Notice: My name is Steve Senti and I own I am running my 3rd quarter fund drive to raise the money I need to pay my website hosting and internet fees. I need to raise $150.00 to cover my expenses for the next 3 months.

So please donate if you can, thank You.

Click Here To Donate!

Advertise Contact About This Web Site Donate To
Get started with the top online bitcoin casino and win real cash playing casino games.

As you already know by now that Oreilly sucks and is the biggest loser. Oreilly facts apart, many people spend their time on computers playing online poker real money games as a hobby including slots

If you are looking to buy prescription medications from Canada, then buy from a licensed Canadian pharmacy. is quickly becoming the #1 source for playing online casino games for real money. Check them out

Some of the most comprehensive mobile bingo reviews can be found here. Definitely no spin just honest reliable site reviews.

The number one place for mobile slots is this site, they offer lots of info and exclusive free spins.

O'Reilly Sucks
Blog Archives

January - 2016
February - 2016
March - 2016
April - 2016
May - 2016
June - 2016

January - 2015
February - 2015
March - 2015
April - 2015
May - 2015
June - 2015
July - 2015
August - 2015
September - 2015
October - 2015
November - 2015
December - 2015

January - 2014
February - 2014
March - 2014
April - 2014
May - 2014
June - 2014
July - 2014
August - 2014
September - 2014
October - 2014
November - 2014
December - 2014

Website Links

O'Reilly Info

The O'Reilly Iraq Apology Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Spins

Cable News Ratings

Read The Letter O'Reilly Had His Attorney Send me

O'Reilly Wins 2004 Misinformer of The Year Award

O'Reilly Death Penalty Lies

O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 49 Times Since 2001

O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks



O'Reilly #5 On Top 25 Right-Wing Journalist List

O'Reilly Factor Year In Review 2009

Factor Pollster Caught Writing GOP Policy Memo

What a Fair & Balanced O'Reilly Factor Would Look Like

Transcript: Bill O'Reilly v Jeremy Glick

Peabody Award Facts

Bill Clinton Enron News

Buzzflash Names O'Reilly Media Putz of The Week

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly & The Republican Party Are Both Corrupt

The Right-Wing Liberal Killer Story O'Reilly Ignored

The Facts About O'Reilly And GE Doing Business With Iran

How to Deal With an O'Reilly Factor Ambush Interview

Why FOX News Loves Juan Williams: The Strings And The Puppet

Progressive Eruptions
Rude Pundit
Prison Planet
Apocalypse Cafe
Fox News Boycott
Inebriated Discourse
Hannity Sucks
Glenn Beck Is An Idiot

The Factor Guest List Count

June 2016 (19 Shows) Republicans - 137 | Democrats - 19

The Factor Guest List Count Archives

Ratings: The O'Reilly Factor - Total Viewers

Monday - 6-20-16 -- O'Reilly - 3.177
Tuesday - 6-21-16 -- O'Reilly - 2.629
Wednesday - 6-22-16 -- O'Reilly - 3.059
Thursday - 6-23-16 -- O'Reilly - 2.293 - Eric Bolling Hosted
Friday - 6-24-16 -- O'Reilly -

Weekly Factor Average -

The Cable News Ratings Archives

Oreilly is a polarizing figure and so is online gaming, especially at Begado Casino. There are advocates in Congress proposing a federal law, but Republican detractors. This, according to a supporter of Steve and, who runs a Begado Fan Blog. The conservative approach is to stick to legitimate gaming certifications and says Zachary Gleason.

The O'Reilly Sucks Blog

Breaking: Bill O'Reilly Wrong Once Again
By: Steve - June 27, 2016 - 11:50am

O'Reilly said the vote to leave the EU by the British was all about immigration and open borders. Here is what he said Friday:

O'REILLY: "It's about immigration, open borders. British tradition is very strong. And what has happened over the past 30 years is that the British system has allowed so many people in. And those folks generally speaking have not assimilated. So that if you go to parts of London, you're not really in England, you're in Pakistan or you're in the Middle East or you're in the West Indies.

And everybody knows this. And I think that with 'the open border, EU policy, anybody can go anywhere, anytime,' that the English people said you know what, enough."


Now the political and economic experts from England, who are living and working there say that is wrong. They do admit the immigration issue was a small part of it, but the majority of it was people voting to stop Belgium from making their laws and deciding how to enforce them.

The British experts on the Charlie Rose show said it was a vote to get away from Belgium, their judges, and their laws. They said the people of England and the UK want their own judges and their own laws, and they are tired of the EU telling them how to run their country.

They also said immigration was a very small part of the vote, from a minority of the far-right who are opposed to all immigration, similar to the far-right in America who only want whites in the country.

Supreme Court Strikes Down Texas Abortion Law
By: Steve - June 27, 2016 - 11:30am

More bad news for O'Reilly and all his crazy pro-life friends. Earth to right-wing nuts, abortion is legal, get over it.

In a 5-3 vote the Supreme Court struck as unconstitutional part of a restrictive Texas statute that threatened to shutter half of the state's remaining abortion clinics and deny millions of women the right to a safe abortion.

The ruling in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt represents the most significant victory for abortion rights at the high court since the turn of the century, as states have scrambled to pass and defend similar laws across the country, seeking to chip away at the landmark Roe v. Wade.

That 1973 decision, refined by a conservative compromise in a 1992 case, established that the Constitution protects a woman's right to end her pregnancy, but later rulings and conservative lobbying have given states leeway to craft abortion laws and regulations targeting not so much the right but those who facilitate it.

When the Supreme Court heard the Whole Woman's Health case in March, Texas insisted that "abortion is legal and accessible" in the state, but was badgered by the liberal wing of the court, led by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, to explain how its law, the controversial HB 2, protects women's health - an interest the court has in the past recognized as a valid justification for abortion-related legislation.

Avowing a concern for women's health, Texas lawmakers passed the sweeping HB 2, which, among other requirements, mandated that abortion clinics undergo costly structural upgrades so as to resemble mini hospitals, and that abortion doctors obtain so-called admitting privileges at nearby hospitals - all in the name of reducing health risks and increasing safety.

And you can bet O'Reilly will lose his mind tonight and spend half the show (or more) crying about it, because he is also a pro-life right-wing nut who thinks he can tell a woman he does not know, and is not related to, what to do with her body.

Trump's Clinton Benghazi Lies Came Right From Fox News & Bill O'Reilly
By: Steve - June 27, 2016 - 11:00am

And btw, O'Reilly never said a word about all the lies Trump put out in the speech, because he has put out the same lies himself.

Donald Trump used his June 22nd campaign speech to parrot Fox News lies about presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton's response to the 2012 attack on diplomatic facilities in Benghazi, Libya.

In his speech, Trump claimed Ambassador Chris Stevens was a victim of Clinton's actions while she served as secretary of state, claiming that she was asleep throughout the September 11, 2012, attack at the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi. He later claimed that "to cover her tracks," she lied about whether an anti-Islam YouTube video -- which led to widespread protests throughout the Middle East at the time -- inspired the attack.

Even though both of those claims are proven lies, she was not asleep and she was not the one who said the anti-Islam YouTube video inspired the attack, the intelligence community did.

Partial transcript:

TRUMP: Among the victims of our late Ambassador Chris Stevens, I mean, she, what she did with him was absolutely horrible. He was left helpless to die as Hillary Clinton soundly slept in her bed. That's right. When the phone rang, as per the commercial, at three o’clock in the morning, Hillary Clinton was sleeping.

Ambassador Stevens and his staff in Libya made hundreds and hundreds of requests for security. They were desperate. They needed help. Hillary Clinton’s State Department refused them all. She started the war that put them in Libya, denied him the security he asked for, then left him there to die. To cover her tracks, Hillary lied about the video being the cause of death, the famous video, all a lie, another Hillary lie.


On top of those lies Trump failed to mention that those requests for more security were not to Hillary Clinton, when they ask for more security it does not go to the actual Secretary of State, it goes to a lower office that is in charge of security, Hillary Clinton had no idea they were asking for more security, and had nothing to do with giving them more, or not.

Trump lied as if she got a direct phone call or email to give them more security, when she did not, and had nothing to do with security for anyone. The secretary of state does not decide who gets what security, someone else in the Government does, and Trump knows it, but he lied about it anyway.

And btw, Trump also never mentioned that embassy security is part of the overall Government budget, and that when the Democrats asked for more money to provide more security for Government employees, the Republicans all voted no and blocked it, funny how O'Reilly and Trump never mention any of that.

Fox News and Bill O'Reilly have long pushed the lie that both Clinton and President Obama were not responsive during the attack. But the fact is, congressional testimony has confirmed that Clinton was in close contact with military officials and National Security Advisor Tom Donilon throughout the night of the attacks, proving she was not asleep.

The former deputy chief of mission in Libya testified in 2013 that Clinton called him during the attack to be briefed on developments. Clinton also testified in 2013 that she spoke with administration officials and President Obama from her office at the State Department throughout the night.

Fox and O'Reilly have spent years dishonestly denying the role the inflammatory anti-Islam YouTube video had in inspiring the attack and suggesting that administrations drawing such a link were politically motivated.

But the intelligence community initially indicated that the video played a role in the attack, and interviews with some of the attackers revealed that the attack was "fueled in part by anger" over the video.

Fox News itself even reported -- the night that the attack occurred -- that the attack was partly "triggered by a movie produced in the United States that is anti-Muslim."

Conservative Joe Scarborough Slams Trump & Calls His Campaign An Embarrassment
By: Steve - June 27, 2016 - 10:00am

Joe Scarborough, a Trump cheerleader for most of the 2016 campaign, has had some sharp words for Donald Trump in recent days.

Last week, he suggested that the presumptive GOP nominee was "throwing the election" and said it was time for Republican leaders to stand up to him. On Monday's "Morning Joe," he went even further by calling Trump's campaign an "embarrassment."

SCARBOROUGH: Trump could be doing so much better. It is an embarrassment, every day, the embarrassment deepens because he just simply refuses to stop playing to the lowest common denominator. That lowest common denominator over the weekend got Donald Trump saying that people drinking alcohol in a nightclub at 2:00 a.m., should have guns strapped to their waists and firing those weapons.

He said it, bullets, gunfight at the O.K. Corral gunfight at an Orlando nightclub at 2:00 a.m. when bullets are flying across -- not just there, he's suggesting that people take guns, strapped to their waists, to nightclubs. Something that even the NRA will not follow him down that dark rabbit hole.

But when asked if guns should be allowed at his campaign speeches or the RNC convention, Trump says no and has banned all guns.

SCARBOROUGH: "Does Donald Trump want to actually win? And all of the evidence, if you look at all of the objective evidence on what is required to win a presidential race, he is going to turn the White House over to Hillary Clinton. He's going to turn the United States Supreme Court over to Hillary Clinton.

And we're making a warning today, or at least I am, because it's going to be too late, soon. We were talking about this six weeks ago, before we skidded into the ditch adds badly as he has. He doesn't have that much time to clean things up. And it just keeps getting worse every day."

Trump Is So Bad GOP Delegates Are Filing Lawsuits To Avoid Voting For Him
By: Steve - June 27, 2016 - 9:00am

You know you are a terrible person and a terrible candidate for President when your own delegates file lawsuits to try and get out of voting for you at the convention. These are Republican party delegates, and they say they can not vote for Trump. Now that is bad, and of course O'Reilly does not say a word about it, or have any of them on his show to discuss it, because he is a Trump stooge.

"I cannot, in good conscience, vote for Donald Trump at the Convention."

Beau Correll, a delegate to the Republican National Convention from Virginia's Tenth Congressional District, today asked a federal court in Richmond to block the state's delegate-binding law. That law requires convention delegates under penalty of imprisonment and fines to vote for the state's primary winner, in this instance, Donald Trump, who won just 35 percent of the primary vote.

The lawsuit seeks expedited relief from the Virginia statute for all Virginia delegates to the Democratic and Republican national conventions.

"I am proud to call the Commonwealth of Virginia my home, but I feel strongly that the state has no right to tell any delegate of any political party how to vote, my vote is a matter of conscience that is protected by the First Amendment."

Correll is represented by attorneys David B. Rivkin, Jr., Andrew M. Grossman, and Mark W. DeLaquil of the law firm Baker & Hostetler LLP.

"We believe Virginia's delegate-binding law is a clear violation of the speech and associational rights protected by the First Amendment," said Rivkin. "As the complaint points out, the Virginia statute violates decades worth of Supreme Court decisions, including one striking down a nearly identical Wisconsin law. We believe that no state has legal authority to regulate political party national conventions or to tell delegates how to cast their convention ballots."

The case was filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. And don't look for news about it on the O'Reilly Factor, because it has been and will be totally ignored, even though he does a legal segment every week and he has done thousands of legal segments over the last 15 years.

First Trump Fundraising Email Flops After Being Reported As Spam
By: Steve - June 26, 2016 - 11:00am

Donald Trump's first fundraising email wasn't the hit that he claimed it was because nearly 60% of the emails he sent were automatically listed as spam.

Ad Age reported this:

Nearly 60% of those first-ever fundraiser emails, however, never reached inboxes. Instead, they were automatically relegated to recipients spam folders, according to Return Path, which evaluates email campaigns using estimates based on its panel of 2.5 million active email users.

The email tracker also reported that just 12% of recipients opened the email, and 6% deleted it without reading it.

In May, 7.9% of the emails sent by the Trump camp were caught up in spam filters, according to Return Path. Even that nearly 8% spam rate is considered very high by industry standards.

The Trump fundraising email was only sent to people who signed up to be on Trump's mailing list. The fact that only 12% of the recipients opened the email casts doubt on the campaign's claims that they raised $3.3 million from a single email.

One of the reasons for Trump's emails being listed as spam could be that Donald Trump's sales pitch style of campaigning reads more like an ad for an online payday lender than a message from a candidate for president.

Trump is using sales techniques to run for president, which is why the spam filters are so confused. The filters can't tell the difference between the Nigerian prince offering to send you $2 million and the Republican Party's nominee for president.

Both the prince and Trump are running scams, and only a sucker would open an email from either of them.

And of course you never hear a word about any of this from the so-called journalist Bill O'Reilly, because he is a friend of Trump and a Trump stooge who is helping to cover for him.

Hillary Clinton's Lead Grows To 13 Points As Trump Campaign Falls Apart
By: Steve - June 26, 2016 - 10:00am

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton regained a double-digit lead over Republican rival Donald Trump this week, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Friday.

The June 20-24 poll showed that 46.6 percent of likely American voters supported Clinton while 33.3 percent supported Trump.

Trump had enjoyed a brief boost in support following the June 12 mass shooting in Orlando, Florida, as he doubled down on his pledge to ban Muslims from entering the country, cutting Clinton's lead to nine points.

But Trump's rise in popularity appeared to be only temporary, unlike his lasting surge among the Republican field last year after the attacks in Paris and in San Bernardino, California.

Clinton's 13.3 percentage point lead is about the same as she had before the Orlando attack.

Trump's slip this week came as he struggled to show that he can keep up with a Clinton campaign apparatus that has dwarfed his in size and funding.

Conservative George Will Leaves The GOP Because Of Donald Trump
By: Steve - June 26, 2016 - 9:00am

WASHINGTON - Conservative columnist George Will has left the Republican Party, and he is urging others to make sure the GOP's presumptive nominee, Donald Trump, doesn't win.

"Make sure he loses," Will told PJ Media, an online news company, in an interview Friday. "Grit their teeth for four years and win the White House."

Will, a long-time columnist and commentator, spoke Friday at the Federalist Society luncheon. "This is not my party," he said during the speech.

According to PJ Media, Will said he has changed his GOP registration in Maryland to "unaffiliated."

Will, a Pulitzer-Prize winning columnist, has long been critical of Trump. The Washington Post columnist warned in a column in April that Trump's damage to the party had only just begun.

Trump, he said, would be the "most unpopular nominee ever" and unable to get support from women, minorities and young voters.

In a column earlier this week, Will urged Republican donors not to contribute to Trump's campaign.

David Gergen Calls Trump's Speech Slanderous
By: Steve - June 25, 2016 - 10:00am

Partial transcript:

DAVID GERGEN: But you can't ignore the truth of what he says or the lack of truth of what he says. And I do think in coming days we're going to hear an awful lot about a string of lies and exaggerations.

I mean let's go to something fundamental. And that is, I was really surprised he leaned as heavily as he did upon the Schweizer book, called the Clinton Cash, that book has been basically discredited.

Other news organizations have looked at it and said he has no evidence, he has no evidence, that shows that money given to the -- by donors to the Clinton Foundation then resulted in actions by the State Department that favored those donors.

And what Schweizer himself has said is, well I think there's a pattern here and we ought to investigate. I'm sorry, at this level, you can't slander somebody -- and this was a slanderous speech, without more proof.

Even his friend Bill O'Reilly, who defends everything Trump says and does, said he looked into it and he can not confirm what Trump said is true.

BILL O'REILLY (HOST): Trump's speech lasted about 40 minutes and featured something new.

Now, the Factor checked out that allegation, and it is based solely, solely on a book unfavorable to the Clintons. Fox News cannot confirm the data Mr. Trump used. We cannot confirm that independently.

Another Negative Trump Poll O'Reilly Has Ignored
By: Steve - June 25, 2016 - 9:00am

Even half the Republicans want someone other than Trump, the polls show, but you will never see that from O'Reilly, because he ignored the entire poll.

A new poll shows that 48% of Republicans want someone else to be their presidential nominee besides Donald Trump.

It turns out that nearly half of REPUBLICANS would rather have someone else not named Donald Trump as their nominee. There has been a great deal of scoffing at the idea that the Republican Party might replace Trump at the convention with a different nominee, but there is a definite segment of the party that would support dumping Trump.

When half of a political party would rather have someone else, that is an omen that the party is in complete chaos. Trump has done nothing to reassure Republicans that he can lead their party. In fact, he continues to provide proof on a nearly daily basis that he is not capable of effective leadership.

Trump is getting crushed in the money race. He is getting out organized on the ground. Republicans have managed to hand their presidential nomination to a man who doesn't have a real presidential campaign.

Almost half of the Republican Party wants Trump gone, and they will go into November as a hopelessly divided party that will be ripe for the Democratic picking.

The Media Is So Dishonest It's Pathetic
By: Steve - June 24, 2016 - 11:50am

They keep saying the 4 to 4 ruling by the Supreme Court over the Obama Immigration order is a devastating loss for Obama. When it was not a loss, it was a tie, the vote was 4 to 4, so he never lost.

A loss would have been 5 to 3 against him, a tie is not a loss, it's a tie.

The split decision means a lower court ruling that effectively blocked the program will stand, and no national precedent will be set as to whether the president acted within the law when he announced it in November 2014.

Obama expressed disappointment at the Supreme Court's "inability to reach a decision" and stressed that its failure to decide was also partly to blame on Senate Republicans unwillingness to consider the person he chose to fill the seat of the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

"This is part of the consequence of a Republican failure so far to give a fair hearing to Merrick Garland, my nominee to the Supreme Court," Obama said at a White House briefing, adding that their recalcitrance is "not a sustainable strategy" and that it stalls progress on issues that need definite answers.

On that note, Obama made clear that the ruling is only nominal and doesn't carry any legal weight -- let alone stand for a value judgment on his presidency.

"If we have a full court issuing a full opinion on anything, then we take it seriously," he said. "This we have to abide by, but it wasn't any kind of value statement or a decision on the merits on these issues."

Fox News is calling it a big loss for Obama, when it was not a loss, it was a tie. They even put some of their stooges on the air to say the Supreme Court ruled against Obama and said he made the order without the proper authority, even though they made no such ruling, and he had the authority to make the order.

Now there are millions of undocumented immigrants who are here and working, who had kids here who are American citizens, and they do not know what to do now. They simply come here to work and raise their family because we have such a great country, they are not in gangs or out breaking laws, they are just trying to work and support their family.

Republicans even claim to be the party of family values, then they block laws that would help million of families who are already here, with kids who by law are American citizens. What do they want to do, send their parents back to Mexico, what do the kids do?

It's Official: CNN Is A Joke & No Longer A Valid News Network
By: Steve - June 24, 2016 - 11:30am

I barely watch CNN as it is, because they have moved so far to the right in the last 2 years it is almost Fox News. But now they have gone too far, and I will never watch CNN again, I have even blocked it on my cable tv box.

They hired the dishonest and disgraced Corey Lweandowski, the former Donald Trump campaign manager. To begin with, it is wrong for any so-called objective news network to hire a former campaign manager 5 minutes after he was fired, while the guy who fired him is still running for office, they should have waited until at least after the election is over.

And the worst part is that Lewandowski is not only a Trump loyalist, he is legally prohibited from criticizing Trump, his family, or any of his businesses.

So how in the hell can he be a political analyst, when he can not say one bad word about one of the candidates for President. It's ridiculous, and CNN should be ashamed for what they did.

Even Howard Kurtz from Fox News slammed CNN for it:

HOWARD KURTZ: Well, this is no knock on Corey, who I thought handled his firing with class, but for CNN to hire him 12 minutes after he was fired is to use, one of Trump's famous words, sad.

It's really sad because Lewandowski made clear both in the first interview he did with CNN before he was on the payroll, and in an interview he did just tonight as a CNN contributor, that he doesn't intend to utter a negative syllable about Donald Trump, and even if he wanted to he signed a confidentiality agreement with Trump, so he's limited in what he can say.

So I don't see how this helps CNN provide anything approaching independent analysis, and watching Corey tonight, it almost seems like he was still on Trump's payroll because he was defending him at every possible turn.

Many other media figures across the political spectrum are slamming CNN after the network hired former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski to be a political commentator on the network.

Good job CNN, you have hit rock bottom in your ridiculous attempt to get ratings, and I predict your ratings will go down even more, the cable news network that used to be #1, is now #3 and getting worse. You just lost me as a viewer forever, I will never watch any CNN show again for the rest of my life.

Paul Ryan Cuts Off C-SPAN Cameras To Blackout Democratic Gun Protest
By: Steve - June 24, 2016 - 11:00am

Republican Speaker Paul Ryan responded to Democrats shutting down the House with a protest to demand a vote on gun control by shutting off C-SPAN's cameras and blacking out the sit-in. This is the same man who cries about free speech when Democrats do something he does not like, and due process for all, while not allowing a vote on the gun bills, and shutting off the cameras the people have a right to look at.

Speaker Paul Ryan responded to Democrats shutting down the House with a protest to demand a vote on gun control by shutting off C-SPAN's cameras and blacking out the sit-in.

As another Democrat began to speak, the Republican lawmaker sitting in the chair gaveled the House into a temporary recess until noon. The House cut off the C-SPAN cameras that normally broadcast the floor. Later, when lawmakers reconvened, Democratic members still refused to budge, forming a circle in the well of the floor while chanting. Republicans were forced to gavel into recess once more.

The C-SPAN cameras are controlled by the office of the Speaker of the House. C-SPAN even reminded viewers on twitter that they have no control over the cameras on the House floor.

Speaker Ryan responded to the Democratic protest demanding a vote on gun control legislation in the most undemocratic way possible. Ryan cut off the cameras so that the world could not see what House Democrats are doing. The cutting off of cameras is something that happens in authoritarian regimes. It should not happen in the United States of America.

Ryan pulled the move of a cowardly dictator. Speaker Ryan supports Donald Trump, because, at heart, they have so much in common. Paul Ryan had a chance to live up to his principled rhetoric, but when push came to shove, Speaker Ryan cut off the cameras and got on his knees for the NRA.

Republicans can black out the video, but they can't hide from the demand of the American people for Congressional action on gun violence.

O'Reilly Ignores The Real News About Trump's Troubling FEC Filing
By: Steve - June 24, 2016 - 10:00am

It looks like Trump is just one big con-man who is using his run for President to make all his own companies richer, while not really doing much to win the election, in fact, the way he is running his campaign you could argue he does not even care about winning, just making more money.

Bill O'Reilly ignored the fact that Donald Trump's May financial report showed the campaign paid his own businesses and family for campaign events, instead choosing to debunk a controversy regarding a payment to what some initially believed to be a fictitious advertising firm.

During a June 22nd discussion with Fox contributor Martha MacCallum, O'Reilly focused on a $35,000 advertising payment to New Hampshire ad firm Draper Sterling. The payment drew scrutiny because the company's name was similar to lead characters in a fictitious television series about an ad agency, Mad Men.

Media outlets have confirmed that Draper Sterling appears to be a real ad firm, although it remains unclear what work the company actually did for the Trump campaign.

But O'Reilly ignored the most scandalous aspects of Trump's May FEC report.

New York Magazine explained that the "embarrassingly bad" report showed that Trump raised just $3.1 million in May but paid out $6.7 million.

Furthermore, roughly 20 percent of the money spent by the Trump campaign in May went to either companies owned by Trump and his family, or to travel reimbursements for his children. The Trump campaign also spent more than $900,000 on T-shirts, hats, mugs and signs.

CNBC reported this:

About 20 percent of May spending went to Trump companies or reimbursements for his children. That includes a roughly $423,000 payment to the Trump Organization's Mar-a-Lago club.

Trump's campaign also spent a solid portion of its May haul on "collateral," like T-shirts, hats, mugs and signs. It spent more than $900,000 on those categories, more than 13 percent of its total spending.

"Trump's failure to develop an effective fundraising operation has his campaign at this point without the resources to scale up its staffing, build a field organization, or begin advertising in crucial states," said Anthony Corrado, a professor of government at Colby College and campaign finance expert.

"His campaign spending is largely devoted to the costs of personal paraphernalia, such as hats and mugs, which can be sold or distributed by the campaign as a means of raising small sums of money."

These 23 GOP Senators Voted Against The New Gun Control Laws
By: Steve - June 24, 2016 - 9:00am

And every single one of them should be voted out of office for representing the NRA above the will of the American people. Polls show that 80% of the people support the new gun control laws, but the Republicans do not care, all they care about is doing what the NRA wants them to, and taking millions from them for their elections and their re-election.

Here is the list:

1) Kelly Ayotte (NH)
2) Roy Blunt (MO)
3) John Boozman (AR)
4) Richard Burr (NC)
5) Mike Crapo (ID)
6) Chuck Grassley (IO)
7) Richard Shelby (AL)
8) David Vitter (LA)
9) John Hoeven (ND)
10) Johnny Isakson (GA)
11) Ron Johnson (WI)
12) James Lankford (OK)
13) Mike Lee (UT)
14) John McCain (AZ)
15) John Thune (SD)
16) Dan Coats (ID)
17) Jerry Moran (KS)
18) Lisa Murkowski (AK)
19) Rand Paul (KY)
20) Marco Rubio (FL)
21) Tim Scott (SC)
22) Rob Portman (OH)
23) Pat Toomey (PA)

On Monday night, one week after the worst mass shooting in modern U.S. history, the Senate rejected four gun-related measures. One proposal would have made it harder for suspected terrorists to purchase firearms and another would have expanded background checks to all gun sales.

Similar measures also failed after 26 people were killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School and 14 people were killed at a San Bernardino office party.

The votes are not surprising given that the 56 senators who voted against expanding background checks (and 53 who voted against allowing the attorney general to stop the sale of a firearm to a suspected terrorist) have received a combined total of roughly $36 million from the National Rifle Association.

"What am I going to tell 49 grieving families?" Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) said after the votes. "I am going to tell them the NRA won again."

But roughly 90 percent of Americans -- including 80 percent of gun owners -- support these measures. Immediately after the vote, voters and gun control advocates vowed to make the upcoming election a referendum on Republican politicians who are beholden to the NRA. On Twitter, people expressed their disapproval at Congress with the hashtag #RememberinNovember.

A total of 24 Republican Senate seats are up for election in November -- 22 face reelection and two are retiring. Illinois Republican Sen. Mark Kirk, the most vulnerable Republican senator running for re-election, bucked his party and voted in favor of closing the current loophole that allows people to purchase firearms online and at gun shows without a background check. The other 23, meanwhile, voted against that measure.

The Republican senators who both voted against background checks and who could leave office in January have received a net total of $16 million dollars over their careers from the NRA.

That number accounts for all of the money they've received from the NRA, both directly and indirectly. It also includes all of the money the NRA has spent against their opponents (payments the NRA has made in favor of their opponents are subtracted).

"A lot of these people are up for re-election this year and I will dedicate the next several months of my life to making sure we remember that," Everytown for Gun Safety survivor engagement manager Erica Lafferty Smegielski said Monday.

Smegielski's mother, Dawn Hochsprung, was the principal of Sandy Hook Elementary School and was killed in the shooting there in 2012.

"We're going to take it to the polls," she continued. "And if Congress again, now after the worst mass shooting on U.S. soil in modern history, if they're not going to act now then when? Clearly it's not going to happen with the people who are holding office and we're going to hold them accountable for that and vote them out in November."

Only On Fox: Three White Guys Debate & Deny White Privilege
By: Steve - June 23, 2016 - 11:00am

Not only did they debate and deny white privilege, they made jokes about it. It was three white Republicans who have the benefit of white privilege sitting there denying there is white privilege.

Partial transcript:

BILL O'REILLY (HOST): Now, I really didn't understand too much of that, Gutfeld, but I know you were locked in. It's like Garth and what's his other name?

GREG GUTFELD: You're talking about Wayne's World.


GUTFELD: I do believe white privilege exists but so does black privilege, Asian privilege, Arab privilege. But the biggest privilege of all is hot privilege. That no matter what race you are, if you're hot, you always win. David Duke would give his left arm to sleep with Beyonce. The homely have no Gandhi, Bill. They have no Gandhi.

O'REILLY: Those guys made more sense than you just did.

GUTFELD: I do my best, Bill.

O'REILLY: You have any idea at what the message was from those guys?

BERNARD MCGUIRK: Of course, white privilege. They're saying that it doesn't exist. But I say it does.

O'REILLY: You do.

MCGUIRK: We have the Congressional White Caucus. We have the National Association for the Advancement of White People.

O'REILLY: No, we don't.

MCGUIRK: White Lives Matter. Just go down to Appalachia and ask any person how they're doing, they'll tell you they're doing just fine. Anybody at a trailer park in the South, or out on Long Island, they're doing wonderful. Listen Bill, if you wake up in the country, delay gratification, work hard, lose the chip on your shoulder, that's all it takes. In this country more than any other country in the history of civilization.

O'REILLY: Isn't it boring, this is a serious point, this white privilege and black lives matter. Isn't this boring? I hate to be a kumbaya guy, but it's just boring now.

MCGUIRK: You hit the lottery so big time when you're born in this country, no matter what class, what strata, if you work hard.

O'REILLY: Just because you're here, you get a shot. I know it's harder for people with bad fathers and fathers who leave.

Mark Cuban Trashes Donald Trump And Mocks His Business Competence
By: Steve - June 23, 2016 - 10:00am

During a recent interview with Extra, Cuban had some rather harsh (and hilarious) words to say about Donald Trump.

"You know what? It's rare that you see someone get stupider before your eyes, but he's really working at it," Cuban said. "You have to give him credit. It's a difficult thing to do, but he's accomplished it."

He was also asked whether or not he's had any contact with the presumptive GOP presidential candidate.

"He sent me an email when I started picking on him," Cuban answered. "What happened was I really didn't like Ted Cruz, so I started helping Donald, tried to encourage him, because I thought he'd be, and to this day thought he'd be a better candidate than Ted Cruz. But at some point, you've got to start learning and understanding the issues, you know? Donald has been at this a year but you don't look at him and say, 'Wow, he's gotten so much smarter on this topic or that topic.' In fact, you look at him and say, 'What the hell are you talking about?' That's not good for America."

After mockingly saying that he can't name one "good deal" Trump has actually done, Cuban went on to say that Trump would be "kicked out of Shark Tank so fast, it would make your head spin."

While I agree with most of what Cuban said, I'm not seeing much difference in the Donald Trump we see today and the same man who called most Mexican immigrants rapists and criminals when he launched his campaign last year.

But I do find his comments about Trump's business record rather telling. As a verified and legitimate billionaire and businessman, for Cuban to take direct shots at Trump's business acumen is a pretty big statement. Trump sells himself as some sort of genius in the business world, but when you get right down to it, he seems to be more of a con man who's done a fantastic job selling his last name as a brand more than anything else.

That's basically what Trump has done throughout his entire campaign. He's sold a brand full of bold promises aimed at pandering to certain groups of ignorant people, while not really offering rational, substantive or tangible solutions to anything.

I think Mark Cuban summed up Trump's campaign best when he said that "The Donald" has managed to somehow "get stupider" before our very eyes.

As Expected O'Reilly Did Not Say He Was Sorry For Slap Remark
By: Steve - June 23, 2016 - 9:00am

The Congressional Black Caucus demanded a public apology from Bill O'Reilly, after O'Reilly stated he wanted to slap the African-American Congressman Jim Clyburn for his push to strengthen gun safety laws.

The Congressional Black Caucus call for an apology comes after O'Reilly's June 16 appearance on Fox News Fox & Friends, where O'Reilly attacked Clyburn's call for stronger gun legislation, saying "I just want to slap him, with all due respect."

O'Reilly continued, asking "What is it going to take? Do the ISIS people have to come to your backyard, do they have to put you in a cage?"

Politico reported that the Congressional Black Caucus Chairman G.K. Butterfield said: "The Congressional Black Caucus is absolutely outraged" at O'Reilly, calling on O'Reilly to "disavow the statement and apologize" to Clyburn:

"The Congressional Black Caucus is absolutely outraged," Chairman G.K. Butterfield (D-N.C.) told POLITICO, adding that the caucus is calling "upon [O'Reilly] to disavow the statement and apologize" to Clyburn.


So what did O'Reilly do, he attacked them some more, refused to say he was sorry, invited them on his lame cable news show, then slammed them once again for not coming on his racist and biased fake news show.

Notice how O'Reilly spins the issue, which is what he does best, spin things in the so-called no spin zone. O'Reilly said the crazy liberal websites were misleading their readers, when all they/we did was quote him directly (word for word) from his own transcript, and post the actual video of what he said, so how in the hell is that misleading anyone?

Partial transcript for the June 20th O'Reilly Factor:

BILL O'REILLY (HOST): I want to spotlight something that happened last week. Congressman Jim Clyburn, very liberal guy from South Carolina, put forth an amazing analysis of the Orlando terror attack to which I replied.

Now, I used a slap line as a rhetorical device to show my displeasure. That was obvious unless you are a complete moron. But the crazy left websites who routinely mislead their readers played it up as an actual physical threat. A few hours later, the Congressional Black Caucus demanded an apology. I very politely said to them "Come on the Factor, we'll talk about it."

I also invited Congressman Clyburn on as well. Guess what? They are hiding under their desks. I guess they are afraid I would slap them. So, here's the deal. We researched the congressman, and we can find no mention of gun control in connection with the Chicago violence. None. This weekend, 13 more people shot to death in the windy city. At least 43 others wounded, including a 3-year-old boy.

That brings the total to about 1,800 human beings shot so far this year in Chicago. Paging Congressman Clyburn. Come on. If he were truly concerned about guns in America, he would have to say at least something about his fellow African-Americans being shot down in Chicago every single day, and it's been going on for years. He would have to say something, would he not?


And for the record, that O'Reilly got wrong, Congressman Clyburn has spoken out about gun violence in Chicago, many times, O'Reilly just never reports it. All he did was speak out about fixing some gun laws, that 80% to 90% of the American people agree with, and O'Reilly said he wanted to slap him for it.

Then after getting slammed for the comment by just about everyone, O'Reilly attacked him again and called him a coward for not coming on his fake news show. And that's the fair and balanced no spin zone, haha, yeah right, and I'm Elvis too.

It Looks Like Trump Is Running One Big Scam
By: Steve - June 22, 2016 - 11:00am

And of course, you never hear O'Reilly report any of this, so much for journalism.

Corporations & Some GOP Party Delegates Are Opposed To Trump
By: Steve - June 22, 2016 - 10:00am

Trump even said the media is making it all up, even though some of those GOP delegates have been on tv talking about how they can dump Trump at the convention by changing the party rules, and one of them is on the rules committee. It just shows what a liar Trump is, and how he is living in fantasy land, in his world everyone loves him and he is doing great, even though reality is the opposite.

Even while Donald Trump moves forward as the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, establishment figures in both politics and business have stepped away from the candidate. Some delegates are withdrawing support from Trump and major corporations have decided to bow out in their sponsorship or offer less to the Republican convention this year.

A small but reportedly increasing coalition of delegates say there may be enough Republicans to unite against Trump and make changes to party rules. If they change those rules, then delegates have the ability to vote for anyone at the convention. They would be allowed to vote for someone besides Trump if it violates their moral or religious beliefs.

On Thursday, at least 30 delegates from 15 states participated in a conference call on the subject. The convention's rules committee meets July 14 and 15. Even if the rules committee supported the proposal, a majority of convention delegates would still have to agree. The effort is being led by a Colorado delegate who supported Ted Cruz and is a member of the party rules committee, Kendal Unruh.

At a rally in Las Vegas on Saturday, Trump acknowledged the news about delegates organizing against him and said, "So now I hear after beating them fair and square. So how would you like to have someone who wins not only 37 states and no one else was remotely close, sets an all-time record gets 14 million votes over period of nine months and gets 37 states. How would you like to be in a party where Trump wins? Where Trump keeps winning? Where Trump gets the highest ratings in history of television?" Trump said.

"I mean forget about the fact that Republican National Committee put out a statement saying it's all made up by the press, by these people right here," Trump said as he pointed to the press as the audience booed. "These are the most dishonest people, not all of them, but I watched CNN yesterday knowing it can't happen and then, 'Breaking news there will be this and that at the convention!' I beat the hell out of them," Trump said.

Which is not what CNN reported, all they did was report that some GOP delegates are trying to get the rules changed so they can dump Trump at the convention, and that one of them is on the rules committee, so Trump was also lying about what they reported.

When asked whether House Republican conference members should follow their conscience on deciding to support Trump, House Speaker Paul Ryan told Chuck Todd on Meet the Press, "Oh, absolutely. The last thing I would do is tell anybody to do something that's contrary to their conscience. Of course I wouldn't do that. Look, believe me, Chuck. I get that this a very strange situation. Trump is a very unique nominee."

Which is a nice way of saying Trump is crazy and you can vote for him or not, and I wish we had a different nominee. That is what Ryan really meant.

The Republican National Committee has even dismissed the reports about delegates organizing against Trump. Its spokesman, Sean Spicer made this statement to the press, "There is no organized effort, strategy or leader of this so-called movement. It is nothing more than a media creation and a series of tweets."

They also refuse to admit reality, one of the people on the GOP convention rules committee is on tv saying it is all true, so the RNC is as big of a liar as Trump is.

A number of large companies have decided to stop or reduce their participation in or sponsorship of the Republican National Convention. The list of companies that aren't sponsoring at all includes JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, United Parcel Service, Motorola, and Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc, which all sponsored the last convention, Bloomberg reported. Although the tech giants Google, Microsoft, and Facebook will all be present at the convention, Apple decided to sit this one out, specifically citing Trump's controversial rhetoric.

Although Trump and Apple have had their issues for a while now -- he called for a boycott of the company's products back in February, referring to the company's refusal to break into the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino shooters on behalf of the FBI -- Apple specifically referred to his statements about immigrants, people of color, and women as the reason for not sponsoring the convention.

O'Reilly Can't Remember The Last Time An Abortion Clinic Was Attacked
By: Steve - June 22, 2016 - 9:00am

Fox Host Bill O'Reilly downplayed the dangers of anti-abortion attacks claiming he was unable to remember the last time an abortion clinic was attacked by right-wing extremists, ignoring the long history of attacks against abortion clinics.

On the June 21 edition of The O'Reilly Factor, O'Reilly argued with contributor Kirsten Powers over remarks made by CNN's Van Jones claiming that "young white" right-wing extremists are seven times more likely to kill an American citizen than Muslim terrorists. During his discussion with Powers, O'Reilly dismissed the prevalence of right-wing Christian attacks by asking, "When is the last time a Christian blew up an abortion clinic?"

The National Abortion Federation reports there have been 42 documented cases of bombing or attempted bombings of abortion clinics since 1977. Most recently, in 2005 a man confessed to two deadly bombings at women's clinics in Georgia and Alabama. After pleading guilty to the crimes, he told the court "abortion is murder."

And that does not include abortion doctors who have been shot and killed by far-right pro-life nuts, O'Reilly also can't remember them, and never mentions them.

From 1977-2014, 6,948 incidents of violence have been reported at abortion clinics, including the Nov. 27 deadly shooting at a Colorado Planned Parenthood clinic that was inspired by false claims that alleged the network of clinics illegally sold "baby parts."

Reproductive health clinics have faced a surge of violent threats following conservative media's wave of anti-abortion attacks that tailed the release of the deceptive video that inspired the Colorado shooter.

Donald Trump Is Hated By Everyone But A Few Republicans
By: Steve - June 21, 2016 - 10:00am

Here is something Bill O'Reilly never reports on, the actual approve/disapprove numbers for his friend Donald Trump. Yes O'Reilly mentions in passing that a lot of people do not like Trump, but he never does a detailed in-depth segment on the numbers, putting them ALL on the screen for everyone to see, because when you look at them it is stunning just how many people hate Donald Trump.

He is hated by everyone, out of 22 categories the ABC/Washington Post poll sampled, Trump is negative in all of them but one, the Republicans overall give him a 65% favorable rating to 34% unfavorable. The other 21 categories have Trump more negative than positive, and that included conservatives and white men, who have Trump at 46% favorable and 52% unfavorable.

He is just about the most hated man in America, except for maybe Bill O'Reilly. And when you look at the numbers it is stunning, what's more stunning is that Trump knows what these numbers are and yet he does not change the way he is campaigning. It's as if he is trying to lose, because he could not be doing a worse job of running for President, it's as if he is trying to destroy the Republican party, because he is.

Just look at these numbers For Donald Trump, the first one is unfavorable and the 2nd is favorable:

1) All - 29% - 70%
2) Registered Voters - 31% - 69%
3) Independents - 31% - 68%
4) Democrats - 5% - 95%
5) Conservatives - 46% - 52%
6) Moderates - 26% - 73%
7) Liberals - 11% - 89%
8) Men - 36% - 62%
9) Women - 23% - 77%
10) Whites - 39% - 59%
11) Blacks - 4% - 94%
12) Hispanics - 11% - 89%
13) Non-Whites - 12% - 88%
14) White Men - 46% - 52%
15) White Women - 33% - 67%
16) Non-White Men - 17% - 82%
17) Non-White Women - 7% - 93%
18) College Grads. - 25% - 74%
19) Non-Grad. - 31% - 68%
20) Under 50 - 23% - 76%
21) Over 50 - 37% - 62%

And now (Drumroll) the one category Trump has a higher favorable than unfavorable:

22) Republicans - 65% - 34%

Which shows just how out of touch most Republicans are with the rest of America, because Trump is hated by everyone but a few Republicans who love him no matter what he says or does.

They are the brainwashed robots who vote for the party nominee no matter how bad he is, how much of a racist he is, or how crazy he is. They are what I call party fools that just vote Republican no matter what. Hitler could be their nominee and they would still vote for him.

I have some bad news for them, and Bill O'Reilly. Donald Trump is going to lose to Hillary Clinton in a landslide. And not only will it be a historic win (the first woman President) it will destroy the Republican party, and most likely give control of the Senate and the House back to the Democrats.

So not only will another Clinton be in the White House, she will have the Senate and the House behind her, and she will appoint one (if not two) Supreme court justices, and the Republicans will have their voters, Bill O'Reilly, Fox News, and Donald Trump to thank for it.

Trump Campaign Only Has 30 Paid Staff Members
By: Steve - June 21, 2016 - 9:00am

This shows just how unprepared Donald Trump is to run for President, in the entire country he only has 30 paid staffers. That is not even one for each state, which is just laughable, and it proves that Trump had no idea he would get this far, because anyone else would have at least 200, if not more at this point.

Much has been made about how unprepared Donald Trump is for a general election -- and then his campaign revealed Friday that it estimates there are only about 30 paid Trump staffers on the ground nationwide.

Taylor West, who worked on the campaign for failed Democratic presidential candidate Chris Dodd in 2008, said that 30 paid operatives was how many her candidate had in Iowa alone:

Thirty! We literally had that many staffers in Iowa alone on Chris Dodd's presidential campaign.

Trump is counting on Republican Party-led state-based efforts to win the general election, despite the fact that many in the Republican establishment are fairly skeptical about Trump as their nominee.

Nevertheless, one aide defended Trump's decision to The Associated Press by saying, "We are creating the playbook."

Hillary Clinton began putting state-level directors in swing states back in April.

Hot Links

O'Reilly Loses Custody Of His Kids After Choking Wife

Conclusive Proof Bill O'Reilly Is Biased In Favor Of Republicans

O'Reilly Dishonest About Publishers Weekly Not Reviewing Killing Reagan

Bill O'Reilly Proves He Is A Lying Right-Wing Idiot Once Again

O'Reilly Wrong About The Constitution & Obama's Power

4 Fox Hosts Slam O'Reilly Over His Ebola Reporting

Historians & The Patton Family Rip O'Reilly's New Patton Book

Jon Stewart Slams Fox For Criticizing President While At War

Facts On The Economy Bill O'Reily Is Totally Ignoring

Under Bush O'Reilly & Fox News Did Not Blame Him For Beheadings

Study Finds Fox News Only Tells the Truth 18% of the Time

More Republican Corruption O'Reilly Has Ignored

Jon Stewart Destroys O'Reilly & Fox For Ferguson Shooting Bias

O'Reilly Caught Lying About ISIS Threat & Juan Williams

NY Times Charles Blow Says Bill O'Reilly Is The Race Hustler

Homeland Security Shows Gutfeld & Baker Are Liars

More Republican Corruption O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Cost Of Obamacare

Bill O'Reilly Is Lying To You About Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Electic Car Company Success

The Most Annoying Celebs Who Should Go Away

Bias Alert: O'Reilly Spins Presidential Election Media Study

O'Reilly & Fox Still Ignoring GOP Voter Registration Fraud Story

Biased O'Reilly Tells Romney To Call Obama A Socialist

O'Reilly Slams Obama With Dishonest Tip Of The Day

O'Reilly & Brit Hume Spin And Lie For Mitt Romney

Fox Promotes Ridiculous Study Of Doctors & Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media & Obama

Low Gas Prices Shut O'Reilly & The Repiblicans Up Fast

I Am Waiting For The O'Reilly Health Care Bill Apology

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About The Media

O'Reilly Ignores MRC Calling For Sharpton Firing

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Wrong On The Deficit

O'Reilly & Fox Lie That Obama To Blame For High Gas Prices

Scientist Group Slams Celebs Like Snooki & O'Reilly

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About America

O'Reilly & Ingraham Lied About Planned Parenthood (Again)

Fox Unemployment Chart Shows Their Right-Wing Bias

U.S. Troops Burn A Box Of O'Reilly's Books

Kelly & O'Reilly Make Up Another Green Energy Scandal

O'Reilly Ignoring All The Stock Market Increases

O'Reilly Flat Out LIED About The Debt Obama Added

O'Reilly Caught Doctoring Florida Mans E-Mail

O'Reilly Ignored Michele Bachmann Church Scandal

O'Reilly & Morris Lied About The Debt Polls

O'Reilly Hypocrisy On The West/Schultz Story

The Truth About Those Bush Tax Cuts

Number Of Tea Party Events Down 50 Percent

NWLC Says O'Reilly Statement Made Up & Offensive

Video Proof O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Hack

O'Reilly Gets It Totally Wrong On Norway Terrorist

Norway Terrorist Info O'Reilly Ignored

O'Reilly Ignoring Ensign/Coburn Hush Money Scandal

O'Reilly Calls Obama Health Care Waivers A Scam

O'Reilly Complains About Losing In His Own Poll

O'Reilly Ignores Republican Hypocrisy On Judicial Filibusters

O'Reilly Ignoring Republican Unpopularity

O'Reilly Tells GOP How To Beat Obama With Scare Tactics

O'Reilly & Fox Are Lying To You About The Debt

O'Reilly Spins The 2008 Presidential Media Study

Important Tax Information Bill O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Ignored McCain Op-Ed On Bin Laden

O'Reilly Scrubs Website & Podcast Of False Obama Claims

O'Reilly Ignored DOJ Black Panther Report

O'Reilly Still Ignoring Wisconsin Judge's Order Story

O'Reilly Ignored Jobs & Unemployment Report

Fox News Town Hall Protester Hypocrisy & Double Standards

O'Reilly & Varney Speculate About Oil Prices

O'Reilly Spins The Quinnipiac Temperature Poll

O'Reilly Proves How Stupid He Is Again

How O'Reilly Puts Out Right-Wing Propaganda

Fox News Insider Admits They Make Things Up

Luntz Admits Fox Has Anti-Obama Focus Groups

Reagan SG Says Health Care Bill Constitutional

O'Reilly Ignores Gore Answer To His Question

O'Reilly Wonders How The Moon Got There

More Republican Hate & Racism O'Reilly Has Ignored

Another Poll O'Reilly Has Totally Ignored

O'Reilly Thinks We Are Still In A Recession

O'Reilly's Nazi Comment Defense Was Laughable

Fox News The Least Trusted Cable News Network

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media (Again)

O'Reilly Claims Estate Tax A Seizure Of Property

O'Reilly Called Bernie Sanders A Loon

Bloomberg Tax Cut Poll Proves O'Reilly Was Lying

O'Reilly Ignored Positive DADT Study & Story

O'Reilly & Fox Ignore Judge Being A 9-11 Truther

More Real News O'Reilly Has Ignored

More Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Ratings

O'Reilly Got The Ireland Economic Crisis Wrong

O'Reilly Ignored The Tom Delay Conviction Story

Women Of America: You Need To Read This

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly Is Dishonest & Crazy

O'Reilly Nazi Comparison Hypocrisy

O'Reilly Ignores New Poll While Promoting Paladino

Andrew Sullivan Called O'Reilly A Dishonest Propagandist

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Nevada RCP Senate Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Right-Wing Abortion Bomber Terrorism Story

Fox & O'Reilly Ignored Friday Pro-Mosque NY Rally

O'Reilly Busted For Health Insurance Premium Lies

Most Factor Gear Made in Vietnam And China

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

O'Reilly Busted For 1st Time Retraction Lie

The Bill O'Reilly Non-Apology Shirley Sherrod Apology

O'Reilly & The Right Are Racist Idiots

O'Reilly Ignored Tea Party Express Racism Story

O'Reilly Compares Gay People To Al-Qaeda

Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Rating Polls

O'Reilly Ignored Mark Kirk Military Award Lie Story

Where Are The Sedition Charges Now O'Reilly

O'Reilly Caught In A Massive Lie About Jail Time

O'Reilly Running Ads For Emergency Food Supply

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Tea Party Militia Links

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Gallup Tea Party Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Harris Poll Showing Republicans Are Stupid

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Health Reform Bill Tax

O'Reilly Caught Lying About NEJM Health Care Survey

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

The Truth About Ratings For News Shows

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Spin Doctor

O'Reilly Spinning Fox News Most Trusted Poll

Fox News Did Not Air Hope For Haiti Telethon

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Obama Terrorism Polls

O'Reilly Caught Lying About House Ethics Committee

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Increase

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Limbaugh Racism

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Religious Festival

O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Lying About CNN

O'Reilly Caught Violating Journalistic Standards Again

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The ACLU & Racial Profiling

More Proof O'Reilly & FOX News Do Not Tell The Truth

O'Reilly Called Bruce Springsteen Un-American & Un-Patriotic

The Bill O'Reilly Senate Torture Report Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Obama Approval Numbers

FOX News Caught Lying About Obama Budget

O'Reilly Busted For Helping GOP Smear Pelosi

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Obama Earmark Promise Report Proves O'Reilly Wrong About Homeless Vets

O'Reilly Places 7th in 2008 Wingnut of The Year Award

O'Reilly Denys Reality About Abstinence Only Programs

Proof The O'Reilly Factor is Biased Against Barack Obama
O'Reilly said he is a non-partisan Independent, who is fair to both sides, and that he has been fair to Barack Obama. To check that claim I did a 3 month study of the Factor, it started on August 1st, 2008, and ran until October 31st, 2008. I watched the Factor every night and counted the negative and positive comments for Obama and McCain.

Visit the web page I set up, and you will see the stunning bias from O'Reilly and his mostly Republican guests against Barack Obama. Then you will see there is no doubt Bill O'Reilly is a dishonest and biased Conservative. This study is conclusive proof that O'Reilly is in the tank for John McCain.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The 3 Month Factor Bias Study:

Proof O'Reilly Lied About The Balance on His Show
O'Reilly claims the factor is balanced, and that he personally makes sure every week he has an equal number of Republican and Democrat guests. This is a bold faced lie, and I can prove it. I put together a web page that shows the guest list from the factor for the last 2 weeks. Read it and you will see with your own eyes that Bill O'Reilly is lying when he says the factor is balanced.

And remember that we are 3 weeks before a major Presidential election, or the Republican bias numbers would be worse than it is normally. O'Reilly is actually having more Democrats on than he usually does, and the balance is still not even close. If we were not so close to an election it would be a lot worse.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The Lies About The Factor Balance:

O'Reilly Sucks Investigation: Dishonesty, Deception, And Bias By Bill O'Reilly
O'Reilly claims there are no Republicans or Conservative groups that rival George Soros. O'Reilly said the top three conservative tax-exempt foundations are totally dwarfed by Soros and the radical Ford Foundation. And that they have 15 times more the assets. George Soros net worth is $8.5 billion, the Ford Foundation has a net worth of $13 billion. But the seven billionaires who donate to Newt Gingrich and other right-wing causes have a combined net worth of $34.8 billion dollars.

Somehow O'Reilly claims that Soros and the Ford Foundation have 15 times more the assets than anyone on the right. When the seven billionaires alone who give money to Newt, have roughly $14 billion more than Soros and the Ford Foundation combined.

Visit the web page below to see the massive money O'Reilly has ignored from the right:

(( Right-Wing Hate Speech Ignored by Bill O'Reilly ))
O'Reilly claims there is no hate on the right, that it's all on the left. But the way he defines hate is ridiculous, if a liberal blog or website writes an article that criticizes George W. Bush (or any Republican) O'Reilly calls it hate. When it's not hate, it's reporting the facts, there is no hate. A great example is when websites like,, etc. criticize O'Reilly he calls it hate, and says they are hate groups who lie about him.

That is a lie, it is not hate, and they are not hate websites. There is real hate on the internet, but O'Reilly does not report it, because most of it is from the right. I have documented this hate in my blog and on a web page, all of it was ignored by Bill O'Reilly, and it was never reported on the Factor.

Visit the web page below to see the massive right-wing hate O'Reilly has ignored: Privacy Policy

Copyright 2001 - 2014

eXTReMe Tracker