook, said that if Trump's aides knew of Russia's plans, there should be charges of treason.

And let's not forget that during the campaign Trump said on tv that he wanted Russia to hack Hillary Clinton and get all her e-mails. Which they did, so they did exactly what he asked them to do.

In July of last year, during the campaign, Donald Trump invited Russia to hack Hillary Clinton's emails, asking one of America’s longstanding geopolitical adversaries to find "the 30,000 emails that are missing" from the personal server she used during her time as secretary of state.

TRUMP: "I will tell you this, Russia: If you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing," the Republican nominee said at a news conference in Florida. "I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press."

Trump's comments set off an immediate uproar from the Clinton campaign, which blasted the remarks as a threat to national security.

"This has to be the first time that a major presidential candidate has actively encouraged a foreign power to conduct espionage against his political opponent," Hillary for America policy adviser Jake Sullivan said in a statement. "That's not hyperbole, those are just the facts. This has gone from being a matter of curiosity, and a matter of politics, to being a national security issue."

"I find those kinds of statements to be totally outrageous because you've got now a presidential candidate who is, in fact, asking the Russians to engage in American politics," said former CIA Director Leon Panetta, a Clinton surrogate. "I just think that's beyond the pale."

The statement from Trump implies he knows they are doing some hacking on Hillary Clinton, and he is telling them to make sure they get Clinton's missing emails, it implies Trump had knowledge of their hacking.

Now read through this information again, and ask yourself how this could all just be a coincidence, it's not possible. Especially when half the Trump administration has lied about links and meetings with Russians, including Trump himself. You only lie about something when you do not want people to know the truth.

And if you lie about something you clearly have something to hide. Now think about this, O'Reilly is ignoring all of this, even though it all points to a Trump/Russia connection. We just do not have the proof yet, but O'Reilly is not even investigating or reporting on any of it, which is his job, but he does not do it because he is a friend of Trump and he does not want to know the truth.

More Proof Trump Lied About His Business Dealings With Russians

From the USA Today Newspaper:

To expand his real estate developments over the years, Donald Trump, his company and partners repeatedly turned to wealthy Russians and oligarchs from former Soviet republics -- several allegedly connected to organized crime, according to a USA TODAY review of court cases, government and legal documents and an interview with a former federal prosecutor.

The president and his companies have been linked to at least 10 wealthy former Soviet businessmen with alleged ties to criminal organizations or money laundering.

Trump told reporters in February: "I have no dealings with Russia. I have no deals that could happen in Russia, because we've stayed away. And I have no loans with Russia. I have no loans with Russia at all."

Yet in 2013, after Trump addressed potential investors in Moscow, he bragged to Real Estate Weekly about his access to Russia's rich and powerful.

Notice exactly what Trump is saying:

TRUMP: "I can tell you, speaking for myself, I own nothing in Russia," President Trump said at a news conference last month. "I have no loans in Russia. I don't have any deals in Russia."

He says in Russia, but in the United States, members of the Russian elite have invested in many Trump buildings. A Reuters review has found that at least 63 individuals with Russian passports or addresses have bought at least $98.4 million worth of property in seven Trump-branded luxury towers in southern Florida, according to public documents, interviews and corporate records.

The buyers include politically connected businessmen, such as a former executive in a Moscow-based state-run construction firm that works on military and intelligence facilities, the founder of a St. Petersburg investment bank and the co-founder of a conglomerate with interests in banking, property and electronics.

People from the second and third tiers of Russian power have invested in the Trump buildings as well.

One recently posted a photo of himself with the leader of a Russian motorcycle gang that was sanctioned by the United States for its alleged role in Moscow's seizure of Crimea.

Trump even said this in 2013:

"I have a great relationship with many Russians, and almost all of the oligarchs were in the room," Trump said, referring to Russians who made fortunes when former Soviet state enterprises were sold to private investors.

Trump is a liar and a con man, and he has so many conflicts of interest and so many links to Russians it will take years to investigate them all, and he could even be out of office before they get to them all.

Bill Maher Calls Out Republican Hypocrisy Over Syria Bombing

On HBO's Real Time, Bill Maher called out Republican hypocrites for blocking Obama's requested action on Syria while hailing Trump's meaningless missile strike.

Maher said, "American cruise missiles blew up an airfield in Syria because the dictator there was using chemical weapons -- which he has done many times. In 2013, 98 Republicans signed a letter saying bombing Syria in response to a chemical attack was unconstitutional without congressional authorization. But this is different because Obama was president then. That would have involved bombing while black, and you can't do that."

He pointed out that the bombing was tricky for Trump because if he does the wrong thing, Putin might not reelect him.

Maher then turned on the media, "In America, you're not really president until you bomb something, you know?" said Maher. "Even the liberals were all over this last night. Everybody loves this f-ing thing. Cable news loves it when they show footage of destroyers firing cruise missiles at night. It's America's money shot."

Maher is right. When Obama wanted to bomb Syria after a chemical attack, Republicans responded with howls of dictator and unconstitutional, but when Trump openly violates the Constitution by attacking a nation that has not attacked the United States, Republicans hail the move as presidential.

Some Democrats in Congress have been correctly pointing out that Trump's ineffective Syria missile strike was unconstitutional, but Americans can't stand by and allow a president to use the emotions of a moment to grab additional powers. Trump's Syria bombing is a smaller version of what happened when a terrified nation unconstitutionally allowed a president to launch and unrelated invasion of Iraq after 9/11.

Instead of praising Trump, the press should be doing its job and calling out the Republican hypocrisy and the president's unconstitutional actions. Trump even said he did it in the interest of national security, which is just laughable, because it had nothing to do with our security, he simply did it to get all the scandals about him out of the news.

Bill Maher spoke out. And the media needs to grow a pair and join the rest of us who aren't afraid to condemn hypocrisy and unconstitutional presidential actions.

Tillerson Told Russia About Syria Strike Before It Happened

Donald Trumps Sec. of State Rex Tillerson revealed late Thursday that the U.S. warned Russia that they would be bombing the airfield in Syria since there was Russian military in the vicinity.

ABC News reported early Friday that the Syrian military seemed to know that something might happen. Eyewitnesses claim the military then evacuated personnel and moved equipment before the strike took place.

I guess that is what you get when half your campaign staff is cozy with Russians, a heads up on a so-called secret bombing mission. Trump even once said as president he would never tell anyone about a military action before it happens, so that was another lie for the list.

When you are under investigation by the FBI, the House, and the Senate for links to Russia, it is not good to have warned them about a military strike. But of course O'Reilly and all the other Trump supporters will not say a word about it, but if a Democrat had done the same thing they would want him/her put on trial for treason and impeached. Hell they wanted Hillary to go to jail over some lousy e-mails.

Hot Links

O'Reilly Loses Custody Of His Kids After Choking Wife

Conclusive Proof Bill O'Reilly Is Biased In Favor Of Republicans

O'Reilly Dishonest About Publishers Weekly Not Reviewing Killing Reagan

Bill O'Reilly Proves He Is A Lying Right-Wing Idiot Once Again

O'Reilly Wrong About The Constitution & Obama's Power

4 Fox Hosts Slam O'Reilly Over His Ebola Reporting

Historians & The Patton Family Rip O'Reilly's New Patton Book

Jon Stewart Slams Fox For Criticizing President While At War

Facts On The Economy Bill O'Reily Is Totally Ignoring

Under Bush O'Reilly & Fox News Did Not Blame Him For Beheadings

Study Finds Fox News Only Tells the Truth 18% of the Time

More Republican Corruption O'Reilly Has Ignored

Jon Stewart Destroys O'Reilly & Fox For Ferguson Shooting Bias

O'Reilly Caught Lying About ISIS Threat & Juan Williams

NY Times Charles Blow Says Bill O'Reilly Is The Race Hustler

Homeland Security Shows Gutfeld & Baker Are Liars

More Republican Corruption O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Cost Of Obamacare

Bill O'Reilly Is Lying To You About Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Electic Car Company Success

The Most Annoying Celebs Who Should Go Away

Bias Alert: O'Reilly Spins Presidential Election Media Study

O'Reilly & Fox Still Ignoring GOP Voter Registration Fraud Story

Biased O'Reilly Tells Romney To Call Obama A Socialist

O'Reilly Slams Obama With Dishonest Tip Of The Day

O'Reilly & Brit Hume Spin And Lie For Mitt Romney

Fox Promotes Ridiculous Study Of Doctors & Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media & Obama

Low Gas Prices Shut O'Reilly & The Repiblicans Up Fast

I Am Waiting For The O'Reilly Health Care Bill Apology

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About The Media

O'Reilly Ignores MRC Calling For Sharpton Firing

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Wrong On The Deficit

O'Reilly & Fox Lie That Obama To Blame For High Gas Prices

Scientist Group Slams Celebs Like Snooki & O'Reilly

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About America

O'Reilly & Ingraham Lied About Planned Parenthood (Again)

Fox Unemployment Chart Shows Their Right-Wing Bias

U.S. Troops Burn A Box Of O'Reilly's Books

Kelly & O'Reilly Make Up Another Green Energy Scandal

O'Reilly Ignoring All The Stock Market Increases

O'Reilly Flat Out LIED About The Debt Obama Added

O'Reilly Caught Doctoring Florida Mans E-Mail

O'Reilly Ignored Michele Bachmann Church Scandal

O'Reilly & Morris Lied About The Debt Polls

O'Reilly Hypocrisy On The West/Schultz Story

The Truth About Those Bush Tax Cuts

Number Of Tea Party Events Down 50 Percent

NWLC Says O'Reilly Statement Made Up & Offensive

Video Proof O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Hack

O'Reilly Gets It Totally Wrong On Norway Terrorist

Norway Terrorist Info O'Reilly Ignored

O'Reilly Ignoring Ensign/Coburn Hush Money Scandal

O'Reilly Calls Obama Health Care Waivers A Scam

O'Reilly Complains About Losing In His Own Poll

O'Reilly Ignores Republican Hypocrisy On Judicial Filibusters

O'Reilly Ignoring Republican Unpopularity

O'Reilly Tells GOP How To Beat Obama With Scare Tactics

O'Reilly & Fox Are Lying To You About The Debt

O'Reilly Spins The 2008 Presidential Media Study

Important Tax Information Bill O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Ignored McCain Op-Ed On Bin Laden

O'Reilly Scrubs Website & Podcast Of False Obama Claims

O'Reilly Ignored DOJ Black Panther Report

O'Reilly Still Ignoring Wisconsin Judge's Order Story

O'Reilly Ignored Jobs & Unemployment Report

Fox News Town Hall Protester Hypocrisy & Double Standards

O'Reilly & Varney Speculate About Oil Prices

O'Reilly Spins The Quinnipiac Temperature Poll

O'Reilly Proves How Stupid He Is Again

How O'Reilly Puts Out Right-Wing Propaganda

Fox News Insider Admits They Make Things Up

Luntz Admits Fox Has Anti-Obama Focus Groups

Reagan SG Says Health Care Bill Constitutional

O'Reilly Ignores Gore Answer To His Question

O'Reilly Wonders How The Moon Got There

More Republican Hate & Racism O'Reilly Has Ignored

Another Poll O'Reilly Has Totally Ignored

O'Reilly Thinks We Are Still In A Recession

O'Reilly's Nazi Comment Defense Was Laughable

Fox News The Least Trusted Cable News Network

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media (Again)

O'Reilly Claims Estate Tax A Seizure Of Property

O'Reilly Called Bernie Sanders A Loon

Bloomberg Tax Cut Poll Proves O'Reilly Was Lying

O'Reilly Ignored Positive DADT Study & Story

O'Reilly & Fox Ignore Judge Being A 9-11 Truther

More Real News O'Reilly Has Ignored

More Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Ratings

O'Reilly Got The Ireland Economic Crisis Wrong

O'Reilly Ignored The Tom Delay Conviction Story

Women Of America: You Need To Read This

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly Is Dishonest & Crazy

O'Reilly Nazi Comparison Hypocrisy

O'Reilly Ignores New Poll While Promoting Paladino

Andrew Sullivan Called O'Reilly A Dishonest Propagandist

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Nevada RCP Senate Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Right-Wing Abortion Bomber Terrorism Story

Fox & O'Reilly Ignored Friday Pro-Mosque NY Rally

O'Reilly Busted For Health Insurance Premium Lies

Most Factor Gear Made in Vietnam And China

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

O'Reilly Busted For 1st Time Retraction Lie

The Bill O'Reilly Non-Apology Shirley Sherrod Apology

O'Reilly & The Right Are Racist Idiots

O'Reilly Ignored Tea Party Express Racism Story

O'Reilly Compares Gay People To Al-Qaeda

Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Rating Polls

O'Reilly Ignored Mark Kirk Military Award Lie Story

Where Are The Sedition Charges Now O'Reilly

O'Reilly Caught In A Massive Lie About Jail Time

O'Reilly Running Ads For Emergency Food Supply

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Tea Party Militia Links

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Gallup Tea Party Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Harris Poll Showing Republicans Are Stupid

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Health Reform Bill Tax

O'Reilly Caught Lying About NEJM Health Care Survey

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

The Truth About Ratings For News Shows

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Spin Doctor

O'Reilly Spinning Fox News Most Trusted Poll

Fox News Did Not Air Hope For Haiti Telethon

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Obama Terrorism Polls

O'Reilly Caught Lying About House Ethics Committee

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Increase

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Limbaugh Racism

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Religious Festival

O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Lying About CNN

O'Reilly Caught Violating Journalistic Standards Again

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The ACLU & Racial Profiling

More Proof O'Reilly & FOX News Do Not Tell The Truth

O'Reilly Called Bruce Springsteen Un-American & Un-Patriotic

The Bill O'Reilly Senate Torture Report Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Obama Approval Numbers

FOX News Caught Lying About Obama Budget

O'Reilly Busted For Helping GOP Smear Pelosi

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Obama Earmark Promise

Military.com Report Proves O'Reilly Wrong About Homeless Vets

O'Reilly Places 7th in 2008 Wingnut of The Year Award

O'Reilly Denys Reality About Abstinence Only Programs

Proof The O'Reilly Factor is Biased Against Barack Obama
O'Reilly said he is a non-partisan Independent, who is fair to both sides, and that he has been fair to Barack Obama. To check that claim I did a 3 month study of the Factor, it started on August 1st, 2008, and ran until October 31st, 2008. I watched the Factor every night and counted the negative and positive comments for Obama and McCain.

Visit the web page I set up, and you will see the stunning bias from O'Reilly and his mostly Republican guests against Barack Obama. Then you will see there is no doubt Bill O'Reilly is a dishonest and biased Conservative. This study is conclusive proof that O'Reilly is in the tank for John McCain.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The 3 Month Factor Bias Study:


Proof O'Reilly Lied About The Balance on His Show
O'Reilly claims the factor is balanced, and that he personally makes sure every week he has an equal number of Republican and Democrat guests. This is a bold faced lie, and I can prove it. I put together a web page that shows the guest list from the factor for the last 2 weeks. Read it and you will see with your own eyes that Bill O'Reilly is lying when he says the factor is balanced.

And remember that we are 3 weeks before a major Presidential election, or the Republican bias numbers would be worse than it is normally. O'Reilly is actually having more Democrats on than he usually does, and the balance is still not even close. If we were not so close to an election it would be a lot worse.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The Lies About The Factor Balance:


O'Reilly Sucks Investigation: Dishonesty, Deception, And Bias By Bill O'Reilly
O'Reilly claims there are no Republicans or Conservative groups that rival George Soros. O'Reilly said the top three conservative tax-exempt foundations are totally dwarfed by Soros and the radical Ford Foundation. And that they have 15 times more the assets. George Soros net worth is $8.5 billion, the Ford Foundation has a net worth of $13 billion. But the seven billionaires who donate to Newt Gingrich and other right-wing causes have a combined net worth of $34.8 billion dollars.

Somehow O'Reilly claims that Soros and the Ford Foundation have 15 times more the assets than anyone on the right. When the seven billionaires alone who give money to Newt, have roughly $14 billion more than Soros and the Ford Foundation combined.

Visit the web page below to see the massive money O'Reilly has ignored from the right:


(( Right-Wing Hate Speech Ignored by Bill O'Reilly ))
O'Reilly claims there is no hate on the right, that it's all on the left. But the way he defines hate is ridiculous, if a liberal blog or website writes an article that criticizes George W. Bush (or any Republican) O'Reilly calls it hate. When it's not hate, it's reporting the facts, there is no hate. A great example is when websites like oreilly-sucks.com, mediamatters.org, etc. criticize O'Reilly he calls it hate, and says they are hate groups who lie about him.

That is a lie, it is not hate, and they are not hate websites. There is real hate on the internet, but O'Reilly does not report it, because most of it is from the right. I have documented this hate in my blog and on a web page, all of it was ignored by Bill O'Reilly, and it was never reported on the Factor.

Visit the web page below to see the massive right-wing hate O'Reilly has ignored:


www.oreilly-sucks.com Privacy Policy

Copyright 2001 - 2014

eXTReMe Tracker