|
Hey Folks, welcome to oreilly-sucks.com. Before you check out how I kick O'Reilly's ass for his right-wing bias and spin, please visit the donation link and make a donation to our 3rd quarter fund drive. I need to raise $150.00 to pay my website/ISP/Bandwidth fees for the next 3 months, so please donate if you can.
|
|
| Advertise | Contact | About This Web Site | Webmaster Information |
|
Astonishing online blackjack tables can be found in this extraordinary online casino website.
Play at online gambling sites with popular games like blackjack online
January - 2010 February - 2010 March - 2010 April - 2010 May - 2010 June - 2010 July - 2010 January - 2009 February - 2009 March - 2009 April - 2009 May - 2009 June - 2009 July - 2009 August - 2009 September - 2009 October - 2009 November - 2009 December - 2009 January - 2008 February - 2008 March - 2008 April - 2008 May - 2008 June - 2008 July - 2008 August - 2008 September - 2008 October - 2008 November - 2008 December - 2008 March - 2007 April - 2007 May - 2007 June - 2007 July - 2007 August - 2007 September - 2007 October - 2007 November - 2007 December - 2007 2001-06 Blog Archives 2006-07 Blog Archives
|
The Factor Guest List Count Archives
Monday - 7-26-10 -- O'Reilly - 2,702,000 - Laura Ingraham Hosted Hannity - 2,160,000 Beck - 2,222,000 Tuesday - 7-27-10 -- O'Reilly - 2,752,000 - Laura Ingraham Hosted Hannity - 2,165,000 Beck - 2,062,000 Wednesday - 7-28-10 -- O'Reilly - 2,651,000 - Laura Ingraham Hosted Hannity - 2,107,000 Beck - 2,296,000 Thursday - 7-29-10 -- O'Reilly - 2,424,000 - Juan Williams Hosted Hannity - 2,027,000 Beck - 2,012,000 Weekly Factor Average - 0,000,000
By: Steve - August 1, 2010 - 8:30am Hello, my name is Steve, and I would appreciate it if you could make a donation to oreilly-sucks.com. So I can continue to expose the spin, the right-wing bias, the lies, the hypocrisy, the propaganda, and the double standards from Bill O'Reilly, Fox News, and the Republican party. I am a real person who is pretty much broke and living with my retired Father, and I actually use these donations to pay my website bills. I do this all on my own for no salary from anyone. I have been doing this for 10 years now, with only a few times that the website had to be taken offline for a day or two, due to financial issues. With the economy down as it is, my donations have virtually dropped to zero, so I need your help to keep the website online. Just click the paypal donation link below, or e-mail me to get info on how to snail mail a donation. Click Here To Donate! Thank You, Steve More Proof Juan Williams Is A Conservative By: Steve - July 31, 2010 - 11:30am While hosting the O'Reilly Factor Friday night, Juan Williams has proven once again that he is a true blue conservative. By dragging out the ridiculous right-wing talking points that President Obama has done NOTHING to solve the border problem. Williams said Obama has done NOTHING, here is what he said: Following Judge Susan Bolton's decision to block the controversial portions of the Arizona immigration law, conservatives in the media have claimed that Arizona passed the law because President Obama is refusing to enforce immigration law and secure the border, but this propaganda, which happens to be exactly what Republican politicians are saying, bears no relation to the facts. The actual Data shows that enforcement efforts are up and illegal immigration is down. And now the facts: -- In a July 22nd hearing of the House Committee on Homeland Security, Michael Fisher, Chief of the U.S. Border Patrol said this: "Currently we have over 20,000 Border Patrol agents nationwide, more than ever before in the history of the country." -- A Customs and Border Protection document states that the 2010 budget included $19.4 million for 123 new Border Patrol agents and support staff. The Obama administration's 2011 budget states, "An increase of $44.8M is requested to fund 318 Custom and Border Protection Officers FTEs [Full-Time Equivalent] within the Office of Field Operations and 71 support FTEs for CBP." -- Spending on immigration enforcement is higher under Obama than Bush. Budget data from the Department of Homeland Security compiled by America's Voice, shows that the budgets for Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement increased under president Obama. -- On May 6th, "under the Southwest Border Initiative, the Obama administration doubled the number of agents assigned to the Border Enforcement Security Task Forces." -- James Dinkins, director of the Office of Investigations at ICE said this in a July 22nd Congressional hearing: "Just this last year we've sent 160 additional agents to the southwest border alone, so we have done great. -- The Obama administration also "tripled the number of intelligence analysts along the southwest border" and sent in new canine teams. -- The Washington Post reported on July 26th that "the Obama administration is deporting record numbers of illegal immigrants" and "The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency expects to deport about 400,000 people this fiscal year, nearly 10 percent above the Bush administration's 2008 total." -- The Department of Homeland Security reported that illegal immigrant population dropped to 10.8 million in 2009 under President Obama, compared to 11.6 million in 2008 when George W. Bush was the President. But if you listen to Juan Williams you would think Obama has done NOTHING to deal with illegal immigration, and you would be badly misinformed. Because Williams simply put out the right-wing lie that Obama is not doing a damn thing about illegal immigration, even though he is doing more than Bush did. Proving that Juan Williams is no different from O'Reilly, Hannity, Ingraham, or any other right-wing hack who spins out these lies, in the hope someone will believe them. He probably learned from his teacher O'Reilly, who does the same thing with the illegal immigration crime rates in Arizona, O'Reilly claims they are going up and out of control, when they have actually went down over the last few years. The Friday 7-30-10 Williams Factor Review By: Steve - July 31, 2010 - 10:30am Willians started the show on illegal immigration again. He had the Univision anchor Jorge Ramos on to discuss it. Then Williams and Ramos both slammed Obama for not getting a bill done on immigration. And I have to say that this immigration issue is just being used by O'Reilly and everyone at Fox, to fire up the right-wing base to get out and vote. Once the election is over, you will barely hear about it, except on the Arizona law story. They are doing the very same thing with the racism garbage, that is what Breitbart did. They are trying to claim Obama and the blacks are being racist, to get them out and vote. It's a political plan by the Republican Party, and Fox News. And if you can not see this is happening, you are blinded by your ideology. In the next segment Williams had Dana Perino and Leslie Marshall on to talk about Democratic Congressman Anthony Weiner screaming at Republican Peter King on the floor of the house. Of course Williams and Perino made Weiner out to be the bag guy, when he was in the right, and he was following the rules. Williams pulled another O'Reilly trick, he played a 20 second clip of Weiner screaming, but did not put it into context, or go into details of what he was talking about. The bad guys are the Republicans, and Weiner was talking about how they were blocking a vote so they did not have to go on the record with a vote that would make them look bad. Williams never reported any of that, he just slammed Weiner for screaming. Which is the exact same dishonest garbage O'Reilly does, and more proof that Williams is a conservative. Then Williams had Sandy Rios and Gloria Feldt on to talk about the crazy comments made by Phyllis Schlafly. She accused President Obama of trying to make unmarried women "dependent on government for their living." Which is just insane right-wing garbage, but of course Rios agreed with Schlafly. Feldt, who was the former head of Planned Parenthood, blasted Schlafly as offensive and wrong. "That was very demeaning and insulting to unmarried women. Almost all of us women have been unmarried at some time in our adult lives. I hope all women go to the polls and they pull those levers for candidates who support equal rights and equal pay." Then Williams had a right-wing smear segment on Obama with no Democratic guest to give the counterpoint. Fox Business anchor Cheryl Casone was on to slam Obama for the economy, etc. But it was all one sided right-wing propaganda so I did not report what she said. Geraldo Rivera was up next to talk about the Wikileaks on Afghanistan. Juan asked Rivera if the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange should be prosecuted for publishing the information. Geraldo said this: "No, but let me parse my answer. The person we should focus our wrath on is the service member who was the source of these documents. That's the traitor!" Then Williams had a re-run of the dumbest things of the week segment with Greg Gutfeld and Juliet Huddy, and it was just old clips from past shows, of what those 3 morons claim were dumb things. I vote for this segment as dumbest thing of the year, not just the week, it's not news, and it's worthless. And finally Williams had another stupid tabloid garbage segment on the Chelsea Clinton wedding with the Washington Post's Sally Quinn. And I refuse to report on this garbage. But I will say this, Juan Williams tried to turn it into an Obama bashing segment. He SPECULATED that the Clinton's were snubbing Obama by not inviting him to the wedding. Juan said this: "Chelsea Clinton's multi-million dollar wedding will be attended by hundreds of politicians and entertainers, but President Obama is not on the guest list. Quinn downplayed any suggestion that the Clintons intentionally snubbed President Obama." Quinn said this: "It's not a snub at all. The Obamas and Clintons are not close family friends, but they have a good relationship. This is about the bride, and both families know that if President Obama went it would be about him." Hey O'Reilly, what happened to that no speculation zone. Only 1.38% of Fox Viewers Are African Americans By: Steve - July 31, 2010 - 9:30am While working on his article published Monday in the New York Times highlighting the right-wing media's misleading coverage, Brian Stelter did some background research into cable news viewership demographics. While he did not include all the findings in his story, he found them notable enough to publish on Twitter. STELTER: According to Nielsen, Fox News has averaged just 29,000 black viewers in primetime so far this television season (9/09-7/10). That represents 1.38% of its 2.102 million total viewer audience.Stelter also said this in the article: Conservative media outlets risk damage to their credibility when obscure or misleading stories are blown out of proportion and when what amounts to political opposition research is presented as news. The National Association of Black Journalists has faulted Fox for years for inaccurately portraying blacks. And Glenn Beck called President Obama a racist last August, prompting an advertiser boycott that continues. In the last month, Fox doggedly pursued an accusation of voter intimidation by a fringe hate group called the New Black Panthers on the day of the last presidential election. One news anchor, Megyn Kelly, devoted dozens of segments to the incident. (Kelly was even upbraided on the air by a Fox News contributor, Kirsten Powers, who accused her of doing the "scary black man thing." Jane Hall, a communication professor at American University and a former contributor to Fox News, said partisan media outlets "look for something that will get an audience and that will whip up people in some kind of frenzy, warranted or not." Hall said what Ms. Sherrod had endured was "classic propaganda." And btw folks, O'Reilly and Fox News have said they did not report on the Sherrod video until after she was fired by Secretary Vilsack. But that is a lie, because they had reported and linked to the video on their website before she was fired. O'Reilly mentioned her in his Reality Check segment the night before she resigned. And on the day she resigned, O'Reilly had taped his show and called for her to resign, before she did it. Stelter even confirms that, writing this: "Fox's newscasts did not cover the edited Sherrod video last Monday, nor did Glenn Beck, but Bill O'Reilly did call on her to resign. She resigned between the time O'Reilly taped his show and when that show was broadcast." So anyone who says Fox News did not report on the video before she resigned is a liar. Republican Economic Plan: More Tax Cuts For The Rich By: Steve - July 31, 2010 - 9:00am Here it is folks, read this and remember it. This is their plan for the economy, do what George W. Bush did from 2000 to 2009, billion in tax cuts for the wealthy. This is their actual plan, to do the same thing that caused the biggest recession we have seen in 50 years. It's the very same plan that turned a budget surplus under Clinton, into a massive deficit under Bush. Here is what Florida GOP U.S. Senate candidate Marco Rubio wants to do. Basically he just want's to double down on the Bush tax cuts with an unspecified corporate tax cut thrown on top of that for good measure. And how does Rubio plan to pay for all these tax cuts, when asked for comment, neither Rubio, or his campaign could give an answer to that question. Monday, Rubio laid out a new plan to cut spending. The plan contains many ideas that would do very little in terms of paying down the debt and reducing the deficit, including reducing the size of the federal bureaucracy, and cutting Congressional and White House budgets. Other cuts are outright gimmicks, such as allowing taxpayers to allocate taxes to the debt and calling for a balanced budget amendment. And crazy Rubio also wants to end the Obama stimulus program: IDEA #4: End The Stimulus Program And Use The Savings To Cut The Debt. We must end the wasteful stimulus program that has failed to create jobs. Stimulus money that has not been spent should be used for something that will actually help the economy and create jobs, or to pay down the debt. Canceling unspent stimulus funds could save over $300 billion.Of course, it's a right-wing lie that the Obama stimulus bill failed to create any jobs, as Rubio claims. In fact, the Congressional Budget Office recently found that the Obama stimulus has created up to 2.8 million jobs and projects almost 4 million new jobs could be attributed to the stimulus by September. Not to mention, ending the stimulus would eliminate the remaining funds that are set aside for middle class tax cuts. The stimulus provides a tax cut to 95 percent of Americans and $55 billion dollars have yet to be spent on tax benefits. So, on one hand, Rubio wants to extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy at a cost of $700 billion and has no idea how to pay for it (increasing the debt and deficit), while on the other hand, he wants to repeal middle class tax to pay down the debt. It's just insane, and it would only make the rich even more richer. And how much money will Rubio's new spending cut plan actually save. Nobody knows, because his plan does not provide any figures, and his campaign has not responded to questions from the media. Republican Admits Tax Cuts Increase Debt By: Steve - July 31, 2010 - 8:30am He admitted it, then he realized what he did so he went back to the GOP talking points and tried to cover up for his screw up. At the end of the year, President Bush's tax cuts are set to expire. President Obama and many Democrats in Congress favor extending those tax cuts, but only for the middle class. But Republicans are not worried about the $700 billion cost, and they want tax cuts for the rich included too. Congressman Devin Nunes (R-CA) is one of those Republicans. But when C-Span host Steve Scully asked the California Republican about the tax cut issue on the Washington Journal Thursday morning, Nunes screwed up: SCULLY: Tax cuts, do they increase the debt or do they spur economic growth?Uh oh, that will most likely get him in trouble with the GOP leadership, because he actually told the truth, that tax cuts increase the debt. Then later he tried to backtrack on his rare moment of honesty. Nunes was back on message later in the interview, saying that the deficit is going to grow if all the Bush tax cuts expire. But when asked why, he could not come up with an answer. Nunes is right about one thing: Tax cuts do increase the debt, but he's dead wrong in claiming that they reduce the deficit. In fact, as the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities pointed out, the Bush tax cuts will cause $3.4 trillion in deficits between 2009 and 2019 while the "debt-service costs caused by the Bush-era tax cuts, amount to more than $200 billion through 2008 and another $1.7 trillion over the 2009-2019 period - over $330 billion in 2019 alone." And the Washington Post's Ezra Klein wrote just how the federal debt will skyrocket if the Bush tax cuts are extended as opposed to allowed to expire. "If they're willing to let the tax cuts expire," Klein writes, "it's good evidence that they're serious about cutting the debt. If they're not willing to let the cuts expire, it's irrefutable evidence that they're not." What this shows is that Republicans know that tax cuts increase the debt, but that they will not admit that fact because the wealthy and the Corporations give them money to run for office and re-election, and basically legally bribe them to not admit the truth about tax cuts. And here is the kicker, Republicans claim tax cuts to the wealthy will create new jobs, and grow the economy. They claim those millionaires will use the money to hire more people, and that will lead to economic growth, so it's worth it. But all of that is a lie, after the Bush tax cuts no new jobs were created with that money. The millionaires just put the money in the bank, invested it, or bought a new Limo with it. The Bush tax cuts added to the debt, and did nothing to help the economy, that is a fact. All it did was make the wealthy, more wealthy, while adding to the debt we have. And think about this, these are people that do not need that extra money, so it will not hurt them at all. That money should be spent on things that will actually help the economy, like middle class tax cuts, and job creation programs. Not on tax cuts to millionaires so they can get more wealthy. More Proof Republicans Want Obama & America To Fail By: Steve - July 31, 2010 - 8:00am Here is more proof Republicans not only want President Obama to fail for political reasons, it proves they also want the economy to stay flat so they can gain seats back this November. This is an outrage, along with the other news I am reporting, notice that neither Bill O'Reilly or Laura Ingraham are reporting any of this news. If the Democrats were doing stuff like this under a Republican President, O'Reilly would be screaming bloody murder, calling them un-American, and want to put them on trial for treason. But when Republicans do it, not only does O'Reilly not call them un-American or traitors, he ignores all the news about it. So I will do it, the Republicans in Congress are un-American traitors for what they are doing. Here is the AP story: Republicans Block Small Business Lending Bill WASHINGTON – Senate Republicans have blocked a bill to increase small business lending, dealing a setback to President Barack Obama's jobs agenda. The bill would have created a $30 billion government fund to help community banks increase lending to small businesses, combining it with about $12 billion in tax breaks aimed at small businesses. Some Republicans, however, likened it to the unpopular bailout of the financial industry. Democrats and Republicans will continue to negotiate amendments to the bill. But Thursday's vote will make it difficult for Congress to pass the bill before lawmakers go on their summer vacation. After reading this, if you vote Republican this November you are un-American. Because everything they are doing is, to hurt the economic recovery, to hurt Obama politically, and to gain back seats in Congress they lost 2 years ago. They are trying to stall the economic recovery, for political reasons, which is a fact, and a flat out outrage. Shirley Sherrod Will Sue Andrew Breitbart By: Steve - July 30, 2010 - 9:30am SAN DIEGO -- Agriculture Department employee Shirley Sherrod said Thursday she will sue the conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart, who posted an edited video of her that implied she was making racially tinged remarks last week. Sherrod made the announcement in San Diego at the National Association of Black Journalists annual convention. The edited video posted by Andrew Breitbart led Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to ask her to resign, a decision he reconsidered after seeing the entire video of her March speech to a local NAACP group. In the full speech, Sherrod spoke of racial reconciliation and lessons she learned after initially hesitating to help a white farmer save his home. And I hope she takes him for every fricking dime he has. But of course she will have to prove he edited the video and tried to smear her on purpose. Which may be hard to do, because he is clearly going to deny he did that, and he already has. He will claim he was fooled too, and that he simply made an honest mistake. Even though she may not win, at least it will force him to pay legal fees to fight it, and who knows, maybe justice will be served and she will win. Good luck Shirley, go get him. The Thursday 7-29-10 Williams Factor Review By: Steve - July 30, 2010 - 9:00am Juan Williams filled in for O'Reilly so there was no TPM. And right away he had Bill O'Reilly on the phone to talk about Obama going on the View. Basically O'Reilly said Obama did very well, but that he knew he would because they are all Obama lovers, except for Elisabeth Hasselbeck. Then they talked a little about Obama's impact on jobs and the economy. Juan said this: "I think most Americans right now don't think that what Obama is doing is leading to more jobs for the country." Then O'Reilly said this: "It may be leading to more jobs, but it also might be leading to bankruptcy." So Juan, the so-called moderate Democrat was harder on Obama than O'Reilly was. In fact, Juan sounded more like Laura Ingraham than he did a moderate Democrat. And btw, this economy was caused by Bush, Obama is still trying to fix the mess Bush left him. And all the polls show it, something like 70% still blame Bush, while only 30% blame Obama, but of course neither O'Reilly or Williams ever report that poll data. And the Obama stimulus is working, just not as good as they had hoped because all the Republican owned banks are not loaning money to create jobs, and they are doing that on purpose to hurt Obama politically. Which is something else O'Reilly and Williams never report. Then Bernie Goldberg was on to discuss it, and of course Goldberg said it was just a liberal dog and pony show for Obama to try and get his approval rating up among women and Independents. Then he spewed out some nonsense about how the conservatives are not unfairly attacking Obama, he claimed they are attacking him because the American people have opposed almost everything he has done. Which is just ridiculous, and the polls show it. On almost every issue, except one or two, the majority of people support most of what Obama has done, proving that Bernie Goldberg is a right-wing liar. Other than immigration and health care the majority of the people support everything he has done, and if the health care bill had a public option the majority would have supported that too. Then Williams did a ridiculous segment asking if Obama going on the View diminishes the office of the President. And I will not even report on that right-wing garbage, I will just say this is coming from the so-called moderate Democrat, when it sounds more like something Ingraham would do. Williams had Mike Papantonio and Andrea Tantaros on to discuss it, and you can guess what they said. Papantonio said it does not diminish the office, and the crazy Tantaros said it does. To even do this segment shows that Juan Williams is almost as much of a conservative as O'Reilly. In fact, having Juan host is almost the same as having O'Reilly there, with less screaming and name calling. In the next segment Williams had Kris Kobach, a former Bush Justice Department official who co-authored the Arizona law and Susan Church, an immigration attorney on to talk about the Federal Judge blocking parts of the Arizona law. And of course Kobach said it was a bad decision, while Church said it was a good decision. But what they never report is that the Judge was recommended by the Republican Senator Jon Kyl, so they are being dishonest when they do not report that. They try to claim all liberals oppose the law, and all conservatives support it, which is not true, even Judge Napolitano who works at Fox is opposed to the law, but they never have him on to discuss it. Then the culture warriors Margaret Hoover and Gretchen Carlson were on to discuss Obama on the view, and Chelsea Clinton's wedding. Carlson did not like Obama going on the View, and did not like some of what he said. But hoover had no problem with it, and defended Obama. Which is a miracle, because they are both Republicans, but Hoover is a little more moderate. Carlson is a far right nut, and Hoover is less of a far right nut. And I am not going to report anything about Chelsea Clinton's wedding, because it's not news, it's tabloid garbage that should not even be discussed on a so-called hard news show. Then A.B. Stoddard was on to talk about the Charlie Rangel ethics scandal. Rangel was charged with breaking 13 different regulations and laws. She basically reported the details of the story, without really giving an opinion about it. And here is what I have to say about it. If they find him guilty, he should resign, and if he does not resign, the Congress should boot his ass out, as fast as possible. If you break ethics rules you should be gone, Democrat, Independent, or Republican, no exceptions. I have no sympathy for ethics violations, just like when Newt Gingrich did it, he should be gone if he is found guilty. In the last segment Juan pulled an O'Reilly and cried about the Democratic party saying they will try to link the Republicans to the Tea Party. Which is just laughable, because they are already linked to them, and pretty much everyone knows it. The Tea Party is the Republican Party, it's just a bunch of far right conservative who are not happy with the Republicans in Congress now, because in their mind they are not far right enough. The Tea Party is basically a bunch of far right white Republicans who hate Obama because he is black, and because he is a liberal. Some of them are racists, and most are Republican. And that is a fact. What's really funny was watching Juan Williams defend the Tea Party, now that was funny, the so-called moderate Democrat sounded just like O'Reilly. Williams is 80% conservative, and 20% moderate, that makes him a Republican. Just as if I was 80% liberal, and 20% moderate I would be a Democrat. Fox Admits They Lied About Sherrod Video Reporting By: Steve - July 30, 2010 - 8:30am In a rare moment of honesty, a Fox News official has admitted they did report on the Sherrod story before she resigned. Which is what I have been saying for a week, because I know they did, I saw it myself. The question is whether or not Fox News jumped on Andrew Breitbart's bogus Shirley Sherrod smear campaign. We all know that on the day it broke online, Bill O'Reilly hyped the story on his primetime show, presented Sherrod as a racist, and demanded she "resign immediately." Of course, at the time O'Reilly didn't have the slightest clue what the whole story of the Sherrod tape was. But that didn't stop him from unfairly smearing a black women in the Obama administration. So if O'Reilly was demanding Sherrod resign, that meant Fox News covered the story before she was forced out, right? Yes and no. While his show tapes at 5 p.m., it doesn't air until 8 p.m., and Sherrod resigned shortly before 8 p.m. So technically Fox News, or so the claim goes, didn't cover the story before she resigned and so all those people who claim Fox reported the Sherrod attack are smearing Fox News. WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! Because of course, Fox did report the story before Sherrod resigned. Fox reported the story online, they reported it in two different online forums before Sherrod's resignation. And what almost everyone but me has missed, O'Reilly also reported on it the night before she resigned in his lame Reality Check segment. O'Reilly said this: O'REILLY: Department of Agriculture official Shirley Sherrod was caught on tape saying how difficult it was for her to provide assistance to a white farmer. The Factor's Check: "That is simply unacceptable. The federal government can not have skin color deciding any assistance, and we are requesting an explanation from Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack."That was the night before she resigned, and here is what he said the next day in his talking points memo: O'REILLY: As we told you last night, Department of Agriculture official Shirley Sherrod admitted that years ago she held back some government assistance to a white farmer because of the color of his skin. After hearing that I said 'Ms. Sherrod must resign immediately,' and that's exactly what happened.So O'Reilly actually reported on it 2 times before she resigned, the day before, and the day she actually resigned. Notice that O'Reilly also slammed the media for not reporting it, saying it showed their bias, when they were doing the right thing, and what real journalists do. Then in a later show O'Reilly even slammed the media FOR reporting the doctored video. Making him a total lying, biased, idiot. And in a new report from Politico, Fox News Senior Vice President of News Michael Clemente said this about the story: CLEMENTE: But FoxNews.com did run a story about the existence of the video, titled "Video Shows USDA Official Saying She Didn't Give 'Full Force' of Help to White Farmer" at 5:58 p.m. on Monday, an hour before the Agriculture Department announced Sherrod's resignation.Notice that Clemente does not say a word about O'Reilly talking about her in his Factor Reality Check the night before, or the fact that O'Reilly taped his show before she resigned, the show where he actually called for her to resign. So even when they try to come clean about their dishonest journalism, they still do not admit all the dishonesty, only some of it. Republicans Oppose Health Care To 9-11 Responders By: Steve - July 30, 2010 - 8:00am Note to voters, now the low-life Republicans are trying to block a bill that gives health care to the brave 9-11 responders who risked their lives to help after the 9-11-2001 terrorist attacks. This is an outrage, and just another example of what Republicans do. Now think about this, they are doing this while asking for the Bush tax cuts to millionaires be extended, and while they opposed the unemployment benefits extension to unemployed workers. This is what Republicans are all about, lobbying for the wealthy, and the Corporations, while sticking it to the little guy to pay for it. The House Republican leadership is telling its members to vote against a bill that would aid 9-11 responders suffering from health problems. The GOP policy statement complains that the aid program, which will be paid for by closing "a tax loophole on foreign companies with U.S. subsidiaries, creates a massive new entitlement program." So the bill would be paid for, by closing a tax loophole on foreign companies, and yet the Republican leadership is still telling their people to vote against it. So they are even lobbyists for foreign companies now, even after they said any bill must be paid for before they will vote yes. So the Obama administration pays for it, and they still plan to vote no. The James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, sponsored by New York City Rep. Carolyn Maloney(D), provides medical monitoring to those exposed to toxins at Ground Zero, bolsters treatment at specialized centers for those afflicted by toxins on 9/11 and reopens a compensation fund to provide economic loss to New Yorkers. And it's all paid for by closing a tax loophole on foreign companies with U.S. subsidiaries. But the Republican scum in Congress are still opposed to it, and this is just one more reason why you should vote against every Republican running for Congress this November. Those 9-11 responders are heroes, they risked their life breathing toxic air to save people after the terrorist attack. And this is the thanks they get from Republicans, for the medical problems they have now, a big fat no to the care they deserve. More Right-Wing Hate For O'Reilly To Ignore By: Steve - July 29, 2010 - 9:30am Once again the far right shows how much hate they really have, and as usual neither O'Reilly, Ingraham, or Fox News is reporting it. But if it was a doctored video from Breitbart they would be all over it. O'Reilly never reports any of this stuff, then later denies it is a reality. A right-wing group that is against gay marriage has a new plan to deal with the gays who get married, put them to death, by hanging. The National Organization For Marriage (NOM) has started a 23-city Summer for Marriage Tour, spreading the gospel of one-man-one-woman marriage to their 40 supporters. On Tuesday, Bill Browning attended a NOM rally in Indianapolis and found that while over 250 gay people protested the rally, only 40 NOM supporters showed up. Among the small crowd of so-called traditional marriage supporters was a man holding a sign. It showed two yellow nooses and a bible passage suggesting that gay couples should be put to death. Here is a photo of a sign they were using at one of their hate filled protests.  Now if O'Reilly and Ingraham were real nonpartisan journalists, they would report this hate, condemn it, and call for them to stop the hate. As O'Reilly says, if you see hate and you do not condemn it, then you support it, especially if you are in the media business. So O'Reilly and Ingraham support it. The Wednesday 7-28-10 Ingraham Factor Review By: Steve - July 29, 2010 - 9:00am Once again the insane far-right propagandist Laura Ingraham was filling in for O'Reilly so I did not do a full show review. I will say is that it's ridiculous for O'Reilly to claim to be a nonpartisan Independent with a no spin zone, when you have Laura Ingraham as your full time fill-in host. It would be like me saying I am a nonpartisan Independent, then I have James Carville write my blog postings for me. It would be just as ridiculous as O'Reilly saying it, while having Laura Ingraham host his show. And at the start of the show she even says "Caution You Are Entering The No Spin Zone" which is just laughable. Then at the end of the show she even says the spin stops here. When Ingraham is hosting, the entire show is nothing but right-wing propaganda and spin. Which is about as far away from a no spin zone as you can get. Even when O'Reilly is hosting it's 95% right-wing spin, because he is a Republican, and he has 95% right-wing guests. I will also add this, Ingraham called the ruling on the Arizona immigration law, a suprise ruling, ridiculous, and a sudden ruling. Which is just crazy, it was not a sudden ruling, or a surprise ruling, so she was even lying about that. There is no way it could have been a sudden ruling, because the law was set to take effect on Thursday, and the ruling came down on Wednesday. So how the hell is that a sudden ruling, when it had to be made by Wednesday to block the law from being put in place the next day. Ingraham is just crazy, and a liar. And it was not a surprise to anyone that the Judge ruled the way she did, except to the brainwashed and braindead right-wing idiots who had talked themselves into believing the judge would rule in their favor, which also includes O'reilly who also thought the judge would rule in favor of the state of Arizona. Not to mention over the last few months, O'Reilly told every liberal he had on the show that they are wrong about the Arizona law, when he is the moron that was wrong. What's funny is how Ingraham made sure to mention that Judge Bolton was a BILL CLINTON appointee. But she failed to mention that the Republican Senator from Arizona Jon Kyl recommended her and praised her. Which is just more evidence that Ingraham is a dishonest partisan right-wing hack. Ingraham and one of her right-wing guests also predicted that the Supreme Court will overturn judge Bolton in a 5 to 4 ruling. And that may be the only thing she could be right about in the entire show. Because the Supreme Court has a 5 to 4 right-wing bias, which is why almost every ruling comes down 5 to 4 for the Republicans. Bush stacked the court with a Republican justice, so they have the 5 to 4 majority now. Fox Legal Reporter Gets Basic Facts Wrong By: Steve - July 29, 2010 - 8:30am Reporting on the breaking news that an Arizona federal judge has blocked parts of the new Arizona immigration law, Fox News Supreme Court reporter Shannon Bream stated that an appeal of the case "will go to the Ninth Circuit, which is viewed as the most overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court." And that is a lie. The Ninth Circuit was nowhere near the most overturned federal appeals court last year and has not been the most overturned court in many years. It's just more right-wing propaganda Fox likes to spin out, to make the Ninth Circuit seem like they are the most overturned court in the country. This attack on the Ninth Circuit is a favorite talking point of the conservative media, including O'Reilly, even though it's wrong. According to SCOTUSblog.com, in the last Supreme Court term -- from October 2009 to June 2010, seven of the 13 appellate courts had a higher reversal rate than the Ninth Circuit. The seven circuit courts with a higher rate were the Second, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits. Funny how O'Reilly and Fox News never report this information, I guess they just forgot. Yeah right, and I'm Babe Ruth too. Stock Market Up: O'Reilly Silent By: Steve - July 29, 2010 - 8:00am A couple months ago O'Reilly cherry picked a 3 week period where the stock market was down slightly, and hammered Obama for it. O'Reilly actually said the market is plummeting because of the liberal far left policies put in place by President Obama. Even though the market was simply going through a temporary short term drop. O'Reilly said this on May 26, 2010: O'REILLY: Well, the stock market is getting pounded, down another 23 points Tuesday. After a nice run-up last year, the Dow is down almost 900 points over the last three weeks. And along with the market's fall comes a drop in President Obama's job approval rating.O'Reilly went on to blame it all on the liberal policies put in place by President Obama. But since then he has not said one word about the stock market, because it's been up every week since then. O'Reilly does not say anything now, because it makes Obama look good. Since that day the market has went up hundreds of points, to over 10,400 as of Wednesday. Here are some stats on the DOW for the last 5 days, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and year to date. Notice they are all up but one time frame, and in some cases up a lot. But O'Reilly never says a word about any of that, as he is lying that the market was plummeting because of Obama, when the exact opposite has happened since Obama took office. In the last 5 days the DOW is up - 3.01% In the last 3 months the DOW was down - 4.60% In the last 6 months the DOW is up - 4.12% In the last year the DOW is up - 15.69% In the year to date time frame, from January of 2010 until now, the DOW is up - 1.05% Now you can see exactly what O'Reilly did, he cherry picked the short term drop where the DOW was down 4.60%, and then claimed it shows that the liberal Obama policies are crashing the stock market. While ignoring every other time frame that had the DOW up. Which is all of it, except 3 months ago. This is what O'Reilly does to make Obama look bad, it's dishonest, and total right-wing propaganda. In the last year the DOW is up a whopping 15.69%, so what did O'Reilly do, he found the one time frame that had a drop in the DOW, then reported that to make it look like the market was crashing because of Obama. Now that is about as partisan, and about as dishonest as a so-called journalist can get. And if anyone disputes the dishonest right-wing bias I just documented from O'Reilly, please e-mail me and tell me how I am wrong, I would sure love to hear that one. More On The Arizona Immigration Ruling By: Steve - July 28, 2010 - 2:00pm Here is the best part, the judge who made the ruling was praised and recommended by the Republican Senator Jon Kyl(R-AZ), who is a supporter of the new law. On the recommendation of Sen. Jon Kyl, Bolton was nominated to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona by President Bill Clinton in 2000. During her confirmation hearing, Kyl said this about her: KYL: Well, there is one person in our state who's a real expert on this in the judiciary, and that's Judge Bolton. And because of her expertise and fairness, all of the contending interests from Arizona have been willing to place their concerns before her to be resolved, and she is right in the middle of this important litigation right now.Now remember that, because O'Reilly and the right will probably try to smear the judge as a crazy liberal. Even after she has been praised by Republicans, and one of them even recommended her. Judge Bolton blocked the following sections of SB-1070 arguing that "the United States is likely to succeed on the merits in showing that [they] are preempted by federal law" and the "United States is likely to suffer irreparable harm" in the absence of an injunction: Portion of Section 2 of S.B. 1070: Requires police to inquire about the immigration status of anyone they stop, detain, or arrest if they reasonably suspect the person is in the country illegally.Bolton also echoed the criticisms made by SB-1070 opponents over the past few months, noting that "requiring Arizona law enforcement officials and agencies to determine the immigration status of every person who is arrested burdens lawfully-present aliens because their liberty will be restricted while their status is checked." She also found that the burdensome verification requirement "will divert resources from the federal government's other responsibilities and priorities." Before learning of Bolton's decision, Gov. Jan Brewer (R-AZ) said this: "I'm confident Arizona will prevail." WRONG! And btw, judge Bolton has been described by her peers as an impeccable and fearless judge whose rulings are well-reasoned and unambiguous. But somehow I have the feeling O'Reilly and the right is not going to think that way now, haha. Judge Blocks Big Part of Arizona Immigration Law By: Steve - July 28, 2010 - 1:00pm As I have been saying for months, the courts will block most of the new Arizona immigration law, and that is what they did on Wednesday. Which is the exact opposite of what O'Reilly and all his right-wing friends predicted. For months they have been saying the law is fine, and the courts will rule against the Obama DoJ. Wrong, dumbass, haha. Read it and deal with it, idiots. PHOENIX - A federal judge on Wednesday blocked the most controversial parts of Arizona's immigration law from taking effect, delivering a last-minute victory to opponents of the crackdown. The overall law will still take effect Thursday, but without the provisions that angered opponents - including sections that required officers to check a person's immigration status while enforcing other laws. The judge also put on hold parts of the law that required immigrants to carry their papers at all times, and made it illegal for undocumented workers to solicit employment in public places. In addition, the judge blocked officers from making warrantless arrests of suspected illegal immigrants. "Requiring Arizona law enforcement officials and agencies to determine the immigration status of every person who is arrested burdens lawfully-present aliens because their liberty will be restricted while their status is checked," U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton ruled. Fox News is flipping out, and if O'Reilly is back tonight he will flip out too. if Ingraham is still the fill in she will go crazy, haha. Too bad morons, suck on it. The Tuesday 7-27-10 Ingraham Factor Review By: Steve - July 28, 2010 - 9:00am Laura Ingraham filled in again for O'Reilly, so I will not do much of a review. I pretty much just counted the guest list and that's about it. All you need to know is that Ingraham spent the entire show spewing out right-wing propaganda, which is not really news to anyone, because she is an admitted partisan Republican. The main reason I do this website is because O'Reilly claims to be a nonpartisan Independent with a no spin zone, who is fair to both sides. And we all know that is a lie, so I document his bias, his lies, his spin, his propaganda, his hypocrisy, and his double standards. And it does not do much good to document what Ingraham says, because we all know she is a partisan liar. Instead of a big Factor review of her, I will just report on some other news that the people should know about. To be honest, I can barely stand to listen to Ingraham spew out her dishonest right-wing garbage, so I only watched her enough to count the party of the guests. I mostly watched Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, and for a change it was fun, plus I actually got some news out of it. I will report 3 crazy things Ingraham said: 1) Ingraham said that under the new Arizona immigration law, you cannot use race as a factor at all. Which is just ridiculous, because the law in the entire country now says you can not use racial profiling, and yet, some cops do it anyway, just because the law says you can not do it, does not mean it will never happen. Pot is illegal, and yet, 30 million Americans still smoke it every day. 2) Here is the really crazy one: Ingraham claims that Obama has done more in 18 months to ruin the economy than George W. Bush did in 8 years. Now that is flat out insanity, Bush almost destroyed our entire economy, and the world economy for that matter, all Obama has done is try to fix the mess Bush left him, and he has. Ingraham should be locked in a padded room over that statement, right next to Glenn Beck. 3) Ingraham said it was an outrage that Obama did not speak at the boy scouts jamboree. Are you kidding me, I think the President has more important things to do then speak at a boy scouts meeting. And if Obama did speak to them, Ingraham would have attacked him for doing that. She would say he has more important things to do, and ask why he is wasting his valuable time at a boy scouts meeting. And that is about all I am going to say about crazy Laura Ingraham. O'Reilly Busted For 1st Time Story Retraction Lie By: Steve - July 28, 2010 - 8:30am On The Monday Tonight Show with Jay Leno, O'Reilly claimed that his apology to Shirley Sherrod was the "first time in 13 years" he had to apologize or retract a story. In fact, O'Reilly has apologized for or corrected a story that he got wrong quite a few times. It is rare, but he has done it a few times. Here is a partial transcript: LENO: Do you find there's less fact-checking? I remember, it wasn't that long ago, I --Notice the part where O'Reilly said "This is the first time in 13 years -- it's true." After 13 years you see this -- in the transcript. That's a short pause where Leno and some of the audience laughed at what O'Reilly said, because Leno and most of the audience knew he was lying, so after the pause for the laughter O'Reilly said -- it's true. Okay, so let's get to the facts. Here is why Leno and the audience were laughing at O'Reilly. On the June 2009, broadcast of The O'Reilly Factor, O'Reilly apologized for falsely claiming that "only Anderson Cooper on CNN covered the murder of Army Recruiter Pvt. William Long." Because three days earlier O'Reilly accused CNN of ignoring the story outside of Cooper's show, when in fact, six other CNN shows covered the story at least 15 times prior to O'Reilly's claim. O'REILLY: We have a correction -- a rare correction on The Factor. Earlier this week, I said that only Anderson Cooper on CNN covered the murder of Private Long in Arkansas. Well, today, a snide and surly guy on CNN pointed out that the story was covered more extensively by that network, and that is true. I was wrong. My apologies to CNN. I was talking about primetime, but I did not say that. So, I was wrong. As they say in third grade, "My bad."On the June 26th, 2006 O'Reilly Factor, O'Reilly apologized for "picking up" a quote from a South Florida Sun-Sentinel article which incorrectly reported that Rep. John Murtha had claimed the "American presence in Iraq is more dangerous to world peace than nuclear threats from North Korea or Iran." O'Reilly cited the Sun-Sentinel report to allege that Murtha's "kind of extreme thinking, based on little evidence, by the way, is putting all Americans in danger." After the Sun-Sentinel published its correction, O'Reilly stated on June 29th that "the newspaper has apologized, and since we picked up the paper's quote, we should apologize, as well," adding: "I should have checked it out myself and called Murtha's office. Next time, we will do that." During the February 19th, 2008 Factor radio show, O'Reilly discussed Michelle Obama's assertion that "for the first time in my adult lifetime, I'm really proud of my country." O'Reilly then said this: "I don't want to go on a lynching party against Michelle Obama unless there's evidence, hard facts, that say this is how the woman really feels. If that's how she really feels -- that America is a bad country or a flawed nation, whatever -- then that's legit. We'll track it down." Then on the February 21st, 2008, O'Reilly Factor, O'Reilly apologized for his use of the phrase "lynching party," saying, "I'm sorry if my statement offended anybody. That, of course, was not the intention. Context is everything." So as you can see he has done a few retractions, and you now know why Leno was laughing at him when he said he has only had to do one retraction in 13 years. Not to mention the other 10,000 retractions he should have made, but did not do, because 99.9% of the time he will not admit he got anything wrong. Remember This: The Bush Tax Cuts Did Not Work By: Steve - July 28, 2010 - 8:00am They added a Trillion dollars to the deficit, and made the rich, richer, and that's about all they did. But Republicans keep calling for them to be continued. Think about this, when the Republicans passed the Bush tax cuts they said they would create robust economic growth, it never happened. They said it would create millions of new jobs, it never happened. We were even told the tax cuts would balance the budget, and they actually turned the budget into massive deficits. This was the Republican line, then and now, they claim tax cuts for the wealthy do not increase the deficit. They claim it will give the wealthy more money, and they will use that money to create jobs. And now we know that is all a lie, nothing they claim happened, and in fact, the opposite happened. When Republicans passed the tax cuts, which overwhelmingly benefited the wealthy, they set the cuts to expire at the end of 2010. The point was to obscure the cost, play a dangerous budget game, and make it so that the GOP would not have to pay for their own 10 year tax cut shell game. And while a few moderate Democrats may vote to keep the cuts in place, the Obama administration's plan is the right one. Here is what the Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said last Sunday, he made the case for letting the Bush tax cuts expire later this year. Geithner said that letting tax cuts expire for those who make $250,000 a year or more would affect 2 percent to 3 percent of all Americans. He dismissed concerns that the move could push a teetering economy back into recession and argued that it would demonstrate America's commitment to addressing its trillion-dollar budget deficit.And btw, letting those Bush tax cuts expire would instantly cut $600 billion dollars off the deficit. And it would only be an increase in taxes on the top 2 percent of the most wealthy people in America. The NY Times reported that the issue will move to the top of the agenda when lawmakers return to Washington in September from their summer recess, just as the midterm campaign gets under way in earnest. Democrats say, Republicans who oppose the bill would be blocking a tax cut for more than 95 percent of Americans to defend tax cuts for a relatively few wealthy households. Every time Republicans complain, the same answer should come to mind, it was their idea for the tax cuts to expire. And maybe if Bush had not left a $1.3 trillion deficit for Obama to clean up, it would be easier to talk about keeping more of those tax breaks for the wealthy the Republicans love so much. The bottom line here is that Republicans only care about tax cuts for the wealthy that cost over $600 billion dollars. Even if they are not paid for. But if the average working man wants to get his unemployment benefits extended, that only cost $38 billion dollars, the Republicans oppose that unless it's paid for. And they still can not explain how Bill Clinton raised taxes on the top 2 percent and the economy boomed. Proving they are massive hypocrites, and proving that they only care about the wealthy, because that is where they get most of their money to campaign on. Funny how O'Reilly never reports any of this, I guess he just forgot. |
O'Reilly Busted For 1st Time Retraction Lie The Bill O'Reilly Non-Apology Shirley Sherrod Apology O'Reilly & The Right Are Racist Idiots O'Reilly Ignored Tea Party Express Racism Story O'Reilly Compares Gay People To Al-Qaeda Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Rating Polls O'Reilly Ignored Mark Kirk Military Award Lie Story Where Are The Sedition Charges Now O'Reilly O'Reilly Caught In A Massive Lie About Jail Time O'Reilly Running Ads For Emergency Food Supply O'Reilly Caught Lying About Tea Party Militia Links O'Reilly Caught Spinning Gallup Tea Party Poll O'Reilly Ignored Harris Poll Showing Republicans Are Stupid O'Reilly Caught Lying About Health Reform Bill Tax O'Reilly Caught Lying About NEJM Health Care Survey O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again O'Reilly #5 On Top 25 Right-Wing Journalist List The Truth About Ratings For News Shows Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Spin Doctor O'Reilly Spinning Fox News Most Trusted Poll Fox News Did Not Air Hope For Haiti Telethon O'Reilly Caught Spinning Obama Terrorism Polls O'Reilly Factor Year In Review 2009 O'Reilly Caught Lying About House Ethics Committee O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Increase O'Reilly Caught Lying About Limbaugh Racism Most Factor Gear Made in Vietnam And China O'Reilly Caught Lying About Religious Festival O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Lying About CNN O'Reilly Caught Violating Journalistic Standards Again O'Reilly Caught Lying About The ACLU & Racial Profiling More Proof O'Reilly & FOX News Do Not Tell The Truth Factor Pollster Caught Writing GOP Policy Memo O'Reilly Called Bruce Springsteen Un-American & Un-Patriotic The Bill O'Reilly Senate Torture Report Countdown Clock O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Obama Approval Numbers FOX News Caught Lying About Obama Budget O'Reilly Busted For Helping GOP Smear Pelosi O'Reilly Caught Lying About Obama Earmark Promise What a Fair & Balanced O'Reilly Factor Would Look Like Military.com Report Proves O'Reilly Wrong About Homeless Vets O'Reilly Places 7th in 2008 Wingnut of The Year Award O'Reilly Denys Reality About Abstinence Only Programs Conclusive Proof O'Reilly & The Republican Party Are Both Corrupt The Right-Wing Liberal Killer Story O'Reilly Ignored The Facts About O'Reilly And GE Doing Business With Iran How to Deal With an O'Reilly Factor Ambush Interview Buzzflash Names O'Reilly Media Putz of The Week The 10 Page Hand Written Lucifer Letter I Got in 2003 Why FOX News Loves Juan Williams: The Strings And The Puppet
O'Reilly Info O'Reilly Spins Cable News Ratings Read The Letter O'Reilly Had His Attorney Send me O'Reilly Caught Lying About The NY Times JFK Terror Plot O'Reilly's Party Enrollment Form Showing Him a Registered Republican O'Reilly Wins 2004 Misinformer of The Year Award O'Reilly Death Penalty Lies O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 49 Times Since 2001 O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks Mail-to-Bill Hate-Mail FOX News Bias Transcripts Assorted
foxisbias.com glenn-beck-sucks.com Think Progress Buzzflash Bartcop AmericaBlog Crooks & Liars Progressive Eruptions Rude Pundit Moveon.org Truthout.com Daily Beacon Mike Hersh Prison Planet Moose & Squirrel Politics & Society Apocalypse Cafe Fox News Boycott I Hate Hannity Inebriated Discourse Hannity Sucks LT Saloon NewsCorpse.com Glenn Beck Is An Idiot Ranker.com GlennBeckReport.com www.dilhole.net |
| Proof The O'Reilly Factor is Biased Against Barack Obama | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/3mbiasnumbers.htm |
| Proof O'Reilly Lied About The Balance on His Show | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillybalanced.htm |
| O'Reilly Sucks Investigation: Dishonesty, Deception, And Bias By Bill O'Reilly | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreilly-investigation.htm |
| (( Right-Wing Hate Speech Ignored by Bill O'Reilly )) | ||
www.oreilly-sucks.com/right-wing-hate.htm |
| O'Reilly Phone Sex Scandal Information | ||
After hearing of the lawsuit O'Reilly said it was all lies, that it was a shakedown for money, that he would fight it to the bitter end with no settlement, and that he would let the courts decide the matter. That was all before O'Reilly found out she had recorded his phone calls. Then Mr. I will fight her lies to the bitter end with no settlement, paid her $10 million dollars to settle the lawsuit, get the tapes, and shut her up. The out-of-court settlement came on the eve of a courtroom fight over audiotapes, reports CBS News Correspondent Kelly Cobiella. |
